The Great Penis Size Freakout Debate continues. On the Men Going Their Own Way subreddit, one of the regulars has dug up a Youtube video from a random woman who doesn’t like small dicks.
Never mind that men worry a lot more about the size of their dicks than women do — hell, one survey found that women tend to be far more concerned with proper pubic-hair grooming than the length of their partner’s dingle dangles. Reddit’s MGTOW army saw this video as an example of rare female honesty on this perilous topic.
“[T]his is just proof if you’re not above average you are nothing,” one Reddit MGTOW moaned.
[I]f she complains and you aren’t small, next the bitch, she’s either got something wrong with her pussy or she got her head filled with some of her girl group bullshit, and it’s not worth the trouble.
Naturally, it didn’t take long for someone to blame feminism for the size queens of the world. ShitfacedBatman reassured his fellow MGTOWs that only sluts and feminists complain about small penises.
Date short and cute feminine women and you’ll never need to worry about your penis size. Date a woman prone to getting FAT, a woman close to your height, a woman with a big-ass ass, or a sex-industry woman who’s been cored out a few times and it’s “possible” size is a factor in those cases.
You know, women being “cored out” by large penises isn’t actually a thing. The sturdy vagina can recover from childbirth, and there aren’t really a lot of men out there whose penises are literally larger than a baby.
But, as ShitfacedBatman sees it, size queens are only lashing out because they are losers in the “tight vagina” contest that apparently all women are competing in.
Here’s the dealio tho: women that say size matters are saying they have sexual liabilities. To be submissive, pretty, and feminine is actually a competitive sport racing towards female smallness. Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and “innocent” – which means size should never matter and if it does it’s her problem. (Western feminism producing masculine women is incredibly likely to be at the root of the problem.)
Apparently the most “masculine women” are the ones with huge vaginas.
I think the whole “huge vagina” argument made a lot more sense when Larry David explained it on Curb Your Enthusiasm.
“Women by nature should be competing to be small, tight, and ‘innocent'”
I wouldn’t find this worth commenting on except for the “by nature” part. That usually suggests they’re trying to come up with some “evolutionary” excuse for one of their ideas… but I’m curious how they’d figure that evolution would trend toward women being “small, tight, and ‘innocent'” Because none of those things seem obviously positive from the standpoint of purely getting your DNA out there.
I don’t know what these guys are worried about. I can’t think of any bigger dicks than the MRA/MGTOW/PUA crowd.
Why is there dating ‘advice’ on an MGTOW subreddit?! Aren’t they supposed to be sharing anti dating/ how to stay away from women?
Oh yes, that’s right, they don’t actually want to go their own way, they just want women to be childlike, docile, submissive, boner pleasing and never over 30 or fat. Hey man that’s tough!
These men are going their own way, so what does it matter what women think about their dick size?
They’re just concerned about the poor helpless men they’re leaving behind. Who will stand up for THEIR penises?
I’ve always been baffled by the strange idea that a vagina becomes less tight if its owner gains weight. It’s up there with the weirdest ideas I’ve heard, along with “cats hate their human companions” and others.
http://media4.giphy.com/media/13c2YVh83qgJRS/giphy.gif
“- which means I’m pulling this out of my ass because this is how I think women should act based on what I want, not what is actually natural, because I wouldn’t know what was natural if a bog leech attached itself to my average-sized (But we all know it’s huge) penis.”
[TMI] And since I already ousted myself as a size queen in the last thread, does this mean I get to take responsibility for feminism, or does being a feminist automagically make me a size queen? [TMI]
@dhag85 Yeah, I was confused about that too. Why the hell would that happen?
(Also if my cat hates me, someone needs to tell her to stop spending all her time sitting on me and purring.)
That whole “coring out” thing just makes it clear how ignorant they are of female anatomy. Or that they think they have magical penises that leave behind destruction.
And yeah, if I can have 2 babies and still have good sex then I’m pretty sure vaginas don’t work how these guys think they work. Or how would anyone have more than one child?
Hell, by that logic each kid should be easier to deliver than the first, their way having been paved by their older sibling(s). And I’m pretty sure it doesn’t work like that.
I’m totally stealing that graphic of the dude riding the sausage with horse legs. That is UNIQUE.
