Bigots of a feather flock together, so it shouldn’t come as a great surprise to any of you that the woman-hating, rape-legalization-promoting pickup artist Roosh V is also a raving homophobe. He’s long banned gay folks from posting in his comments, and in a recent video expressed a weird bemusement at the idea of gay men using his, ahem, teachings to have “buttsex.”
Now he’s decided to take up arms against gay marriage. He’s a teensy bit late on this one — it’s already legal in all 50 states, dude! But that doesn’t stop him from spewing forth one of the most over-the-top, conspiratorial takes on the issue that I’ve ever seen. In a post last week on his blog, Roosh argued that
the legalization of gay marriage [is] a full frontal attack on heterosexual men …one phase of a degenerate march to persecute heterosexuals, both legally and socially, while acclimating young children to the homosexual lifestyle.
How so, Roosh?
The … societal reorganization that is necessary to allow gay marriage automatically elevates homosexuals to a special class of citizenry. To hoist one class you must demote another, meaning that heterosexual men are by default the enemies and oppressors of homosexuals.
Well, some of them are, dude. Like, for example, the ones who go around saying that the legalizing gay marriage is a degenerate attack on heterosexuals.
It is a foregone conclusion that these oppressors, which includes both straight men and women, must be ordered to give tribute, benefits, and submission to the “victim” class. You will eventually kneel whether you like it or not.
Interesting choice of words there. Roosh is such a thickheaded clod that I’m not sure if he did that on purpose or not.
In addition to “aggressively modifying” hetero dude behavior “through social shaming and re-education in schools,” Roosh argues, the Gay Gestapo will force
straight men … to pay taxes for the AIDS drugs of gays, their impulsive sex changes, their mental and medical treatments resulting from sleeping with hundreds of partners, and also the salaries of politicians that continue to vote against traditional family values and basic morality standards.
Oh, and the eeevil gays and their allies will also crack down on the free speech of brave realtalking hetero men. Indeed, he complains, straight men are already muzzled by the Gay Thought Police.
You can make a comment about “toxic masculinity” at work and not get written up by human resources. You can make fun of “lame pick up artists” in your co-ed social circle and get pats on the back. But what happens if you say that homosexuals are degenerates who are spreading HIV to the general population? What happens if you say gay marriage is state-sponsored anal sex?
People laugh at you for being an idiot as well as a raving homophobe?
It won’t be long until you will be forced to declare your allegiance to the homosexual lifestyle to retain your job, to pretend that you’re a believer in social justice just to keep bread on the table.
Not only that, but your co-workers will be deprived of your fascinating disquisitions on how gay marriage is state-sponsored butt sex.
Even more sinister than modifying our speech and behavior is that the homosexual agenda aims to convert children by sexualizing them at a young age. The media normalizes homosexuals as loving and lively characters by showing their lifestyles as exciting, adventurous, and fun instead of the disease-ridden cesspool of drugs and medical horrors that it really is.
[citation needed]
Millions of boys who grow up to experiment with “cool” anal sex thanks to the propaganda will grow up to lead sterile and disturbed lives because of it—if they’re lucky enough not to avoid getting abused through adoptions by homosexual men.
Wat.
Child abuse and pedophilic sex rings will skyrocket, but I hope you’re not expecting this abuse to be covered by the media. Instead, they will push fantastical new rape hoaxes that try to portray straight men as evil. Crimes by homosexuals will be not be pursued or publicized while false crimes done by heterosexuals will be manufactured.
I think Roosh may be turning into Mr. Burns.
And all this will, of course, lead to THE END OF THE WORLD.
Once heterosexuals such as yourself are persecuted and shamed for preferring vanilla sex, and children are converted to bisexuality or homosexuality with the aid of a gay and transsexual obsessed media, marriage will decline from its already pathetic rate, birth rates will plummet, and society itself will collapse…
Yipes. And he hasn’t even gotten to the … TRANS MENACE.
The dust from gay marriage hasn’t even settled before the establishment has begun forcing transsexual acceptance down our throats with ABC, ESPN, and Starbucks leading the charge.
Starbucks?
The media has also started attempts to promote pedophilia as a reasonable alternative lifestyle.
Dude, I think you’ve mixed up “the media” with “all those Red Pill dudes who want the age of consent lowered to 12.”
[I]f this degenerate march is not halted, we will see a complete inversion of American society where most masculine behaviors are made illegal and the traditional family becomes a relic of the past. Homosexual marriage will only embolden the degenerate forces that have power in America today. Unless they are stopped, I fear great catastrophe, not only for us men, but the country itself.
In other words:
Hysteria? More like man-steria.
“He’s long banned gay folks from posting in his comments”
Wow! There is so much wrong in Roosh’s diatribe. Pedophilia is not a byproduct of homosexuality. Has he never heard of heterosexual pedophiles? Also, Roosh must not know that the majority of people who have AIDS are straight.
