I had hoped to avoid writing about Cassie Jaye and her strange journey into Red Pill-land again so soon.
Jaye, you may recall, is the apparently former feminist who is now directing a movie about the Men’s Rights movement that is, as she herself put it in one interview, “kind of being funded by men’s rights advocates.” A Voice for Men, the Men’s Rights garbage site at the heart of her film, actively helped her to raise money on Kickstarter for postproduction work on the film.
It’s no secret that I have some rather serious doubts that she will provide the “balanced” look at the Men’s Rights movement that she has been promising. I have written several posts here highly critical of her and the direction her Red Pill documentary seems to be going.
So I can understand that she’s not a big fan of me at the moment. Unfortunately, she’s responded to my criticisms with, well, lies.
And now she’s added a new lie to the pile, claiming in a recent interview with YouTube blabber Sargon of Akkad that I sent her “bullying” emails. After dismissing my concerns about her film as a “smear campaign,” she went on to say that
David Futrelle was also emailing me privately – two different emails since the Kickstarter – and so I made a statement video, I think a week ago, trying to just have something on record where I’m explaining the false allegations that Futrelle is reporting and so I had my say out there on record. And something maybe I should have included in that it hasn’t just been his articles and tweets; it’s also been private emails. Well, I think the word that most closely describes it is bullying.
(The interview is more than two hours long; she first brings me up about ten minutes in, and makes the comments above at around the 23 minute mark, after being asked about harassment.)
Jaye is right about one thing: I sent her two emails since the Kickstarter started. But to describe them as “bullying” is beyond bizarre.
So let’s take a look at them, shall we?
I sent the first email before she solved her funding problems by giving an interview to Breitbart, and when I still thought there was a chance Jaye might deliver something even vaguely close to a balanced view of the Men’s Rights movement in her Red Pill film, rather than the straight-up MRA propaganda that it seemed to be turning into.
In the subject line of the email, I told her I was “deeply concerned” about her film. In the email, I explained why
Cassie,
We haven’t talked since the plans for an interview with me fell through, which may have been my fault.
But I have just watched the preview for your film and looked at some of the things you’ve posted on your facebook page and I am very deeply concerned about the direction of your film, and the highly unbalanced list of people that you interviewed for it.
It looks as though you have gotten a highly distorted, one-sided view of the Men’s Rights movement, by talking to a bunch of MRAs who tamped down their anger long enough to give you a sanitized pitch about what it is they do.
It’s good that you talked to some feminists. But instead of talking to those feminists and writers who have actually dealt with MRAs on a regular basis you have talked to feminists who have only a vague connection to what is really going on with the Men’s Rights movement.
I’ve been writing about them for five years now, and trust me, the video here is a better representation of them than what I’ve seen in your preview.
I linked to the now-notorious video of Paul Elam’s crude, drunken and NSFW tirade about two feminists.
I suppose that might have been a little harsh. saying that Elam’s video was a more accurate representation of MRAs than what she’s posted from her film. Then again, it is. I continued, referencing something Elam said in in the clip of the film she posted:
Elam, I think it was, made a joke about how no feminists were harmed during the making of your film. But in fact during the several years you have been making this film, many feminists and other women have been harmed by Elam and his allies.
Though she talked to one of the more famous victims of MRA harassment, I noted that there had been “many, many others,” and suggested that
Making a video about Elam and his allies at AVFM without talking to these women would be like making a documentary about Bill Cosby without talking to any of his accusers.
I listed a number of these women, with links to relevant posts of mine about them.
I mentioned one AVFMer who, since Jaye had interviewed him, had fallen out with Elam, with each accusing the other of being a con man. I mentioned that one MRA that Jaye had “managed to get an almost reasonable-sounding quote out of” was better known for his bitter, vicious attacks on Twitter. I mentioned “Janet Bloomfield’s” troubles with the truth.
And I pointed her to a notorious post from Paul Elam in which he declared he wasn’t actually interested in doing anything to help men beyond yelling at people on the internet.
I ended with this:
You can find more information about almost all of these things on my blog, even if I haven’t provided a link. And if you need any more information or links or contact information, please feel free to contact me. And I really hope you do.
And I hope even more strongly that you contact some of the women that Elam and his allies have harmed.
I should point out that I was not writing out of the blue. She had in fact contacted me during the filming of The Red Pill, asking for information and advice and attempting to set up an interview on film, which ended up falling through for various logistical reasons. We hadn’t communicated since then.
In any case, after this note, Jaye offered to talk to me on the phone about some of these issues and, after a few brief emails back and forth to set up a time to talk, we did, for about 20 minutes, I think.
I was polite, she was polite, and I believe I offered apologies for the sometimes blunt tone of my email to her. She assured me she was aware of all the issues I was raising, and that the film would reflect many of my concerns, which she told me that she herself shared.
