Milo Yiannopoulos, Breitbart “journalist” and full-time GamerGate panderer, has weighed in on the topic of the day amongst woman-hating dudes: sexbots, and how non-robot women are going to be so sorry when men desert them en masse for sexy, uncomplaining lady robots.
His 1800-word post on the subject covers pretty much all of the standard manosphere talking points on the coming sexbot utopia for men; he even manages to quote (approvingly, of course) our old friend Heartiste, the woman-hating white-supremacist pickup guru.
The basic argument will be familiar to anyone who read my post about MRAs and sexbots yesterday, or who’s ever heard MRAs and/or manospherians wax poetic on the subject: modern Western women, infected by feminism, have gotten so awful that men these days only put up with their bullshit for the sex; as soon as even halfway decent sexbots become affordable, these mean ladies will get the comeuppance they deserve, and end up living sad, lonely lives with no one to keep them warm except for their cats.
And yes, Milo is enough of a hack that he actually includes the bit about the cats.
“When you introduce a low-cost alternative to women that comes without all the nagging, insecurity and expense, frankly men are going to leap in headfirst,” he writes. “What’s clear is that the purchase women have over men, sexually and emotionally, is fading fast.”
As Milo sees it, men won’t even mind that their sexbots’ orgasms won’t be real. Indeed, he sees this more as a feature than a bug.
[W]ith a robot, men know the orgasm will be fake, so it removes the performance anxiety of trying to make the grade. (Men know the robot orgasm doesn’t exist — unlike the female orgasm, whose existence is still insisted upon by some conspiracy theorists and biological extremists.)
Amirite, fellas? You’re terrible at sex, and you don’t care! High five!
Apparently worrying that he isn’t pandering enough to his audience as it is, Milo even suggests that his own sexual preferences — he’s gay — are the result of the deficiencies of human women.
“I mean, look,” he writes. “I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads.”
Really, Milo? Really?
But this raises a question. Milo starts off his post by suggesting that the only reason human civilization has amounted to anything is because of the hard work men force themselves to do in order to impress the, er, “broads.”
Who, or what, men have sex with is the basis of our civilisation. It is the driving force behind our greatest accomplishments. Men don’t compete for abstract pleasure: they compete to bag the best mate. The internet, the pyramids and the moon landings would not exist were it not for man’s desire to have sex with woman.
Actually, the moon landing wouldn’t have taken place without the work of Margaret Hamilton, lead software engineer of Project Apollo, but never mind that for a moment.
The question I have is: why does Milo Yiannopoulos pound out 1800-word posts for Breitbart on a regular basis? Why does he even bother to get out of bed in the morning? I mean, he’s gay. He doesn’t need to impress any of those “nutty broads” he says made him gay.
Admittedly, Milo’s work isn’t advancing civilization in any way, shape or form, but there have been plenty of accomplished gay male artists, writers, inventors, you name it. I mean, I’m pretty sure that Michelangelo didn’t paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to impress some hot chick.
And what about lesbians? How do they even decide who gets to be the hot chick, and who gets to be the hard-working genius trying to impress the hot chick?
It’s all very confusing. Or it would be, anyway, if Milo’s bullshit were anything other than bullshit.
@Buttercup Q. Skull pants
I’m sure there’s a certain cohort of MRAs that believe that, by virtue of their ALPHA!!1! male-ness that they’re modern day Einsteins and Michaelangelos. You can see it in their sneering dismissals of non-STEM academic fields, like yesterday, and pumping up STEM (pseudoscientific bs like biotruths).
I was under the impression that the Broads was a riverine system in Norfolk, Eastern England, famous for its water birds, boats and in-breeding? How could such an environment be ‘nutty’?, unless the good people of Great Yarmouth have taken to growing peanuts instead of peas?
It’s a dialectical theory of history, the kind of thing taught by Marx, Hegel, and some other Germans. Obviously he’s not gonna want to be associated with Marx, so he’d probably call it Hegelian. Destroying civilization as we know it is not a problem, because every civilization destroys itself in order to make or in the process of making the next, more advanced civilization. The cultural, political, or biological forces that brought us to the place where we are (which… in this case would be boners, I guess) are no longer necessary, because we are already here.
They constantly accuse feminist of Miss Andry but believe that every man would want a metallic and plastic corpse with a sex whole instead of a human relationship.
They’re accusing feminists of complaining about meaningless things while they’re raging out over the fear of a vast feminist conspiracy to steal their sex bots.
It’s amazing.
I wonder if people who claim that we humans only do things because we want sex may actually mean approval from other people, rather than sex specifically. Sure, these guys really want sex, but did they ever stop to think why they want to get laid so bad?
I am firmly convinced that if sexbots ever were to become a reality in the way that they imagine, the nature of MRAs and MGTOWs would still be unchanged, i.e. they would still complain about their useless sexbots, and make up amazing conspiracy theories about how the sexbot industry is secretly run by evil women and jews as an explanation for why sexbots aren’t good enough.
It seems to be in these guys’ nature to complain about everything and hate everybody who isn’t them, so it strikes me as naive to think this would change just because they get to fuck a robot.
Maybe he’s gay as in happy
@spacelawn:
Can’t be, he’s really not coming across as happy in any manner. 🙁
I don’t resent these guys their power fantasies. They want control, and think that unfeeling uncaring machinery will provide that.
Enjoy your vaguely more realistic masturbation guys.
Pfft, Milo is clearly of so little brain that he believes the moon landings happened. Anyone with any true intelligence knows that the moon is an illusion perpetrated by the Snake People for the purpose of keeping us docile and unquestioning as they prepare to ignite Jupiter and thus open the star gate directly into the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy, which will result in a massive protonic reversal and suck us all into an alternate dimension.