“The media has also started attempts to promote pedophilia as a reasonable alternative lifestyle.”
Not any of the media that I read. He needs to be specific when he makes such outrageous claims.
Roosh must know that running his mouth against same sex marriage at this point in time is a waste of time. Marriage equality is here to stay. There’s no going back. I assume this diatribe is the way to build up traffic on his website.
ahh degenerate that word the third reich loved so much , roosh is marching closer and closer to open neo nazism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_art
That literally means ‘if they’re lucky enough to get abused…by homosexual men.’ If Roosh is going to endlessly pull crap out of his ass and smear it all over the internet, the least he could do is make it grammatically intelligible.
@Pithy Pseudonym
Argh. This makes me want to have a lot of anal sex just to up my value to corporate sponsors! Why didn’t I think of this already? Why? Why?
Now that portland has renamed their big arena (it used to be the “Rose Garden”), maybe I can get someone to name my anus the [Corporate nym here] Rosebud Garden for enough money to pay off my student loans, buy a house in one of the most expensive cities in the world (Vancouver), and leave a little left over to start saving for the kids’ education.
Hello.
@EJ (The Other One)
Hmm, ok, i think i get your point. You mean that the symbolism of the term (and the ceremony) is still a major concern for a part of the population. I see what you mean, but i think this part is quite small (at least, for the really sincere ones).
Here, when the marriage for all has been enforced, there have been a big uproar from some parts of the population, mainly traditionalists, conservatives and extremists (religious and/or social). But it seems to me that the “protection of the traditional marriage” is just a shield, the so-called “natural concept” of the one woman – one man family (or as they say, man – woman, because man first, yeah ?) is a flag they wave because they do not like to see and they do not want to recognize (from a social point of view) non-hetero couples. It is not really the symbolism of the union of two (or more) souls in front of a god (or many gods) that they have at heart. Just, maybe, the fear of something they have been breeded with as “awful”.
@Ohlmann
Exact. The social benefis of the PACS remain less important than the ones of the marriage. But so are the duties and the possibility to end it. And it is possible that the PACS still be used by couples who want to give a try to a life in common before any stronger engagement. Which is, in my opinion, a good thing.
@Catalpa
Thank you for the details and the precisions !
As english is not my mother language, i guess my teachers were a bit “old school” then, and readings provide me variations which sometimes (often ? Alas) confuse me. I am sorry about that and i hope i will remain still understandable.
@Bina
Hear, hear. And from what i have read about and from him, i can easily understand that they dismiss him. The key words are “free will” (while remaining respectuous of the others), and for all. Trying to contest or, worse, forbid it from part of the population just on biased social and/or biological criteria (with phony or no robust arguments) is in no way logical or rational.
You’re right. They seem to be so focused on their own navel that they seem not able to see a world not revolving around them. It reminds me a bit of the tale of the frog at the bottom of the well.
Have a nice day.
“Also, “state-sponsored anal sex” — ha. Like YOU never raped a woman up the ass either, eh Roosh?”
This. You’d think homophobes would also be against hetero anal sex but its virtually all Roosh and many of them talk about (along with bj’s).
“Why are you so hooked on that one lie Roosh barely managed to fart out without laughing and immediately abandoned for his usual “KILL THE MUSLIMS” rhetoric?”
If he claimed to be a strict, practicing Muslim that would be a lie (I think?). Did he claim it? IIRC he claims that his trad-con father is a Shia from Iran and his views informed Roosh’s current views, if not abundantly then at least partially, which would not be a lie.
Bina | October 21, 2015 at 8:16 pm
Sharia law on wife beating is (morbidly) fascinating. It’s so detailed.
If your wife disobeys you then first you have to admonish her. If that doesn’t work then you have to banish her from bed.
It’s only after that that if she doesn’t mend her ways you’re allowed to beat her.
OMG, Sharia holds that depriving a wife of sex is punishment? That means that they acknowledge that women DO have sex for pleasure. Which means that they’re way ahead of a lot of menzers of all stripes, who insist that women use sex only to “get affection” (and/or expensive shit) out of men.
Sorry, I just find it hilarious that they’re a lot more reasonable, when you get down to it, than all those “spare the rod, spoil the child” Christians. Who, of course, are also the ones to hold up Muslims as the abusive bad guys.
_______________________________________________________________
No. No. No. And no! They are not “a lot more reasonable” – both are horrific.
Just as I said before that if I’m not interested in a guy who shows interest me, I make it loud and clear, similarly I make it loud and clear to “well-meaning” “nice” Christians and Muslims that I have ZERO interest in their religions, am not looking to convert and they must give up all endeavor in such attempts.
