So our dear old friend Scott Adams has responded to my recent post on him by declaring it “Pathetic Outragism” and me an “Outragist.” He also strongly suggested that I was a stupidhead. Which is a step up, I suppose, from calling me fat, which is the go-to response of many of those I’ve written about.
Adams’ fans, a tiny army of whom showed up here after Adams linked to it, haven’t been quite so polite, leaving behind some comments that I haven’t let out of moderation. But I thought I’d share a few of them with you all.
“You, sir, are an imbecile of the first order,” wrote one. “P Z Myers is a c**t,” wrote another, perhaps a little confused as to what blog he was on. (And no, the original comment didn’t contain asterisks.)
But it was a fellow calling himself John Doe (but using an email account with a woman’s name) that really took the terribleness cake. I’ve broken his huge wall of text up a bit.
CONTENT WARNING: Domestic abuse, gaslighting, genocide, you name it.
Adams is so great. Fuck all you dirty piece of shit feminists you should be FUCKING SHOT or sterilized. or sent to a rehabilitation facility.
Well, I’ll give him this: he gets right to the point.
You should lose your right to vote. Ignorance is dangeorus. and Feminism is evil ignorance. Feminism is not about equal rights and has not been for many decades. Maybe if this was the 1960s america you could say something to me, but now you can shove it up your fucking ass. Fuck american womena nd fuck feminism.
When I started this blog I really had no idea that there were still people around who think women shouldn’t have the right to vote. Turns out there are a lot of them.
Men will stop getting marreid more and more. THe spawn of the MGTOW groups are evidence of this.
I’m not sure that these guys leaving the dating pool is quite the catastrophe for women that MGTOWs think it is.
The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.
Uh, I’m pretty sure that the government, at least here in the US, is not terribly interested in stopping people from “breeding.” Hell, the IRS actually gives parents an assortment of tax breaks.
But it turns out that Mr. Doe doesn’t actually think it’s a bad idea to, er, reduce the population of planet earth. Specifically by shooting feminists.
I think every feminist should be sent to a labor camp or imprisoned or shot dead. I don’t care. You are scum and if you are not capable of changing you should lose your right to live. All humans are a burden to the earth, but Feminists are a burden to all humans and everything else, especially men.
This seems harsh.
Women are treated like children and coddled with kid gloves and in some ways you always have been.
[citation needed]
Even in 1890 there was a female bandit in the west that did crazy shit and got away with it for years. But there were men that did the same that were shot dead instantly.
An odd example, but I guess that’s as close to a citation as we’ll get. Presumably he means Belle Starr, who had a long career as a bandit in the “wild west” before being shot to death, possibly by her husband, possibly by a dude who was mad she wouldn’t dance with him. (No, really, those were two of the prime suspects.)
After this short digression, Doe returns to his main themes:
And men have always fought the wars. Women rarely in any society ever had to do so. You got to stay home. You got the easier job.
Women have been working, in the home and out of it, since the dawn of time. They have also been victims of war.
The rant then takes another dark turn:
The only way now for a normal guy to have a healthy relationship with a girl under 30 in the new generation is to scare the shit out of your woman and make her fear you and make her think you will end her life if she tries to screw you over. That is the only way to keep them in line from being destructive bitches. And even then you might have to sit them down and threaten them now and then.
This is abuse 101, though not terribly different from “dread game” as promoted by Heartiste and other pickup artists.
I had to, i’ve had to with the last girl i dated. all the time.
I can only hope he’s talking out of his ass here.
Look what happened when i didn’t. She told her friend i was a drug dealer simply because she was jealous she liked me. She publically slandered me. So i used her took her virginity which honestly id trade for her hotter friend at this point.
What a romantic!
Unless you are rich and powerful and good looking youre only real option to have a good time and enough control that you can relax is to scare the shit out of these girls, find some way to blackmail them or scare them and use it. That is the only way.
Today I Learned that “healthy” heterosexual relationships are only possible if the man is rich and/or abusive.
Even without me saying any of this it remains true and feminism has destroyed the country and everyone born from the 90s onward.
And once again an opponent of feminism demonstrates clearly why feminism is necessary.
Doe had some words for me as well:
David Futrelle is a piece of shit beta male and should lose his right to vote among other freedoms for supporting such a piece of shit ideology.
Apparently the only people Doe thinks should be allowed to vote are men who hate women.
The US and Canada and most 1st world countries are female dominated all the way up to the super rich who then are the men having power but everyone who is not rich is ruled and controlled by females if they want any kind of success. Period.
Yeah, that’s not actually how it works.
Unless you do as I was saying before, find a way to scare a girl and blackmail her into doing what you want. Because even if she likes you, even if you are perfect for her, she would rather run away and flirt with many other guys and fuck things up. So scare her into submission.
If you hate women so much that your notion of a “healthy” heterosexual relationship is one in which the man is so abusive that the woman literally fears for her life. here’s a thought: Don’t date women. Don’t come near them. Seek treatment for your fucked-up ideas.
