Categories
a voice for men lying liars MRA red pill

Is “Red Pill” director Cassie Jaye’s Cannes award a fake? Signs point to “yes.”

Seems legit
Seems legit

If you look at Cassie Jaye’s official bios, you might be forgiven for thinking that the director of the upcoming Red Pill documentary had won an impressive “best documentary” prize at Cannes for her first feature-length film.

On her LinkedIn page, Jaye writes that “Daddy I Do,” her film on the abstinence-only movement, “won the Best Documentary Award at the 2010 Cannes Independent Film Festival.” She makes similar statements on YouTube and on her official site, CassieJaye.com.

Press coverage of the young filmmaker has made much of her Cannes award. In a feature on Jaye, the San Rafael Patch reported breathlessly that “Daddy I Do soon garnered immense acclaim, culminating with the Best Documentary Award at the Cannes International Film Festival.” Feminist website Bust declared that the film “has already won Best Documentary awards in several festivals, including the Cannes Film Festival.” A writer at Rumpus.net started off her interview with Jaye by congratulating her for winning “Best Documentary at Cannes.”

But if you go to the official site of the Cannes Film Festival, and look at its list of winners for 2010, you will find no mention of Daddy I Do.

Hell, you won’t find a Best Documentary winner for that year at all, because Cannes didn’t actually have a Best Documentary award.

So what’s going on? Is Jaye lying? Well, not technically.

She did win an award with the word “Cannes” in it. But it didn’t come from the official Cannes festival.

It came instead from a knockoff event, the Cannes INDEPENDENT Film Festival, that many in the film business consider an outright scam, using the Cannes name in order to profit from entry fees, much as the makers of the Spader-Man action figures above hoped to make money from confused or perhaps overly thrifty fans of the real Spiderman.

A site called CannesGuide warns filmmakers not to submit films to the faux festival, declaring that

the Cannes Independent Film Festival (CIFF) is, in our opinion, a scam. It is not connected to the Festival de Cannes, Marche du Film, or any other official festival organisation. It is a coat-tails event, run from the UK, which likely seeks to capitalise on the prestige associated with the city’s name and famous festival.

Although CIFF is a real event, we have questioned its legitimacy in the past and continue to believe that there is little or no value to filmmakers in submitting a film. 

Since that was written, the “festival” seems to have vanished entirely from the world. Take a look at what its official web site looks like now. (Seriously, take a look.)

Jaye’s supporters will presumably point out that she’s never technically lied about her award or claimed that it came from the official Cannes festival. Certainly it’s not her fault that reporters make mistakes!

Except that it kind of is. Here’s a screenshot from the trailer for Daddy I Do.

Screenshot of the Daddy, I Do trailer
Screenshot of the Daddy, I Do trailer

Most people seeing this flash by on the screen, I suspect, will remember the giant CANNES and won’t even notice the word “independent” underneath it. Or, like the reporter for the San Rafael Patch, they’ll change the “independent” to “international” in their minds.

At the very least’s it’s a graphic seemingly designed to capitalize on the confusion between the Cannes Independent Film Festival and the real Festival de Cannes.

No, Jaye isn’t doing anything illegal here. But trumpeting an award from a phony festival as if it were a real award is not only dishonest; it’s kind of pathetic.

 

214 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wetherby
Wetherby
9 years ago

It’s very common practice to misleadingly inflate your credentials in the film industry.

I know one person who significantly exaggerated the responsibility of her first industry job (I was her successor with access to all her work-related correspondence, so I knew exactly how little power she had), presumably in order to get up on the second rung of a notoriously tricky career ladder.

The weird thing is, despite a lengthy list of entirely genuine and in some cases genuinely significance achievements made since then, I saw a few years ago that she’s still exaggerating the importance of that original job in her published industry bio. Maybe she genuinely believes that it was bigger than it was? Or maybe she cynically thinks that nobody’s ever going to call her out on it? After all, only about two or three people know the truth.

Wetherby
Wetherby
9 years ago

Bloody autocorrect. “Significance” = “significant”, obviously.

sagamanus
sagamanus
9 years ago

Damn that’s embarrassing. Making that claim, that is.

