Categories
Uncategorized

Open thread for discussion of Jian Ghomeshi acquittal

Jian Ghomeshi
Jian Ghomeshi

Today, as CBCNews reports:

Jian Ghomeshi has been acquitted on four counts of sexual assault and one count of choking by an Ontario Court judge who says the “deceptive and manipulative” evidence of the complainants raised a reasonable doubt in the guilt of the former CBC Radio host.

Share your thoughts below. This thread is a NO TROLL/NO MRA etc thread.

102 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
weirwoodtreehugger
8 years ago

I really liked Black Rock. It was a pleasant surprise! I’ve seen a shit ton of survival horror and I thought it was going to be just another generic entry into that subgenre, but it actually has some substance.

Leda Atomica
Leda Atomica
8 years ago

@ WWTH

It’s also such misandry and doing womaning wrong, because it had a feeeemale director. Katie Aselton, who also kicks ass as one of the lead characters, really made the movie look as cold and threatening as the world can be for women. I had no expectations going in, but was very pleasantly surprised, not only as a feminist but as a horror fan. It’s a good watch even if you don’t appreciate the social commentary. But I personally appreciated the substance.

@VP

comment image

Victorious Parasol
Victorious Parasol
8 years ago

@ Leda

A sentiment I’ve felt on occasion.

Fishy Goat
Fishy Goat
8 years ago

Another thoughtful bit of discussion:

The Ghomeshi Verdict: Re-imagining How Future Sexual Assault Cases Are Heard
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-sayers/the-ghomeshi-verdict-reim_b_9544430.html?utm_hp_ref=crime&ir=Crime

FriendlyFyre
FriendlyFyre
8 years ago

@NicolaLuna

I’m glad you got something out of my post, and I’m sorry for what that person did to you. The idea that survivors immediately shrink in fear or stop associating their rapist is such a pernicious myth and all you need to do is look at how rape and survivors are portrayed in media (visceral, traumatizing, rapists as inhuman and survivors as clear victims) to understand WHY people (especially men) completely can’t comprehend it.

But just like domestic abuse, the ability to get away from an abuser is constrained by fear, and our own ability to rationalize someone’s behavior.

Partially i think it’s because when we say “rape” or rapist” we are conditioned to act with revulsion because it’s a concrete statement, but the act is sometimes so subtle and often seems to come out of nowhere from a person we like and trust that survivors don’t feel right calling it what it really is (Not to mention how much we are conditioned to forgive people who hurt us). And that means people simply refuse to believe that a person who was hurt in that way wouldn’t immediately feel it and run away from the person who did it…

@Moocow

Same to you, I feel like this is landmark case for understanding victim-blaming’s effect on rape verdicts. For instance, look at all the people defending the verdict who insist that the women MUST have been trying to smear Ghomeshi’s reputation, when in reality the judge CLEARLY stated that their ruling didn’t mean he didn’t hurt them, just that (in his opinion, and fuck him) there was “reasonable doubt”

“Reasonable doubt” for rape cases is such a loaded term because most of the public STILL doesn’t understand how ingrained the “perfect victim” mindset is…

Bina
Bina
8 years ago

@rick:

I stopped following this case cause I knew he’d be exonerated. I recently saw an article about the victims “colluding” with each other. Not sure if that’s what worked to get this verdict, but its indicative of how rape is framed depending on its social context. In the West, unless its the maniac-in-an-alleyway trope, rape does not exist. We are too “civilized” for that, and of course, civilized here is translated as white, European, straight and male. So women who accuse men of rape in this context are “falsely accusing” because rape does not exist in the civilized western world. Whereas, elsewhere, it is part of “their culture”. The Cologne attacks are a perfect example of this dichotomy. Those rapes were “real” because they were committed by non-white, “foreign” men, outsiders on the edge of civilization. Cause its always them, and never us… cue the rightist blathering… and on and on and on…

My thoughts exactly. And that’s why I quit following the trial too, for the most part. I’m not usually an “Oh god, I can’t look” person, but…when they started whacking the complainants, I literally could not bring myself to sit through it. It was getting too much like seeing a bear-baiting session in progress.

It was also too much of a reminder that when a man is supposedly tried for assaulting a woman, it’s really the woman who is on trial. HE wasn’t even called on to testify in his own so-called defence. It was just his lawyer, ripping one woman after another apart and bamboozling the judge (who has a history of letting men off even when there’s DNA evidence to convict!) Where is the justice in that? Won’t somebody think about the fucking MENZ?

