Men Going Their Own Way have a keen eye when it comes to spotting subtle injustices that the rest of us often miss.
Like, for example, the terrible injustice that is … fat chicks dating dudes who aren’t themselves fat.
One Reddit MGTOW recently reminded his comrades just how pervasive this terrible injustice has become in the contemporary world.
Preach it, brother!
Others in the MGTOW subreddit reported their own findings.
He THOUGHT he was happy. Just as the German citizens under Hitler THOUGHT they were free!
Little did he know that his life could have been snuffed out in a moment had his girlfriend — *shudder* — decided to sit on him. We have lost too many men, cut down in their prime by hambeast girlfriends who thought it might be “funny” to pretend that their boyfriends were chairs.
Another MGTOW Redditor applied some powerful STEM logic to the problem:
Can society long survive with the attractiveness ratio so far out of whack? What kind of world is it when dudes who are EIGHTS are saddled with level 5 plain janes? Or when men who are average joes find themselves trapped in completely voluntary relationships with level 2 hambeasts, some of whom are quite angry and/or stern.
It is the thoughtful ovendice — we’ve met him before — who brings real clarity and wisdom to this difficult issue.
I can’t argue with that! Mainly because I have no idea what he’s talking about. How does working hard prevent men from being pigs?
Here’s a song I don’t think MGTOWs are going to like very much.
NOTE: This post contains
They should be thrilled, though? By PUA/MGTOW etc. etc. “logic”, if good-looking guys go out with these terrible, terrible abominations doesn’t this mean there’s less competition for the mythical “high-value” women so they have a better chance? (I haven’t tried following this kind of “logik” like this before, and it’s making me feel queasy; must be my brain just don’t logic so good like theirs do)
Of course a bloke couldn’t possibly go out with a woman because they, you know, get on well together/share interests/make each other laugh/actually have fun together. Not to mention that not everybody shares the exact same taste in physical attributes anyway.
As a short, fat woman I find that rather than fearing I will sit on them, men are eager to tell me specifically that they’re into that.
Some men like fat women. Some do not. Some just don’t care one way or another because their attraction is not tied to a body type. What is so scary about that to these dudes? Is it that they are so driven to preform masculinity and conform to other men’s expectations that they are afraid they are going to be forced to chase fatties? Did a fat girl turn them down and they’re still not over it? Is it that they know a woman who isn’t interested in living to please random boners is free and happier outside of their control? Do they assume all thin women are thin to please them and fat women are being fat AT them? I just don’t understand so much bitterness over other people’s bodies and love lives.
Speaking of, has anyone else seen 12 Angry Men Inside Amy Schumer? I died. I laughed so hard.
opposablethumbs: Yeah, the paradoxes abound. It all makes sense, though, once you realize that most of the RedPillers are:
A: Actually pretty miserable human beings, and;
B: Would rather rip other people down rather than be happier with themselves.
The ‘game’ mentality is based entirely around winning. If someone is happier than you are, by default, they’re winning (which makes you a loser). So, in order to deflect the building cognitive dissonance arising from the unacceptability of being a loser, you have to make the following assumptions:
1: Any guy who is happy and with an attractive woman is being cheated on.
2: Any guy who is happy with a woman who is not attractive (by your personal standards) is deluding himself.
Ergo, you are:
http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120622143653/uncyclopedia/images/9/99/Winning.gif
And all is right with the world.
Oh my, did I accidentally make choices based on common interests, personality, and intelligence rather than the “objective” physical attractiveness ratings of internet douches?
Oops. How ever can I recover from the unhappiness this doubtless has caused me.
Icanreed,
Abandon all hope. You’ll just have to keep living by your own judgement.
Of course, one problem is how they define body shape for women. My in-law family thought of me as “large” when I was 5’9″ and weighed….110 pounds! Not a healthy weight for my height. They told my husband I shouldn’t sit on his lap because I was so heavy.
Until we clearly define body weight so that Twiggy does not set the standard for all of us (this is not to skinny shame; it merely is to point out that everyone has a different body), then women will be fat-shamed for being anything but fat. And women who are curvy or are fat will continue to be shamed for being who they are and not being someone else.
And what about all those women who are 10s who are dating “beta men” who are only 5s? It seems the MRAs and PUAs also complain about that, because that means, they, alpha males who are so totally 10s, lose out to nerdy, geeky, beta males. These guys can’t be happy with anything as long as people they deem unacceptable and unattractive are still allowed to live past puberty.
That’s cos this isn’t about PUA/MGTOW “logic” as such, but more about their fragile little misogynistic worldview being smashed up on contact with reality. How dare the sort of women they don’t like be happy.
What’s so bad about chubby tummies? That would just mean that there’s more to love.
Well, now I know where the MGTOW are actually going. They’re Going Their Own Way…to shopping malls. Not to buy anything they actually want or need, like normal folk, but just to stare at all the handsome guys dating hambeasts, and speculate on how (un)happy they are.
