Categories
a new woman to hate a woman is always to blame alpha males antifeminism dark enlightenment entitled babies evil sexy ladies hypocrisy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny post contains sarcasm PUA red pill return of kings rhymes with roosh the c-word

Beer-soaked Roosh V files charges against alleged drink-tosser, retreats to fainting couch

I declare I am overcome with the vapors!
I declare I am overcome with the vapors!

So pickup artist and rape legalization proponent Roosh V has, he says, filed charges against a woman who allegedly threw beer in his face outside a Montreal bar on Saturday night. That’s his right, of course.

But reading the statement he says he gave to police, I was struck by the tone of wounded innocence that runs through it. In the forum post on the subject, sounding a teensy bit like a stereotypical 19th century Southern belle overcome with the vapors, he complains about being “attacked” by the woman and her friends “after I was seduced by a young woman.”

In the statement he says he gave the police, Roosh affects a tone of indignation at the allegedly deceptive behavior of this young Jezebel.

I talked to one girl of the group who gave me the name “Jennifer.” She complimented my beard and general attractiveness and asked me to come outside with her for a cigarette. She is approximately 23 years old, shoulder length hair, brown hair, brown eyes, and slim build. She has a piercing between her nose like farm bulls have.

It’s called a septum piercing. You do live in the 21st century, do you not?

I went outside and sat next to her. She began sensually rubbing her legs against mine. Her skirt was short.

That hussy! Getting him all hot and bothered with her “sexy legs” before tossing a drink in his face.

After the beer-toss, Roosh reports, the alleged assailant and her friends followed him down the street,

yelling vulgar language. One girl yelled, “Eat my cunt.”

Heavens to Betsy! A woman referred to her delicate vagina flower using a very rude word!

Apparently, in Roosh’s world, only men are allowed to use that word. He and his followers certainly use it often enough.

A search on his blog for the word “cunt” returns 305 results.

In a post entitled “The True Nature of Women,” for example, Roosh writes that

within every woman on this planet, regardless of her education or background, is a bitch, a cunt, a slut, a golddigger, a flake, a cheater, a backstabber, a narcissist, and an attention whore that is dying to get out … .

In one called “It’s Your Fault That American Women are Winning,” he demanded of his readers

When was the last time you put an Americunt in her place?

He seems to like that particular portmanteau. On his site Return of Kings, he published a post titled “A Perfect Example Of The Americunt.”

Meanwhile, a post on RoK titled “American Women Are Only Good For One Thing” declares that

[m]ost of today’s women are bitchy, masculine, selfish cunts with inferiority complexes that make them think they want to dominate men.

The sad truth is that decades of feminism has reduced women to nothing more than three holes and a set of tits who are only as good as the orgasms they provide men.

In “Why You Should Avoid Dating Girls Who Claim They Were Raped,” another RoK writer informs us that

[e]ven the most manjawed cunt secretly harbors fantasies of locking down a good man, marrying him, and thereby trebling her disposable income. Chicks will cry rape if it means endless, adoring attention with zero associated cost. But they won’t if they think getting raped renders them unattractive in the eyes of men.

In other posts, RoK writers complain about “empowered femcunt doublespeak,” “Sheryl Sandberg-clone femcunt[s] …who have brought into the myth of office-cubicle empowerment,” and the sad fate of men who have “a cunty controlling bitch of a wife.”

I could literally spend the rest of the day providing more examples of “cunt” usage from Roosh and his friends from his two main blogs. If I started searching his forum as well, I suspect I could be at it for the entire week.

In other words, I’m pretty sure Roosh has heard the word before.

Were any woman to post a police report like the statement posted by Roosh, she would quickly be accused of “damseling” and worse by dozens if not hundreds of MRAs and PUAs and other assorted misogynistic woman-pesterers online.

And they’d call her a cunt, as well.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

317 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
katz
katz
6 years ago

BUT HE’S A FEMINIST YOU GUYS.

Catalpa
Catalpa
6 years ago

If I were to demand that people give me money because they did something I considered wrong, or, alternatively, took those people and locked them away somewhere for an extended period of time, people would say that I was an extortionist and a kidnapper. How come the courts can force people to pay fines or even imprison them?! Just because of something they did in the past? The past is over now and no justification for taking any action against someone else! Ever! /Sarcasm

Wheeee I can make false equivalencies too!

