Is plus-sized model Ashley Graham being used, wittingly or unwittingly, by a secret cabal of degenerate Jews trying to brainwash red-blooded white men into finding fat chicks attractive?
That’s what Andrew Anglin, the Trump-loving, Jew-hating editor of the internet Nazi tabloid The Daily Stormer seems to be suggesting in a series of posts on Graham and her diabolical plumpness.
When Graham was featured on the cover of Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue earlier this year, Anglin warned his readers not to be fooled into thinking that she was actually pretty hot. Because that’s what THE JEWS want you to think.
This is part of a propaganda campaign of the Jews called “fat acceptance.” Instead of looking at fatness as a form of sick degeneracy – not to mention a dangerous health hazard – which should be shamed, fat accepters believe that fatties should love their fatness, and force it on everyone else. They also claim that fat chicks are attractive somehow.
The horror!
As Anglin sees it, “fat acceptance” is part of a slippery slope of terrible “equality” that will somehow also lead people to think that child molesting is super cool. “[T]his embracing of degeneracy,” he warns
is part of the whole equality doctrine of the Marxist Jews.
First they told us women were equal. Then the Blacks. Then they started openly celebrating disease by promoting the homos. They also now claim that Islam is a religion of peace, even though the entire religion is about murdering people.
It is no wonder at all they are now pushing pedophiles as victims, as well as fatties as beautiful.
That is one weird slippery slope.
The evil Ashley is now on the cover of Maxim. While this is terrible in itself, Anglin is even more angered that some “fatties” are charging the magazine with photoshopping away some of the plump model’s plumpness.
Her fat fans are revolting, as they believe she is their ticket to brainwashing men into being attracted to them, and the last thing they need is to have her look less fat.
Graham, for her part, says the magazine didn’t slim her down with photoshop. Not that it matters to Anglin, who thinks she’s a giant gross fatty either way.
And it’s all, somehow, the fault of THE JEWS, who “are encouraging men to masturbate to pictures of fat women, further warping their destroyed psyches.”
In yet another post on the subject yesterday, Anglin again attacked Graham as a tool of the “Jew-SJW agenda to normalize obesity,” warning that “[m]en who buy into this fat acceptance are just buying into another form of sick Jewish degeneracy.”
My only question is what exactly the Jews are hoping to accomplish with this dastardly fat-encouraging conspiracy. I went back and checked the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and I couldn’t find anything about putting fat chicks on the cover of Maxim.
Are the Jews hoping to boost sales of bagels and pastrami sandwiches?
Oh, crap, now I’m hungry. IT’S WORKING, JEWS!
@Hambeast:
I haven’t been in a while, but Israel having a lot of fatphobia permeating its mainstream culture sounds, sadly, entirely plausible to me.
However (and I kinda hate that I know this), that actually wouldn’t strike Mr. Not-At-All-Attracted-To-Ashley-Graham Neonazi here as any contradiction of his theories. You see, the diabolical thing about us Jews is that we promote these evil, degenerate trends (gay rights, cultural diversity, treating fat people like human beings, etc.) for (non-Jewish) white people so as to corrupt and undermine their society and bring about the downfall of their countries (and thus the rise of our New World Order/global government), but we cleverly shun those same trends for ourselves.
…no really, this is what those fucktrumpets argue. One example they like to cite is that US American Jews (who as a demographic are majority liberal/Democrat-voting) support accepting refugees from war-torn areas into the US (see for example the open letter from numerous US rabbis about Syrian refugees), while Israel has a rather draconian immigrant/refugee policy. Apparently they cannot grasp the concept that US Jews and Israelis are different people, who can (and often do) have different opinions and motives*. Even though (gasp!) they are both Jewish!
As a Jew who is only too familiar, sometimes from in-person experience, with the concept “two Jews, five opinions,” I find this especially hilarious.
*Not to mention, of course, the fact that there are of course plenty of conservative/rightwing Jews in the US, and that Israel is a thoroughly split country on just about any policy you care to name.
Fashion is not reality and what people consider as attractive is just fashion. My Grandmother (born circa 1892) used to refer to skinny women as “A rag, a bone and a hank of hair.” Similarly Marilyn Monroe was considered an ideal but by the standards of today would be regarded as overweight as would virtually all the female idols of the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s. Even Audrey Hepburn and Twiggy would be regarded as overweight by the standards used by these persons of limited morality.
