Most Men’s Rights Activists who wish women didn’t have the right to vote are savvy enough not to say so outright. Instead, they make up fairy tales about how men’s right to vote (at least here in the US) is contingent on men signing up for the draft.
This isn’t actually true — when the draft was abolished in 1973, men weren’t suddenly stripped of their voting rights. And while it is true that young men in the US have been required to register for the draft since 1980, there is no draft, nor will there be one at any point in the forseeable future, making registration about as much of a burden as signing a pledge that you won’t sprout wings and fly to the moon.
But not every anti-suffragette resorts to this sort of sophistry. Take, for example, the Alt-Rightster and woman-voting-opposer Axel Mckibbin.
In a recent post on his blog The Anti-puritan, McKibbin argues that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote because they’re a bunch of lazy, emotional, dishonest, irresponsible and irrational cowards who will bring Western civilization crashing down around us if they aren’t stripped of their power, and soon.
In a post with the lovely title “Why women can’t be trusted with voting, free speech, national budgets, or power,” Mckibbin sets forth his case against women.
It’s not a very original one. He starts off by contrasting the rational, data-driven approach he thinks men bring to complicated problems with the emotional, irrational “feminine method.” As he sees it,
Men argue or accommodate information they don’t like, women stifle upsetting discussion with emotional tyranny and censorship, or simply bury their heads in the sand.
This wouldn’t be much of a problem if women had no power whatsoever, but for some silly reason men gave women the vote — and the world has been going down the toilet ever since.
[S]ince women have achieved the right to vote, power has shifted from the masculine to the feminine, and thus, from logic to tantrums, from debate to censorship.
Tantrums, huh? I guess he’s right. I’ve never seen men throwing tantrums when people disagree with them.
Oh wait.
Ok, ok, ladies! Don’t throw a fit about this! Let’s just assume that fellow is an outlier, and move on.
Like the rational, data-driven dude he is, McKibbin then throws out a free-associational list of all the things he thinks the ladies are doing wrongly and badly and femininely. Naturally, he provides no evidence for any of his assertions.
It is not a coincidence that the most challenging academic disciplines and hazardous jobs are male dominated. Women are psychologically, not just physically, weaker than men. They choose the easy road in everything. They censor rather than debate honestly in women’s studies departments. They chose easy majors that pay less. They chose easy low paying jobs rather than dangerous/difficult high paying ones. They lie about wage gaps rather than take responsibility and do difficult work.
Then, without even a pause for a paragraph break, he essentially accuses women of being a bunch of lying false rape accusers.
They believe that regret constitutes rape when they could instead take responsibility for their sexual choices.
And then, again without a pause, he offers what is either a weird, out-of-place dig at Hillary Clinton … or a suggestion that all the women of the world routinely mishandle top-secret material.
The screw up classified emails rather than do a minimum of ass-covering. They hate white men who they disagree with rather than Muslims who rape them.
Dude, I’m pretty sure women do hate Muslims — and Christians, and Hindus, and atheists — who rape them. They’re just a little less likely to blame all Muslims (or Christians, or Hindus, or atheists) for the actions of some Muslims, or Christians or, well, you know the rest.
Whenever a female is given a choice, she will choose the cowardly, dishonest, low agency method rather than the courageous, honest, high agency masculine method.
Yes, this is an actual sentence a human being wrote.
She would rather have handouts than balanced budgets for her children’s futures. She would rather censor than be upset. She would rather falsely accuse men of rape than take responsibility for her sexual choices when drunk.
And he’s back on that false accusation thing.
She would rather get divorced than work through the rough patches. She would rather vote stupidly for Bernie than understand economics. She would rather have a 15 dollar minimum wage than a job.
Uh, maybe because raising the minimum wage won’t actually cost us jobs?
She would rather vote for the wage increase than study the issues.
Or maybe she already studied the issue?
She would rather have alimony and child-support than a lasting marriage.
Or perhaps she would simply like to get out of a miserable marriage. And would like the father of her children to continue to pay some of the costs of raising them.
As I have said in other places, democracy is the ethnic form of government of white males. It is designed for high agency individuals of relatively equal capacity and relatively high intelligence. It simply does not work for low agency people.
Ah, racism. It’s about time you showed up. It wouldn’t be a true alt-right rant without some racism to go with all this misogyny.
To a male the state is a series of threats, to a female a series of benefits. Women cannot be drafted (yet), they are arrested at much lower rates, and given shorter sentences for the same crimes.