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
6 years ago

@Catalpa:

And yet that’s pretty much the argument of sovereign citizens and various other folks who think taxation isn’t real. It takes all types in this world…

katz
katz
6 years ago

comment image

Bina
Bina
6 years ago

Had to be Said? Gotta be trollin’. Know what really has to be said?

FUCK OFF, TROLL.

pkayden
6 years ago

@Buttercup,

Your poster is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen. You should send a copy to Roosh V to memorialize his Victory! Given his ego, he may not understand that it’s mocking him.

Bina
Bina
6 years ago

Also, less than 3 dozen guys ≠ “close to 200”, and getting chased out of a bar by a mixed crowd all calling you a piece of shit, after a mere woman has dumped a beer on your wig, in a district where every bouncer has been alerted to your skeezy presence, is NOT a stunning victory.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
6 years ago

You know who else once threw a beer? Yeah, that’s right HITLER!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch

Well, ok, he actually started shooting in the beerkeller; but that’s the same thing right?

Had To Be Said
Had To Be Said
6 years ago

All,

Fair enough. I will alter the hypothetical scenario to match the known facts more closely.

BACKSTORY: A feminist activist wrote in her blog that she once had sex with a man who was so drunk that in another jurisdiction the sex might have been considered rape. She expressed no remorse for having sex with a very drunk man. This activist had a day job writing dating advice for women that was criticized by MRAs for being manipulative and portraying men as interchangeable objects to be exploited. She also once wrote an essay — received by many of her readers as a Swiftian satire — stating that women cannot rape men and therefore should never be charged with that crime.

Angered by her writing, a group of male and female MRAs formed a plan to confront her in person. The MRAs found her at a bar and they:

–Deceived her by acting friendly to gain her trust.

–Then turned on her and threw beer in her face while repeatedly yelling at her, “You’re a piece of shit!”

–Then formed a small mob and hounded her all the way to the door of the condo where she was temporarily staying.

–Then immediately bragged about their actions online and posted the condo’s street address for all to see, with a note explaining that their target was hiding out at that address at the present time.

So now all of these actions are fine?

dhag85
6 years ago

A text doesn’t become “Swiftian satire” just because you say it is. Jesus fucking christ.

dhag85
6 years ago

It’s already been acknowledged that she shouldn’t have posted the address. Stop being stupid on purpose. You’re already plenty stupid by accident.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
6 years ago

@Had To Be Said:

A couple more additions:

–Deceived her by acting friendly to gain her trust.

This was after Roosh tried to pick her up, and tried that whole “kino escalation” thing. It wasn’t like the woman followed Roosh around and approached him just for the purposes of throwing a drink in his face, she just recognized him when he approached her.

–Then immediately bragged about their actions online and posted the condo’s street address for all to see, with a note explaining that their target was hiding out at that address at the present time.

The woman posted her comment with the address in response to Roosh’s post. She didn’t “immediately brag about [her] actions online.” Posting the address was bad and she shouldn’t have done it, but this part is still describing the situation wrong. She was clarifying what had really happened in response to Roosh’s mischaracterization.

In general, your description of your hypothetical seems to paint the drink-throwing MRA as someone who had specifically targeted the feminist, as if he had planned out everything from the drink throwing to the following and doxxing ahead of time and went to seduce the feminist for that purpose. That’s not what really happened, and it’s pretty telling that that’s how you think things went down.

It’d be much simpler for you to say “what if the genders were reversed?” But even then you’d have to reverse genders for the rest of society to make the situation truly identical. By then, you’ve pretty much lost any point you were trying to make with the hypothetical, since the hypothetical is no longer distinguishable from the original in any way.

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
6 years ago

@Had To Be Said

No, because she wouldn’t be a feminist because she fucking raped someone. Rape of ANY KIND is so ANTI-FEMINIST that a feminist who has raped isn’t a feminist.

Paradoxical Intention
6 years ago

Had to be Said, are you trying to make it into the NBA? Because that reach is impressive.