I find this disappointing, because Dilbert was the main comic-strip of my childhood.
🙁
I wonder what he would consider sufficient control of a woman before feminism. The actual ownership of women as per the 19th century? We already know that he wants women to lose the vote. I’ll make a wild guess that he considers the notion of marital rape to be an outrage to male control. Asking husband/ father permission to do anything? I think he’d like that.
The more I read about these wankers the more clear the need for feminism becomes – if there are men around who actually wants to take away all our human rights AND use threats and intimidation in relationships then the fight for women’s liberation is far from over.
I think we should add ‘nonsensical petulant outrage from misogynists’ to life’s guarantees, alongside death and taxes.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/wuut.gif
And once again, irony is not those guys strong suit as they make “outraged” declarations against “outrage”.
We keep trying to tell them, it’s okay to take themselves somewhere, that is away, from the rest of humanity, but for some reason, they refuse to leave.
Apparently this guy wants to return to the times depicted in the old west/Victorian era, that was depicted in 1950’s movies, where women didn’t have any choice but to marry who they were told or be consider ruined, like spoilt milk.
My, my. And misogynists think women are over-emotional and out of control.
Re: guy having a female’s name for an email address… A loud misogynist used to haunt a woman’s site and boast that he was able to infiltrate a sooper-seekrit ultra-feminist website so he could learn of all the sooper-seekrit feminist plans to overthrow the government (yes, really). He said all it took was a fake female-sounding email address and a few phony posts supporting the eebil sooper-sekrit plans.
He then proceeded to tell us all that feminists are evil, are trying to kill/destroy men and boys, and currently control ALL factions of the government in North America. The guy was so absurd-sounding, but also so very proud of himself for having infiltrated what must have been to him the KGB.
I wonder now if this is a common trick that woman-haters do.
Reading John Doe’s sexist/violent rant makes me shudder since he’s proudly admitting to threatening women with whom he has had relationships. He needs to stay the hell away from women since he hates us so much.
Okay, seriously: I’ve seen a few people under the name “John Doe” and they all have been raging assholes. Is this only one John Doe who spreads his shit everywhere, are all men named John Doe assholes, or is this I joke I just don’t get?
“The government is getting what they want. People to stop breeding.”
Great! How can I help the government help these men to go their own way?
Dafuq I just read? I don’t know what’s more terrifying, that people honestly hold those kinds of beliefs, or that they feel free to spew them every which way.
@Rosa – It’s their way of claiming to be an anonymous everyman.
http://m.mentalfloss.com/article.php?id=29996
What’s weird is that usually John Does are unidentified male murder victims. Why would they want to name themselves after something people associated with that? Wouldn’t a more accurate anonymous name for rage filled internet misogynists be something like UnSub?
If she would rather run away from you, and if the consensual flirting she wants to do is something you will not tolerate in the context of your relationship…
…you aren’t perfect for her, are you?
“If you hate women so much that your notion of a “healthy” heterosexual relationship is one in which the man is so abusive that the woman literally fears for her life. here’s a thought: Don’t date women. Don’t come near them. Seek treatment for your fucked-up ideas.”
Also, the next time you see your dad – punch him in the balls, hard. You learned this bullshit from SOMEPLACE.
I’m surprised Scott Adams responded so briefly. Usually he spends a lot of words explaining how you misunderstood what he wrote because you have low reading comprehension
http://irresponsibleirreverence.trhonline.com/comics/2011-06-29-92scottadams.jpg
@mockingbird
Thanks you! I feel like this is telling.
But if this ‘John Doe’ in particular was an accurate representative of the average guy, I’d be Going My Own Way just about now.
@RosadeLava:
There’s one John Doe I like.
But showing your face and using John Doe to keep your private life private when you’re in a band is a bit different than not showing your face and screaming abuse at people and using John Doe to escape accountability.
Trae Dorn, Adams is actually planning to post a longer post tomorrow explaining what he “really meant” or some such.
This is a good example of the demographic that Scott Adams and his ideas represent. It makes it crystal clear why feminism continues to be an urgent necessity.
What a surprise that fans of this Scott Adams guy are real asshats.
“So our dear old friend Scott Adams has responded to my recent post on him by declaring it ‘Pathetic Outragism’ and me an ‘Outragist.’”
Scott Adams — not good with words.
Can’t he just stick to pictures?
My money’s on: this John Doe person has never actually dated any women in his life, ever.
Mr. Doe, thank you for weighing in.
What state do you reside in? Never mind, I’ll just show you this as an example:
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/violent-crime/california-assault-battery-laws
HAHAA, I’m an 80s baby! Foiled again feminists!! Muahaha-
GODDAMMITT! Just had to migrate didn’t we! “We’re going to have a better life” my parents said. A dastardly plot by my mother, no doubt!