So our dear old friend Scott Adams has responded to my recent post on him by declaring it “Pathetic Outragism” and me an “Outragist.” He also strongly suggested that I was a stupidhead. Which is a step up, I suppose, from calling me fat, which is the go-to response of many of those I’ve written about.
Adams’ fans, a tiny army of whom showed up here after Adams linked to it, haven’t been quite so polite, leaving behind some comments that I haven’t let out of moderation. But I thought I’d share a few of them with you all.
“You, sir, are an imbecile of the first order,” wrote one. “P Z Myers is a c**t,” wrote another, perhaps a little confused as to what blog he was on. (And no, the original comment didn’t contain asterisks.)
But it was a fellow calling himself John Doe (but using an email account with a woman’s name) that really took the terribleness cake. I’ve broken his huge wall of text up a bit.
CONTENT WARNING: Domestic abuse, gaslighting, genocide, you name it.
Adams is so great. Fuck all you dirty piece of shit feminists you should be FUCKING SHOT or sterilized. or sent to a rehabilitation facility.
Well, I’ll give him this: he gets right to the point.
You should lose your right to vote. Ignorance is dangeorus. and Feminism is evil ignorance. Feminism is not about equal rights and has not been for many decades. Maybe if this was the 1960s america you could say something to me, but now you can shove it up your fucking ass. Fuck american womena nd fuck feminism.
When I started this blog I really had no idea that there were still people around who think women shouldn’t have the right to vote. Turns out there are a lot of them.
Men will stop getting marreid more and more. THe spawn of the MGTOW groups are evidence of this.
I’m not sure that these guys leaving the dating pool is quite the catastrophe for women that MGTOWs think it is.
The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.
Uh, I’m pretty sure that the government, at least here in the US, is not terribly interested in stopping people from “breeding.” Hell, the IRS actually gives parents an assortment of tax breaks.
But it turns out that Mr. Doe doesn’t actually think it’s a bad idea to, er, reduce the population of planet earth. Specifically by shooting feminists.
I think every feminist should be sent to a labor camp or imprisoned or shot dead. I don’t care. You are scum and if you are not capable of changing you should lose your right to live. All humans are a burden to the earth, but Feminists are a burden to all humans and everything else, especially men.
This seems harsh.
Women are treated like children and coddled with kid gloves and in some ways you always have been.
[citation needed]
Even in 1890 there was a female bandit in the west that did crazy shit and got away with it for years. But there were men that did the same that were shot dead instantly.
An odd example, but I guess that’s as close to a citation as we’ll get. Presumably he means Belle Starr, who had a long career as a bandit in the “wild west” before being shot to death, possibly by her husband, possibly by a dude who was mad she wouldn’t dance with him. (No, really, those were two of the prime suspects.)
After this short digression, Doe returns to his main themes:
And men have always fought the wars. Women rarely in any society ever had to do so. You got to stay home. You got the easier job.
Women have been working, in the home and out of it, since the dawn of time. They have also been victims of war.
The rant then takes another dark turn:
The only way now for a normal guy to have a healthy relationship with a girl under 30 in the new generation is to scare the shit out of your woman and make her fear you and make her think you will end her life if she tries to screw you over. That is the only way to keep them in line from being destructive bitches. And even then you might have to sit them down and threaten them now and then.
This is abuse 101, though not terribly different from “dread game” as promoted by Heartiste and other pickup artists.
I had to, i’ve had to with the last girl i dated. all the time.
I can only hope he’s talking out of his ass here.
Look what happened when i didn’t. She told her friend i was a drug dealer simply because she was jealous she liked me. She publically slandered me. So i used her took her virginity which honestly id trade for her hotter friend at this point.
What a romantic!
Unless you are rich and powerful and good looking youre only real option to have a good time and enough control that you can relax is to scare the shit out of these girls, find some way to blackmail them or scare them and use it. That is the only way.
Today I Learned that “healthy” heterosexual relationships are only possible if the man is rich and/or abusive.
Even without me saying any of this it remains true and feminism has destroyed the country and everyone born from the 90s onward.
And once again an opponent of feminism demonstrates clearly why feminism is necessary.
Doe had some words for me as well:
David Futrelle is a piece of shit beta male and should lose his right to vote among other freedoms for supporting such a piece of shit ideology.
Apparently the only people Doe thinks should be allowed to vote are men who hate women.
The US and Canada and most 1st world countries are female dominated all the way up to the super rich who then are the men having power but everyone who is not rich is ruled and controlled by females if they want any kind of success. Period.
Yeah, that’s not actually how it works.
Unless you do as I was saying before, find a way to scare a girl and blackmail her into doing what you want. Because even if she likes you, even if you are perfect for her, she would rather run away and flirt with many other guys and fuck things up. So scare her into submission.
If you hate women so much that your notion of a “healthy” heterosexual relationship is one in which the man is so abusive that the woman literally fears for her life. here’s a thought: Don’t date women. Don’t come near them. Seek treatment for your fucked-up ideas.
@Trae Dorn
Thanks for that graphic. It sums up a certain type of interaction nicely.
What really gets me about all this is just how doomed their worldviews are. They do realize it’s not so much that they’re going to lose the culture war so much as it was lost before most of them were born, right? I mean, I find a lot of this MRA stuff as chilling and (sorry) outrageous as the next person — maybe more, because I have a vivid imagination and a tendency toward catastrophizing with it — but they must understand that women actually aren’t going to give up the vote.
Right?
