Men’s Rights Activists learned a long time ago that the easiest way to win an argument with someone is by playing the old straw man game, ignoring what they actually believe and instead pretending that they believe something much less defensible — and much easier to rebut.
Trouble is, when you’re actually debating one of these people directly, they may point out to you that they don’t actually believe what you claim they believe. And this makes it oh so much harder to win the argument.
Luckily, MRAs have found a workaround for this little difficulty. Instead of debating real feminists who can argue back, they debate imaginary ones who say only what the MRAs allow them to say.
One quick visit to a stock photo repository and hey, presto! You’ve got yourself the following memes depicting Straw Feminists Confused About Everything.
Er, what? Feminists have the power to ban hot babes from going out in public? Do these hot babes have to make themselves less hot before they can get a walking around permit from the Department of Jealous Feminists Who Won’t Let You Go Out if You’re Too Hot?
I think I may have posted this one before, but I still don’t quite understand it. Hey MRA dudes, you’re supposed to confuse the imaginary women in your memes, not the rest of us!
This dumb little cartoon, drawn in 2003 by a dude hoping to sell a few t-shirts, has provided MRAs with thirteen years’ worth of cheap outrage so far. Congrats, MRA meme-maker, for squeezing a little bit more outrage from its desiccated corpse.
I ain’t saying she’s a golddigger but, yes, you are saying that. Again. That song is more than a decade old. Move on, dudes.
@dreemr,
I know, right? This is the problem with evolutionary psychology. It feels just like a bunch of guys sitting in a room, complaining about things they don’t like and going for the first excuses that come into their heads. And then, to make themselves feel all rational and sciencey, they ask thirty college students a questionnaire to see if they agree, and – guess what, college doods are likely to agree with a bunch of other college doods about things that annoy them.
And they call it science! Science!
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/955/225/70f.gif
@dreemr
It’s just a hunch; I’ll say it’s possible, but I could be wrong. Explanations were wanted, so I provided.
Two perfect examples of arguing exact opposite points in immediate succession.
When women have to pay more for things it’s just capitalism at work and if they don’t like it, they shouldn’t buy it! (No word on how they would, for example, avoid getting women’s haircuts which charge by gender, not style. Drag?) But when men have to pay for things it’s 100% biology that they can’t do anything about. “If they didn’t buy that stuff, the demand wouldn’t exist” somehow doesn’t apply to them.
If you’re a woman, being skinny proves you have more resources for your family (you’d think being skinny would suggest you had no food and being fat would suggest you had extra food, but apparently not), can run away from predators, and are less appealing to predators! You might think those things might be even more beneficial to the men who are out hunting the mammoths, but no. It’s not as important to them. Men need to be fat so their body heat can keep them warm. As opposed to women, who apparently don’t need to stay warm.
@Scildfreya
I hope it’s okay that this came across in Gimli’s voice for me – “And they call it a mine. A MINE!”
Also, even though I’m sure your words regarding genetic expression are wasted on the amazing Dusty, I found them very enlightening, so thank you!
Additionally, I learned tonight the importance of ledges, and of climbing same, to our very survival! I had not heretofore appreciated the role ledges have played in human history.
I also wondered how he came to the conclusion that fat people swim poorly? Has he never seen aquatic mammals? A good portion of them carry a great deal of fat stores.
@PoM
Hit the nail right on the head. I was a data entry clerk in my late teens/early 20’s. It was an on/off thing as I was a student, but I worked full time in the summer break etc. I also took 2 years out of education when I left school at 16 (this is the school leaving age in the UK; 16 – 18 is optional) to work full-time. I ran away from home just after my 17th birthday, so I needed to save some money to support myself before I started studying for my A Levels (qualification needed for university). Between the ages of 16 and 20, I worked on off full time/part time either as a data entry clerk or in retail. I was at Marks and Spencer’s for quite a while too. They were the only jobs I could get.
They paid an absolute pittance. Some of the worst data entry positions were what’s known as ‘piecemeal’. That means you get paid for the number of data inputs, not the number of hours you work. This was before health and safety checked your workstation. So I had severe repetitive strain in both hands, neck, shoulders and back. It didn’t help that I broke my upper arm and neck when I was 19 and the hospital didn’t X-Ray my neck. I walked around for 10 months with a neck that was broken in 4 places.
I also discovered when I was working for Top Shop that my male colleagues at Top Man (the other side of the store) were paid more than we were. We did exactly the same effing job.