Father Goose
Father Goose
8 years ago

Not sure if its been posted yet but Lucy has done an interview about the trial.

http://www.chatelaine.com/news/exclusive-lucy-decoutere-on-the-ghomeshi-disaster/

katz
8 years ago

Who is on the phone and has no time for customers who buy books to match the couch.

But how does he feel about thick leather-bound editions of Yeats?

(I do not have the fortitude to talk about the case or even look up all the gory details, sorry.)

Moocow
Moocow
8 years ago

@FriendlyFyre

It reminds me a lot of the logical fallacies I’ve seen involving conspiracy theorists. Just because a small piece of logic is technically true (jet fuel can’t melt steel beams!) doesn’t mean it has any bearing on the matter at hands (The melting point of steel beams is irrelevant. Anyone with a basic understanding of mechanical/civil engineering can explain how buckling happens and how the heat of burning jet fuel is enough to cause the the steel beams to buckle, which is exactly what happened)

Naturally, this gets exacerbated when discussing sexual assault since it’s a lot harder to disprove faulty logic involving human behavior.

Bina
Bina
8 years ago

Partially i think it’s because when we say “rape” or rapist” we are conditioned to act with revulsion because it’s a concrete statement, but the act is sometimes so subtle and often seems to come out of nowhere from a person we like and trust that survivors don’t feel right calling it what it really is (Not to mention how much we are conditioned to forgive people who hurt us). And that means people simply refuse to believe that a person who was hurt in that way wouldn’t immediately feel it and run away from the person who did it…

And sometimes, it’s so subtle that there’s not even any kind of “hurt” involved. Whenever I was assaulted, it was always by guys I liked as a friend. And it never left so much as a mark on me, physically anyway.

Once, it was a guy who used to give me rides home from the local writers’ group meeting — an older guy, married. After he’d sprung his unwanted sexual intentions on me, I avoided him and caught rides home with someone more trustworthy. What clinches it as assault in my mind, and not a mere “misunderstanding” between a naïve young thing (I was 20 and virginal) and the poor old well-intentioned coot she’d inadvertently “led on”, was the fact that he waited until I was buckled into a moving car before he made his move. I couldn’t escape. He had me right where he wanted me. I was SO disgusted, and not just with him. I blamed myself for never having seen it coming.

And once, there was a friend I went out with one night, and made out with on the floor beforehand. Good-looking guy. Kind of fancied him, until. I never saw him again after that; it was him doing the avoiding, not me, which cements in my mind the understanding that he knew what he was doing, and he knew it was wrong. That was the part that I now recognize as his guilt admitting itself. That he knew he’d raped me. That maybe he’d done it to others before me, too, because he seemed just a bit too smooth, too practiced, to have just been totally spontaneous about wanting a BJ and not bothering to ask first.

It took me years to even just call these experiences “assault” or “sexual assault”, because there’d been no overt violence involved, and I wasn’t hurt or traumatized in any way. I didn’t get PTSD or blackouts, didn’t engage in any unusual behavior at all. I was still entirely myself, before, during and after. I was more stunned than anything else, that they would just do that. The only thing that was hurt was my trust in them, and my understanding that yes, I too am now a date-rape (and sexual-assault) statistic — one of the vast unknown number of ones that never press charges, because everybody blames us, and nobody wants to count us; we’re a waste of police time and resources, as we’re often given to know. We don’t fit the “true victim profile”, because we’re not cowering in corners wetting ourselves. I don’t even like to see myself as one, because “victim” is practically a cussword in these oh-so-libertarian times. And because like so many others, I bought into the idea that there are “right” and “wrong” ways of being a victim. And because the word carries such connotations of abuse and bruises, and I have none to speak of, because the assault was less an abuse of my body than it was of my trust. But there it is.

And even after more than 20 years, I’m still having trouble saying it of myself. Because to say it is to admit that this rape-culture thing really IS a thing, and it’s more endemic than even I, a long-time feminist, could ever have thought. And that fucking scares me, even more than the guys who assaulted me did.

epitome of incomprehensibility

His emails and phone messages/texts to the complainants? Inadmissible – although THEIRS are dredged up to be analyzed and cited as “proof” that consensual contact continued after the assault, therefore the assault was clearly consensual. (Notable leap of logic, that, equating an individual’s desire that a relationship continue in some form with her desire for every occurrence within the relationship to have occurred, and even to recur in the future.)

