The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive is on! If you haven’t already, please consider donating through the PayPal button below. Thanks!
Oh dear. Apparently the women of the western world are having a lot of sex. And we all know where that leads, right? THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION.
Over on Roosh’s equally horrifying and risible Return of Kings, Max Roscoe (a self-described “aspiring philosopher king”) sets forth his vision of our apocalyptic “sexual future.”
Already deeply enmeshed in a world of “financial insolvency, moral weakness, social instability, destruction of the traditional family, and political corruption,” Roscoe warns we are edging ever closer to some sort of Mad Max future, only with much fatter women.
Expect a world in which we have
fewer freedoms, less economic opportunity, a weaker currency, a declining moral compass, more hypergamy, slut acceptance, and the pervasiveness of masculine, tattooed up, large, bossy women.
Even worse, Roscoe warns:
If the trends of feminism continue, society faces a future with loud, shrill, fat, manly, neon colored, sexualized women full of shrapnel and graffiti.
Wait, didn’t you just say that already? Apparently our dystopian future won’t have copy editors.
And it will be a world in which piercings are referred to as “shrapnel,” tattoos as “graffiti.”
Anyway, after warning us about these brightly colored, shrapnel-filled fatties — who bear more that a little bit of a resemblance to the contemporary feminist stereotypes I wrote about in my last post — Roscoe paints a picture of today’s sexual landscape, filled with young women who
are so free and loose with their bodies that they become physically aged and degraded, not to mention losing the ability to pair bond with a life partner.
Yep, Red Pill “science” has proven that when women have contact with more than one penis in their lifetime it turns them into a sort of female version of Dorian Gray, only without that painting in the attic. Meanwhile, men who sleep with lots of women remain eternally young.
If you meet a 25-year-old woman today, she has likely performed more degrading and perverse sex acts than a married woman of a generation or two prior completed in her entire lifetime. If we consider the cases of sexting, camwhoring, slutification, Dubai-whoring, pre-marital sex, lack of shame or self confidence, and project a few generations in the future, we have a very scary society.
If women don’t watch out, Roscoe warns, they could well end up “sexually used up, perhaps before even reaching their teenage years.”
Uh, before they hit the age of thirteen!?
These guys spend way too much of their time thinking about 12-year-olds having sex.
In this dystopian future, all these sex-having people may end up forgetting what gender they are.
Indeed, what do the sexes even mean at that point? Will we see an increase in trannies and gay sex and things that even today are too taboo? Bestiality? If it’s only about the physical orgasm, then it seems these would do the job as well. Forming a family will be impossible.
I dunno, this guy and his dog bride seem to be making it work (and by “making it work” I mean they managed to get their man-dog wedding covered by the Daily Mail).
Roscoe, who sadly offers no opinions about man-dog weddings, worries that if current sexy trends continue the human race will either stop making babies, or will be transformed into
a matriarchal system where the government, forced to provide things a husband typically would, must rely on the labors of men to obtain resources needed to replace the missing husbands.
So in conclusion, women better let dudes like Roscoe and Roosh boss them around, or we’ll go back to being monkeys, or something.
The bottom line is that if women do not have their actions and behaviors controlled by men, then it is no exaggeration to say that we are facing the end of civilized society. Masculinity is the natural state of affairs throughout history. We are only attempting to reset things to their natural order, before feminism literally turns us until [sic] animals again.
Animals, you say? Wall of Voodoo had some interesting thoughts on what might happen if we all suddenly turned into animals. And frankly, this song makes more sense than any of Roscoe’s weird and creepy speculations.
I would just like to add that we’ve had “slut acceptance” for a long time, except it only applied to men. For most of history, men have been lauded for having sex with tons of women.
@Sally: Ugh, no. At no point did I feel like I was exploited or victimized when I was doing prostitution / sex work / whatever the language police insists on calling it, so I refuse to speak of someone as being a victim unless I know that they are. I didn’t delve deeply enough into the subject to find out if that was the case here.
If patriarchy was in fact the ‘natural order of things’ as asserted, then there would be no need for laws and social norms to foist it on people and no need for legal sanctions and social punishments to enforce it.
Just more garbage thinking from unthinking reactionaries. 🙁
I’ve heard rumors of models and aspiring Hollywood starlets being flown to Middle Eastern countries and receiving large amounts of money for spending weekends with men who are filthy rich from the oil industry. Maybe that’s what ‘Dubai-whoring’ is referring to?
(As far as getting paid for sex goes, it beats marrying Donald Trump…)
@Buttercup Q. Skullpants – YES, EXACTLY. Amongst all of the strange incomprehensibility of Roscoe’s rambling, that sentence managed to stand out for sheer internal contradiction.
“We must return to nature, before feminism, um, returns us to nature.” So they can say “We got here first”???
