Famously lady hating garbage site Return of Kings has published another one of their helpful posts outlining simple ways that women can drive away the sort of guy who takes dating advice from, well, Return of Kings.
In the post, titled “30 Signs That An Eastern European Girl Isn’t Relationship Material,” regular RoK contributor Jean-Batave Poqueliche provides a handy guide to all sorts of things that RoK Red Pillers see as red flags.
I’ve adapted some of my favorites into my own list of 8 Ways Eastern European Women Can Send Roosh Fanboys Running for the Door. Happily, many of these suggestions should also work for non-Eastern European women as well.
Throw your clothes (and possibly your birth control) on the floor
Poqueliche warns his readers to avoid women who are messy.
If you go to hers and … you discover that she has clothes on the floor and everything is out of place, beware. She is careless and has probably the same behavior towards sex and protection.
Let’s just set aside the irony of seeing this statement on a site run by Roosh V, who, by his own admission, had unprotected sex with multiple women over the course of several years even though he thought there was a good chance he had HIV.
The good news here is that women can scare off a Roosh fanboy by simply throwing some dirty socks on the floor.
Buy a few condoms
Apparently Roosh and his fanboys are more terrified by women who are so loose that they own their own condoms than they are of having sex with a woman they barely know without condoms.
Have friends from other countries
This, according to Poqueliche, is a sign that a women “likes foreign culture, ergo she is partial to a foreign knob that is not designed to be static.”
Wait, penises can generate static electricity? I should have probably read the manual a little more carefully.
Tell your date you prefer poetry to firearms
Poqueliche warns men not to date any woman who’s
repulsed by the idea of violence, manliness, or weapons.
She does not understand that a man could fight for his family, enjoy masculine hobbies or knows how to shoot. She wants a progressive man that reads poetry and is not ashamed to cry.
Do bawdy limericks count?
Learn enough about pickup artistry to know when some dude is trying it on you
Poqueliche tells men to shun any woman who
calls you out for escalating, not by playfully delaying it but putting it in words in the “I know what you are doing” way.
Alternately, you could simply work “player” or “pickup artist” or “you’re one of those creepy jackasses who reads Roosh, aren’t you” into your conversation, as that is also a sign to them that YOU KNOW.
Show your bellybutton
As Poqueliche sees it, this is a big slutty tell, and “generally the mark of an especially childish and irresponsible girl.”
Weirdly, RoK’s graphics-master chose to illustrate Poqueliche’s discussion of this important topic with a picture of a woman baring her belly in such a way that … her bellybutton is not actually visible.
Which raises the question: Do RoK readers actually know what a bellybutton is? Is it possible that Roosh and his readership come from some far-away planet where they reproduce by, I dunno, laying eggs, or cell division, or publishing crappy eBooks?
Be older than 25
RoK readers regularly express deep disdain towards women who make it past the quarter-century mark without snagging a man, declaring them unfit for serious relationships. So you’ve got that going for you.
Unfortunately Roosh and his fanboys are still totally willing to “bang” spinsters in their late 20s and up. Sorry old gals! While they don’t want to marry you, Roosh’s fanboys will still pester you for sex, especially since, as Poqueliche sees it, you decrepit old hags are basically easy pickings with
usually a higher notch count and some kind of a despair for a cock that comes with a prospect of relationship.
Henri here feels a similar despair, though in his case he hungers not for sex but for tuna fish
Cut your hair short
If you’re unable to ward off Roosh’s fanboys using any of the tips above, you can always CUT YOUR HAIR, something so terrifying for Poqueliche that it conjures up images of French villagers shaving the heads of women suspected of being Nazi collaborators in the aftermath of D-day.
No, really. You can practically hear him shudder as he asks
Why would a man want to have sex with something that looks like an underfed woman that got sheared just after the locals found out she slept with the occupying army?
Short hair: apparently the most effective form of creep-repellent after pepper spray.
@other jake
What SFHC said. What the hell, dude.
