So @benschoen, the putatively feminist co-founder of feminspire and the former co-host of a popular Harry Potter podcast, is having a bit of a meltdown on Twitter at the moment.
Well, more than a bit of a meltdown. He’s flying apart like the washing machine in the video above, announcing and quickly canceling online “press conferences,” lashing out at critics with bizarre “jokes” and weird threats, and generally acting like a giant ass.
For example:
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633325425272451072
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633712589265088512
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633715930883846144
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633468512250535940
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633461383309475840
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633422642805084162
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633398579042865154
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633322695397142528
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633715165054267393
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633382676746121216
In addition to joking about menstruation and comparing himself to woman-beating pro football player Ray Rice, he’s also made some super-funny jokes about committing suicide:
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633322086551953408
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633342393815842820
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633382587113820160
Oh, and for some reason he keeps mentioning Hitler.
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633716053026205696
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633397429820354560
https://twitter.com/benschoen/status/633390461143654400
The whole thing started yesterday when Buzzfeed writer Grace Spelman posted screenshots of some Tweets and messages Schoen had sent her — first hitting on her in an exceedingly creepy manner and then reacting with fury and additional creepiness when she politely told him she had a boyfriend.
After Spelman posted her screenshots, other women came forward who said they’d had their own weird experiences with Schoen, including the co-founder of feminspire and a former writer for the site, both of whom evidently left the site because they couldn’t deal with Schoen’s creepy ass any more.
You can read more of the details over on NYmag.com, or on Jezebel, or on Spelman’s Twitter timeline. Or watch the continuing horrorshow live on Twitter.
Are there any lessons to be learned from all this? Why, yes, there are. Here are 8 Ways to Not Be a Male Feminist Creep, inspired by Schoen’s meltdown.
1) If you’ve never spoken to a woman before and the only reason she knows who you are is because she was a fan of a podcast you were on eight years ago, don’t be surprised if she doesn’t respond to a completely out-of-the-blue tweet to her.
2) And for god’s sake don’t try to force her to respond by going all stalkery on her.
3) And if she doesn’t respond to your stalkerish Tweets, don’t write her an even creepier Facebook message, I mean what the fuck were you even hoping to accomplish with this, dude?
4) And if she actually responds politely to all this creepiness and gently suggests you move on (see above), don’t send her a series of angry, insulting Tweets.
5) And then don’t write her a furious 1500 word diatribe that you don’t send, then write an, er, “apology” that you do send that starts off by mentioning the furious 1500 word diatribe you didn’t send.
6) When the woman you’ve thoroughly creeped out with all of this shit posts screenshots to Twitter, don’t dig your hole deeper with an endless stream of awful Tweets (see above).
7) And when your meltdown becomes so spectacular that it actually attracts press coverage, don’t send a message to one press outlet declaring that
I have done more for the cause of advancing women’s rights than any of the people who are criticizing me.
Because, dude, you haven’t.
And even if you had, it still wouldn’t justify any of this.
But, you know what, you don’t need to remember all of these rules if you can just remember the following:
8) If you send a message to a woman you’ve never spoken to before in your life and she doesn’t respond, just move the fuck on.
How hard is that?
Yep. A presumably dude troll on the previous page. eugenicides I was surprised no one else responded – but it was pretty feeble.
I half thought that raising Cats Against Feminism as a problematic issue was a misguided attempt at a joke. But the rest of it is simply incoherent.
“eugenicides”? Eeesh. Some names should just stay caught in moderation.
@eugenicides
[i]RE: all comments about how ‘male feminists’ can’t be trusted –
Is anyone going to note that that author of this site himself has engaged in problematic behavior (Cats Against Feminism) and benefits from his white male privilege in writing and getting as much attention/praise for this site as he does? I like this site but this has to be brought up.[/i]
Nice job of concern-trolling, asshole.
@cupisnique “He is quite the piece of shit, isn’t he?….”
He really is.
@eugenicides: Did you feel that…had to be said?
Eh, I might have been laughing too hard to notice that this one slipped through the filters.
If you want to elaborate on how “Cats Against Feminism” is/was problematic, I’d love to hear it.
(Though, I would like to remind you that that’s satire, and not actually David saying that feminism is somehow bad.)
White male privilege doesn’t automagically equal “bad person”. David is well-aware of his privilege and will respond accordingly when called out for fudging something up, as all humans (or a business of ferrets in a human suit) are wont to do.
Nobody’s perfect, but David does his best to not let his privilege get in the way of his feminism, and he does a pretty good job of that.
The reason David gets so much “attention/praise” for doing what he does is that he keeps us informed of what’s going on in the manuresphere by crawling through it himself so we don’t have to.
