I found this insightful manosphere graphic on the Blue Pill Subreddit; it seems to have originally come from a blog called “Females exposed.”
I hope all the women reading this will see this as the challenge that it is: Gotta Catch ’em All!
Click the pic for a much larger and far more readable version.
Oh, and if you’re wondering how many types of women — er, “females” — there are, apparently there is only one, at least according to Females exposed.
Wat.
Seriously. How about in my whole life I’ve just looked for type of person I want to be my partner, husband, friend, share-our-life for better or for worse.
Well that certainly reflects a healthy and rational mindset.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/tumblr_mj7krd58tW1r3gb3zo1_400.gif
These guys are incapable of seeing any relationship as something other than transactional, aren’t they? Having a friend with whom you can have interesting conversations with and learn from is using them to enhance your intellect and ideals. They’re literally unable to see beyond the user and the used.
I also think this “artist” ran out of ideas. Aren’t Beta Bucks and ATM guy the same thing with a different title and stock model picture? The same goes for Tampon Guy and Creepy Guy.
Is it just me or is the “beta bucks” guy fairly decent looking and in shape?
Facepalm…Just facepalm.
@WWTH
I wonder if this is how they treat every relationship, even so called “guy friends”? They don’t hang around anyone that gives them something? Awful.
If you assume women are good for nothing except sex, then I suppose it’s true by definition that every relationship a woman has with a man is either a transactional exchange of sex for goods and services or a one-sided mooch.
God only knows why they think women have relationships with each other.
Where’s my harem? 🙁 Am I “feeeemaling” wrong? Btw, love that plaid skirt.
Wow, I’m completely missing out on the veritable cornucopia of men ready to do my bidding. Damn it. I guess I’ll just have to settle for #1 hubby who loves me. 😀
katz – That’s easy.
To plot.
a) How can this be a harem if she isn’t having sex with all of them? Or is she? It sounds like she’s only sending sex payments to the shirtless motorcycle man.
b) Is the trope that rich men get all the best women or just one unappreciative wife?
c) I sort of feel bad for anyone who was looking for a tumblr about female sex poses.
By the way, relevant for other claims by Redpillers, though not this, BUT:
http://www.theage.com.au/business/workplace-relations/top-27-most-risky-jobs-for-your-health-20151103-gkq1ab.html
The top 27 most risky jobs for your health. This is not the ‘grr hunted the mammoth’ individual risk, but the risks over time for a whole group. Here are the top four from most actually dangerous to least:
Dentists, dental surgeons, and dental assistants (unhealthiness score: 65.4)
Flight attendants (unhealthiness score: 62.3)
Anaesthesiologists, nurse anaesthetists, and anaesthesiologist assistants (unhealthiness score: 62.3)
Veterinarians and veterinary assistants and technicians (unhealthiness score: 60.3)
This is risk of disease, radiation damage over time for the general population of that group, etc. Basically, what is likely to actually happen, using data from the Occupational Information Network from the US Department of Labor. So things like needlestick injuries reported, exposure to harmful chemicals, etc.
Wait… All women have a man who provides beta bucks AND a sugar daddy? Jeez, we must be rolling in it.
(prepares best game show narrator/announcer voice); let’s tell these lucky contestants what they can win today! First up, a ridiculous redpillian depiction of women and a toxic classification system for men they think that women rather than just themselves in reality, have in something the redpillians call a harem which is total bullshit. But WAIT there’s MORE: those redpillians are going to have sexbots someday and then women will be sorry they didn’t have sex with those guys – suuuuuuuuuuure they will scooter, I think your mom is yelling at you to bring your dirty laundry out of the basement if you want clean underwear and socks this week.
Oh silly me, of course WWTH made the exact same point. But still, though!
The model they picked to represent “females”–is she supposed to be a typical woman?
Because it’s like looking in a mirror! Positively uncanny.
(And my boyfriend looks just like Fuckbuddy!)
Oh, it’s recursive. Those of us who aren’t sluts and users who look like porn stars thrusting out our fake boobs and asses don’t meet their definition of dateable females.
I’m looking for a man who will glorify my crimes.
I suppose I needed some sort of sarcasm tag; I don’t use that language in earnest.
Given I don’t look anything like the example of “women” they picked, I presume I fall under the category of “rock” (as per the grand old game of “eat, mate, rock” as played by predators everywhere). Talk about being taken for granite!
I have been doing it wrong.
@ Buttercup… I’m looking for one that’ll help me move the body. Hubby has a bad back
I love how this seems to accuse women of having standards and expectations for men as if it’s a BAD thing…
If they weren’t so intentionally harmful, I’d feel sorry for these guys.
It must be horrid to go through life with such a cynically transactional view of human relationships.