The Snake People are doing that, of course, in order to control money.
Yeah, but apparently it makes you cranky, judging by the population under observation by this here blog.
Milo’s said in the past that he wishes he wasn’t gay. Oh, now it’s that he chose to be gay because wiminz be crazy. Uh huh.
Among the many other problems with this statement, it’s also MRA misandry, exhibit number eleventy billion.
Heads up to all the man-haters: men do things for reasons other than boner-satisfaction. They might explore the moon or some shit because they want to find out what’s on the fuckin moon. It’s also not just the physical act of sex that is important to men, they also like being in a reciprocal relationship with another sentient being with whom they can have fun times and potentially a life-long partnership. C’mon, MRAs, men are way better than you think they are.
Perhaps MRAs are so obsessed with sex robots because that’s what they think men are?
The thing about female orgasms being a conspiracy theory cooked up by biological extremists has to be a joke, right? He can’t actually believe that, can he? Or is this what guys start believing when they go that long without talking to people who aren’t gamergaters or redpillocks?
@Tabby,
I’m pretty sure that he was joking too, but still…why joke about something like that? How can he hate women so much that he’s willing to throw LGBT people under the bus by claiming (on a conservative website, no less) that being gay is a choice?
@alaisvex
I read that part as a joke. Stupid joke, but still.
Yeah. It’s pretty clear from redpillians that they don’t really care about simple sexual satisfaction, it’s all about dominance, conquest, and control. I doubt Heartiste et al. would be satisfied for long without knowing that they’re forcing their will over something that has its own will, and the subsequent bragging to their peers over their alphaness.
Strange people in the subject, divided strictly on zhenougodnikov misogynist and vice versa. Those who are in the middle that is?)
I here girl is fond povynosit my brain, earning itself a good idea, it lacks, well, I myself do sometimes gifts. The machine here like myself, I wanted to buy myself, but no, she took a loan and the benefits and content of this fact)
The woman as a pet, like a cat, such a nice thing, created for fun, but if there is also a benefit, then all super. I was happy with everything that’s my, well, except that trains are not particularly good, but then I can pick on, cook for God, and not just her, but also other females food friends are not satisfied.
With girls, women fun, they are funny)))
Can’t tell if just joking about female orgasms
or if really is that much of a fucking moron
Gonna be honest: my inclination is to think he really is that much of a fucking moron. At first I thought “he does know Masters & Johnson objectively detected, measured, and documented female orgasm in the fucking 1960s, right?” but then I realized who it is we’re talking about. Chances are excellent that he does not, in fact, know, and that he cannot be arsed to check.
I’m naming my next vibrator The Co-Conspirator.
That sort of joke is where it really doesn’t matter if it is a joke or not — it will be used against other gay men, and in the end, against Milo as well. His short-sighted, petulant brattish pay-attention-to-me behavior is going to bite his ass further down the road, should the conservative powers of whose groomed pet Muppet he is right now fully arise in power.
At very least, I wonder if it costs him dates with gay men already (if he’s in dating scene, whatever, can’t be arsed to check it out). “Oh so you are the douchebag who writes for Gamergate and churns out Breitbart’s bullshit. No thanks. Go be a choice gay elsewhere.”
Someone put that on a t-shirt.
Okay, well, if he literally “went gay”, that means he was also attracted to women at least once in his lifetime? I mean, I would rather date ciswomen than cismen for certain reason (like how they’re less likely to be MRAs and, you know, the fact that lesbians get orgasms way more often with their lady friends) but I didn’t turn gay, I’m just pansexual and would like to get off.
I mean, I am gay, but I didn’t turn gay. IDK, my situation is a little bit different now that I accepted that I’m genderfluid.
…
Being gay isn’t a choice. Unless you’re monosexual, then it’s more of a preference, I should say.
*not monosexual I mean.
“[W]ith a robot, men know the orgasm will be fake, so it removes the performance anxiety of trying to make the grade. (Men know the robot orgasm doesn’t exist — unlike the female orgasm, whose existence is still insisted upon by some conspiracy theorists and biological extremists.)”
Uh dude you ever thought that maybe you and those “conspiracy theorists and biological extremists” are really bad at sex?
“I mean, look,” he writes. “I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads.”
Then after he dates some men he’d turn asexual not because he realizes he’s has issues but he thinks everyone is nutty.
“Who, or what, men have sex with is the basis of our civilisation. It is the driving force behind our greatest accomplishments. Men don’t compete for abstract pleasure: they compete to bag the best mate. The internet, the pyramids and the moon landings would not exist were it not for man’s desire to have sex with woman.”
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s–7AtwzDlG–/886813887726407309.gif
http://orig09.deviantart.net/f338/f/2014/015/5/b/my_little_pony__ponies_s_laugh__mlp_fim__by_albertojulian-d4ykc8r.gif
Pfft Ok first the Internet and moon landings wouldn’t have existed without WOMEN and the pyramids
http://news.discovery.com/history/ancient-egypt/pyramids-tombs-giza-egypt.htm
This is why history and women studies are SO EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
Second, way to go on proving that the best misandrists are the misognists (and just men in general from my experience)
“[W]ith a robot, men know the orgasm will be fake, so it removes the performance anxiety of trying to make the grade. ”
this guy thinks way too much of robot sex. like wayyyy to much. i know there is a mech subculture on 4chan but I taught it was mostly a joke
Upon rereading, I think that the bit about female orgasms as a joke but that the bit about “turning” gay is serious. It seriously sounds like he hates being gay so much that he’s ended up hating women for not being hot enough to attract him.
Off-topic for a mo’, but I wonder how this thing will progress: http://microsoftgendercase.com/