About that Dubai-whoring…
It’s been said in various and random celebrity/gossip corners of the web that Dubai is where aging actresses, former (actual) models, d-list celebrities and ‘Instagram models’ go with sugar daddies or with a couple of their friends for a ‘working vacation’…if you know what I mean *wink wink*, *nudge nudge*. (say no more, say no more!)…Whether it’s true or not I don’t know, but those are the rumors.
Damnit, ninja’d by LindsayIrene. That bitch. 😉
@Snowberry
“I didn’t personally experience something therefore there’s no problems here”? Really? :/
That’s like when those few lucky black people say “Well I haven’t been discriminated against in life so racism doesn’t exist.”.
Apparently the future holds “sexualised women”.
And these misogynist wannabe f*ckboys and rapists think that’s a *bad* thing?
Er..?
Re: “Dubai whoring” – I lived 100 miles from the city of a thousand shopping malls in the sand for 6 years, and nope, not a clue – though there is a massive, thriving, totally overt, highly exploitative and thoroughly illegal sex trade there.
Well, he’s right about one thing, sex with a trans man is totally on the table for this heterosexual woman if I weren’t married. I’m missing the part where this breaks society though.
Also, just because you don’t want to think about your grandma doing nasty raunchy things, doesn’t mean that she didn’t. Just saying, guys.
@ Alan, I’d never heard that about the Flintstones, but al Freej (“the neighbourhood”) is pretty much beloved all over the UAE, though it’s set in Dubai.
Wait, then what’s your problem with “manly” and “masculine, tattooed up, large, bossy women”? You make them sound downright traditional.
@Some Sort of Username: Not the slightest. Sex slavery is horrifying. So is the all of the other kinds of trafficking and slavery. But I refuse to imply that all sex work is slavery because then I’d have to call all farm work slavery. And all textile work slavery. And all mining slavery. And then I’d have to victim-shame myself, and I already get enough of that from both sides of the political spectrum. Sure there are problems, many of which are a consequence to the fact that it’s not legal, but I’ve heard an awful lot of horror stories from people I know about totally legal jobs… seriously, demonizing sex-for-pay is just a convenient way to ignore major structural problems while pretending to do something useful.
…Also, I’m seriously regretting bringing this up again.
What the heck is “Dubai-whoring?”
Actually, it’s Dubya-whoring (it’s a typo)
http://i3.cpcache.com/product_zoom/768771482/george_bush_valentine_laptop_skins.jpg?height=250&width=250&padToSquare=true
I dunno about anyone else, but that sounds pretty good to me.
Oh, noes. Women are having sex and liking it. Where are my smelling salts. I’faith, I shall swoon and it shan’t be a counterfeit swoon.
@Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Obviously the only acceptable number of legs is three.
@Snowberry
I hear you.
@Some Sort of Username
Worst strawman ever. Why would you even do that to yourself?
I have had an MRA on this awful dating app with an anonymous message board try to argue that slut shaming is for the public good because “it works” and because some studies (no idea how good or accurate they are) show that the likelihood of divorce increases with a women’s stated number of partners. Virgins at marriage are “the safest bet.” Because there *obviously* wouldn’t be any confounding factors there. And apparently there isn’t the same effect with men.
Granted, this is all self-reported. Also, it’s been shown that people lie in the culturally dictated directions for their gender when you ask their “number,” even when it’s in an anonymous survey.
This guy tried to peg the breakdown of marriages and fatherless children solely to women for being dirty hooors (because obviously it’s the only reason why divorces would ever take place), and therefore to more of this “breakdown of western society” that we hear so much about. It’s just science guys.
Won’t the sexbots even things out?
@Snowberry
Fair enough, seems a bit more nuanced than I believed it to be. I’ll take what you’ve said in mind, as well as drop it because I don’t know what I’m talking about, heh.
@Imaginary Petal
You think that’s bad, you should have seen how I “argued” when I was younger, I looked like an even bigger idiot back then.
Seriously though, I’m gonna shut up before I embarrass myself further like I normally seem to.
Their hatred of “sluts” is funny, not only because PUAs depend on women who have casual sex for many of their plans and tactics to have any use, but I’m also fairly certain they wouldn’t care for frigid women. (btw, is frigid correct? It sounds kind of mean, but I mean in it as women who just aren’t very interested in sex)
I think it’s plain to see that they are scared of women having any choice (from having sex to as often and in as many ways as possible to never doing it, and anything in between) because they are afraid no woman will want them if they can see them for who they are and reject them if they choose.
And that’s fun!
Also, hopefully not too TMI, but the only penis I’ve ever touched was one from a dead snake (it’s two, actually) in my university’s herpetology lab. Hopefully that’s enough to make me the worst kind of slut!
Also also I apologize for that pun.
@beardache in a previous life
You know, you just reminded me of something
Now, there! I fixed my nym!
@Snowberry
Your contributions are valuable. Don’t regret making them.
@SSoU
I apologize if I were too harsh there.
If I *was. Heh.