Almost three years ago, a feminist activist committed what many not-so-impartial observers apparently see as an unpardonable sin: she was less than polite to a small squad of Men’s Rights activists at a demonstration in Toronto. At least one of these gentlemen caught her outburst on video, and uploaded it to YouTube.
You know the rest: the video went viral, and the activist, a red-headed woman known as Chanty Binx (or “Big Red,” to the douchebag army), found herself suddenly transformed into “The Posterchild of Everything Wrong with Feminism,” as one of her haters put it. Her face has become ubiquitous in antifeminist memes, and she’s endured nearly three years of harassment.
Earlier this month, antifeminist YouTuber Sargon of Akkad — who makes his living pandering to some of the internet’s worst lady haters — posted an animated video by another antifeminist YouTuber in which an angry Islamist and an angry feminist sing a song explaining that they pretty much believe all the same things. (For some reason, this nonsensical theory is something that a lot of antifeminists have convinced themselves is true.)
The angry Islamist in the video is a familiar racist stereotype, complete with “funny” accent. [Correction: He’s evidently supposed to be a parody of this guy, known as Dawah Man, a legitimately terrible person you wouldn’t think atheists would have to strawman in order to criticize..]
The angry feminist, meanwhile, isn’t a generic figure; she’s an especially crude caricature of Binx, spouting nonsense that neither Binx nor any other feminist actually believes: the video ends with her encouraging the Islamist to rape her, because it’s not really rape if a Muslim does it, dontchaknow.
It’s a vicious, hateful little cartoon made worse by the fact that these words are being put in the mouth of a real woman who’s been the target of a vast harassment campaign for years.
Yesterday, Richard Dawkins, apparently seeing this horrendous video as a clever takedown of some brand of feminism that he must think actually exists, shared it with his 1.3 million Twitter followers:
Dawkins, a well-respected scientist-turned-embarrassing-atheist-ideologue, has become notorious for his endless Twitter gaffes. But this is plainly worse than, say, his famously pathetic lament about airport security “dundridges” taking his jar of honey; his Tweet contributed to the demonization of a real woman who’s already the target of harassment and threats.
The awesome Lindy West pointed this out to him in a series of Tweets and linked to one of my posts cataloging some of the abuse Binx got after the video of her went viral.
In a series of eloquent and angry Tweets, she made clear to Dawkins how and why he was misusing his huge platform and contributing to an atmosphere of hate online. Dawkins, alternately indignant and defensive, ultimately took down the offending Tweet, but not before making other Tweets that were nearly as bad. Dawkins can’t even do the right thing without being a dick about it.
Let’s watch Lindy at work:
After what was apparently an unsatisfactory response from Dawkins — I couldn’t find his Tweet, if there was one — West repeated and expanded upon her basic points. [EDIT: The unsastisfactory respose, West tells me, was that Dawkins posted a link to one of the videos of Chanty Binx at the Toronto demonstration.]
Well, that got his attention:
So there you have it: when informed that a tweet of his will almost certainly worsen the vicious harassment faced by a young woman whose only “crime” was being rude to a couple of MRAs in public, Richard Dawkins, a one-time winner of the American Humanist Association’s Humanist of the Year Award, replies by saying that “she deserves nothing more than ridicule.”
West replied:
Dawkins then decided to suggest that perhaps Binx was, you know, crazy:
Dawkins ultimately agreed to take down his Tweet linking to the execrable video. But he offered no apology. And he went on to suggest that just maybe Binx had … threatened herself.
We’ve seen this, er, argument before.
Does Dawkins have any conception of just how much abuse women like Chanty Binx get? If she were sending herself all the threatening and harassing messages she gets, she wouldn’t have time to eat or sleep.
And I wonder if Dawkins thinks she drew the caricature of herself that was used in the video he retweeted.
Thoughtful as ever, Dawkins made sure to remind his 1.3 million followers that Binx still deserved all the mockery they could deliver. Just not the death threats please!
