I had hoped to avoid writing about Cassie Jaye and her strange journey into Red Pill-land again so soon.
Jaye, you may recall, is the apparently former feminist who is now directing a movie about the Men’s Rights movement that is, as she herself put it in one interview, “kind of being funded by men’s rights advocates.” A Voice for Men, the Men’s Rights garbage site at the heart of her film, actively helped her to raise money on Kickstarter for postproduction work on the film.
It’s no secret that I have some rather serious doubts that she will provide the “balanced” look at the Men’s Rights movement that she has been promising. I have written several posts here highly critical of her and the direction her Red Pill documentary seems to be going.
So I can understand that she’s not a big fan of me at the moment. Unfortunately, she’s responded to my criticisms with, well, lies.
And now she’s added a new lie to the pile, claiming in a recent interview with YouTube blabber Sargon of Akkad that I sent her “bullying” emails. After dismissing my concerns about her film as a “smear campaign,” she went on to say that
David Futrelle was also emailing me privately – two different emails since the Kickstarter – and so I made a statement video, I think a week ago, trying to just have something on record where I’m explaining the false allegations that Futrelle is reporting and so I had my say out there on record. And something maybe I should have included in that it hasn’t just been his articles and tweets; it’s also been private emails. Well, I think the word that most closely describes it is bullying.
(The interview is more than two hours long; she first brings me up about ten minutes in, and makes the comments above at around the 23 minute mark, after being asked about harassment.)
Jaye is right about one thing: I sent her two emails since the Kickstarter started. But to describe them as “bullying” is beyond bizarre.
So let’s take a look at them, shall we?
I sent the first email before she solved her funding problems by giving an interview to Breitbart, and when I still thought there was a chance Jaye might deliver something even vaguely close to a balanced view of the Men’s Rights movement in her Red Pill film, rather than the straight-up MRA propaganda that it seemed to be turning into.
In the subject line of the email, I told her I was “deeply concerned” about her film. In the email, I explained why
Cassie,
We haven’t talked since the plans for an interview with me fell through, which may have been my fault.
But I have just watched the preview for your film and looked at some of the things you’ve posted on your facebook page and I am very deeply concerned about the direction of your film, and the highly unbalanced list of people that you interviewed for it.
It looks as though you have gotten a highly distorted, one-sided view of the Men’s Rights movement, by talking to a bunch of MRAs who tamped down their anger long enough to give you a sanitized pitch about what it is they do.
It’s good that you talked to some feminists. But instead of talking to those feminists and writers who have actually dealt with MRAs on a regular basis you have talked to feminists who have only a vague connection to what is really going on with the Men’s Rights movement.
I’ve been writing about them for five years now, and trust me, the video here is a better representation of them than what I’ve seen in your preview.
I linked to the now-notorious video of Paul Elam’s crude, drunken and NSFW tirade about two feminists.
I suppose that might have been a little harsh. saying that Elam’s video was a more accurate representation of MRAs than what she’s posted from her film. Then again, it is. I continued, referencing something Elam said in in the clip of the film she posted:
Elam, I think it was, made a joke about how no feminists were harmed during the making of your film. But in fact during the several years you have been making this film, many feminists and other women have been harmed by Elam and his allies.
Though she talked to one of the more famous victims of MRA harassment, I noted that there had been “many, many others,” and suggested that
Making a video about Elam and his allies at AVFM without talking to these women would be like making a documentary about Bill Cosby without talking to any of his accusers.
I listed a number of these women, with links to relevant posts of mine about them.
I mentioned one AVFMer who, since Jaye had interviewed him, had fallen out with Elam, with each accusing the other of being a con man. I mentioned that one MRA that Jaye had “managed to get an almost reasonable-sounding quote out of” was better known for his bitter, vicious attacks on Twitter. I mentioned “Janet Bloomfield’s” troubles with the truth.
And I pointed her to a notorious post from Paul Elam in which he declared he wasn’t actually interested in doing anything to help men beyond yelling at people on the internet.
I ended with this:
You can find more information about almost all of these things on my blog, even if I haven’t provided a link. And if you need any more information or links or contact information, please feel free to contact me. And I really hope you do.
And I hope even more strongly that you contact some of the women that Elam and his allies have harmed.
I should point out that I was not writing out of the blue. She had in fact contacted me during the filming of The Red Pill, asking for information and advice and attempting to set up an interview on film, which ended up falling through for various logistical reasons. We hadn’t communicated since then.