I had a baby when I was 21, so I was probably out of the data entry work for about 18 months. By the time I was ready to go back, I found the door slammed in my face. The revolution of the male whizz kids had taken place and I couldn’t get my old job back, even though I had more experience than they did. They were being paid phenomenally higher wages to boot. To say I was frustrated and pissed off is an understatement.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/4a9c4e2be2f025fb6673932bb8153366/tumblr_mvgd9499pR1qh613ao6_r2_250.gif
🙂
Ledges! apes and monkeys are all about the safe and cozy perches. We cling like stubborn pines to the cliffs!
Well, I’d like to be a tree.
the aquatic ape thing is … an interesting theory, but not much evidence for it. I don’t think boobies evolved as flotation devices!
No, he’s just sold on the fat=unhealthy stereotype, which is certainly not true. Sedentary=unhealthy, not fat.
I want to buy a rowing machine :s
@Scildfreja (and others), since you strike me as the kind of person who would find it interesting:
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.ca/2016/04/why-gross-gender-gap-in-earnings-is.html
In fact, Echidne’s older series is quite good: http://www.echidne-of-the-snakes.com/gendergap
Wait, are you saying that women shouldn’t eat every day? How often are we allowed to eat? Every other day? Every three days? You should Google “amenorrhea” and maybe learn why eating every day would be beneficial for fertility and breastfeeding.
Also, skinny does not imply fit. Fit people can be a variety of different sizes. When I was an athlete, I started out super skinny. Then puberty hit full force and I got pretty curvy. Big boobs, curvy hips, chubby arms. I was still an athlete. Still really fit! But I did have to pretty relearn every dive I knew. That really sucked.
Since when do mothers and children compete for resources? Mothers provide resources for their children. Some of those resources would be breast milk. A hungry mom isn’t going to be provided the best quality breast milk.
Humans stay safe from other predatory animals by banding together. A lion won’t attack a group of people.
No. When humans are killed by other animals, it’s usually because they’re isolated from the group. Most animals won’t even try to attack an adult, though. Not unless it’s guarding its young. Adult humans aren’t food for other animals. Toddlers might get taken, but not grown ups. Do you really think that there are bears roaming the forest looking for fat people to eat? That’s … adorable.
What? You really need to back this one up. I don’t even know what the fuck you’re talking about here.
Where do you think Paleolithic women lived? Heated mcmansions? You really think women used to sit around the cave eating bonbons, don’t you? We joke about that around here all the time, but wow. Here’s someone who actually believes that!
Anyway, I’ve noticed that you’ve utterly failed to bring up pregnancy and childbirth. Do you not know how dangerous it is? Before we had modern medicine, dying in childbirth was very common. Teenaged girls, even now are much more likely to die giving birth because their hips are too narrow. Also, their babies are more likely to be of low birth weight. Which means infant mortality rates are higher. This is why “childbearing hips” is a thing. This is what I was getting at when I asked you why skinny in women would be a reproductive advantage. Predictably, you were too ignorant to pick up on it.
Evopsych fans always pretend to be such experts on reproduction and fertility, but they never seem to know the first thing about pregnancy, labor or breastfeeding. Funny how that works. All they know is what their boner likes.
http://www.animalfactguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/echidna2.jpg
Thank you for the link! very neat stuff. I was aware of this issue, but it’s important to bring up. Statistics is hard!
(I sort of hope that PSA methods become more popular, as they allow you to control for these sorts of differences of age, location, etc, without invalidating your conclusions. But that’s a bit too math dorky for here!)
@Dustinzeit
This is simply your inaccurate guess, with no evidence whatsoever. You also fail to take into account cultural and/or historical norms and values. Far from finding fat women unappealing, Nigerian men with the money to do so pay for prospective brides to go to ‘fattening houses’. A fat wife shows that you have lots of money. Prince Edem in the article below says a slim wife would have no appeal for him;
His wife Happiness elaborates further;
So instead of imagining what other cultures/different historical eras are like and getting it wrong, read up on it. Google is your friend.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6904640.stm
@Scildfreya
I wasn’t actually thinking of the aquatic ape “theory”, just about whales, seals, sea cows, etc. But you reminding me of it did make me laugh!
Some pretty gruesome serial killer stuff coming up, so feel free to look away now.
@Bina
This made me go completely cold as it reminded me of an incident I read about regarding Jeffery Dahmer. It seems the police had the same attitude towards gay couples.
