Yesterday, I introduced you to the mysterious vaginal goo that enables those with vaginas to transform nearby men (and possibly even some women) into helpless zombie vagina slaves. According to some totally legit scientific studies summarized on the blog WOMEN NEED CONSTANT SUPERVISION, the hormone-ish lady chemicals called “copulins” act a bit like the magical midi-chlorians from Star Wars, turning ordinary women into Jedi masters of the vagina.
Also, they smell like butter.
If you haven’t read my original post on the subject, go read it now. Trust me, ladies, you won’t regret it.
Since writing yesterday’s post, I have done some additional research on the subject. So let me answer some lingering questions you gals might have.
I have had sex with my boyfriend many times, but I have not yet seized complete control of his mind, and he frequently exhibits annoying amounts of free will. What am I doing wrong?
Are you moving around at all during sex? While most sex-havers exhibit a strong preference for movement during intercourse, the most effective way to transmit your copulins into his brain is if both of you remain motionless. As WOMEN NEED CONSTANT SUPERVISION notes,
Through the process of coupling a female and male will lay relatively still without having sex with the penis inside of the vagina. The process may take up to 15 minutes and works faster and more efficiently when the female is on top of the male.
You may wish to distract your fella with some sports talk radio so that he doesn’t notice that you’ve stopped having sex with him and instead are lying atop him stock still with a slightly maniacal look on your face.
During this period the vagina injects up to 1/2 cup (100 ml) of the copulin fluid into the urethral opening at the tip of the penis, which is chemically attracted to semen, and will follow the semen down the shaft directly into the testicles.
Yep. Not half a teaspoon, half a cup. Apparently, penises are a bit like the Tardis, a lot bigger on the inside than they appear on the outside.
After 15 minutes of coupling the copulins will have entered the blood stream and traveled from his testicles up into the hypothalamus (a section of the brain that controls hormones) causing the male to become completely influenced by the needs and suggestions of the female.
And there you go, ladies!
In your last post, you said that copulins can also be transmitted in the form of a butter-scented gas, in order to ensnare nearby males. Yet none of the men I stood next to today started spontaneously doing my bidding. What’s up with that?
Be patient! Proper copulin transmission can take up to 15 minutes! As this totally legit real science website explains:
When a woman breathes, the movement causes minute amounts of copulins to become airborne. If she is stationary for an extended period of time, the copulins will eventually exist in the air around her; however, it appears to take some time for copulins to escape clothing fabric and actually become airborne.
But if you wait long enough, all the males in your vicinity will ultimately surrender to your Jedi vagina juice. WOMEN NEED CONSTANT SUPERVISION elaborates on this point:
Fifteen minutes is all it takes for copulins to take over a majority of the hypothalamus gland. … If you are within 3 feet of an ovulating woman or group of them YOUR polypeptides are being replaced at a rate of 5% a minute with THEIR copulins.
What if I don’t want any dudes sticking their icky man penises inside me? Can I turn a dude into a vagina zombie just by having him perform oral sex on me?
Yes! Just be sure to slather your basement area with baby powder before he starts heading downstairs. According to our totally legit science expert,
the use of talc (baby powder) on the vagina may facilitate copulins to becoming airborne. The copulins attach to the powder particles and are inhaled by the male, or enter the bloodstream via the eyes (which would explain why it works faster).
Gosh, David, I would love to transform every man around me into my helpless vagina slave, but how can I be sure this will work?
You don’t have to take my word for it! Listen instead to the totally real females who wrote in to this totally legit science page about copulins with their testimonials
Female: My husband is very happy now, and very helpful. … our marriage has become even better.
Female: He does all the housework, everything, and he is so happy about it! Its a miracle! …
Female: I use “power” words like the lady commenting here. I find it works wonders at keeping my boyfriend happy even long after we are “together”. Because with a word I can make him feel pleasure or pain, he sees me like a magic power, and has a…lot of respect for me always.
Wow. Can my vagina goo really give me that much power over men?
Yes, and more! According to this totally legit copulin expert, women can even command men who’ve been under their vaginal control for some time to stop thinking about things they don’t want them to — even GOLF!
If the female stated that he won’t think about golf anymore, and will instead think of her, the male will find himself incapable of thinking of golf while the copulins are present.
In the final stage of “copulin dominance,” the man will stop thinking these terrible golf thoughts altogether, even if his vaginal commander isn’t there to remind him not to think about golf.
Past communication has already established that the female doesn’t want him to play golf, and so the copulins allow only those thoughts that promote non-golf activities to reach the conscious level.