@darkstatistic
I think that’s why some of them are so obsessed with the end of the world, and post-apocalyptic societies. They know that it would be hard to “fix” things without destroying western society.
Yet another dude who thinks that the American experience of war – that war is something that happens far away from here, that you need to join/be drafted into a regular military to fight – is the universal experience.
Do these guys just think that nobody lived in Europe in the early 20th century? That nobody lives in the Middle East today? Do they just completely forget that women exist in areas that become conflict zones, and even when the dominant culture tells them that they aren’t allowed to fight, they do it anyway because they fucking live there and they become victims if they don’t fight?
Actually it’s about ethics in genocide.
Not to mention women did dress up like men and fight in U.S. wars like Revolutionary, Civil
Wah wah wah. You mean we have to treat women, fellow human beings, with dignity? You mean they aren’t just here to please us with sex at our mere whim 24/7?
Fuck you, Scott Adams. Fuck you, and your misogynist asswipe fans.
How pathetic do you have to be as a “professional” to create a sockpuppet to make yourself look good? By the way, I use professional loosely. This guy is a no-talent hack. I’ve read comics written by grade school children that are classier and better drawn with 100x the wit this pile of suck pretends to have. Apparently his fans eat up his shit like dung beetles from what I can see written here.
I wouldn’t put it past Adams to have created a sockpuppet to post here as a “fan.”
and yea, Im gonna go out on a limb and say I fully believe this man is, as he claims, a rapist and abuser, and I do believe a lot of the men commenting online in similar fashion are too. Fuck it Im sick of holding that back, if you go around saying rape victims are liars and so on constantly you are probsbly a rapist or at least at risk of becoming one.
and if you look at the comments on his blog, Adams has no problem with guys saying all sorts of ridiculously ignorant, awful things. I think his views are worse than what weve seen so far if he is cool with keeping thst company.
Says a man who most likely has never been to war or been drafted in his fucking life.
But, you know, you’re more than welcome to stay at home and raise the kids, cook, wash laundry, work two jobs to make ends meet (because the government sure as hell won’t help you), and keep house while wifey’s away being a soldier if it matters that much to you.
I’m sick of them using the “men fight in wars” nonsense. In the vast majority of warfare throughout human history, especially in modern wars, civilians, including women and children, suffer just as many casualties and often far more than the military forces
@Policy of Madness
That was an amazing article. I always learn so much from this community.
…so, what you’re saying is that countries with the highest level of wealth, technological advancement, and quality of life tend to be countries that are “female controlled”? Doesn’t that mean that “female control”, is, you know, a good thing? Or at least correlated with a society succeeding, since steps towards gender equality- that is, I mean “female control” are prevalent in most first world countries?
@Paradoxical OR…you know…they could read literally anything about previous wars…Shakespeare was all about how women were often the first victims of war, whether or not they had any way to defend themselves… but no they’re probably not going to do that. They much prefer the idea of themselves as Heroic Sacrificers For The Greater Good, but would prefer that “the greater good” really mean “men getting whatever they want” and not “yay our families wont be killed or enslaved!”
Would it be too obvious to reletter a bunch of Dilbert strips with stuff Scott Adams writes on his blog? Surely someone’s done this already, right?
Because I really want to do something with this the comments:
“For example, men earn most of the money in the world. Same as slaves everywhere.”
Scott Adams used sock-puppets on Metafilter and reddit to blow his own horn. Dude’s a complete loser.
Well, this is a reliable demonstration of how men logic while women only hysterically emote.
Nothing says “logical” like threatening to put women in camps, scare us all, force us to submit with threats of death/violence because we totes control the world. I can’t believe that he didn’t use MISANDRY. Maybe he tried, but couldn’t spell it?
@Shaenon
…Wait, wut? Slaves don’t get paid. That’s why, you know, they’re called slaves. Is that something that Adams said, or one of his adherents?
Mr. Doe, you might find these statistics of interest:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science_of_longevity/2013/09/death_in_childbirth_doctors_increased_maternal_mortality_in_the_20th_century.html
Ha, ha, I’m kidding, of course! These statistics don’t interest you.
Nothing interests you except where you can stick your dick on a regular basis.
And being a bully.
I think someone’s been messing about with Adams’ autocorrect so every time he tries to type ‘mockery’ it comes out as ‘outragism’. It’s happened to all of us!
No violence, please. Especially no sexual violence.
Hello.
Yeah. Go and tell that to the ones who had fight in the Resistance during WWII.
I only agree with him about ignorance, as he is one living proof.
Have a nice day.
…Wait, wut? Slaves don’t get paid. That’s why, you know, they’re called slaves. Is that something that Adams said, or one of his adherents?
It’s Adams, explaining how men are oppressed because they make more money than women, but women get to do the grocery shopping.
– David Futrelle
You think he REALIZES that basically stating “If women won’t satisfy my needs on command, it’s THEIR fault if I go on a murder spree!” – is messed up? Or is he just going on the defensive due to the reaction of anyone NOT a raging misogynist?
Re: John Doe
You’re a clever bunch so you probably already know the origin of the term; but I never miss an opportunity to pontificate so…
There was a particular procedure in English land law where it was actually simpler and cheaper if you were acting as agent foe someone else rather than on your own behalf.
So people used to pretend to be acting on behalf of a fictitious person. The court was fine with this. As a joke people liked to use names that rhymed. The most common combination was “on behalf of John Doe and Jane Roe”
Eventually these names became common placeholders in legal proceedings were anonymity was required.
An example US readers will be familiar with is the case of “Jane Roe versus Wade”