Hey, he managed to work the non-existent draft into the equation!
Men are arrested much more often than women, it’s true; they also commit many more crimes. The best way to reduce the number of men arrested for bullshit charges? Get the cops to stop racial profiling. And end the war on drugs.
Women do tend to get somewhat shorter sentences for the same crimes. This is partly because the men committing the same crimes tend to have longer criminal records. It’s also because some male judges are more likely to treat women more leniently. Female judges tend to be more egalitarian in their sentencing.
Despite men being victims of domestic violence, only women have state-supported domestic violence shelters.
Most shelters get only a small portion of their funding from the government. Many if not most also provide shelter for men in the form of hotel vouchers. There’s nothing stopping Men’s Rights activists from building shelters for men. Aside from the fact that they’re Men’s Rights activists, and MRAs don’t actually do crap for men.
Only men can be successfully prosecuted for raping women, despite the fact that women also rape men. Women get preferential treatment and custody in family courts. Men are essentially guilty until proven innocent in affirmative consent states.
None of this is true. Women are prosecuted — successfully — for rape. It doesn’t happen a lot, but it happens, and will almost certainly happen more in the future.
While more women than men get custody, that’s not the result of bias. In the overwhelming majority of cases, it’s because that’s what the divorcing parents agree to out of court. When men do go to court to ask for custody they often get it.
“Affirmative consent” laws apply to colleges, not criminal law, and they actually go a long way to clearing up anxieties about consent between partners. If you get an enthusiastic “yes” from a partner who is’t wasted before having sex, well, you know you have consent.
Men are taxed at higher rates.
If they earn more, yes.
Women receive benefits that men don’t. Since only women get custody, only women qualify for welfare. Even WIC means Women Infant Children program.
WIC is designed to provide assistance so poor kids don’t starve to death. Despite the name, WIC provides food vouchers and nutrition classes to men responsible for kids getting fed. True, it doesn’t provide cis men with the same benefits it provides pregnant and breastfeeding women, but that’s because cis men do not get pregnant.
The state treats males as disposable in war, letting them die homeless on the streets while paying females with five baby daddies to get pregnant at the taxpayer expense and receive food stamps.
Yes, it’s terrible that the government provides minimal assistance to keep babies and young children from starving. A quick Google search would have told you that men and women without children can also get food stamps.
It attacks marriage and men with alimony and child-support. The state is nothing but threats for men and benefits for women.
You know, rich women can end up paying alimony just like rich men. Fathers raising kids are entitled to child support from their exes, just as mothers are. And again, child support is designed to support children.
This is why women cannot be trusted with national budgets. Even if a woman possesses the courage to engage with uncomfortable facts she still has a disincentive to defend her national interest.
Er, what? Is it somehow in our national interest to let kids starve?
Combine with low agency she works to destroy her society, letting in rapugees, voting for handouts, creating guilty until innocent rape laws, censoring males in the workplace, filing bogus sexual harassment charges, and on and on. Here, low agency and incentives make her nothing but a threat to civilization.
Or at least to that portion of civilization that thinks it’s hilarious to make awful sexist jokes at work.
Her right to vote is a right to destroy other’s rights with redistribution, censorship, and false rape accusations, to bring in hostile raping refugees while attacking the conservative men who defend her as racists, even though Islam is not a race!
Yeah, it’s just a big coincidence that so many of the people the alt-right hate tend to be black or brown.
She will get a Muslim America in the bargain for her efforts. Women will never take equal responsibility, have equal agency, or be equally courageous. Strip them of power before they destroy civilization.
Honestly, the biggest threat to civilization right now is named Donald Trump, and women are a good deal more likely to vote against him than men.
I say, let’s keep women’s suffrage, at least for now.
@Jason
The satisfaction of a job well done.
Notice how the most frequent Nazi-Like commenters band together in these threads? Know why? Because they follow the same rules. They follow the same rules by design. The rules they follow are the same rules followed by the heads of state in North Korea, the former Soviet Union and those of the former Nazi party. Always genuflect to the leaders words.
Apparently, Kat and GenJones are KimJungUnHitler combined.
Sieg Heil
Jason, you’re late to the party, don’t you know the leader of the feminist hivemind is Katie? Get with the program, another of your ilk exposed Katie’s treachery MONTHS ago!
http://i.imgur.com/IePq12R.jpg
@Jason
Wow, all that because I cited a couple of Wikipedia biographies?
I hate to think how you’d react if I burned the toast!