(Quote from @dlouwe) – Exactly. And that I find really frustrating: the way the defense framed it as just some angry exes ganging up on poor JG – how he couldn’t have been guilty of hitting or choking the women since they (or at least one of them) continued a relationship with him and it wasn’t likely that someone abused could act that way, etc. etc. (I don’t like that the Montreal paper The Gazette continues to reprint articles from Christie Blatchford – perhaps I shouldn’t target one journalist like that, but she seems to be all about this sort of victim blaming. She had an article today that the editor headed “Verdict Only One Possible” and I didn’t want to even look at it before going to work because I knew it’d make me angry.) It’s like ignoring all that’s been studied about abusive relationships ever before. The “perfect victim” myth is a silencing tactic, like other people here said.

Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
8 years ago

Matchstick, Refinery29 also has a decent overview of the events of the case.
http://www.refinery29.com/2016/02/102715/jian-ghomeshi-sex-assault-trial

Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
8 years ago

This used to be a double post, but now it’s just a false alarm. Thought the Hyperlink Mammoth had beaten me, but I’ve recovered the original post.
OT: anyone got plans for the Easter weekend? My dad’s family all canceled on the usual meal-can anyone else who’s Stateside recommend a place for us to get a quick, light lunch before Easter dinner with my mom’s family?

Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
Nikki the Bluth Wannabe
8 years ago

Cases like this are why I have a note saved in the Notepad function of my phone reminding myself that if I get raped, which means any form of unwanted genital contact, I should call the police and preserve the evidence until I can get a rape kit and a police interview, which would (hopefully) lay ground for me to make a criminal accusation against the rapist.
I don’t intend to suggest that any other reaction is wrong-everyone handles traumatic events differently and I can understand why other people act differently in the wake of the same situation. It’s just the only reaction I can imagine where I leave the situation with the sense that I did everything I could to fight back, self-advocate, and make the rapist pay for what they (but statistically more likely, he) did. Personally, I’d rather fight with every possible means available to me, even if nobody else believes me and seemingly the whole world’s against me, than hold back due to the severe societal pressure and end up wishing I’d done more.
It’s late and my emotions are running high-if you think I’ve said any of this in a problematic way, please tell me and I’ll address your concerns tomorrow or later in the week, when I’m thinking more clearly.

Vajassa Faldocci - Feminist Attorney
Vajassa Faldocci - Feminist Attorney
8 years ago

The patriarchal court system likes to acquit rapists when there is no evidence, in order to built it I urge sisters to add more accusations following the legal advice of attorneys specialised in allegations against men

Makroth
Makroth
8 years ago

I’ll bite. Credentials, please, Vajassa.

Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
8 years ago

That is the worst gotcha I’ve ever seen. And I was here for Pelagic.

opposablethumbs
opposablethumbs
8 years ago

VF-FA you sound awfully like a fairytale creature that lives under a bridge to me.

There was of course plenty of evidence – and the court recognised that the acts of violence had taken place just as described.

Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
8 years ago

Google says “Vajassa Faldocci” is a feMRA who plays a straw feminist character for her buddies on AVFM. Just in case the everything didn’t give it away.

Unfortunately for her, this is a troll-free thread.

WeirwoodTreeHugger
WeirwoodTreeHugger
8 years ago

Yeah, that was waaaaaay too obvious.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
8 years ago

Just for my curiosity, are there any bona fide feminist groups who legit refer to each other/other women as “sisters” in a non-ironic way?

Mish
Mish
8 years ago

Just saw Vajassa’s comment this morning when I got up – ermergerd, that’s just awful. I’m torn between hilarity, and offense that she thinks people here are actually that silly.
Effort: D-
Content: D-

@Policy of Madness – none that I can think of! I’d get some very strange looks indeed if I referred to women in my groups as ‘sister’ 😀

Anon Ymous
Anon Ymous
8 years ago

My wife and I were asked about ten years ago (when we were both very young and not yet married) if we were “sisters”. The person asking looked left-wing/hippie/(possibly lesbian) enough to me that I responded “No, we’re partners”‘ to which she replied with a laugh “That’s what I meant, dearies! Sapphic sisters!”

That’s the only time “sister” has ever been used to me as meaning “member of a group” unironically.

I think.

:p

History Nerd
History Nerd
8 years ago

I think a lot of sex criminals are aware of how the legal system works and how memory can be complicated and take advantage of that. It seems like Ghomeshi groomed people by developing a fake “nice guy” persona and promising people career advancement. Though I guess he couldn’t resist the urge to be an abusive asshole to his staff on Q.