In any case, after this note, Jaye offered to talk to me on the phone about some of these issues and, after a few brief emails back and forth to set up a time to talk, we did, for about 20 minutes, I think.
I was polite, she was polite, and I believe I offered apologies for the sometimes blunt tone of my email to her. She assured me she was aware of all the issues I was raising, and that the film would reflect many of my concerns, which she told me that she herself shared.
After this conversation, I seriously considered stepping forward to offer public support to her Kickstarter, despite my serious misgivings over the footage she had released so far, her marketing strategies, and the unbalanced roster of interviewees.
But I couldn’t overcome my doubts about her, and after reading her interview with Breitbart I realized that my gut feelings about her had been right. She had been bullshitting me, and bullshitting feminists in general. And so I wrote my Open Letter to her.
So what about that second email of mine? I wrote that after A Voice for Men accused me of threatening her, in an attempt to clarify to her what I had actually meant in my Open Letter, and to check one fact with her.
Here’s the whole thing:
She didn’t respond. Figuring that she didn’t want to talk to me, I didn’t send a followup.
I’m having trouble understanding how my saying that “hey, these MRAs giving you money are actually total jerks” counts as bullying, exactly.
Indeed, in an interview published a day after I sent that email, she made it clear that MRA harassment is something she herself worries about, jokingly telling Tracy Clark-Flory of Vocativ that she could always “go into hiding” if the MRAs partially funding her film weren’t happy with it.
Cassie, if you want to see what bullying looks like, take a look at what A Voice for Men’s “social media director” did to feminist writer Jessica Valenti on Twitter.  Look at Elam offering $100 for a clear photo of one of his enemies. Look at the hate campaign Elam launched against one female college student because she attended a demonstration and made a few jokes on Twitter. Click on the  “harassment”or “bullying” tags on this blog for countless more examples.
Hell, go take a look at any of the examples of women harassed by AVFM and other MRAs that I sent you in that first email of mine.
I wasn’t trying to bully you; I was doing my best to convince you to listen to the women that the apparent heroes of your documentary have bullied, and continue to bully to this day.
I know that you spoke to one of these women. I hope that you at least do her justice in your film, though at this point, admittedly, I don’t have much reason to think you will.
NOTE: For reasons of space I didn’t include all of the first email. If you are a journalist or someone else with a legitimate need to fact check this piece I can send you the entire email. As text, as a screenshot, with the gory details of the email’s passage over the internet, whatever.
“Pleb” has recently returned to public consciousness in the UK after the “Plebgate” scandal… which also had some of the qualities of a “let’s you and him fight” spat, now I come to think.
I’ve also been thinking that the doxxer must be an 8channer or 4channer. I’m almost utterly certain. It sounds almost exactly like one.
Don’t know 8chan speak either, but just read something from an 8channer elsewhere using ‘pleb’ incorrectly. I’m thinking 8chan use it in their pig Latin and troll accidentally brought it here and in the doxxing crap. If so, I’d bet it’s definitely an 8chan shitstirrer.
Thanks for calling me on that, Alan and Chiomara.
Yay! I love reading troll take-downs! 😀 Especially the part when the MRA/manospherian does the obligatory bit of trying to convince everyone that they’re intelligent and reasonable and everyone who doesn’t agree with them isn’t while basically throwing a man-baby tantrum. So much projection.
http://www.southernfriedscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/inigo-montoya-you-keep-using-that-word-i-dont-think-it-means-what-you-th-3b4b2920-sz625x625-animate.jpg
Yeah. Using words like f*g and ret***ed as insults, or fat shaming is not something I’ve ever seen regulars here doing – in fact, everyone here seems pretty consistently against it. The comment about Barnes being “dickless” also doesn’t line up (associating bravery with genitals). And I think I’ve seem this “pleb” thing from trolls before (probably youtube), but I wouldn’t know where.
I also think it seems more like a troll trying to start a fire. Should we see if they’re having a laugh at 4chan or 8chan? But independently of the position this doxxer holds on feminism and MRAs, David’s always positioned himself against doxxing, and even deleted links to people’s personal information when they were posted here. (I remember someone had posted a link to, I presume, Janet Bloomfield’s personal info and David removed the link)
Btw, I don’t think I’ve ever heard “nrx” before. Could someone tell me what this means? I’ve googled it, but I doubt the results I got are what this doxxer meant.