Ultimately, the vagina slave will turn into something resembling a zombie, sans rotting flesh and the overpowering urge to eat brains,
Females report that males at this stage, as copulins are transmitting, steadily become “dumber”, repeating themselves or the female’s words, slurring, or mixing words up. Late in the coupling, females state that the male will typically become incoherent and finally go silent.
Vagina zombification, complete!
Once a hypothalamus is flooded with copulins, the male brain is just sitting on idle, with only the bare minimum of thought process. In this state, the male is probably not thinking of anything at all, but any input from the female will become the male’s singular focus.
And she doesn’t even have to be there!
The female can plant ideas during coupling (later stages of the session) and the male will act upon them at a later date, completely convinced they are his own ideas … .
Boy, I’m really glad I decided to write this post!
I am very confused by all this. If men are as superior as MRAs and their ilk think they are, how come are they so easily controlled by vagina goo? And where is my man slave?!
Men are slaves to women and women are slaves to cats. But are men also by extension slaves to cats? I’m having a dispute with Fingie, thankful for input.
I WANT MY COPULINS! why is my wife denying me my dose? I want to do the housework and be happy about it, right now i’m doing it and feeling miserable. And I’m tired of thinking abouto golf, I don’t even play!
Tonight I’m going to have a very serious talk with her and tell her “If you don’t inject 200ml of copulins into my penis right now I’m going to sniff all the women who smell like butter until my hypothalamus is fried.”
What is with Jack Barnes? Am I supposed to know who that is?
I don’t twitter, but I followed dhag’s link, and ended up looking at barney’s twitter, where he had tweeted that David had “followed through with his threat”, and then linked to the story about Cassie Jayes “cannes” award being a scam.
Ok, so, reporting that Jaye was playing fast and lose with that “award” is a threat? Reporting the truth is a threat? Can someone tell me what the threat in that article was?
Maybe jack is infested with vagina goo, it’s making him invent wild stories about threats that no one but him can see. Wrong use of vagina goo, obviously, or maybe goo gone awry, hard to tell.
David, I want to second dhag85’s comment re Jack Barnes’s harassment.
Stay strong. Stay safe.
Ick, I’ve just read Jack Barnes’s message to David (on Twitter).
Barnes is lying. David never encouraged his readers to dox Barnes’s child. Anyone who reads David’s website knows that.
Ick!
If Jack Barnes has been doxed it is not clear who has done it – Jack Barnes could have done it himself.
Thanks, folks. I’m doing what I need to do to keep safe, looking into legal options. I’m not sure Barnes knows that he’s full of shit; I am fairly certain that Elam and McCarley are fully aware of his and their own bullshit and are egging him on,
eyesopen, I would lay odds on the doxer being either an AVFMer or other MRA or a “third party troll” rather than a feminist. These people are chronically dishonest.
It’s striking that Barnes accused me of “remaining silent” about the doxing — in a post in which he cited a post of mine in which I explcitly condemned the doxing. Then McCarley claimed I hadn’t condemned it — while quoting a Tweet in which I condemned it. Agt this poit I don’t think i can assume this is carelessness on their part; I have to assume a degree of malice and outright deceit.
Hello.
Hmm, indeed, that sounds like station porn cartoon old scenarii…
But if some persons really believe this ludicrous “scientific fact”, this may be harmful, because they are just at one step to say something like “I have not rape this woman. She just use her copuline-scent to tease me into have sex with her so that she can false-rape accuse me !”. Just another terrible argument to try to justify the unjustifiable.
Sorry to miss the funny part of the scenario.
Have a nice day.
Oh, and good luck, Mr Futrelle. Swashbuckling against so mala fida persons is certainly strainous and tiring. I hope you will be safe. Is there anything like a “main courante” (sorry, i do not know the equivalent term in your country) in your state ? If not already done, maybe you should fill one at the policestation, just in case of ?
@Snowberry
Sounds like an accurate description of Roosh’s life, recently.
The time when he expressed his wish to create a Neo-Nazi Paramilitary Battalion? It was the equivalent of him writing “GNARF GNARF GNARF”, or complete nonsense.
@ occasional reader
There’s not an official equivalent as such in the US. If you lay a complaint which the police it’s generally as a prelude to them taking some action. Of course, if they decide not to arrest or refer for prosecution then the record of the original allegations still exists and may have some legal significance (c.f. the OJ Simpson trial for an example)
Yeah, “creep shaming” is not really a valid concern. Unlike slut shaming (shaming those who like having lots of consensual sex with different people) and virgin shaming (shaming people for not having sex), which are about policing people whose actions don’t affect others in a negative way outside of their possible wish to control others, “creep shaming” is about shaming someone for behavior that does affect others in a negative way. They’re not equivalent, no matter how creepy MRAs try to frame the issue.
