Almost three years ago, a feminist activist committed what many not-so-impartial observers apparently see as an unpardonable sin: she was less than polite to a small squad of Men’s Rights activists at a demonstration in Toronto. At least one of these gentlemen caught her outburst on video, and uploaded it to YouTube.
You know the rest: the video went viral, and the activist, a red-headed woman known as Chanty Binx (or “Big Red,” to the douchebag army), found herself suddenly transformed into “The Posterchild of Everything Wrong with Feminism,” as one of her haters put it. Her face has become ubiquitous in antifeminist memes, and she’s endured nearly three years of harassment.
Earlier this month, antifeminist YouTuber Sargon of Akkad — who makes his living pandering to some of the internet’s worst lady haters — posted an animated video by another antifeminist YouTuber in which an angry Islamist and an angry feminist sing a song explaining that they pretty much believe all the same things. (For some reason, this nonsensical theory is something that a lot of antifeminists have convinced themselves is true.)
The angry Islamist in the video is a familiar racist stereotype, complete with “funny” accent. [Correction: He’s evidently supposed to be a parody of this guy, known as Dawah Man, a legitimately terrible person you wouldn’t think atheists would have to strawman in order to criticize..]
The angry feminist, meanwhile, isn’t a generic figure; she’s an especially crude caricature of Binx, spouting nonsense that neither Binx nor any other feminist actually believes: the video ends with her encouraging the Islamist to rape her, because it’s not really rape if a Muslim does it, dontchaknow.
It’s a vicious, hateful little cartoon made worse by the fact that these words are being put in the mouth of a real woman who’s been the target of a vast harassment campaign for years.
Yesterday, Richard Dawkins, apparently seeing this horrendous video as a clever takedown of some brand of feminism that he must think actually exists, shared it with his 1.3 million Twitter followers:
Dawkins, a well-respected scientist-turned-embarrassing-atheist-ideologue, has become notorious for his endless Twitter gaffes. But this is plainly worse than, say, his famously pathetic lament about airport security “dundridges” taking his jar of honey; his Tweet contributed to the demonization of a real woman who’s already the target of harassment and threats.
The awesome Lindy West pointed this out to him in a series of Tweets and linked to one of my posts cataloging some of the abuse Binx got after the video of her went viral.
In a series of eloquent and angry Tweets, she made clear to Dawkins how and why he was misusing his huge platform and contributing to an atmosphere of hate online. Dawkins, alternately indignant and defensive, ultimately took down the offending Tweet, but not before making other Tweets that were nearly as bad. Dawkins can’t even do the right thing without being a dick about it.
Let’s watch Lindy at work:
After what was apparently an unsatisfactory response from Dawkins — I couldn’t find his Tweet, if there was one — West repeated and expanded upon her basic points. [EDIT: The unsastisfactory respose, West tells me, was that Dawkins posted a link to one of the videos of Chanty Binx at the Toronto demonstration.]
Well, that got his attention:
So there you have it: when informed that a tweet of his will almost certainly worsen the vicious harassment faced by a young woman whose only “crime” was being rude to a couple of MRAs in public, Richard Dawkins, a one-time winner of the American Humanist Association’s Humanist of the Year Award, replies by saying that “she deserves nothing more than ridicule.”
West replied:
Dawkins then decided to suggest that perhaps Binx was, you know, crazy:
Dawkins ultimately agreed to take down his Tweet linking to the execrable video. But he offered no apology. And he went on to suggest that just maybe Binx had … threatened herself.
We’ve seen this, er, argument before.
Does Dawkins have any conception of just how much abuse women like Chanty Binx get? If she were sending herself all the threatening and harassing messages she gets, she wouldn’t have time to eat or sleep.
And I wonder if Dawkins thinks she drew the caricature of herself that was used in the video he retweeted.
Thoughtful as ever, Dawkins made sure to remind his 1.3 million followers that Binx still deserved all the mockery they could deliver. Just not the death threats please!
And he begged his readers to think about the real victims here — those people, like him, who might have to curtail their mockery somewhat because their terrible, terrible fans might be inspired to hurt someone.
RIP, Richard Dawkins’ comedy career.
Is Dawkins actually unaware that by punching down at a woman who’s already been the target of a three year harassment campaign he almost certainly is contributing to the threats he claims to deplore? It’s hard for me to believe that he could be so naive. But the alternative explanation — that he knows full well that he’s encouraging the harassers — is even more disquieting.
One good thing has come out of this ugly episode today: The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism has un-invited Dawkins from its event this year. A post on the group’s website today explains:
The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism has withdrawn its invitation to Richard Dawkins to participate at NECSS 2016. We have taken this action in response to Dr. Dawkins’ approving re-tweet of a highly offensive video.
We believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular, and even offensive, views. However, unnecessarily divisive, counterproductive, and even hateful speech runs contrary to our mission and the environment we wish to foster at NECSS. The sentiments expressed in the video do not represent the values of NECSS or its sponsoring organizations.
We will issue a full refund to any NECSS attendee who wishes to cancel their registration due to this announcement.
The NECSS Team
Good for them. The atheist movement needs to stand up to the haters and harassers in its midst, including those like Dawkins, who may not directly harass or threaten but who use their huge platforms to amplify and embolden this hatred and harassment.
It would be nice if Dawkins were to actually learn something — a little humanity, a little humility? — from this incident, but when it comes to the subject of feminism Dawkins seems incapable of taking in new information, much less learning anything from it.
