As I write this, the ballots are still being counted, but it’s clear this is a big night for Trump. And a terrible night for Marco Rubio, who lost his home state of Florida and bowed out of the race.
So naturally, Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters (many of whom are also sort of white supremacists) took to Twitter to crow about Mr. T’s various victories. And call people cucks.
Did I mention that these are the guys who like to call people cucks? Well, they are.
https://twitter.com/Ali_in_So_Cali/status/709938562662150148
https://twitter.com/redgullsjeffrey/status/709938801276137472
https://twitter.com/robo_junkie/status/709933440779464704
https://twitter.com/SodomyRockets/status/709939915874639874
https://twitter.com/MikeVivian/status/709945091163627520
https://twitter.com/rhowlingcoyote/status/709905625354883073
https://twitter.com/_deSaintJust/status/709901935344750592
https://twitter.com/dave1163sag/status/709903955451637761
https://twitter.com/shellwinder/status/709929365681934336
@anjiecast cuck tears make Trump stronger
— Christopher Williams (@neon_shadows) March 16, 2016
https://twitter.com/uncleancasuals/status/709921039422242816
I feel a little bad for this guy, though.
What does cuck mean
—  (@dustypoker) March 16, 2016
Dude, you’re better off not knowing.
Note: There are actually worse Tweets out there containing the word “cuck,” but I’m not sure anyone reading this really deserves to be subjected to the wisdom of Twitter users @AdversaryOfJews, @bloodandsoil4, or @jewsf**kbabys. (And yes, aside from the asterisks, those are real Twitter accounts.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us/politics/donald-trump-butler-mar-a-lago.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&pgtype=imageslideshow&module=RelatedArticleList®ion=CaptionArea&version=SlideCard-1
Democracy? Who needs democracy! It sounds a lot like Democrat!
That beta male, George Washington, turned down the title of king. Yes, he was a slave master, but now that the Orange Man is on the scene, we can afford to have more stringent standards!
https://twitter.com/JimSterling/status/709057352884948992
https://twitter.com/JimSterling/status/709058991645728768
‘Cuck’ is everywhere now it seems
Sort of like when #gamergaters started posting some of their memes as posters at their school.
One of the ones they posted was this, based on WW2 propaganda, but utterly opaque to anyone outside the GG world.
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/837450-totalbiscuit
This entire campaign season has been a slow motion nightmare.
I’ve never been much of a fan of the Republican Party, but I honestly never thought they were incompetent enough to let things get this far out of hand, then again who knows maybe in a two man race Trump would just be winning with majorities instead of pluralities.
Trump is Reacher Gilt from Going Postal. A brutal monster in a clown costume.
I always found Gytha Ogg to be much, much scarier than Granny. Granny can drop a mountain on you. Nanny Ogg can subtly ruin your life in ways that make the mountain-drop seem like the soft option.
@David Futrelle:
TotalBiscuit? Of course…
Not being on Twitter, and not being interested in it either, I have to ask: How come these are real Twitter accounts? Why does Twitter allow accounts with these names to exist?
And yes, the more I read/see the news of late, the more I want to leave this planet for a better place. Preferably with two or more suns.
I really hope that the Berniebros can bring themselves to vote for Clinton and don’t vote for Trump out of pique (as polls suggest many might).
@snorkmaiden:
I read recently that 8% of Sanders supporters said they would switch to Trump if Clinton won the nomination, and 12% said they’d stay home.
A mere 80% of the electorate is still quorate, I believe, so IMHO that’s no great cause for concern.
I wonder what those numbers would look like for Republicans if Trump wins the nomination? How many would switch sides, or just stay home?
NickNameNick:
Blue and naked?
I’d quite like to see Angua of the Ankh Morpork City watch get her claws into the Orange one. As a (kind of) woman who immigrated from Uberwald and works in a “man’s job” she’s make him into a chew toy 🙂
Vetinari wouldn’t throw him in the pit, he’s too useful a distraction…though he may just leave him stranded on the island of Leshp after awhile.