He also gets a LOT of shit for running this blog from manuresphere types as well, so I think it balances it out.
This sounds like a really lame “gotcha”, and it’s not the first time it’s been “brought up”.
So many trolls have marched in here with the notion that feminists all hate men and would never defer to one in any subject, and yet, here we all are, feminists one and all, factually disproving that every single day.
And you are…?
Oh, let me guess: A humorless git who doesn’t understand satire, and doesn’t think a white man has the right to criticize/satirize/mock other mostly-white dudes who are complete fucking jackasses, infinitely worthy of mockery, and sorely in need of a good soccer-dribbling of their asses around the field.
In other words, not really a fan of this site.
“Schwyzer is also a religious Christian (he has written of “a return to Christ following my near-death experience in 1998″) and leads a Christian youth group, so the language of redemption comes easily.”
Ah. That explains everything.
Source: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/exile-in-gal-ville-how-a-male-feminist-alienated-his-supporters/252915/
http://31.media.tumblr.com/e3dbb8bca3d0190e95389e34f5a74043/tumblr_nki7bqxzfo1qcxzu2o2_500.gif
I’ll address it. My troll fighting muscles are all warmed up from Gawker.
We didn’t say male feminists can’t be trusted. We said some people prefer men not identify as feminists because some men abuse the term.
Either this is a silly gotcha troll attempt. Or you don’t understand the concept of a joke.
This has actually been brought up plenty. Both by David and by us. He’s also privileged to be able to stomach manosphere garbage because he’s not the target of the hatred. Something else he has acknowledged.
Next?
Ninja’d many times because I’m slow!
And these chucklefucks wonder why we’re often so skeptical and slow to warm with self-professed allies.
Almost like we’ve been burned a thousand times before by fake allies who will claim support up and until the point where they are actually called on to DO something.
The cringe… oh dear god! The cringe!
Or they claim support until they somehow feel like they aren’t getting enough of the “Special Ally Snowflake” treatment, which apparently includes “sexual access” to any woman they want in this case, regardless of if they’re dating someone else or not.
To be honest, the terribleness of male feminists is one of the big reasons why I don’t refer to myself as a feminist any more. It’s not quite self-labelling-as-an-egalitarian-instead bad, but it’s certainly not a good sign. (This isn’t the only reason, but going into it would be a particularly shitty derail.)
I’ll call myself feminist ally rather than feminist as I have prior. Definitely learned a thing or two from this post and subsequent discussion
Yikes. Serious question, do we think this jackass is on a drug rampage and/or having a manic episode? Even before Hugo’s creepy involvement, his tweets were starting to sound pretty unhinged.
katz:
Ah good, you spotted that too. Yeah, there’s suddenly a whiff of sock around here.
Looks like he has read Roosh´s dating advices.
http://i.imgur.com/RjnxVrQ.jpg
@Nashradnek
Not to be an ass (although im being an ass) but this guy struck me as the fedora wearing type. Is there anything in the site rules about that? Baseless fedora accusations?
@wwth
just read the comment section you linked. Just wanted to share my admiration for how you manage to handle the situation.
Since I started to read the WHTM I’ve gone from being “egalitarian” to being a feminist, to labeling mys self as Feminist supporter.
The main reason I usually dont comment is that I fell that my job for the cause right now is to shut the fuck up and just listen. I have to many non feminist Ideas I need to deal with first.
@everyone
Thanks alot for the insightful comments and interesting discussions.
@David
Thanks for all the hard work and interesting articles
It is profoundly distressing to me that WOC/POC/TG do not feel their experiences are considered important and that in the greater scheme of things, white feminists have failed to truly include them. The problem is (as a white woman who feels that equality is something all humans deserve, not patriarchy or matriarchy, just egalitarian.) what can I personally do differently, I’m not even sure who to ask, or if my questions regarding what will demonstrate their experiences are important and feelings valid will even be taken seriously. Every movement starts with an individual joining forces with other individuals.
Though the above is only slightly relevant to the post, it’s been bothering me for a while and this place seemed like the best one out of any to bring it up.
Yeah, the way I usually word it is “There are feminists who happen to be male, and then there are male feminists.”
Is there any other activism group that is criticized for not taking on the causes of all groups? I can’t help but read it as “women aren’t important enough so it should be about this instead”.
@makingfitzcarraldo
Oh, all activist groups are, not just feminism. I’ve seen the NAACP be critisised for not taking on the cause of white people and the LGBT+ rights movement be critisised for not taking on the cause of cishet people, and that’s just in the half hour I’ve been awake. =P