And he begged his readers to think about the real victims here — those people, like him, who might have to curtail their mockery somewhat because their terrible, terrible fans might be inspired to hurt someone.
RIP, Richard Dawkins’ comedy career.
Is Dawkins actually unaware that by punching down at a woman who’s already been the target of a three year harassment campaign he almost certainly is contributing to the threats he claims to deplore? It’s hard for me to believe that he could be so naive. But the alternative explanation — that he knows full well that he’s encouraging the harassers — is even more disquieting.
One good thing has come out of this ugly episode today: The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism has un-invited Dawkins from its event this year. A post on the group’s website today explains:
The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism has withdrawn its invitation to Richard Dawkins to participate at NECSS 2016. We have taken this action in response to Dr. Dawkins’ approving re-tweet of a highly offensive video.
We believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular, and even offensive, views. However, unnecessarily divisive, counterproductive, and even hateful speech runs contrary to our mission and the environment we wish to foster at NECSS. The sentiments expressed in the video do not represent the values of NECSS or its sponsoring organizations.
We will issue a full refund to any NECSS attendee who wishes to cancel their registration due to this announcement.
The NECSS Team
Good for them. The atheist movement needs to stand up to the haters and harassers in its midst, including those like Dawkins, who may not directly harass or threaten but who use their huge platforms to amplify and embolden this hatred and harassment.
It would be nice if Dawkins were to actually learn something — a little humanity, a little humility? — from this incident, but when it comes to the subject of feminism Dawkins seems incapable of taking in new information, much less learning anything from it.
EDITED TO ADD: And now, as if to prov what I just said in that previous paragraph, Dawkins is now second-guessing his decision to take down his tweet linking to the video, because GamerGaters are telling him that Chanty and I made up the evidence of the abuse she got.
NOTE: Lindy West has a book coming out soon. Pre-order it below!
CORRECTION: I added a bit noting that the Islamist in the cartoon video is supposed to be a parody of a real person.
EDIT: I added a line about Dawkins tweeting a link to a video of Chanty Binx at the Toronto demonstration.
That part about no war and no depression is just WTF. Has he been asleep since 2001?
@SFHC, I laughed at that part too. If you’re going to talk about how easy the kids have it today, maybe don’t bring up things that the kids today have actually experienced? But w/e.
Gavin himself, of course, was forged in The Great Depression of the 30s, and tempered in WWII. Gavin is 95 years old.
@ gavan
But don’t the conditions you describe apply equally to men?
Do you think then that the MRA whinging is just a result of them not having been tested in some crucible of fire or having to live in a Hoover Town?
Do you think that the veterans of WW2 would find that the greatest issue of the day is that there’s a woman in a Mad Max movie or a video game?
Sounds like an MRA troll.
Is he not just quoting Fight Club?
Viscaria – You are not really doing much to discredit my comments. You are saying ” I am a part of this club and you are making me uncomfortable.”
In Australia, we have not had any real hardship since the 2nd world war. That means I too have lived an easy life free from true hardship. I am grateful for that, but that doesn’t mean I have to become a sook. It is ridiculous to bring such petty, childish sentiments to a man that has contributed so much to our society. It is truly absurd that great men can be brought down by bratty ‘permanent victims’. What a tedious process it must be for him.
What are you even talking about? Get to the point.
@Lorcan Nagle
Is he really? Why are douchebros all so lazy?
Gavin, I’m afraid that your trolling has became so inane that I can’t bring myself to read any of your comments without financial incentive. I’ll just skip them until the promised gift of all of your money materializes. Thanks, bye.
Edit: not trying to discredit you, dude, just trying to get paid.
@Alan Robertshaw
Cogent points!
You didn’t ask me but I’ll answer anyway.
Yes, I do. (Partly.)
No, I don’t. At least not the ones with any degree of awareness or sense of proportion.
@Gavan
Sorry, Gavan, here in the USA (and elsewhere in the world, from what I hear), we speak our minds. Doesn’t make us “sooks,” or big babies for our American readers.