Maybe Ridicully could talk over him or turn him into a frog?
I’m going to be different here and imagine Trump meeting Lady Sybil. A woman who doesn’t meet his standards of beauty, and yet has more class in her smallest toe than he has in his whole body.
Plus, if we’re lucky, one of her dragons would drool on him.
This is the first election campaign season that brought back memories of Barry Goldwater and the reactions of adults I knew or the news reports they listened to covering Goldwater’s dislike of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. I remember my friends telling me what they heard or what their parents said that left them frightened of Goldwater as president. I remember a fellow schoolyard child stating she couldn’t live in a country run by Goldwater, probably repeating what her parents said. What I hear now about Trump and possible violence is far more repulsive in rhetoric than the sixties but seems to bring up similar reactions.
There was commentary I vaguely remembered from 64, so I went looking. I did not know until now but it was Martin Luther King Jr. who predicted the possibility that if Goldwater were elected, the nation would erupt into “violence and riots, the like of which we have never seen before.” This was because Goldwater thought a government should have all taxes go the defense budget not to interfering in hiring or housing minorities.
It seems like Trump is this era’s threat to progressive social ideals with the addition of a rather striking lack of consistent political philosophy, unlike Goldwater. The points of similarity are really only the possibility of violence and the push to change the nature of political and cultural criticism on the right and even in surrounding US politics. I don’t think Trumpism as populist conservatism, is a good thing, but it may be a real thing, just as Goldwater’s libertariansim was.
I second Victorious Parasol in wishing Lady Sybil’s dragons could drool on the whole orangery.
Trump reminds me a bit of Reacher Gilt in “Going Postal”. No physical resemblance, just in terms of being a major scam artist.
What you are missing is that the scorpion pit (or any similar fate), if initiated by Vetinari , are always preceded by a pointed stare.
@Ddog – yes, Angua. Orange wolf-food (and I don’t mean food for orange wolves).
Yeah, that confused me as well. I think they’re losing track of the original meaning of the term. And I suppose that’s all for the good — better it indicate mere free-floating disapprobation than its original denotation.
And although I hate the content of the tweet, “NeilDaGrassfedBison” is a rather clever name.
@lamuella
That strikes me as unfair towards Gilt, Trump’s nowhere near that smart or self-aware. He reminds me more of Mayonnaise Quirke of the Day Watch, in that he too is rich, thick and oily.
He’s like Wheatley from Portal 2: A hilarious but homicidal moron-by-design bumbling his way to the top.
@EJ
I’ve seen those numbers as well. They are somewhat depressing, but I have to figure that 8% represents Sanders’ crossover appeal. Anyone who would consider voting for Trump over Clinton probably doesn’t have much of a history of voting for democrats. I don’t think we’ll miss them too much.
@Jamesworkshop
Oh hell, I’d love to see the Stormtrumpers take on Jim Fucking Sterling Son. Chewing up and spitting out assholes and bigots is when he’s at his best.
@ EpicurusHog
So we should get Gaspode to tell Trump he’s got an itchy bottom?
Prickle, prickle, prickle.
@ zyvlyn
The BBC have had a lot of analysis of the US primaries. One thing that surprised me was how many commentators (from across the political spectrum) expressed the view that if it came down to a Clinton/Trump contest, Trump could expect to pick up quite a few votes from Sanders supporters and Democrats generally.
The Ex Sanders supporters would just be those who were generally angry and would vote for any ‘not an insider’ candidate regardless of actual policies. I can sort of see that.
But what did surprise me was the expectation that there would be Democrats who thought Trump overall represented traditional Democratic views more than Clinton.
Or, more likely, any “Not a woman” candidate. We are talking about the BernieBros here.
@ Alan
Do whaaaaaaaaat?
I come from a long line of yeller dogs (as in, “I’ll vote for a Democrat even if they put a yeller dog on the ticket”) and I’m trying to figure out how anybody could think Trump represents traditional Democratic views. My brain now hurts.
I bet this one got a lot of takers.
And by “takers”, I mean CRICKETS.