OMG! The KimJungUnHitler has been named and it’s Kat and GenJones?? THIS CALLS FOR CELEBRATION!
UNLIMITED JUICE FOR EVERYONE!
Jason’s Advice to Men:
1. Never drink and drive.
2. Never do drugs.
3. Never gamble away your life savings in LV.
4. Never get married – no matter what lies spew from that cunt’s mouth!
I’m a little unclear as to how you expose people to the world by doing nothing but posting on their blog, but I see we’ve entered the “random comments unrelated to anything being said” stage of the conversation anyway.
Women wish but one thing upon men. What is that? To transfer the suffer-ring they might have worn upon their own shoulders to men’s backs. Women will repeat the same lie all day long all year long – you’re loved, you’re a friend, you’re family. Is any of that true? Sure it is – right up to the point where your value is replaced by a wealthier, better looking, more useful man.
Don’t be a naive fool. Women love themselves. You’re only in the mix to enrich their personal lives. Once you’ve outlived your usefulness, you’ll be discarded. Don’t be that fool.
Don’t become a cunt’s fool.
So I haz a confuz. You hate western society and all its weakness, but you also despise anyone who isn’t western. So… does that mean that the above is a compliment to Kat and GenJones?
Your rhetoric needs vector calculus to keep up with.
@jason – citation needed.
In other words, you’d prefer to pretend that you’ve been oppressed into silence than admit you have literally no response to the challenge that’s been put to you, even when the floor is open and the world wide web is at your fingertips. What’s the matter? It’s not like you’ve been banned or anything.
Also I love how Jason’s most heinous examples of evil dictators are two men. No cognitive dissonance there! Carry on!
I’m not sure why someone who thinks everyone who doesn’t belong to the same demographics as himself are inferior is comparing other people to Hitler.
I’m going with bot too.
Women can’t be trusted with the vote because women seek only self-entitlement.
Why did women protest the outcome of the Ghomeshi trial after it was proven that the witnesses lied, colluded, withheld evidence and mislead the prosecution? Because women are SHIT.
@WWTH
Bot would explain why he can’t create a coherent thought but considering he did answer Alan’s questions point by point, I’d say he’s just a sad, little man who needs to get frustration off his chest at his own shortcomings rather than take time for true introspection and growth.
So you agree with Mothers Against Drunk Drivers, got you.
So you’re with Nancy Reagan on that one?
So you’re with Dworkin, Greer, et al. A whole bunch of second wave Feminists, basically, who opposed marriage as an institution.
Anyone know of any women heavily into anti-gambling activism? Going to go out on a limb and bet that there are. And then get slapped down by said women for betting, of course.
Never get married, men. Getting married is caving to women’s shaming tactics. Every year – in the US alone – tens upon tens of fathers commit suicide. Every year, in the US alone, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of men’s lives are destroyed by greedy, entitled, narcissistic, sociopathic women.
Do not become the next Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III Sucker.
Real Men Say No to Marriage
@ pandapool
48
He’s right, please do not become the next sucker of Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III. My wife will object quite strongly if you do, and I won’t be too happy about it either.
@Jason
You are the last person anyone should want as a political ally.
*You make sweeping assertions about individuals and groups of people without any apparent ability to back your shit up. So any ally should worry when it comes your to being able to rationally detect more than “made Jason feel bad”.
*You act like simply stating things in strong language is enough to prove something. So any ally should worry that you don’t see a difference between political style and substance.
*When confronted with contradictory information you change the subject and switch to all caps which suggests that you get by on yelling a lot. Any ally should worry about what happens when you meet someone that yelling does not work on.
*You are perfectly happy deciding people are evil based on literally nothing but the fact that you feel negatively about them.
I feel sorry for you. This cannot hold in the long term. I don’t think you actually have any ability to understand the world beyond what some other human being dominates into you, and you act like we are all like you.
I truly wish you have not been hurt like you have been, but that does not make your inability to describe reality in a satisfactory fashion any less absent.
That’s it. I knew you were a number between 40 and 60. Most seem to be around 20 and 60 here so I narrowed it down well. Haha.
(Okay, I just confused you for someone else, alright?? And so I thought you were in your sixties at first but that didn’t seem right so I changed it to a ball park. If it proves anything, you’re just wise beyond your years! And I’m totally not just bad at remembering things!)
I’ve been married since 2003 and I dated her from 1995. There are simply no pains in our relationship that can be boiled down to “because they are women” the way you present.