What in the name of Nut, Goddess of the Sky is a “sook”?
EDIT:
Ah, thanks Kat.
@Gavan:
You’re the one whining about what modern people have become and wishing that there was more hardship so that people would meh meh meh. I’m the one planning humanity’s journey to the stars in order to make us immortal. Which of us is a sook again?
Gavin
You mean the childish sentiment of lauding a video meant to pile on more rape and death threats on someone? I too think it’s ridiculous that someone like Dawkins would stoop so low. Sad really.
Ok. Intelligent debate isn’t working. I’ll go back to: “Girls are all really nice. Boys are all really ewwww! Why is the world so meaaaannnn!” Richard Dawkins is just this kind of, you know, old white dude. He said something, like oh…. it was just so …. like…. oh look – shoes!!!!”
…do you actually think that what you wrote constitutes “intelligent debate?” For shame.
If you aren’t linking properly-sourced studies then what you’re doing isn’t intelligent; and if you aren’t in a formal, umpired environment then it isn’t debate. L2adult, n00b.
Well I don’t know about the rest of you ‘girls’ but Gavin has opened my eyes! I will immediately report myself to the nearest man for re-education and proper servitude. Feminism was a nice movement while it lasted, but this extremely poor attempt at trolling has just turned me around.
Or wait. No. No, it’s just tedious. Never mind.
I actually find this statement of Gavan’s fascinating in that it must work in some cultures. But it just bounces off an American.
OK, that was actually funny. I didn’t even see the sexism he intended at first. It just seemed to be a complete non sequitur. Oh, look–a flower!
I’m laughing so hard.
Gavan, you have stepped into a swamp. And the alligators who pose as commenters here chew trolls up and spit them out–metaphorically, of course. You are in no actual danger from us.
Tell Richard Dawkins that you deserve hazard pay.
Dumbest troll we’ve had in a while?
He’s smarter than orange tango drinker, at least.
Kat. I am trying to find an intelligible comment to respond to but there is a lot of stuff that doesn’t even make sense on any level. Lot’s of labelling of ‘troll’ etc. Cheap. Easy. Nothing substantial. There is a change happening in that the feminist movement and victim culture is starting to be held up to the spotlight. It has had decades of quarantine from analysis, but now things are changing. Once subjected to real open debate and analysis, it falls over very quickly – which is a great thing. Maybe women will grow and find agency. That would be good – for them and for all.
.
.
.
.
.
.
BWAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!
AAAAAAAAAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!
HHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
@ gavan
You appear to have skedaddled before answering the questions I put to you. That’s your prerogative of course.
The irony is that to a certain extent I would agree with you. It’s obvious that society as a whole is less arduous than it has been in the times to which you refer.
I also agree with you that a section of society has taken for taken for granted the relative safety it now enjoys and filled the void with disproportionate angst at petty concerns.
Where I think we do differ is what section of society that is.
It’s men who “have never had it so good” (bonus posts for recognising that quote). Life’s a doddle for us. We don’t get shipped off to fight in the Pacific or storm the Normandy beaches. And what do some men do with that freedom and security? Whinge about self created non existent problems like women enjoying video games or not shagging every guy who comes on to a woman in a manner that would make Pepe Le Pew blush.
Women do make complaints as well of course. But their complaints are about things like not being able to feel safe, to have the constant (and justified) fear that they could get assaulted, raped or murdered. Or abused for daring to express an opinion, or having the audacity to get a job in a “man’s” field.
So yes, we do live in a society where some people get upset over trivial things, but let’s face it, those “some people” are blokes.
I’ve watched this thread explode several times. Linx was a very abusive troll. Gavan is….hmm I’m not sure. Claims to be searching for intelligent debate but makes no points beyond Dawkins is great blablabla….are you a Dawkins sock Gav?
I say, let the Great Man himself engage with us. I await his arrival with bated breath.
PS: Alan, very well stated!
Unbelievable. You may as well call me a Holocaust denier, and nobody here will challenge you.