How about some of you tell me where to find you or if your to pussy i’ll tell you where to find me so I can show you im note joking.
@Scildfreja
It is, however, totally possible to feel as though that is the case (usually symptomatic of severe depression); it’s actually not a very pleasant place to be.
If you can’t take the heat, go your own way.
I think it’s time to ban the violent stalker dude now.
Hey, pussy is a verb again! To pussy or not to pussy, that is the question.
Since none of you took me up on my offer you’re crying for me to be banned to hide behind the fact that your all talk behind that monitor, who’s pathetic now?
I’ve sent an email to David.
@Scildfreja
True story. Also, I don’t make much of a moral distinction between people who threaten women with the intention of carrying out those threats, and people who threaten women because they enjoy it when women feel threatened.
@jake
Because we didn’t take you up on your offer to physically assault us we’re pathetic? Wow.
“Your to pussy”?
Jake’s literally just a middle-schooler, isn’t he.
Awwwwww we can dish it out but can’t take, you are all typical feminazi’s you run your mouth then play the victim card. Another decisive victory by MGTOW and remember who clipped your tits.
Hey now, no need to insult middle-schoolers. 😉
I would play more but I have to beat the shit out of my dog for tearing up stuff so kiss my ass goodbye.
To be clear, jake, this is not a matter of dishing it out but not being able to take it. Nobody “dished it out” – read: threatened violence – to you. You’re the only person who has done that. If anyone else had threatened violence, I would have requested that they be banned also.
My delay is due to the fact that I work for a living.
http://i.imgur.com/fDfTHLf.png
Right here, bucko.
Note: I am not interested in going to you, so don’t post your location details. Also note: I am not interested in having my mail spammed from posting my address, nor am I interested in being harassed by you and yours, so you don’t get my name.
Will respond further when I’m out of a meeting.
I like that jake thinks WE can dish it out but not take it when he’s the one who’s devolved to threats of violence over being called out.
I would respect you more if you just said that your scared, trust me if you gave me an address I promise you I would make a trip so I could give you my undivided attention.
You would respect us more if we were afraid of you? well we’d respect you more if you were capable of making an intelligent argument instead of resorting to threats of violence when called out like a cowardly bully.
But what if I’m not scared of you? It would be pretty disrespectful of me to lie like that.
@jake
Come to Rymdtorget, Gothenburg, Sweden. We’ll have a cup of coffee and let’s see if you can act like a normal person.
I appears that jake is a coward. They have had plenty of opportunities to actually respond to other people making substantive replies. But instead of choosing to do that they continue to try to get people, women in particular, to feel things related to fear. First abandonment and now terror from threats. The ability to save face by getting banned is a second benefit of the strategy.
I think that jake’s strategy does reflect their true nature. Sure they probably would not actually shoot anyone, they would end up in prison or worse (and then there would be insistence that he’s not a “true MGTOW”), but it does reflect an underlying willingness to use threats in response to social challenge instead of offering any substance.
As history advances the ability to answer social challenge with substance will become more important as the ability to deal with people that depend on tactics like threats and other forms of harassment get dealt with more effectively. Banning people for making threats is a perfectly acceptable choice if the situation involving the threat maker can’t be used in some constructive fashion.
Hey, remember a couple days ago when Jake insisted he would never ever do anything violent to a woman, he just wouldn’t help if they were being attacked?
Sorry, kiddo, you’re about as scary as a unicorn in a tutu.
I fail to see how repeatedly failing to stick to the flounce and offering to stalk us constitutes “going your own way.” I’m still waiting to see a man going his own way actually just go already.
And Jake, if you were dedicated enough, you could probably figure out what city I’m in and maybe even the neighborhoods where I live and work. But if you’re going to stalk me, you’ll have to earn it.
Although, I live with a man and a German Shepherd mix, so you’re probably going to leave me alone.
http://terezowens-com-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/2014/07/bruh.jpg
When you put all your level up points into violent trolling and forget to leave any for spelling and grammar…