Women will soon have to offer threesomes to get any male attention, Red Piller predicts

@Linkx

MRWimps also ignore the pertinent issue that women don’t have to prove that the child support is going to the children, instead of, say, luxury purses. Too many truly selfish women view their children as cash machines.

@Epsilon “MRWimps also ignore the pertinent issue that women don’t have to prove that the child support is going to the children, instead of, say, luxury purses. Too many truly selfish women view their children as cash machines.”

I’ve seen that and it’s a horrible thing. Which is why I don’t understand why these “MRA” dudes (I can’t bring myself to say “men’s rights activists.” They’re not) are so focused on videogame critics and cartoon characters (a lot of them rant about Lisa Simpson wtf)

Collateralized Pussy Obligations backed by subprime vaginas threaten to collapse the entire sexual marketplace!

@Kirbywarp

I found out that the MRWimps and their “Game” was rigged against women when I said I was (and still am) “saving myself” for marriage awhile back. There were no, “Oh, how nice,” comments or any advice to be found; they were all insults. At the time, I thought they were all trolls and dismissed them. It wasn’t until recent my rediscovery of the Red Pill subreddit and the finding this website in recent days (yay!) that a lot of MRWimps *believe* their garbage. Or at the very least, they want to believe it and are trying so hard to substitute it for reality.

You’re right that with many of them that feminism is The Enemy that must be destroyed. I can understand their discomfort with the word feminism to some extent; where I come from, “feminism” is strongly linked with the *really* radical feminism lesbian separatist movement that’s near my neck of the woods. But of course, there are many contexts and branches of feminism, and the “basic and normal” (i.e., First and Second Wave) feminism philosophies are just called “common sense” in my area. 😉

Women are the Quantum Slut; simultaneously in the position of having sex way too much and being way too stingey with their sex-bestowing.

Big difference is that, while in Quantum Mechanics you make a measurement in order to collapse the wave function, in Quantum Sexchanics the wave function collapses perpetually based on what annoy the angry misogynist most at the given moment.

Schrödinger’s Slut!

And of course, when she gets old and spinstery, she’ll have Schrödinger’s Cat to keep her company.

Hey, even a maybe-nonexistent cat is better company than these bozos.

Victorious Parasol | January 28, 2016 at 7:57 pm
The phrase “pussy cartel” is reminding me of the card game Pit, where you trade cards in a simulation of commodities trading. I should really stop trying to imagine what the Red Pill edition of Pit would be. The modern version of Pit includes cocoa. I’ll think about that instead.

That sounds kind of fun. Have another game rec in exchange: Fluxx. I was introduced to it by one of my college professors.

Fluxx is an odd one, because you can’t explain the rules of the game to people that well.

The only rules are: 1. The rules change depending on what cards people play and 2. you have to collect “goal” cards by having “keeper” cards.

And the rules can be anything from a “Everyone now draws two cards on their turn instead of one” to a “You have to speak in an English accent from the rest of your turn or else you forefit a Keeper card”, depending on what version you’re playing.

@Paradoxical Intention

Oh, yes! We have a Fluxx deck around here somewhere. Great fun. Haven’t played in forever, it seems like.

Pit was a blast to play as a kid because you’re SUPPOSED to yell loudly and try to make yourself heard over everybody else.

Then the effort was lowered some more and the couple only had to be “going steady”. Next was “in a committed relationship” …

Aren’t those two names for the exact same thing?

Wow, I think they may have missed the pertinent historical fact that marriage is primarily a property contract, and that until 1902 women couldnt vote let alone own their own property, and the way their property was distributed was thrugh marriage.

The rage expressed is ironically because marriage does not any longer control women’s sexuality because it no longer controls their economy, therefore they are technically free sexually and socially. They no longer depend solely as they once did on a man’s permission to exist. Suffragette tells us that those women knew that their best weapon was to commit crimes agaist property, men’s favourite thing.

Men who controlled the property, controlled the fertility and natch the vag connected to the valuable brood mare. Clearly that deal didnt work for women otherwise marriage would have continued to be a voluntary state for economically free women, and it would be thriving for hetero women. Its interesting that same sex marriage is on the rise.

Marriage is too riven with patriarcgy to work for many women. iAnd it never really controlled their sexuality ( genomic testing tells us this) certainly never as well as the social shame that gave us those ever loving shame labels, slut, whore, hussy, slag, slattern – we know these are the ones that give it away for free. Bitches and cunts are the ones you have to punch to get it. Men think “if it’s not controlled by us then we have to attack your sexuality as dirty or frigid” so you have no where to go but get back in the box we have for you.

These guys are afraid because the will not inherit the legal or social control that gave us the “definitions” of feminity and female sexualitythat are so out of sybch with what women want. So now they need to make women fearful of their “devaluation” in order to make them comply. Pretty transparent. I think their level of anger tells us how successful their plan is…what they really need is to learn how to get pussy based on merit not threat, intimidation shame or fear. Old habits die hard.

I know a story regarding someone who was an unbearable University-style solipsist about twenty years ago, constantly irking the bejeebers out of everyone else in any of his classes – he was enrolled in computing, rumour was it was because he couldn’t get into philosophy. They wouldn’t put up with the poor standard of his arguments.

One day after he’d been badgering someone else who had been having a rough time, and wouldn’t let them alone (‘I’m not doing this to you, I’m doing this to me!’) the guy lost his temper and thumped him.

The sputtering was ignored and the comment was:

‘You did this to yourself, you know.’

Who are these men who talk to women, give them attention etc if women send them naked pictures?
Am I living in a different reality?!

I have an impression that most of these men are delusional, residing in a universe they constructed in their minds, in which all women do is trade their photos and have sex with mysterious “alpha” males while men try to get naked photos from women and have sex with them the way supposedly “alpha” men do it.

It could be mind construct influenced by porn in which women crave for sex. Porn can give you a general impression that women have sex constantly, with so many men, just not with you. And that makes you angry…

“I think the next major innovation will be women grouping together to offer threesomes to men in exchange for attention. ”
In my experience, I don’t have to offer sex to men to get their attention. I get other people’s attention with a good advice or kind words, with my cooking, with analyses I make for my work colleagues and so on…
So I presume this only happens in their heads.

@Jackie: Oh, the whole “As a cishet white dude, my experiences are universal, and if I don’t see something happening, it’s not really happening!” thing?

I don’t know if there’s a word for that.