@fruitloopsie
Thank you for pointing out what made me reeaally concerned amidst all the head-shaking. History shows that assigning mysterious supernatural powers and/or elaborate conspiracies to marginalized groups has always been an effective way of justifying their persecution. “To an ignorant outsider, it may seem that we have all the power in society and that it’s really shitty of us to treat group x like this, but actually, they possess power y and have infiltrated our decision-making body*, so we have to fight back by controlling them even harder! Otherwise they’ll do the same to us, and that’s terrible!”
Also why I find the mutants in X-Men to be a really, really bad analogy for marginalized groups.
*Especially fitting in the case of these so-called copulins. I’d really like to see where this dude gets his science.
Actually, scratch that, I don’t. It’s a “surprise goatse” joke, I get it now.
@ occasional reader
There’s not an official equivalent in the US. generally if you lay a compliant with the police it’s a prelude to them taking some action. Of course if they then decide not to arrest or refer for prosecution the record of the original allegation can have some legal weight in subsequent proceedings (c.f. the OJ Simpson trial for an example)
Hello.
@Alan Robertshaw
Oh, ok, thank you for the explanation. I was assuming there was equivalent in other justice systems. Do you have no possibility to legaly inform the police that you fear something happen to you (orally excluded) ? Is this necessarily a complaint ?
And to going back on the topic :
Have a nice day.
Bon courage et bon chance, David. Let us know if there’s anything we can do.
@ occasional reader
The “logbook” system isn’t really something tat caught on in common law jurisdictions; it’s more of a civil law thing. I’m guessing you’re from somewhere with a French heritage?
Interestingly, there’s been an attempt to introduce something similar in the military for sexual assault cases. The theory being that people who don’t want to bring charges (for multiple reasons) can at least highlight an issue. However, because a person cannot be subjected to any sort of detriment without being given a chance to defend themselves; it’s all a bit pointless. There’s a note made but no action can be taken against the alleged perpetrator so victim may well find themselves still working with that person.
As to informing the police, people do that of course but if they don’t want the police to take action it’s pretty much the equivalent of leaving an “If anything happens to me, it was probably x that did it” note.
Re: “GNARF GNARF GNARF”
Actually that’s one of the few full-proof ways to tell one is dreaming. Just pick up a book and read a sentence, look away and it will have changed. Same with writing and mirrors (they never show anything like a proper reflection). If you’re lucky, realising you’re dreaming should allow you to control your dream and spend you dreamtime more pleasantly by flying and breathing under water and creating rainbow castles or smashing rocks with your mind. Also running really, really fast, listening to PSB. GNARF.
Thanks for the great post. Obviously as a man I don’t make my own but I have managed to source some high grade air release butter scented copulins from a reputable seller. I plan to release them into the air at my next meeting with the male bosses. I will implant a strong desire for them to double my wages and halve my working hours. I will disguise the butter smell by giving everyone some pieces of buttered toast beforehand. Will let you know how it goes.
@Alan Robertshaw
Yes, French.
Exact, it can be see as this kind of “accusation” : if something happens to me, that may be because of yada yada”.
Except that it is also a way to motivate police to intervene in some cases. Let say as an example you fill the “main courante” because each saturday, someone in the street puts the volume so loud your walls are shaking (this is an exaggeration, of course), at midnight. The next saturday, if you call the police and provide them the reference of the “main courante”, they are more likely to come and see. And even more, if more than one person fills a “main courante” with the same problem in it. Well, that does not imply that it is always followed by legal action, as you point it out, but it may have a good “prevention” effect.
@ occasional reader
You raise a point that’s quite contentious over here in England. Our law has always been that the police don’t owe a duty of care to victims or potential victims of crime. So you can’t sue the police for inefficiency resulting in harm or even for failing to act when you’ve reported a threat.
That’s been modified lately with a couple of cases. Whilst the general rule applies, it seems the case now that if the police specifically give you advice that gets you injured or killed (e.g. stay in your home) then you have a cause of action.
More controversially there’s now a case where a victim had alerted the police that someone was trying to kill them and the police failed to act (resulting in the person’s death) that is going to the European Court of Human Rights to argue that the police should be liable. Be interesting to see the result of that one.
@Alan Robertshaw
Hmm, this is a difficult case, indeed. If the police is made to be forced to intervene, then there is the risk of false alerts to decoy from specific points, as an example. If not, you have the risk, like in your case, that the alert and the risk are reals, and damages result. As protection of persons should always prevail, how can the other problem should be managed, especially when government (at least here) tend to cut the number of officials in the administrations ?
My girlfriend is A Real Scientist and as a molecular biologist it should be within the scope of her field. I think I’ll ask her if this is legit! (Unless she makes me decide not to do that, of course ..)