EDITED TO ADD: And now, as if to prov what I just said in that previous paragraph, Dawkins is now second-guessing his decision to take down his tweet linking to the video, because GamerGaters are telling him that Chanty and I made up the evidence of the abuse she got.
NOTE: Lindy West has a book coming out soon. Pre-order it below!
CORRECTION: I added a bit noting that the Islamist in the cartoon video is supposed to be a parody of a real person.
EDIT: I added a line about Dawkins tweeting a link to a video of Chanty Binx at the Toronto demonstration.
I am not racist or right wing. I am on the moderate left. I am also a gay black man. Being against Islam is perfectly sensible.
Alan Robertshaw doesn’t want to use his professional knowledge to talk about muslim grooming crews because of the regressives on this comment board who know bloody bugger all who will accuse him of being racist.
This was proven on another thread when people did call him racist for doing that and he said he would never bring it up again. When he was talking about a particular case and people from foreign countries who had never heard of it thought they knew just as much as him because they read the wikipedia article and didn’t even read it fully which was proven when they said it was only 5 men involved. Obviously they only clicked the link in the article about the trial and saw 5 men were tried and convicted and ignored the rest of the article and pretended they read it in full otherwise they would have known there were far more than 5 men involved.
If I do my good womanly duty and make you a totally-not-Lego-and-Ex-Lax sandwich, will you go away? Please?
(I know, I’m not a very good liar.)
How come the troll claims to love this blog so much, while simultaneously explaining how much he hates it.
What does your race, gender or sexual orientation have to do with this?
I love when trolls attempt activate an imaginary anti-sjw-criticism shield by claiming to be a minority.
Even if it’s unfair that this guy is in that jail, why do you think nagging and defending him here will help? You asked a billion questions, they were answered, now go argue with a hired lawyer or a judge, if you must. Speculating with people who are not even slightly interested in helping that guy even if they could will do nothing.
I love the blog not the regressives on the comment board so I won’t bother commenting on anymore threads. Most of the people who read this site don’t comment anyway Because of the regressives on here, yes its such a world famous popular blog but barely anybody comments except only a handful of regulars on because that’s the way y’all like it
Why don’t you just list this handful of commenters, off the top of your head? Should be easy to name all the regular commenters, since there are so few of us.
Tommy Robinson is a great man and he is going on a march today in Birmingham. The proof is in the pudding and I am confident it will be a successful peaceful march. Unless it is ruined by the violent far left attacking them.
Alan Kat Brooked ej sfhc wierwood dhag rugbyrobi orion that’s 9 of the top of my head probably a few more
Okay, this is bugging me, even coming from a blabby moron like Kool-Aid. I get that MRAs only understand words like “Regressive” and “Racist” to mean “The SJWs call us these things, and they seem like insults, so let’s turn them around,” but they actually have real definitions. You’re not a fucking budgie; you can’t just repeat random words and expect to be given the cracker Polly’s hoping for. All you’re left with is a food dish full of word salad.
And hey, since you’re utterly incapable of using Google, I’ll even link to the definition for you.
M, you were right. I should never have doubted you.
(I swear, I should get that tattooed on me or something, it comes up that much.)
I am using maajid nawaz’s definition of regressive left or regressive for short. Its not in dictionaries yet but It does have a wikipedia article and has caught on like wildfire with famous people like Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, Sam HArris and Dave Rubin often using the term so I assumed you guys had heard it by now.
…
http://i.imgur.com/Ni1zbw0.gif
Wow! I did not know that this discussion was still A Thing. 962 and counting!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regressive_left
WWTH may have the last laugh after all!
Orange Tango Drinker:
Here is some free advice, from me to you:
People who want to be credible as leftists, moderate or otherwise, should avoid spending multiple pages hand wringing about the sad sad plight of a noted fascist’s being treated like any other criminal.
Maajid Nawaz, for those unaware, is a heavily discredited source: he is to the islamophobes what Bloomfield and Straughan are to the misogynists, a fig-leaf that they can use to prevent their hatred from swinging openly in public.
Come to think of it, that must be why you like him, orange tango drinker.
He ain’t no fascist, the people who want to stop him from talking are fascist.
No I just said he coined the term, I admit I don’t know that much about him, but I still believe he has been treated appallingly by the regressive left. Some of them using racial insults against him like “porch monkey” which I think is outrageous.
http://maajidnawaz.com/dont-call-me-porch-monkey/
https://thegerasites.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/brown-men-cant-wear-tweed/
Superb article about Maajid Nawaz’s treatment by the regressive left.
http://i.imgur.com/wtuNfhb.gif
I know I probably shouldn’t, but …
OTD, you seriously, seriously want to try and argue that a figurehead of the EDL – the EDL, ffs – is neither racist nor fascist?!?!?
Do you sell bridges, too?
Thats right he is not racist, and he left the EDL nearly 3 years ago. I never liked the EDL anyway . none of his haters have been able to provide quotes of racist things that he ever said. I don’t just mean on this comment board but anywhere ever, they just keep saying racist.
Well, heck, this thread is so far off the tracks, it’s like a scene from “Amok Train”. More specifically, it’s like the scene where two people are floating down a river in a little boat and the train comes roaring out of nowhere and runs them over.
I was correct. It was a peaceful silent march. Tommy is a leader of an awesome non racist movement