A neighbour of Dahmer’s called the police because she’d found a naked 14 year old boy who’d escaped from Dahmer’s apartment. He was beaten, bruised, bleeding and intoxicated. Dhamer had already raped him and drilled a hole in his head. The police accepted that the boy was 19 and in a consensual relationship with Dahmer. Yeah, because all consensual relationships end up with one partner naked and bleeding in the street with a hole in his head.
The idiot police officers put it down to a lovers’ tiff and sent the boy back to the apartment he’d just escaped from. They signed the child’s death warrant as a few hours later, Dahmer murdered him.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/13/us/officers-tell-jury-of-letting-dahmer-keep-boy.html
http://youtu.be/nVtpTv3Fy2k
Hi there, Dustinzeit! I’m a very skinny guy, perpetually bordering on underweight. (Although that’s at least partially because I’m tall and bmi is slanted against tall people.) I thought I would weigh in to give you another data point.
I’m not especially fit. I get tired easily. I can walk quickly but that’s because of my long legs; if I’m running then lack of cardio kicks my ass. I certainly can’t climb onto ledges to escape predators, and I cope with that by living in a city where there are no predators.
I’m not skinny because I work out a lot; I’m skinny because my parents were skinny and their parents were skinny.
Now, clearly, a single data point isn’t a disproof. I’m entirely willing to acknowledge myself (and the rest of my family) as anomalous, if you can show me the data set and the regression curves you’ve drawn from it.
You do have those, right? You wouldn’t make a statement like that without having the backing of a solid chunk of experimental data, would you? After all you’re a rational man speaking rationally. There’s no need to talk down to everyone or to be falsely modest; Scildfreja and I are scientists (as are some others here) and I’m sure we can survive being talked to respectfully as peers.
I can’t speak for Scildfreja, but personally I can’t wait to see your error calculations. Those are always the interesting part.
@ kupo
your babby looks like she could be the identical littermate of my former dearest friend and partner in crime, 1992-2012, god rest her soul ;_;
http://i.imgur.com/NtwAP1J.jpg
She is beautiful. Beautiful.
*Looks up the thread*
Wait, did some troll try to argue that being skinny was an evolutionary advantage and that’s why our culture considers skinny people attractive? Because that’s literally backwards. In cultures where famine is prevalent, fat people are considered more attractive than skinny people. For early human history, when food was scarce, being skinny was a disadvantage. You would drop dead sooner than your fatty mcfatterson companions because the whole point of getting fat is to have food reserves for when the going gets tough.
It’s really quite hilarious that he thinks that our ability to gain weight was some sort of ‘natural process’ that just happens to punish humans for being lazy. We evolved a metabolism that intentionally gains weight. Obviously being fat had some advantage or our bodies wouldn’t go to all this effort.
I forget if this is entirely accurate, but whatever! I’ve got a behavior and a rationalization, what else could I possible need?
“these memes were not posted by real straw-feminists. straw-feminism is about equality”
@Katz
Never saw the movie. I assumed it was just really epic trailer music, so I never thought to try checking the soundtrack. Silly me
@EJ
I eat like a pregnant elephant, and weigh nothing, in full regalia and soaking wet. If anything, my thinness shows just the opposite of Dustin’s competition… hypothesis. My kids, if I ever deign to procure any, will have to fight daddy to the last, or lose their rations to the void. For I am Masticator, Devourer of Food
Metabolism, the real MVP
http://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldrjszGQ5b1qdow0r.gif
Edit:clarification
If you mean the 16th, we’re currently aiming to be there 🙂
Saw that banner at the anti-Trident rally! Will keep an eye out.
@Kale
Last year sometime, I had an online spat with an incoherent MRA troll. His arguments were hard to follow as he weaved all over the place. He also used ‘women’ and ‘feminists’ as synonyms. He was melting down over feminists claiming they wanted to be independent, but Anna Nicole Smith. So there.
I told him that Anna Nicole Smith was hardly the poster girl for Feminism, but he asked again why Feminists only want to be independent when it suited them. I said that wasn’t true and every time I said one of his erroneous beliefs about feminism was incorrect, he roared, “STOP LYING!!” We are all looking for sugar daddies apparently. He then threatened to go his own way and told me to enjoy buying my own shoes and handbags. #byeFelipe
My favourite part of his rant was where he claimed that all women/feminists were out to trap a man, any man, by getting pregnant. Then the poor male victim would be forced to pay child support for a child he wanted absolutely nothing to do with. For 18 years! Why aren’t feminists doing anything about that? What about the menz?