After this conversation, I seriously considered stepping forward to offer public support to her Kickstarter, despite my serious misgivings over the footage she had released so far, her marketing strategies, and the unbalanced roster of interviewees.
But I couldn’t overcome my doubts about her, and after reading her interview with Breitbart I realized that my gut feelings about her had been right. She had been bullshitting me, and bullshitting feminists in general. And so I wrote my Open Letter to her.
So what about that second email of mine? I wrote that after A Voice for Men accused me of threatening her, in an attempt to clarify to her what I had actually meant in my Open Letter, and to check one fact with her.
Here’s the whole thing:
She didn’t respond. Figuring that she didn’t want to talk to me, I didn’t send a followup.
I’m having trouble understanding how my saying that “hey, these MRAs giving you money are actually total jerks” counts as bullying, exactly.
Indeed, in an interview published a day after I sent that email, she made it clear that MRA harassment is something she herself worries about, jokingly telling Tracy Clark-Flory of Vocativ that she could always “go into hiding” if the MRAs partially funding her film weren’t happy with it.
Cassie, if you want to see what bullying looks like, take a look at what A Voice for Men’s “social media director” did to feminist writer Jessica Valenti on Twitter. Look at Elam offering $100 for a clear photo of one of his enemies. Look at the hate campaign Elam launched against one female college student because she attended a demonstration and made a few jokes on Twitter. Click on the “harassment”or “bullying” tags on this blog for countless more examples.
Hell, go take a look at any of the examples of women harassed by AVFM and other MRAs that I sent you in that first email of mine.
I wasn’t trying to bully you; I was doing my best to convince you to listen to the women that the apparent heroes of your documentary have bullied, and continue to bully to this day.
I know that you spoke to one of these women. I hope that you at least do her justice in your film, though at this point, admittedly, I don’t have much reason to think you will.
NOTE: For reasons of space I didn’t include all of the first email. If you are a journalist or someone else with a legitimate need to fact check this piece I can send you the entire email. As text, as a screenshot, with the gory details of the email’s passage over the internet, whatever.
Oh. Blockquote mammoth. I suppose that’s what I get for posting on no sleep.
Well, I can sort of see how David’s messages might smack of concern trolling to someone who has already bought into parts of the manospherian ideologies. If you consider concern trolling to be a form of attack, and any form of attack as bullying, then it’s logical to assume that David was bullying her. Logical, but not reasonable.
The mistake was in assuming that she hadn’t yet fallen in with them. But there was probably no way he could have known at the time.
@wwth – That would not have even occurred to me, but you’re probably right. I guess after the “Cannes” revelation she doesn’t have much to lose.
“She had in fact contacted me during the filming of The Red Pill, asking for information and advice”
This old chestnut is a favourite of tar baby scammers: initiate contact, then paint any disagreement in the following emails as “stalking”.
Pathetic.
Both you and Cassie are in very deep with these creeps.
One of you is handling it correctly.
Eventually you need to write a book on this whole blog and online misogyny, and you might want to call it something like In Deep with the Creeps
Dave, I want you to know that I used to work as a video transcriber and I’m fulling willing to help you with that if need be.
@bvh,
I feel like I should warn you that some people consider “tar baby” a racial slur. I know you didn’t mean it that way, but…
@sbel… maybe because “tar baby” is not a racial slur
I wondered about “tar baby” myself. I’ve only heard it used as a racial slur.
Personal problem time:
Remember my Sargon/TFart/AmazingPedophile watching boyfriend? About whom I asked for your help a few days ago? He has always agreed MRA and RedPill are deeply poisoned and live in an alternative reality. I have always, with aid of this blog, provided him with proof of that, and I have always linked these asshole youtubers with MRA and RP through GamerGate. He has been denying these links, claiming they ridicule both feminists and MRAs, using TFarts bashing of The Sarkeesian Effect as evidence. This interview of Sargon have definitely proved his simpathy with not only MRA (which is pretty bad), but RedPill too (which is much worse!)! And not only that, the fact that they are together in this documentary has linked RedPill with MRA, which definitely make MRAs even less pleasant to the eye. Everything is very perfect for me, it can only be better if TF joins the party. I am eagerly waiting, please warn me if he does.
Now that she is reuninting these very stinky fellows, everything will be so much easier in my relationship. Either he recognizes those people have extremely toxic ideas and stop digging himself into that, or he decides the ideas of MRAs and RedPillers are not that bad, which digs him into the final inch i’m willing to stand him digging into, and I leave him without regrets.
Thanks for all that evidence too, David. I don’t know what would I do without your blog.
And thank you too, Cassie, for making everything so crystal clear even for who is begging not to see.
I don’t know how you find the patience, DF, but somehow you do. Keep up the good work.
@sbel
Thank you for your level headed response.
I’m not sure I agree, but after Googling it, I can see your point and I’ll keep that in mind in future.