EJ (The Other One)
EJ (The Other One)
9 years ago

I hope that however the documentary comes out, it ends up being what Jaye wanted to make. Art is hard: being able to create something in real life which closely matches one’s original vision requires considerable skill and not a little luck. Having to adulterate that even further because of pressure from donors or interviewees to present them in a certain light would be heartbreaking.

Bon courage, Ms Jaye. I hope you do well and I hope this documentary reaches the high standards set by your previous work. If you can do that, I don’t care what awards you won or didn’t win.

Kat
Kat
9 years ago

@Wetherby

It’s very common practice to misleadingly inflate your credentials in the film industry.

I know one person who significantly exaggerated the responsibility of her first industry job (I was her successor with access to all her work-related correspondence, so I knew exactly how little power she had), presumably in order to get up on the second rung of a notoriously tricky career ladder.

I’ve certainly heard of padding your resume.

But showing off a scam film award seems to me to be going above and beyond the call of youthful naivete or youthful ambition. It’s deceptive. It’s dopey. And Cassie Jaye, so far, has done nothing to correct the impression that her film won an award at the Cannes Film Festival.

A film maker shouldn’t mislead her audience.

Nor should she be mislead or manipulated by her backers, who are showing her love. (I don’t know if this is actually occurring, but some commenters have suggested this.)

I note that Cassie Jaye’s film production company is in Marin County (SF Bay Area). Warren Farrell lives in Mill Valley (Marin County). And the Mill Valley Film Festival has been around since 1978. Maybe Cassie Jaye met Warren Farrell there and they cooked up a movie? Just my speculation.

Dandy Andy
Dandy Andy
9 years ago

Well, it seems that Mr. Elam has already responded to this post with his usual hyperbole. He accuses David of following though on his “threat”, if by threat you mean pointing out the difference between the authentic Cannes Film Festival and the CIFF.

Also, I think it’s going to be very difficult for Jaye to make a balanced documentary now that Mike Cernovich has contributed $10,000 and is an Associate Producer.

Dandy Andy
Dandy Andy
9 years ago

Just to add to my last comment, it’s really amazing how upset Elam is over David’s last post. Why is he getting his tighty whiteys into a wad over what David wrote about the CIFF award if there’s no substance to it? What I find funny is how Elam equates David’s pointing out the CIFF is probably a scam is somehow an attack on the integrity of *all* independent filmmakers:

“This is where David Futrelle proves himself ignorant (as I was) of the filmmaking world. By attacking CIFF as a “fake” film festival, he takes aim at the very heart of independent filmmaking and puts a cheap smear on all of them.”

Uh, actually no Paul.

Wetherby
Wetherby
9 years ago

How exactly does David’s post smear, say, the Sundance Film Festival and devalue its awards?

Luzbelitx
9 years ago

Oh noes!

Does this mean David is smearing the Buenos Aires Festival Internacional de Cine Independiente as well!?

You… You… monster!!

numerobis
numerobis
9 years ago

Award and publication scammers are the worst. I’ve seen junior people get caught up in this, particularly on the academic side — they are one reason you’re really strongly encouraged to check with your advisor before publishing anything.

The victims I’ve met figure it out, and work out how to rescue their reputation: you don’t mention it unbidden, and you’re up-front about your mistake when called out.

mockingbird
mockingbird
9 years ago

I’m seconding numerobis.

Getting scammed happens, especially to people new to a field if they don’t have good mentorship.

But touting the results is kinda participating in the scam, no?

I’m agnostic on this whole post – I haven’t looked at any of the source material and I’m unlikely to do so anytime soon – but it does seem like it would be a difficult thing to take an unbiased look at something if one of the subjects (Cernovich, in this case) is an associate producer.

I mean, how much faith would you have in a documentaris called “Gun Control in America” heavily invested in by the NRA, “Our Energy Future” co-produced by Exxon-Mobile, or (for that matter) “The History of the NAACP” independently financed by members of its board?

Such efforts invariavly become the equivalent of vanity publishing.

The one silver lining: She does seem to be an actual filmmaker. Perhaps her efforts will do something to shine a light on actual men’s issues (you know, the ones that the MRM says it’s concerned with but that fall by the wayside in favor of “Internet advocacy”, aka – engaging in on-line misogyny and harassment, brigading comments sections, etc).

mockingbird
mockingbird
9 years ago

in documrntaries*

Darn phone.