Actually, labor and delivery does on average get shorter and easier with each child, but that’s not because the vagina is prestretched. (And there are, of course, numerous exceptions, depending on the position of the baby and so on.)
I can only echo the bafflement already here. I don’t understand why the guys who buy into the idea that women’s vaginas get stretched and damaged by ‘too much’ sex don’t immediately lose all credibility amongst their peers. This is something that teenage boys think before they have any sexual experience.
I guess because none of the MGTOW have the knowledge of female anatomy to call them out on it, and the cycle continues.
I’m almost sure my vagina doesn’t change size when I gain weight. But then again I’m not an expert like a man who knows about evolution and nature and stuff. Being a scientimatist comes with the territory when you’re a MGHOW.
Somebody should tell those guys that women are not balloons..
Not EVERYTHING is expanding, if we get bigger in size…. -_-
That’s from some Silver Age Superman comic and that’s Jimmy Olsen on the sausage steed.
I suspect it makes just as much sense in context.
If they’re so busy going their own way, why on God’s green earth do they care about what women do?
I mean, to the MGTOW we’re this evil force that they must be protected from who might use vagina magic (or the infamous vaginal mind-control goo) to do things to their mind. That logic says that they shouldn’t give a crap about us at all.
(Exempting, of course, that I’m one of them tranzomosexuals and the MGTOWs tend to be the most violently transmisogynist of the massively transmisogynist men’s rights bowel movement…but eh, details.)
Yeah, natural selection never cared if you were tough enough to survive the rigors of infancy and childhood in pre- and early- civilization, or about maximizing the number of young you could successfully bear and raise! What natural selection cared about: appear non-threatening to dimbulb celibate males.
Well, feminism is at the root (heh heh, he said “root.” So did I) of his real problem: Women being free enough to express their sexual preferences and erotic judgments of men.
Lady Mondegreen laughing at ‘root’ reminded me of a horrible misandrist joke me and my friend had in high school. We each had a crush on some guys and to avoid discussing them and getting caught we referred to them as ‘X’ and ‘Y’, respectively. Maths lessons took a more interesting turn when solving the value of x and y (value = size, tee hee). One time the answer was ‘no root’ and I heard a held-back laugh from the seat behind me.
I should hope their penises are able to stand up on their own. (Well, barring impotence for whatever reason, of course.)
ShitfacedBatman also has this to say:
It’s so sad how those dudes don’t realise that the women in porn get paid not only to do sexual things but also for acting as if they get off on it.
oh and yes, I totally believe him when he writes about his “personal experience”. totally. *facepalm*
Is this a new manuresphere theory that being taller and/or heavier = larger vagina? Because I’d never heard that ever until the other penis thread from earlier in the week. Did they not notice that petite women manage to give birth too? And if petite women manage to birth a child, they are plenty large vagina’d enough to accommodate a penis that isn’t small.
I’ve heard the pseudoscience about “sluts” having loose vaginas before. But the tall and/or fat women having loose vaginas is a new one.
Does this mean they’d turn down supermodels? I mean, they’re tall so they must have vaginas too cavernous to please a boner. Right?
It would actually be a negative. A small birth canal means it’s more dangerous to give birth and the baby is more likely to have a low birth weight. This is also why it’s bullshit when they claim it’s “natural” for men to like very young girls.
Doesn’t it? MGTOWs are too dumb tot tell the difference between gaining weight and being born with a large frame, and thus say absurd things. But my experience, and received anecdotes suggest that tall women with wide hips do have an easier time with large insertions. I have not look at any research studies on vagina size, but I know that penis size correlates with height, and I’d expect the same to obtain for women.
Digging a little deeper, I’m actually getting mixed reports on height/penis correlation.
@Tyra Lith
That’s a pretty amazing quote. Made me laugh for real.
@wwth
I’ve been aware of this myth/misconception for a very long time. There’s a popular 4chanesque Swedish message board where people regularly discuss the trufax about Asian women being small and therefore “tighter” whereas fat women are loose. There’s never any explanation as to why/how this would be the case. On occassion someone will question these known truths, but he will inevitably be ridiculed for his lack of trust in sciencey truthiness.