Don’t pretend to speak for all of us. If you had bad experiences they are yours and do not explain more than you. Hopefully at some point you will gain the ability to use research data. Maybe one of us can teach you.
To the idiots that feel sorry for me – marriage is dying. Why? Because women have removed any incentive for men to get married. Men are opting out of marriage the globe over – yet morons like “Brony, Social Justice Cenobite” call ME out. What a douche bag! What the fuck are you saying, asshole? That the massive decline in marriage the world over is my fault? Fuck you and the SJW you rode in on.
This one’s adorable. Can we keep him?
@ Jason
Thank you for answering my questions. I have to be honest though and say I’m sceptical about the truthfulness of some of your biographical details. It’s only fair to you that I explain why and give you a chance to refute/rebut.
I get the impression that you’re really young and you’re creating your biography out of things you’ve read or seen on MRA sites or computer games.
Your “too old” answer didn’t ring true. It was like the opposite of the “hello fellow kids” thing. It sounded like a young teenager trying to join in an adult conversation by dropping in something like “phew, what about those property taxes eh?”
Similarly your purported military experience. I have had a lot of experience around military people (as a ‘civilian contractor’). I have friends in the military. No real military person talks like that. It is the sort of language that’s common with what we call “Walts”. That’s people who pretend to have been in the services. The tone you use is more common with young Walts on the net. It’s cliched video game/comic book language (older Walts tend to quote from books like ‘Bravo Two Zero’).
Same with the ‘not incriminating myself’ thing. You see a lot of that talk on sites like Bullshido, where the more obnoxious idiots of the martial arts world go to brag (although there it’s a bit of a game that’s encouraged). Some people will tell about the “literally hundreds” of street fights they’ve won, but when pressed for details “I can’t say, I’ll incriminate myself” is a pretty standard response.
Your bit about all the man hating women who’ve hurt you and your horrible ex just seems culled from bog standard MRA/MGTOW narrative. It’s the fantasy archetype MGTOW but distilled from the claims of numerous others and out together like a composite character in a ‘based on real events’ story.
I suspect you created this identity from the MGTOW boards you’ve been reading. The same source for your assertions. You’re just repeating the talking points but with nothing of your own to back them up.
Hence why I think you’re very young. I think the ‘naive’ thing may be a bit of projection.
If you’re that young, why do the women hating? May I suggest my theory. You’re young and the world seems scary to you, especially women. They’re mysterious creatures and you’re a bit envious when you see women your age acting with such seeming confidence and coping with maturity so much better. So pestering women on the net is a safe way for you to get back at them and big yourself up.
Am I close to the mark there?
If I’m completely wrong feel free to correct me, but I’ll need perhaps some evidence to demonstrate that I am
PS: I really like Pandapool, so don’t really appreciate the name calling.
Funny, I don’t see anything of actual substance to what Jason is saying.
Just whining that because his view of marriage is his and mine is mine somehow all marriages are like his.
Because he says so.
“Alan Robertshaw
April 12, 2016 at 1:00 am
@ Jason”
I don’t really give a shit what you think of me, Alan. I gave an honest account of my life. If that bothers you, then you have every right to go fuck yourself.
Nevertheless – I saw promise in your posts. At this point- I haven’t’ yet fully written you off. You seem a good type.
So – “Man Up” and join – or not.
@Jason
Sure you don’t give a shit.
That’s why you said nothing and felt no urge to state that did not give a shit.
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/mlp/images/b/bf/Discord_laughing_2_S2E02.png/revision/latest?cb=20121223225546
“@ Jason
Thank you for answering my questions. I have to be honest though and say I’m skeptical about the truthfulness of some of your biographical details. It’s only fair to you that I explain why and give you a chance to refute/rebut.
I get the impression that you’re really young and you’re creating your biography out of things you’ve read or seen on MRA sites or computer games.
Your “too old” answer didn’t ring true. It was like the opposite of the “hello fellow kids” thing. It sounded like a young teenager trying to join in an adult conversation by dropping in something like “phew, what about those property taxes eh?”
Similarly your purported military experience. I have had a lot of experience around military people (as a ‘civilian contractor’). I have friends in the military. No real military person talks like that. It is the sort of language that’s common with what we call “Walts”. That’s people who pretend to have been in the services. The tone you use is more common with young Walts on the net. It’s cliched video game/comic book language (older Walts tend to quote from books like ‘Bravo Two Zero’).