Essentially people whining about overweight women seek a pedophile ideal, a “gamine” with tits.
@PolicyofMadness
Is there any use of the phrase “to rag on” someone which does not inherently imply menstrual rags?
I am aware of no other origin. If one exists, please correct me.
@ carayak
“Ragging” as in “to rag on” is an old British term. It’s been used for centuries so it probably predates any sanitary product implication.
It originally meant to “prank” or “play a joke”. The most common usage over here now is probably “rag week” at our universities. That’s when students get up to whacky high japes.
The Lurker
Not just wealth and health – strength!
What do they think of women athletes? Swimmers with muscular shoulders as wide as axe handles, cyclists whose speed and power rely on their obviously strong thighs and glutes, shotputters, discus-hammer-javelin throwers as well as weightlifters. They all have extremely developed musculature and unusual fat distribution because of the particular requirements of their sport.
Of course, they’re not outstandingly healthy, despite their strength, because extreme sports training puts undue strain on immune and endocrine function so they can be quite vulnerable to contagious diseases as well as sport-related injuries. But these guys obviously aren’t interested in the actual health of women of the body size and shape they say they prefer, because starving yourself into being so extremely underweight is equally detrimental to health.
@Alan Robertshaw
Thank you. You’re one of my favorites around here, so I appreciate your comment. 🙂
I do still question how the women centuries ago were solving their monthly sanitation problems, if not with rags.
I know that the British public school phrase “fagging” actually had its origins in bringing in kindling, but where did “ragging” in the “high japes” sense come from?
@ carayak
Ha, thanks 🙂
I’m not sure of the origin of “rag” in the prank sense. I only knew about how old it was from an article I read years ago about student rag weeks. I’m very grateful for your explanation about fagging though (I love learning stuff like that). I suppose it’s obvious when you think of the original meaning of faggot (wonder if the kindling version predates the meatball one?). I don’t know when that word first got used as a term of abuse.
As to your other query, there are people on here more qualified to comment. My only bit of trivia in that regard is the origin of modern products. (Warning for another of my rambles)
During WW1 there was a shortage of cotton for medical dressings. A timber mill called Kimberly Clarke had developed a cotton substitute made from wood pulp called ‘cellucotton’. They got a contract with the US military to make substitute dressings from it. After the war they needed a new use for it. They had learned that nurses were using the dressings as sanitary pads (and soldiers were stealing them for their wives) so they saw a gap in the market and ‘hey presto’ they launched a new line of products under the Kotex brand.
@ carayak
Ah, straight from the horse’s mouth as it were….
http://www.cms.kimberly-clark.com/umbracoimages/UmbracoFileMedia/ProductEvol_FemininePads_umbracoFile.pdf
ETA:
From that article!
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rag&allowed_in_frame=0
It looks like the verb form of rag has been around for a lot longer than the use of the noun rag as slang for sanitary products, and the origin is unknown but may be related to an old Danish word.
@kupo, @Alan:
Thanks for the etymology lessons! I’m glad one thing that sounded questionable turned out not to be.
@PI
Awesome! 🙂
My Otter and I went to see Carol on Christmas Eve. We almost had the whole theater to ourselves that day too.
The one time I’ve actually had the entire room to myself at the movies was when my local theater in the tiny town where I grew up made the mistake of thinking anyone would be interested in watching The Truman Show.
Any link between ragging=playing pranks and the role of jester/buffoon (wearing motley) ?????
(I have no idea and haven’t tried to check; I’m really struggling with what I’m supposed to be working on right now, so hope you don’t mind that I’m pretending this page is the tea-room/cafeteria/water-cooler)
Etymology, huzzah!
Opposable Thumbs, that’s a fascinating notion. There’s my Friday night – digging around looking for possible connections between ragging and jesters.
Peeps above are correct (of course) – there does not seem to be any etymological connection between ragging on someone and being on the rags. Please do not consult urban dictionary on the latter term; it’s not pretty.
What am I saying? Don’t consult UD on anything – duh.
It’s funny that the men who are obsessed with women staying skinny are also usually evopsych fans too. Haven’t they ever heard the phrase “childbearing hips?”
If attraction is about fertility and reproduction, they should like big hips.
okay i gotta ask: what is it with conspiracy nuts and Jewish people? why are they the go-to group for all world-domination fantasies?
