Categories
antifeminism crackpottery dude you've got no fucking idea what you're talking about evil fat fatties MGTOW misogyny penises reddit vaginas

Worried about your penis size? Blame feminism, MGTOW explains

Not everyone has a giant wiener
Not everyone has a giant wiener

The Great Penis Size Freakout Debate continues. On the Men Going Their Own Way subreddit, one of the regulars has dug up a Youtube video from a random woman who doesn’t like small dicks.

Never mind that men worry a lot more about the size of their dicks than women do — hell, one survey found that women tend to be far more concerned with proper pubic-hair grooming  than the length of their partner’s dingle dangles. Reddit’s MGTOW army saw this video as an example of rare female honesty on this perilous topic.

“[T]his is just proof if you’re not above average you are nothing,” one Reddit MGTOW moaned.

[I]f she complains and you aren’t small, next the bitch, she’s either got something wrong with her pussy or she got her head filled with some of her girl group bullshit, and it’s not worth the trouble.

Naturally, it didn’t take long for someone to blame feminism for the size queens of the world. ShitfacedBatman reassured his fellow MGTOWs that only sluts and feminists complain about small penises.

Date short and cute feminine women and you’ll never need to worry about your penis size. Date a woman prone to getting FAT, a woman close to your height, a woman with a big-ass ass, or a sex-industry woman who’s been cored out a few times and it’s “possible” size is a factor in those cases.

You know, women being “cored out” by large penises isn’t actually a thing. The sturdy vagina can recover from childbirth, and there aren’t really a lot of men out there whose penises are literally larger than a baby.

But, as ShitfacedBatman sees it, size queens are only lashing out because they are losers in the “tight vagina” contest that apparently all women are competing in.

Here’s the dealio tho: women that say size matters are saying they have sexual liabilities. To be submissive, pretty, and feminine is actually a competitive sport racing towards female smallness. Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and “innocent” – which means size should never matter and if it does it’s her problem. (Western feminism producing masculine women is incredibly likely to be at the root of the problem.)

Apparently the most “masculine women” are the ones with huge vaginas.

I think the whole “huge vagina” argument made a lot more sense when Larry David explained it on Curb Your Enthusiasm.

375 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dhag85
8 years ago

@Orion

I know that every time I eat a chocolate bar it adds another 1/2 inch to my penis.

Moggie
Moggie
8 years ago

Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and “innocent”

So women should be competing to be like children? Creeepy.

Leda Atomica
Leda Atomica
8 years ago

I remember reading Charles Bukowski as a teenager and in one of his adventures he was genuinely surprised when a fat woman was ‘tight’.
I guess this myth has been around for a long while.

Virtually Out of Touch
Virtually Out of Touch
8 years ago

We’ll be able to custom design alphabots soon;

http://www.outajamaica.com/uncategorized/sex-robots-are-being-made-to-replace-men-by-2025/

“Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and “innocent”

I’m unapologetically happy that perverse creeps like that feel insecure about their private parts. May the insecurity increase leaps and bounds going forward!

Virtually Out of Touch
Virtually Out of Touch
8 years ago

Oh and one more thing. A very well endowed male friend of mine from the islands said, “there’s no such thing as a loose vagina” years ago after he came to the States and heard such nonsense from American men.

Fruitloopsie
Fruitloopsie
8 years ago

There’s nothing wrong with preferences but It’s amazing that there are guys out there who would get so steamed over Womens’ preferences wether it’s just length and height and in the very next paragraph would list all their preferences: must be a virgin, always beautiful, skinny and young and so forth.

Virtually Out of Touch
Virtually Out of Touch
8 years ago

” This is also why it’s bullshit when they claim it’s “natural” for men to like very young girls.”

Year after year “the wall” gets younger and younger. I think they first started out saying its 30, then it was 27, then mid 20s. Recently I read a pseudo scientific diatribe stating that “human females” are at peak attractiveness at … brace yourselves…7. The reasoning was a male can be assured she’s pre-pubescent and still a virgin, which means if he can get her when she first menstruates, he’ll be the first, and presumably only one, and therefore not a cuck.

HeinzD
HeinzD
8 years ago

Recently I read a pseudo scientific diatribe stating that “human females” are at peak attractiveness at … brace yourselves…7. The reasoning was a male can be assured she’s pre-pubescent and still a virgin, which means if he can get her when she first menstruates, he’ll be the first, and presumably only one, and therefore not a cuck.

Yuck. Just yuck.

bluecat
bluecat
8 years ago

On the fat/loose myth: if you have a vagina and use a diaphragm, you actually need to go up a diaphragm size if you lose much weight, and down a size if you gain.

I was very surprised by this, but of course it isn’t the body cavity that gets narrower but the walls of it, meaning more space inside.

So fatter *should* mean tighter.

Except of course, it doesn’t, because tightness is mainly an effect of those wonderful elastic muscles of the vulva, which bear no relation to body fat at all.

But no surprise at MGTOW not knowing a thing about anatomy – anybody’s anatomy!

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
8 years ago

December 5, 2015 at 3:27 pm
Somebody should tell those guys that women are not balloons..

Not EVERYTHING is expanding, if we get bigger in size…. -_-

But…but….Big Bang Theory states that all vaginas have a red Doppler shift and are constantly expanding at a steady rate. There simply isn’t enough Dark Triad matter to hold it all together.

This has been conclusively scienced, by experts whose exposure (by definition) is largely theoretical.

Women by nature should be

Whoa, whoa, stop right there, bucko. “By nature” and “should be” don’t belong in the same sentence. They contradict each other.