Had To Be Said
Had To Be Said
6 years ago

Okay, she’s No True Feminist. And neither is any self-proclaimed feminist who has ever had sex with a very drunk person. Granted.

Does she deserve what she got, or does the scenario still have to be altered in some way?

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
6 years ago

I think your main problem, Has To Be Said, is that you’re treating ideological acceptance (feminist or MRA) as the most important factor here, as if we think tossing Beer at Roosh was fine simply because he is an MRA, and unrelated to any of his actions or personality. That’s just not what we care about here, so your hypothetical is pretty much necessarily going to fail, especially since you seem to think that making the “feminist” in your hypothetical abhorrent to us would strengthen the comparison. It doesn’t.

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
6 years ago

@Had To Be Said

She fucking raped someone, the very fucking least she deserves is to have fucking beer thrown at her. She would deserve to go to fucking prison for raping someone.

Roosh raped several fucking women so the least he deserves is a fucking beer in the face, even though what he really deserves is PRISON.

HOW THE FUCK DO YOU NOT FUCKING UNDERSTAND THIS YOU STUPID PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT.

Catalpa
Catalpa
6 years ago

Had to be said,

If a well known serial rapist who made a living off of teaching other people how to rape approached someone else in a bar they weren’t allowed in the first place and touched them nonconsensually, I would see that person being justified in upending their drink on the rapist, yelling at the rapist, and doing their best to make sure that the rapist didn’t find an easier target to rape. Posting the rapists location online is the only part of that narrative that I would find objectionable.

If you think that’s a morally reprehensible outlook, you can kiss my shiny metal ass.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
6 years ago

If a woman were as creepy and rapey as Roosh, and was a notorious figure online like Roosh is, and was trying to speak in Canada to talk about rapey things, and she approached a dude in the creepy way Roosh did, she might warrant a drink in the face.

However, she would not have the same relationship to men as Roosh does to women and feminism. She wouldn’t represent anything grander than herself. Thus, I don’t believe the group of men in your hypothetical would bother chasing her around or calling her names. If that’s what they did, it would be weird and an overreaction.

Honestly, there might not even be any motivation for this big movement against her being able to enter the country. Again, because she doesn’t represent anything larger than herself. She’d just be one awful person, or perhaps the leader of a small group of awful people that nobody would really care about. Cultural context really can make all the difference.

Mewens
Mewens
6 years ago

Jesus Christ, of course Had to be Said returns to defend Roosh V. What a brave maverick.

First off, if you’re busy trying to classify this as a “victory” for Roosh, then you’re part of the problem. It’s a good thing that he’s being dragged into the public consciousness; if you’re honestly worried that he’ll appeal to the average bloke, then you’re underlining how much more work needs to be done.

Second off, bad behavior by group B does not diminish bad behavior by group A. Sure, in a perfect world, no one would have a drink thrown on Roosh V. But in a perfect world, Roosh V. wouldn’t be advocating rape. And let’s make one thing clear here: Pouring a drink on someone is far, far less dire than admitting to rape and spreading rape apologia.

Which brings us to point three: Stop calling his rape apologia satire. Stop even pretending it’s satire, stop even giving credence to the jerk-offs who are calling it satire. It’s not satire for a simple reason: Satire mocks a given argument or ideology by taking it to its logical, ridiculous conclusion. If Roosh V.’s “make rape legal” argument is satire, then he’s lampooning himself and his feckless followers.

Had To Be Said
Had To Be Said
6 years ago

How To Qualify For Assault Via Cultural Context

Be considered “creepy”

Be considered “rapey”

“Talk about rapey things”

Represent something “grander than yourself”

Falconer
6 years ago

Had to Be Said, this is you,

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/steven-universe/images/8/81/Frybo_Dancing.gif/revision/latest?cb=20131127224810

an empty suit pushing someone else’s message, powered by forces you haven’t fully examined, because you are incapable of self-reflection and growth. Your presence frankly fills everyone around you with alarm and concern, and yet you are heedless. The dance is all there is.

Dance, trollboy, dance.

Falconer
6 years ago

Stupid link mess up my flow.

http://37.media.tumblr.com/dc2f8f9fc1187cf60fb4f5dd1676e920/tumblr_mwnh4yQJgs1r34we5o1_500.gif

Here. This is you. You are ridiculous. Stop it. Go away.