Dodom
Dodom
9 years ago

To be honest, I don’t think David’s post is any close to being a terrible thing that’ll end up hurting her, but I don’t think I’d have done it, in his place. It feels like a cheap shot because it doesn’t really add to the picture.
Her current gig and her AMA say that she’s willing to do yellow journalism already. Participating in phony awards is just par with that, I don’t think there’s a need for “here’s MORE evidence that the writer promising to pander to her sponsors is the kind of writer that would pander to a sponsor.”

mockingbird
mockingbird
9 years ago

In. Documentaries*

My phone actually autocorrected to the wrong spelling. Twice.

And I don’t think I’ve ever pecked out the word before on this keyboard.

*narrows eyes at Android OS*

Boost
Boost
9 years ago

A short film I worked on once was entered into a festival and received some kind of award. Later the director found out the “festival” didn’t even happen, and he had been duped into paying a fee for an award certificate.

dhag85
dhag85
9 years ago

Frankly, the fact that she’s made Juicebro Cernovich an associate producer is more damning than anything else she’s done so far. Cerno is one of the most toxic manospherians I know of. There’s no excuse for embracing that guy.

Cerno is a raging homophobe. And Cassie Jaye apparently made a documentary about same sex marriage, calling it “The Right To Love” (so I assume it’s a pro-SSM film). That’s just beyond gross.

Leda Atomica
Leda Atomica
9 years ago

Had to look up Cernovich (WHTM came in handy, this is like an online library of misogyny) and I have no reason to think he is a “neutral” party. Unless his views and role in GamerHate are in line of the filmmaker’s view of ‘middle ground’.

dhag85
dhag85
9 years ago

Juicebro seems to be having an obsession with Seth Rogen right now. Looks like some time last month he wrote a tweet randomly saying Seth Rogen is having marriage problems. Rogen’s wife tweeted him back and said “He is?!?! That’s so sad! I hear his wife is awesome.” – obviously rolling her eyes at him. Then either Cerno faked a tweet, or she has deleted it. Juicebro has uploaded an image of a twitter thread where he tweets “Your wife won’t fuck you hahhahahahhahha” to Seth Rogen. Rogen’s wife then allegedly tweeted back: “Well, she definitely would fuck you!”

Now, this may or may not have happened. Can’t find this tweet anywhere, but if it was indeed a real tweet it’s pretty clear she was being sarcastic.

Cerno’s response? More than two weeks later he wrote a blog post with the title “Why Does Seth Rogen’s Wife Want to Have Sex with Me?”. In it, he repeatedly attacks Rogen for being “weak”, “lazy”, “fat”, and for being a “self-loathing” white person (hello dog whistle).

At the end it turns into a promotion post for Cerno’s book.

This is the guy Cassie Jaye is ok with making associate producer of her documentary.

dhag85
dhag85
9 years ago

@Leda Atomica

Juicebro Cernovich is the guy who declared the Umpqua shooter had to be trans or muslim, because reasons.

Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
9 years ago

Cernovich is pretty openly pro-murder, too. A pro-murder lawyer. ETHICS!!!11one

Dodom
Dodom
9 years ago

@dhag: why “Juicebro”?

Leda Atomica
Leda Atomica
9 years ago

Ugh. I read his Twitter too doing my research and was wondering if Rogen had pissed in his morning coffee.
Seems totally like *the* person to associate with your very serious and neutral “documentary”.

That’s right, I put quotes around it!

dhag85
dhag85
9 years ago

@Dodom

Because he seems to be making a living selling scam juice diets. And possibly sperm juice? Not sure.

leftwingfox
9 years ago

Looking over my own resume, the closest I have to that sort of padding is “Attended 2 years of school x, graduated from school Y” as opposed to “Flunked out of second year of school X, graduated from school Y”. It’s also something I explicitly clear up if anyone mistakes.

mewfington catmouth iii
mewfington catmouth iii
9 years ago

my mind has taken the words “sperm juice” and rapidly transformed them into an unstoppable train wreck of utterly vile mental images