This zero tolerance policy has held me in good steed in my travels throughout the world, in my dealings with all kinds of people here at home, and in dating a wide variety of men. Christians and Muslims do sometimes date women with a view to convert them.
Not on my watch, buddy!
David, have you seen this tweet from Roosh? It is from August but still.
https://mobile.twitter.com/rooshv/status/634108269938671616
And if you have not seen this link from Daily Kos about the Laughing Witch/Thunderf00t incident:
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/22/1437368/-Family-Business-Brigaded-on-Yelp-by-MRA-YouTube-Stars
Wow, Thunderf00t doxxed laughing witch? Her channel is pretty small. That’s honestly horrifying. Say what you want about creationists, but I don’t ever remember them acting like this toward the snotty youtube New Atheist crowd.
None of us are really safe. If you disagree with their anti-intellectual, hateful pap, no matter how small you are, you’re apparently a target.
@Scribbles
Yeah, it is no longer a surprise to me that people like Thunderf00t will doxx someone like Laughing Witch. His channel has grown so big now that he seems to think every move he makes is the right one.
You are right. The atheist “community” on YouTube is actually pretty hateful and dare I say, irrational, which is funny when you think about it. Amazing what a huge following and money can do to people and their sense of justice.
Just to clarify, I’m not an atheist and I do have friends and family members from about 7 different religions. I’m perfectly civil to them as long as they don’t try to convert me. I’m even willing to listen to them share interesting tidbits from their religions, but its the proselytizing I despise, and Christians and Muslims are the worst offenders in this regard.
Laughing Witch Jennifer Keller should have done what she did anonymously so that Thunderass could not trace it to her. The internet can be a terrible place.
Thunderass sounds like he has a shit bubble stuck in his throat. His voice sounds as greasy as the rest of his body looks. He’s like that thing that ate Tasha Yar. That’s what he reminds me of.
Pain, yeah. I’m an atheist, I’ve been an atheist for over a decade, and it pains me to see assholes like thunderfoot and Hitchens and other assorted bigot trash using the term Atheist to describe their little fits of hate. Why couldn’t they pick something else? Why do they have to codify their bigotry under a word that confuses the shit out of everyone (big-A Atheism v small-a atheism)?
I like Harris’s endorsement of Jainism. I wish there were more Jains in the world.
And had she done so, and still gotten doxxed, what then? Thunderf00t is a shithead for doing what he did, but Laughing Witch did nothing to deserve what he did, nor could she have known that this was going to happen.
This is a classic case of victim blaming. Don’t do this.
Roosh has become too easy a target for ridicule, he is almost satarising himself now.
My favourte (sarcasm) ‘I am an intellectual I am not a MRA person’ meanwhile goes deeper into pedophilia..
Recent posts:
Male and Female Attractiveness by Age
The 16 Year Old Girl: Advantages and Drawbacks
13-15 Year Old Girls: A Rundown
The Buzzing Beehive of Young Female Sexual Gossiping
And of course his ‘Gay test’, if you are not a pedophile into 13 year old girls then you are gay…..
Test to See if a Man Is Gay or Not
“All of you men who say that female doesn’t turn you on and say any man who likes that pic is a pedophile…guess what? You’re all gay! Every single man who thinks like this is gay. Gay, gay, gay, gay, gay, gay, gay! Only a gay man is not aroused by that female.
We need to start attacking all these idiots running around screaming “Pedophile!” at every man who looks at a teenage girl. Next time a man says that to you, laugh in his face and call him a faggot. Tell him he’s gay. A homosexual. A queer. A nancyboy. A fruit. A swish. A girl. A woman. Tell him he’s not a man. We need to start shaming these men who are working for the enemy – the women.”
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/page/4/
Anybody else think he’s starting to say more and more extreme things in a desperate attempt to make people keep paying attention to him?
This seems like a good enough place to mention this.
In this months Ethical Consumer Magazine Roosh has a dishonourable mention:
“By the end of September, 220,678 people had signed a Change.org petition urging Amazon to pull his “rape books” from the site”
Of particular note was the ‘no rape on private property’ proposal he made in February.
Lisa, Robert Lindsay has openly admitted on his blog that he harbors pedophilic thoughts but has never acted on them. We can only hope he hasn’t.
“13-15 Year Old Girls: A Rundown”
Is that from Roosh or Robert? For Roosh it would be alarming, but from Robert its par for his blog’s course.
It’s from Robert (gah why does my name have to be so common) that site is creepy to say the least, and that picture looks like a little kid. Ewww. :p
Robert wants his pedophilia to be normalized as a “sexual orientation” so that’s why he’s calling people “gay” who don’t agree with him. Did you read that Salon article?
I am assuming that that is a different Robert Lindsay to the Engish actor, who is not known for his Lolita complex!