I pointed out that claiming *all* women/feminists are looking for a mug to give them a bun in the oven for financial reasons is patently ridiculous. There are multiple reasons why people have children. For a start, couples who are/were married tend to plan their children together. That’s why contraception is sometimes referred to as ‘family planning’.
Some men go to extraordinary lengths to have children. One of my best friends was married for 16 years and has IVF twins because her husband had a plumbing issue. He had to have very painful surgery before his swimmers saw the light of day. Fortunately, the vast majority of men who want children find getting their partners pregnant a lot easier (and far more enjoyable). But the desire to have children can be just as strong in men as it is in women.
Unless it’s discussed beforehand, there’s an unwritten assumption when you get married that you’re going to have children. Sometimes unmarried couples have children who were much loved, planned and very wanted. And yes, some women lie to get pregnant, but not all of them want or ask for child support. I know this for a fact because this was how I was conceived; my bio mother did not want any money. She wanted ‘something of his to own forever and ever’ [sic]. She’s a real charmer
I also wanted him to explain how gay men are tricked into having children. I asked the troll if indeed, he thought they WERE tricked, in which case would he like me to draw him a diagram? Either way, the majority of children are not conceived because their fathers were tricked into it for the financial gain of the mother.
I told him that if he was that worried, he could always use a condom or practice abstinence. He became incandescent because contraception wasn’t his problem. It’s the responsibility of women apparently as they are the ones who get pregnant.
He let forth a torrent of abuse about the supposed Matriarchy we live in, with its gender-gap myth and feminists with their ‘enthusiastic yes’ policy. They just want to stop hetero couples having sex and by virtue of my genitals, I had no idea what a torture it is to be ‘involuntarily celibate’. The Matriarchy sent men out to die for their country and forced them to have circumcisions as babies, all for women. And I wasn’t even saying thank you.
Then he ranted on about how unfair custody courts are because mothers are always awarded custody. Misandry! If I was really anti-discrimination, why wasn’t I doing anything about him not getting custodyof his child? I gave him a one sentence answer; ‘Why would I support your custody petition for a child that five minutes ago you said you want nothing to do with?”
Silence.
Lol.
If we’re talking politics, can some people take a gander over to the Britain Stronger In Europe facebook page and help fight the hordes of Brexiters that brigade every damn post with their asinine screeching? We have some world-class troll busters here and y’all are very intelligent people.
Seriously, I have read some of THE dumbest arguments and responses from Brexiters on that page, which is proceeding to drive me even further into the Remain camp. One person went as far as to equate being in the EU to the military advances of the Nazis. They ignore facts, make up their own, and when debunked they go “yeah well it doesn’t matter anyway!” They yell fascist, exaggerated, emotionally charged rhetoric with NO backup evidence, all the while calling their opponents stupid and blind even when faced with hard stats and reliable sources. They are the people trying to get us to leave on June 23rd. THEY’RE ACTUALLY ABLE TO VOTE, GOD HELP US.
#NotAllBrexiters are that bad, I’m sure, but these ones are and I don’t want them influencing the Undecideds (who are reading that page when it pops up on their Feeds) with their hyperbole, lies and half-baked fantasies.
*Gender pay gap myth
Another data point to dispute dustinzeit’s skinny obsession.
I’m skinny. Very. I’m 5’6″ an weigh 47kg (105 pounds). I eat reasonably well, but I sure as hell am not really fit. I don’t exercise. My exercising consists of general walking in my day-to-day life, some swimming on hot days during summer, and a grand total of four zumba classes last year. I will spend the day lying on my bed or on the couch. But thanks to arbitrary genetics my weight hasn’t changed since I was 15, even though I’m less active and eat more now.
@ SunnySombrera
I hold my hands up to not being an expert on Europe. I’m probably slightly more in the ‘Yes/stay” camp because I think there’s safety in numbers. There will be at least some protection because the government won’t be (theoretically) allowed to trample all over our human rights. But Cameron is pro Europe, and I don’t want be on his side on principle. I’ll head over and take a look. Thanks.
You’re not the only one to share this view, but it’s irrational to let such an important decision be influenced by your dislike for the person holding a particular argument. Cameron is wrong on many things, but it doesn’t mean he is wrong on this (a part of me wishes he wouldn’t campaign to stay because it does seem to make some people determined to do the opposite of what he wants, purely out of Tory hatred). The economic facts and knowledge of international trade/relations say that we should stay or we will tank. Thanks for going to take a look though. There are many Remainers in the comments giving out many useful facts and sources in retaliation to the Brexiters.