If a sizable group of woman “should be” engaging in a behavior but aren’t, then how can it be “in their nature”?

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
8 years ago

Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and “innocent”

Wat?

Has this nitwit never heard of “child-bearing hips”?

Jen
Jen
8 years ago

The vaginal muscles relax with arousal, so a tight woman is a woman who is completely unaroused. D: But of course, these guys don’t actually care about the woman’s pleasure.

Orion
Orion
8 years ago

Guess I was wrong. Unsurprisingly, since I was generalizing from <20 data.

Leda Atomica
Leda Atomica
8 years ago

@Jen

“The vaginal muscles relax with arousal, so a tight woman is a woman who is completely unaroused.”

I know what you meant but I’m still going to use your comment as a bridge to the subject I have in mind. Sorry!

Some of us are small, just naturally. And some experience ‘tightness’ even when aroused. The women who seek help to these problems are usually belittled and nothing is done, as women’s issues with sex aren’t deemed that important. Hell, a woman in a documentary went to doctor after doctor for her very actual pain related to intercourse. They just gave her anti-anxiety meds even though she said it did nothing. Very little of the medical field is actually dedicated to women’s sexual health, even though some of it studies the bits in question. Intercourse pain and tightness are real issues, affecting relationships and lives of women.

But as I said, the comment I quoted I’m sure has nothing to do with this, an unaroused woman is sure hard to penetrate.

*Edit: Harder to penetrate than the woman in question aroused.

P.S. I love *edit’ window!!!

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
8 years ago

@Jen

“The vaginal muscles relax with arousal, so a tight woman is a woman who is completely unaroused…”

Not necessarily. But theoretically, sure why not. 😉

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
8 years ago

@Leda Atomica

How long have women been waiting for their ‘little blue pill’-comparable option? Yet in some circles, it’s lamented that so much money is raised for women’s cancers such as breast or other reproductive organs. The fact of the matter is that research by pharmaceutical companies and on diseases/medical matters has long been low on women participants in studies. Too many risks and variables in using human females, I believe is the explanation.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
8 years ago

Too many risks and variables in using human females, I believe is the explanation.

The explanation (which is bullshit) is that a female mouse’s ovulation cycle is a confounding factor in research, and that both carries over to human subjects if/when the treatment reaches that stage, and it discourages research into female reproductive issues because you obviously can’t model those with male mice.

Somehow the male mouse circadian cycle is not a problem, and the male mouse hormonal cycle is also not a problem, and every other cyclical change in a male mouse’s metabolism is not a problem. The only cycle that is confounding is the one that male mice don’t experience. And it’s super-unimportant to figure out how to account for that non-male cycle the way we’ve figured out how to account for the other cycles, because people with uteri aren’t really important and may not actually be people.

Ellesar
Ellesar
8 years ago

The Karma Sutra is very clear on the need for a good match re genital size – it is quite simple – if you are deerlike you should seek a doelike, if elephantlike the same – it is all I remember from the brief reading I did when I was 18.

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
8 years ago

@PoM

I think the explanation is a pile of steaming stinky feces myself, but that’s the one I’ve come across most often and for whatever reason, those who give it don’t bother to even try and explain why they would stop there instead of treating it all like “this is something new to find out about!” It’s not like there’s a shortage of mice of either gender. They can always “make more” – so to speak.

chosen_name
chosen_name
8 years ago

Just imagine the abject terror these assholes would experience if they met Storm Large and her vagina that is 8 miles wide.

(content notice: sexualized content and a near absence of people of color. But what’s new, eh?)

Argenti Aertheri
8 years ago

WWTH — “…they’re tall so they must have vaginas too cavernous to please a boner.”

That’s the part that really bugs me (well, besides every other part) — they never say that their boners aren’t pleased, it’s always a comment on the “morals” of women or similar. It’s not that these (physically) loose women aren’t pleasurable to be inside, it’s that if a woman comments on the smallness of their member it’s cuz she’s all stretched out. Take sex out of it, right, and you get:

“Your coffee is awfully weak.”
“Well you run around drinking just anyone’s coffee, of course you think my average coffee is weak. Maybe if you weren’t taking it from anyone who offers you’d like my coffee!”
“…dude, you have issues, not least of which being your coffee”

Also, $5 says these guys grew up hearing about “loose women” and it somehow never clicked that that lovely phrase means morally loose, not physically.

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
8 years ago

“Woman, thou art loosed!” or something. 😉

Walter
Walter
8 years ago

One of them was right when he wrote, “if you’re not above average you are nothing.”

A man’s value is determined by his penis size. This value has nothing to do with women though. It’s more about showing superior masculinity and manliness in order to establish the proper pecking order between men.

All that other stuff about loose vaginas was totally wrong and ridiculous. I visit a lot of sites that are very concerned with dick size and for the most part, the women who visit those sites don’t care about penis size. At least not as much as the men. There are of course some women who value it greatly, and it is their right to do so, but the majority of women that I’ve encountered are able to enjoy a variety of sizes. These guys would do well to listen to women instead of going off half-cocked with their own stupid ideas.

katz
8 years ago

Also, $5 says these guys grew up hearing about “loose women” and it somehow never clicked that that lovely phrase means morally loose, not physically.

OMG, I think you’re right! That’s hilarious!

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Jackie; currently using they/their, he/his pronouns)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Jackie; currently using they/their, he/his pronouns)
8 years ago

Walter
December 5, 2015 at 8:30 pm

These guys would do well to listen to women instead of going off half-cocked with their own stupid ideas.

*looks at the camera like I’m on The Office*