Hello.
Wow, i am not good at rethorical pathfinding but it seems to me that it is an humongous shortcut (and bullshit, but, eh, this is rethorical). And the remaining of the article is full of that.
If this man was some kind of mercenary, his nickname would certainly be “Shortcut” !
Or maybe “Bingo Boy” or “Bingoy”, because this article can fill many bingo cards (mysoginy, racism, fatshaming, antijudaism, conspiracies, homophoby and so on + intercrossing them). It misses a bit of “free speech !”, “civilization crumbleism (?)”, “ableism” and “rape denying” and “negationism”. In a later post, maybe ?
Have a good day.
@ opposable thumbs & mish
Glad to see it’s not just me who uses Mammoth as a distraction when you’re meant to be working.
Now I’m looking at ‘rag’.
Seems that the “aggressive prank” meaning is peculiarly British (although it’s caught on in India and a few places to describe what our American friends would call hazing). It also has a related ‘disorderly conduct in defiance of authority’ meaning as well historically. It might be though that that flows from the student rag week tradition (which university authorities seemed to have disapproved of originally)
It can also mean to aggressively criticise someone for their perceived or actual shortcomings. The first use in that sense (according to an etymology site) was recorded in 1729 when rag was a synonym for scold (possibly from a Danish word ‘rag’ meaning to begrudge)
That last one seems more in common which how it’s used today.
@ mish
As to euphemisms for menstruation, I don’t know if you’re familiar with ‘The IT Crowd’ but I always giggle at this exchange.
Okay for one, people can be both fat and healthy. Two, people are allowed to do a bunch of unhealthy things (fire guns, smoke, drink, etc.), and I (along with many others) think that such unhealthy or potentially dangerous things are allowable, at least to an extent. Three, if these people think fat ladies are ugly, they should really look at some pictures of Alex Storm sometime. Look her up at your own risk tho, she’s quite NSFW!
@mildlymagnificent
They think muscular/”overly” fit women are disgusting and manly.
Like seriously you can’t win.
I have a friend who’s been lifting heavy and is part of a few groups of women weight lifters and some of the comments they get… my god, it’s disgusting.
I understand why we consider hyper-muscular physiques to be more manly, since they generally require a lower percentage of body fat, and women are designed to retain more fat over their muscles than men, but some men think any defined muscle at all on a woman is masculine and gross.
Pretty much anything that makes you bigger than a dandelion fluff, healthy or not, is a no go.
@IP and PI: My sister used to work in a movie theater. Once a teen boy came up to tell her someone was being loud in their theater. She pointed out that their film was still in previews. When she was walking rounds she went into their theater; this boy and his two friends were the only people in the place. So she made an announcement that could they please keep quiet, as the management had already received one complaint about the noise.
I just realized my second point could be read as contradicting my first point. I meant even – if – being fat is unhealthy, why worry about it too much, especially if it’s not your fat?
cleverforagirl – Yes! I am a big fat fattie myself. I think “fat” is a horribly abused, innocent, and perfectly serviceable three letter adjective. It has been unjustly saddled with a bunch of negative meanings.
Neurite – The closest I’ve ever been to Israel is eastern Turkey* so I have no first-hand experience at all. But yeah, the way anti-Semites think is kind of mind-boggling. I grew up in a rather Jewish** corner of southern California and my Jewish friends were all just, I dunno, people, with the same kinds of lives as everyone else! Who knew??.<
**And Catholic, too; I thought WASPs were a minority as a little Lutheran kid!
Well, everybody knows jewish mothers make you eat a lot…
@Alan Robertshaw
Apparently neither is anyone else, but it appears to have originated sometime in the 18th century, or at least that’s the earliest surviving written usage of that meaning.
@Opposablethumbs
I wonder the same. There also appears to be a longstanding tradition that Rag Week also involves collection for charity, in which case it may be that they were ‘ragging’ or scolding passersby into donating, or possibly that they were trying to accumulate ‘rag’, meaning banknotes or money generally, or indeed ‘rags’ meaning clothes for the poor, and the meaning of hijinx/pranks derives from rag week rather than predating it.
@ A Space Alpaca
Hell, before the recent cleanup of the Taboola sponsored links I kept seeing one that said ’25 things to consider before dating an athletic girl’.