Ugh. Certainly sounds like a *channer looking for laughs. I don’t know anyone outside of the reddit-*chan-goon-somethingawful circle who uses “lel” or “pleb”, or the “j-ing o” comment. Some jerk laughing his ass off at the SJWs and MRAs getting stirred up over this shit. Really have to get to figuring out that NLP person-identifier.
Ugh. Internet ‘culture’ belongs in a petri dish.
The channer is strong in this one >.<
Ps, hi opheliamonarch!
I’m guessing that “nrx” == “neoreactionary”.
Yep, this is definitely starting to look like the work of a chan-stain.
Regarding the new doxxer, who has admitted to being the first doxer?- I’m back to one of my first questions about them: how did they get access to Barne’s family photos?
?
The Internet is not magical or mysterious. It just looks that way. Barnes, from his response, does not have that photo anywhere publicly online. Meaning someone close to Barnes put it up.
Hacking an account is not the same as getting access to a single machine with data on it, extremely difficult unless you live in that household. 90+ % of the time when someone’s account is “hacked”, the password was shared or socially engineered out of them. And even then the data has to exist in that account to be released. To date, AFAIK, no explanation for how this information got into the hands of David’s “evil fans” has been offered. And since they were so quick to smear David, instead of general SJWs, this smells like a deliberate malicious attack. (Especially in the context of Cassie’s ahem “misrepresentations”)
One may mock conspiracy theorists of the woo type, but conspiracy to target someone maliciously can be a crime.
I would report not only the dox account, but Barnes account as well, and anyone who seems to have an interest in boosting the David/David’s fans did it meme. I would think, on banning the original account, they would also ban anyone from the same IP address, but that could be problematic without a direct report. At the very least it will get Twitter to look at if and how the accounts are coordinating with each other.
…and channers are just the sort of scumbags to dox a kid.
The doxer, who doesn’t seem to be making any effort at all to sound like a “real SJW,” is so obviously not one of us I’m not sure that even Barnes actually believes that they are. I think Barnes et al are just happy to play along with the troll because it gives them another chance to smear me with made-up garbage. Their gullible fans will believe the smears, and the less gullible will repeat them even though they know it’s a bunch of made up crap.
These people — the doxer and the AVFMers — have the ethics of intestinal parasites.
I reported the doxer and have screencapped Barnes’ tweets at me.
Hey Argenti! You remember me! Big smile on my face right now. 🙂 Hope you’re well and happy luv. And it’s always Ophelia to you (and any other none trolls).
@Scildfreja
That makes sense. Thank you.
David, this is a massive pile of poo for you, so sorry this is happening. I still say CAKE, cake is the way to go. If I could get one of my apple pies to you, I would do so asap, and with double cream too. Stay safe.
Wishing you well, David. I can’t imagine being targeted with threats while simultaneously being accused of issuing threats yourself. Thanks for everything.
(It ate my comment, i’ll try again!)
I’m pretty sure that Barnes et al know that the doxxer isn’t connected to you (David). I’m also pretty sure that their followers know that the doxxer isn’t connected to you. It really doesn’t matter to them, all that matters is smearing you as much as possible. You’re the Great Enemy, and any effort is justified.
Sounds like the expected modus operandi for people who put instructions on how to forge screenshots on their hate blog, to me.
I think that you’re dealing with it right, David.
@RosaDeLava, de nada!
@David Futrelle
This seems to be the case with another person doxxed. He mocks the troll for knowing how to use Google…which isn’t really doxxing if it’s the target’s public account. Barnes though, imo something much more sleazy is going on.
There was a comment (now deleted) about contacting DCS and David received the same thing in his Twitter feed (which he denounced). The troll admitted making that threat, too.
@opheliamonarch
I remember you. 🙂
The header picture on David’s twitter account is hilariously appropriate.
Hmm. Not sure that really was the troll who said that originally, the troll may have just claimed to in order to piss off Jack.
Yay Auntie Alias, I’m so glad! 🙂 I’ve been lurking on and off, but I’d assumed everyone would forgot me as I haven’t posted in over a year I reckon!
I hope you and yours are happy and well.
bvh, ha! It actually is. Also I’m totally built like that dude.
Ophelia, I took a long time off myself. I had a heart attack a year ago and didn’t feel I could deal with the subject matter here. I had to put my elderly cat to sleep a couple months ago, too, so things have really sucked.
How are you?