Same with the ‘not incriminating myself’ thing. You see a lot of that talk on sites like Bullshido, where the more obnoxious idiots of the martial arts world go to brag (although there it’s a bit of a game that’s encouraged). Some people will tell about the “literally hundreds” of street fights they’ve won, but when pressed for details “I can’t say, I’ll incriminate myself” is a pretty standard response.
Your bit about all the man hating women who’ve hurt you and your horrible ex just seems culled from bog standard MRA/MGTOW narrative. It’s the fantasy archetype MGTOW but distilled from the claims of numerous others and out together like a composite character in a ‘based on real events’ story.
I suspect you created this identity from the MGTOW boards you’ve been reading. The same source for your assertions. You’re just repeating the talking points but with nothing of your own to back them up.
Hence why I think you’re very young. I think the ‘naive’ thing may be a bit of projection.
If you’re that young, why do the women hating? May I suggest my theory. You’re young and the world seems scary to you, especially women. They’re mysterious creatures and you’re a bit envious when you see women your age acting with such seeming confidence and coping with maturity so much better. So pestering women on the net is a safe way for you to get back at them and big yourself up.
Am I close to the mark there?
If I’m completely wrong feel free to correct me, but I’ll need perhaps some evidence to demonstrate that I am
PS: I really like Pandapool, so don’t really appreciate the name calling.”
One day – You’ll remember tearing down a guy that tried to lift you up. It’s going to be good for your character.
“Fuck off and join me!”
This guy is the gift that keeps on giving.
@Alan Robertshaw
If I’m intruding let me know. Jason has no moral position to tell me to butt out, but you do and I don’t think that what I might bring to this is worth violating that.
@ KAT-
In all honesty, no, not really. Most of my life up until fairly recently has been dominated by bullies, users, abusers and dysfunctional social dynamics. I went through most of my journey without outside support, or at least not through anything that directly addressed my issues, partly due to my isolation. More recently I’ve read “Breaking the Cycle of Abuse” and “Toxic Parents”, but before I broke my chains mostly I just tried to model myself after people and characters who struck me for their quality of goodness and reasonability, qualities I found lacking in the people in my personal life. I might have become a real hater, but I recognized that these qualities couldn’t really be grouped by demographic. So I was stuck between being a total misanthrope or a realist. And I’m still stuck somewhere in between those.
I fully understand that it’s a natural defense mechanism to take one’s power back by mirroring outside aggression, which is part of the reason why I had a reputation as one of the most belligerent, stubborn kids of all time. I don’t believe there’s such a thing as inherently bad people and believe they were the victims of some misfortune of nature and nurture and that children are often unquestioning. But I also firmly believe that a journey starts with self guidance, and the guidance one seeks out is determined by intent. I went out of my way to become the kind of person who can be in an intimate relationship for years without getting in a real argument (though I punch holes in walls sometimes when I’m alone) because my intent was to become a better functioning person than my tormentors. Some adopt the “if you can’t beat em, join em” strategy, even if it is unconsciously.
Men – If there are any left here – The #1 way you can destroy your life is by signing the marriage contract. When your sign the marriage contact – you sign your life over to a woman. Marriage is now used by women to bait men into male life destroying death traps.
Never give a woman the ring of power. If you do – she’ll turn that ring of power against you and destroy your life. Never trust a woman.
@Everyone
I’m going to start listing Jason’s assertions. There are bound to be some interesting patterns in there. Let me know if I miss any. I’m hoping that this might be useful for profiles in the future when I have multiple examples of people like this willing to dump data so willingly.
*Lesbians are responsible for affirmative consent because they hate men.
*Affirmative consent is designed to make men terrified to have sex or to force them into marriage to have sex.
*Feminists have destroyed social institutions.
*Feminists want to modify the justice system to allow women to collude, lie and withhold evidence.
*Rape statistics are fraudulent and inspired by lesbians.
*The chances of a rape claim being true or false are 50/50.
*Because some women lie, cheat and manipulate we should not believe a claim of rape.
*When there is evidence that a woman falsely accused someone of rape the cops don’t go after them.
*When there is lack of evidence that a crime occurred we should prosecute accusers.
*Feminists think that all women who claim rape are telling the truth.
*The violence against women act is about making men guilty by default and requires no evidence.
*There are feminists that have said they want men to be castrated, beaten, mass murdered and/or imprisoned and this means that women accuse men of violence falsely.
*Because some women have hired men to beat them so they can file a false rape claim women should not be believed when they file rape claims (funny that this does not make all men accomplices of false rape claims).
*When someone uses ALL CAPS THAT MAKES THEIR ASSERTIONS MORE TRUTHY!