I Formally Accuse You Of Wasting Our Time, Had To Be Said.

isidore13
isidore13
6 years ago

@HTBS, your arguments have been shut down, so now you’re just using reductio ad absurdum to pretend you totes didn’t fail to prove your argument. Nice job. *golf clap*

isidore13
isidore13
6 years ago

Also, don’t ever fucking say “be considered ‘rapey'” about Roosh V. He is not actually just ‘considered’ rapey. He is an actual, bona fide, self-confessed, out and proud rapist. WTF is fucking wrong with you?

isidore13
isidore13
6 years ago

I’m sorry, the “wtf is wrong with you” is probably ableist. I shouldn’t have said that part.

weirwoodtreehugger
6 years ago

It’s not an example of the no true Scotsman to say a rape is anti feminist. Because respect for consent is one of the basic tenets of feminism. That’s why had to be a toolshed can only talk about a pro rape feminist woman in the hypothetical. Because she doesn’t fucking exist. You can’t win an argument by simply throwing out logical fallacy accusations. Especially when you’re not making a logically sound argument yourself.

I can think of one woman who proudly claims to be a rapist. That woman is Janet Bloomfield. I wonder if had to be a fake neutrality troll is over at the MRA sites clucking about her? Probably not.

Paradoxical Intention
6 years ago

I don’t think that’s ableist in this context, isidore. It looks like you’re asking what’s morally wrong with him, not what’s mentally wrong with him.

Still, I can understand how it can be taken as ableist.

freemage
6 years ago

Yeah, with that last post, HtBS has crossed into full-blown rape apologism (Roosh has confessed, publicly, to actions that are not ‘rapey’, but full-blown rape; claiming otherwise at this point is just apologism for a self-admitted rapist). Can someone point David to that comment so a proper banhammering can occur?

isidore: “WTF is wrong with you” isn’t really ablist, generally, so long as it’s clear that non-ablist answers qualify. What’s wrong with HtBS is that he’s a rape-apologist piece of misogynistic shit.

isidore13
isidore13
6 years ago

Thanks, everyone. I was asking morally but I didn’t want to take the risk of hurting someone in case it wasn’t clear and I wasn’t sure how to clarify 🙂

Snuffy
Snuffy
6 years ago

@HTBS here’s what you said:

A feminist activist wrote in her blog that she once had sex with a man who was so drunk that in another jurisdiction the sex might have been considered rape.

And here’s Roosh’s original statement:

While walking to my place, I realized how drunk she was. In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she legally couldn’t give her consent. It didn’t help matters that I was relatively sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated. I won’t rationalize my actions, but having sex is what I do.

Roosh flat out says it would be considered rape so why did you feel the need to throw in the “might”. It’s also funny how both you and him focus on it being a crime illegal in “another jurisdiction”, but don’t bother to note IT WOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED ILLEGAL BY ICELANDIC STANDARDS. You’re whitewashing his crimes to make him more sympathetic. You also whined about how we shouldn’t give him so much “attention” because “that’s what he wants”, but don’t give a shit about warning women to avoid the admitted rapist.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
6 years ago

@Had To Be Said:

Don’t forget “making creepy advances on someone at a bar and touching them when they didn’t want to be touched.” That’s a pretty big part.

But yeah, following on isiodore13; if you take enough details out of a description, anything can seem absurd.

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
6 years ago

How To Qualify For Assault Via Cultural Context

Be considered “creepy”

Be considered “rapey”

“Talk about rapey things”

Represent something “grander than yourself”

http://31.media.tumblr.com/dc101a7c137c56190caf6f2b9d9ecb8d/tumblr_inline_nqqdr3XTc11t9txgy_540.gif

weirwoodtreehugger
6 years ago

I wonder if had to be a Rhoosh supporter is also one of those people who victim blames women for sexual assault because the no wasn’t clear enough. Because throwing a beer on someone who is getting in your personal is a pretty clear no. Funny how there’s always some guy saying we’re telling a guy no wrong. We’re not allowed to be aggressive about it because that’s mean. We’re not allowed to say a soft no and hope he takes the hint because it’s totally unfair to expect basic social skills from men.