About whether or not the red pill film can be considered for an Oscar*, yes, it definitely can be.
*Actually, the award would be an Asscar, which is kind of like an Oscar, there is a goldish statue, and you have to pay to be considered, and to win, but the ceremony is held in the basement of a hotel where an actor that received an actual Oscar once stayed. Oscar adjacent. All very legit.
@Auntie Alias
This is the definition I had in mind:
“tar ba·by
noun: tar baby;
a difficult problem that is only aggravated by attempts to solve it.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar-Baby
It seems it does have a racist or at least heavily race slanted past. I’ll avoid it in future.
bvh said:
weirwoodtreehugger said:
Glad to see you’ve abandoned the “poor naive girl” tale. It’s as I was saying many posts ago, I do believe she is much more malicious than most people think, and much brighter than any Mra. Just look at the “Cannes” think, that is not the action of a naive person, please. She almost smells like a con artist. Let’s call a snake a snake at once.
Mels said:
She expected to be funded by both feminists and Mras, in my opinion.
Thanks, @bvh. I have no clue when and why my brain attached a racist connotation to that term. I lived in the U.S. when I was a kid in 1960s so maybe I picked it up then? I didn’t know about the origin of the term until now.
@Chiomara
It can be emotionally challenging to break it off with someone even when you find out their politics stink. All best wishes.
I would still say she’s naive, since she seems to expect the MRAs not to turn on her at the tiniest perceived slight–which they will, unfortunately. Although I’m having trouble finding the sympathy I once had for her now.
Thanks for your support, folks!
@hedin said:
” I’ve seen documentaries about hate groups that consist pretty much entirely of hanging out with the hate group, and still show them as, well, a hate group.”
I’ve seen many of these myself. But, obviously, the ones that succeed in this do so by capturing their subjects warts and all, seeing the sorts of things they say in their off moments rather than just what they say while sitting down for interviews and on their best behavior. Though if you let a hateful person talk long enough in a sit-down interview, they will end up saying things that are more revealing than they think. Sometimes this requires that the documentary maker pose some smart questions and followup questions. But just letting them talk and talk also works.
When Vice covered AVFM’s little rally in Toronto, they talked to Elam and McCarley and lo and behold both of them ended up saying bizarre and retrograde shit. When Cassie Jaye filmed the rally, she seems to have been more interested in setting up artfully framed shots that made MRAs look like a small band of heroes facing off against the world.
Now I’m wondering if she actually stage managed the AVFMers so she could get the shots she wanted.
Also, even if you talk to only one side on camera, you have to know the arguments that their critics are making. It’s not clear if Jaye talked to any MRA critics — that is, people who know enough about MRAs to make a detailed critique of them — beyond Chanty.
Jaye told me and has told others that she tried to contact one pretty well-known feminist writer, but that the writer never got back to her. That feminist writer has no record of Jaye ever contacting her.
@Auntie Alias
It’s all good. If you’re not aware of it’s use, it does sound like it could be racist. And apparently enough people are unfamiliar with it, better to avoid the chance for misunderstanding online when we’re not face to face. It’s too bad because it a perfect visceral description of the phenomena.
@Auntie Alias
“Glad to see you’ve abandoned the “poor naive girl” tale.”
I can’t speak for wwth, but iirc, my previous comments on the subject were along the lines of anyone can be conned. Nothing to do with her being naive or a girl. I took a “wait and see” policy because I know personally what it’s like to be conned. Naivety has nothing to do with it if it’s done 100% by deception. Looking back 20/20, with the information available, I’d make the same “wait and see” call.
But thanks, I guess.
Note: Hedn, that wasn’t aimed at you or anything; I was just using your comment as a jumping-off point.
It is supremely ironic that someone with such a poor grasp of reality as this young woman should be making ‘documentaries.’
The *concept* of a “tar baby” as a problem you can’t extricate yourself from, with your struggles just making things worse, obviously isn’t racist per se, but the *term* itself first gained widespread currency — among whites; it was already known by blacks — after the “Uncle Remus” story of the same name, and those stories were racist as hell. I think that some of that racism has basically always been stuck to the term (as it were), and it’s been used in other racist ways, so I avoid using it myself.
Here’s an interesting take on it from Ta-Nehisi Paul Coates
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1221764,00.html#ixzz1TpzK7E8j
@Bvh
Oh, my “you” wasn’t you in specific, it was the people of this blog in general. I’m sorry if you felt attacked or something. I do need to learn to express myself better, I always sound very rude. Sorry.
I only cited your comment so people would know what led me to write my own.
@bvh,
Yeah, I was shocked when I heard people calling it racist a couple of years ago. I’ve been mentioning it to people since then, so that they can evaluate if they want to keep using it. I figure even if you do keep using it, at least you’ll mentally be prepared to calmly explain the original meaning to anyone who thinks it’s a slur.