*Because I like my mother you can believe me when I make fact-free assertions about woman and how they choose men based on money, wealth and power and how they are inferior to men who only choose based on looks.
*Women only wanted equal rights because labor was most favorable and war deaths were most unlikely.
*Women use men to destroy other men.
*Men hate women because of women and Jason does not have to prove anything they say.
*Women are manipulative because of violent fathers.
*Feminism is responsible for the fall of the Roman empire.
*Women only care about women.
*Women use men to farther women’s causes.
*There are no consequences for women joining the military because men die for women.
*Women are born cowards.
*Woman are men’s worst enemies even when they are a man’s mother.
*Women vote based on why gives women free stuff. This explains why women are cowards and sacrifice the lives of their sons and why ISIS likes Hillary.
*Gay people have mental illness just like lesbians because they break the rules.
*Tens of thousands of white people are killed in south Africa and no one on the political left talks about it.
*In south America and Mexico you will be killed because you are white.
*When people point out that I have backed up none of my arguments that means they are Frankfurt school Marxist Leftists.
Bonus:
*The person that thinks that all woman are lying, cheating, manipulative monsters also wants to pretend that we hate all men (which would suck if it were true, but you don’t get to make that moral claim like it’s awful at this point).
*It’s ok to have absolutely awful opinions about women and give them freely, but when someone asks you what your opinion of gay people is chicken out and cry about someone controlling a narrative.
Once upon a time – a prince proposed to a princess. The princess refused. The prince lived happily ever after.
We can write a quick script to replace him. It can rotate between two or three variations on “Don’t get married.”
See?
Jason’s comments appear to be exerpts from every one of David’s blogposts over the years.
Thats how trite and repetitive they are.
This has been hugely entertaining for me to read.
Seems like you’ve supplied your own explanation. I’m in my twenties and I’ve been seriously proposed to five times, and I’ve never been married or had kids because I opted to decline (thank goodness, in retrospect). In fact, it seems to me that marriage is on the decline like the birthrate because women suddenly have better options than playing house and are better off having a family after they’ve established themselves rather than jumping on the first prospect who comes along. Analysis has shown that women are still getting married and having kids, just as much as ten years later. That delay is going to show a dramatic decline in the overall marriage rate.
Fuck women. Fuck the men that support the fucked women.
*This has the same informational content when it comes to evidence*
Men – If there are any left here – The #1 way you can destroy your life is by [burning the sacred puppies].
When your sign the marriage contact – you sign your life over to a woman. Marriage is now [for government programs designed to make Spanish the new global economic language].
Never give a woman [ The necronomicon, she will raise the dead and feast on the living]. Never trust a woman.
@Jason
What, more non-literalisms with no actual connection to reality that you can articulate?
I really want you to be more, useful maybe? Useful is a terrible word for someone who seems to have had some unpleasant experiences, but when you are using those to step on the experiences of others you don’t really get to appeal to them as if they mean much.
It was one time. ONE. TIME.
“Brony, Social Justice Cenobite
April 12, 2016 at 1:32 am
@Jason
Once upon a time – a prince proposed to a princess. The princess refused. The prince lived happily ever after.
What, more non-literalisms with no actual connection to reality that you can articulate? ”
What do I love most about you? What I love most about you is that you’ll someday be me.
http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff223/Aliceknot/download_zps3ac61pdm.png
@Jason
Well that’s nice and simple. Maybe we can start here?
Will I grow 50% more parvalbumin and cholinergic interneurons in my striatum?
Yeah, I was tending towards ‘bitter and divorced’, but the ‘teenager terrified of asking a girl out’ is starting to show.
Look, kid. Just ask her. Worst that could happen is she’ll say no. Honestly, the first time you get turned down it hurts pretty bad, but it’s good in the long run because it’ll hurt less in future.
What do women think about when they get married? They think about
(1) The most stable of men.
(2) The most titled of men.
(3) The most moneyed of men.
(4) The best looking man.
Don’t believe me? READ THE FUCKING INTERNET! A woman’s vagina – you’re mothers vagina – is nothing but a cash cow! In this age of equality – still yet – women trade their couches for cash! All women are whores – including your mother!
Because the internet never lies!!!ELEVENTY!11!!111
There is cash flowing from them cows! Enough to make your student loans! Never mind that Cows don’t actually have anything to do with vaginas and money, I made it sound like something!
Nice way to refer to your mother, Jason.
She must be so proud.