My only question is, which stores in the malls deal in all this “free stuff” that women supposedly get? Because I’ve been there I don’t know how many times, and shit’s expensive as fuck for us feeeeeemales and our 70-cent dollars…
They’re mad because, according to the Mathematical Formula of Dating, if an 8 guy can only get a 5 girl, then a 2 guy is limited to a -1 or below, which means they have no chance to snag the unicorn HB10 and level up.
Other ironclad MGTOW Laws of Relationships:
1. Everyone has a single Attractiveness Rating that the rest of the human race agrees on.
2. Women may not receive male attention or rewards that are disproportionate to their scientifically calculated Attractiveness Coefficient
3. Numerical partner ratings are transitive. A hot partner makes the less attractive partner hotter, while a less attractive partner deals +3 damage.
4. Cooties are a thing.
I love it when their heads explode from going outside and observing happy couples violating these laws. They never stop to think that maybe their laws are wrong. Instead, they have to come up with all these farfetched hypotheses. The man was tricked somehow. He’s desperate. He’s a moron. He “thinks” he’s happy but he was bewitched by SJWs. Anything but the most obvious explanation, which is that yes, there are people who are attracted to other people for reasons besides looks and money.
You encounter a level 85 Hambeast!
Fight
Item
-> Complain on Reddit
In the ninties, there was a very popular TV presenter called Charlie Dimmock, in the UK who was the co host of Ground Force, a landscape gardening program. (She’s still about, maybe Google her)
She became an overnight sensation because of her cheery personality, great gardening knowledge, practical skills with everything from a chainsaw, muck spreading to bricklaying, but mostly (in the tabloids at least) because she never wore a bra!!!
Now, for some reason she became a nations darling, an odd ‘pin up girl’ and was even depicted on a famous Radio Times cover posing as Aphrodite coming out of a sea shell.
I think back now when I see her range of goods in Poundland, what was it made her so popular? Was it just the boobs and the Wild Ginger hair? No. I think it was a mix of her Tomboyish personality, her ability to ‘muck in’ and mastery of ‘guy stuff’ that made her both a great role model to girls, and made her ‘awesome’ and respected by men. Men in reality, do not want a passive dumb dolly woman, they want a practical knowledgable woman, and I think Charlie proved this. There are not so many good role models on TV for girls past the objectified Kardashians and Geordie Shore/Jersey Shore/ TOWIE bints. It’s nice to see someone different.
I feel really bad that I, as a fat person who has long struggled to overcome self hate, I have a hard time finding fat women attractive. Im not sure its really down to being as simple as a preference, like racial or cis preferences in dating, it can be informed by or caused by prejudice. ? 🙁
PS Im also grey asexual so complicated
There are loads of popular songs about guys who love the larger framed ladies, Sir Mixalot’s I Like Big Butts, Queen’s Fat Bottommed Girls, AC/DC’s Whole Lotta Rosie…..the list goes on. There are plenty others.
Haha, it couldn’t be that these people just like each other and that’s pretty much it. No, there has to be some kind of gynocentric fat-game mind tricks going on for these dudes to get tricked into this.
freemage and Pie – yup, it does make (a kind of (terrible, horrible, twisted) sense 🙁
Virgin Mary,
Sir Mix Alot went out of his way to make sure the public knew his song was not in praise of fat women but of otherwise thin women with big butts. He mocked fat women when he did.
Just so ya know. And yeah, he’s fat. It’s like that.
Pie,
That’s it exactly! “How dare people I hate not suffer?”
being seen as a fat mannish uggo in my experience has meant lots of immature men ignoring me, being extra aggressively creepy bc I “should be grateful” I guess / “I can turn a lesbo into a threesome”, self hating themselves for being attracted to me (feels gay, Im ugly so they are embarrassed) and punishing me even tho hi I don’t even like you back dingus, ignoring me – not looking at me, talking over me – and so on. Its the only reason I ever wanted to be “pretty” – to be respected. I couldnt care less otherwise.
The couple in the header image is adorable.
@Lea
Being Fat at someone is one of the best things I’ve heard today, so thank you.
@FrickleFrackle
Well yes there is but that also means that your love has to be spread out over a wider area, thus the over all love felt by the person you are loving decreases as their size increases. Inversely though, the larger a person is the more love their body can produce, thus I propose the phrase “More to love you” instead… and no you can’t have any of what I’m smoking.
@Kale : I don’t think you should feel bad to have your own tastes, and I don’t think you should try to be what you find attractive.
I wonder if this is connected to that Jewish plot around promoting Ashley Graham.
I sure know my criteria for beauty are extremely complex – as in “you need to be at least 6 feet tall or less than 4, you need to be red haired, but the shade of red depend on your skin tone, etc, etc”, not as in exigeant. I wonder if it’s specific to me and my tendancy to overcomplicate things, or if most people have an ideal set of criteria who are ridiculously complex.
@ Virgin Mary
I remember Charlie! And yeah, I’m sure the lack of a bra didn’t hurt her tabloid popularity, but I think her smile, attitude, and competence counted for a lot more. I know I’d love to be able to design and install a water feature as easily as she could.
So, one minute MGTOWs are crowing about how we women are all gonna be so sorry when we can’t find a man, and the next they’re whining because women are finding men. It’s as if their plan isn’t working!
http://i.imgur.com/Nsjmd.gif