It’s almost like these men don’t think we should be able to say no at all.

katz
katz
6 years ago

Running list of people HTBS has defended:

-Janet Bloomfield
-Reddit
-Roosh
-Himself

Running list of people HTBS has attacked:
-David
-Everyone else here

isidore13
isidore13
6 years ago

@wwth, and yet when we say yes we’re immediately irredeemable sluts who have no value at all.

dhag85
6 years ago

It’s really time to ban this troll. The most tedious type of troll is the one who claims to not be a troll. Pull the plug.

alaisvex
alaisvex
6 years ago

@Had to Be Said,

As people already acknowledged, if a woman who had once bragged about having sex with a man who was so drunk that what she’d done was legally rape after she took advantage of the situation to ensure that he had to rely on her to get home, if that woman frequently gave dating advice that encouraged women to exploit and abuse men, and if that woman went into a bar and made advances to a particular man that involved unwanted contact, then, yes, she would deserve to have a drink tossed in her face and be chased out of the bar. However, as Pandapool said, a woman who was as open about doing to men the things that Roosh does to women and went around encouraging other women to emulate her behavior, then no one would be lauding her as a feminist activist.

As a matter of fact, the woman whose self-purported behavior most closely mirrors your hypothetical feminists is Janet Bloomfield, aka JudgyBitch.

Zeb Berryman
Zeb Berryman
6 years ago

Had To Be Said: Dude, give it up. Almost everyone who said you weren’t a troll before has realized there mistake.

If you aren’t trying to troll here I regret to inform you that you are a creepy asshole.

Go away.

repentantphonebooth
6 years ago

Actually, if a feminist made their living promoting violence and dehuminizing a particular group through hate speech, advocated for sexual assault to be legalized against that group and even committed by their own admission sexual assault I wouldn’t be in the slightest bit interested in someone throwing beer in their face. I’d want them in jail for sexual assault. Further, if this person tried to silence justified opposition to violating the national law (the nation in which they are a guest) against hate speech through inciting a campaign of internet harassment I would want them charged for that too. And I would want everyone who has committed sexual assault based on this person’s teachings brought to justice as well. Being a feminist or an MRA isn’t the issue- the dehumanization of women and the promotion of violence against them is.

RosaDeLava
RosaDeLava
6 years ago

Janet Bloomfield also admitted to having raped someone?!
Jesus tapdancing Christ on a cracker; is rape in vogue in the manosphere or something?!

Had To Be Said
Had To Be Said
6 years ago

It’s interesting how a false narrative has formed here in the comments using nothing but imagination and enthusiastic reinforcement of favored “facts.” This wasn’t an organized attempt to confront Roosh? The original instigator did not seek him out but instead was the victim of an unwanted pickup attempt? The confrontation was motivated by unwanted touching by Roosh?

Not according to one member of the mob:

Roosh V Montreal Update

So he managed to do his little speech thing at some place on the outskirts of the city, this morning.

This evening anarcha-feminists were out checking bars to see if he was in them. An amazing comrade found him at a bar with his posse. He was wearing a wig but she recognized him. She took one for the team and let him hit on her while putting the word out on her phone as to his location. A crew showed up, at which point things got heated real quick and he ran away, terrified, to a nearby apartment and called the police. His posse also ran.

If Roosh’s “kino” was unwanted, Roosh had no way to know that — because she “let him hit on her” to stall for time as she waited for accomplices. How can it be Roosh’s fault that she actively deceived him while waiting for her backup to arrive for the planned confrontation?

I believe this Kafka-esque move is known as “victim-blaming.”

kirbywarp, in addition to repeating the above misinformation, you say that “She didn’t ‘immediately brag about [her] actions online.'”

She wrote this: “Pouring my drink on Roosh V’s head was the best moment EVER!!! #rooshv”

But never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

repentantphonebooth
6 years ago

Yes, Roosh has made his living off of building a reputation for being a man who violates women’s personal space in a sexual manner. And it was made very clear that the people of Montreal didn’t want them there- their own mayor publicly said as much. It wasn’t up to those women to avoid his unwanted sexual attention, it was up to him to refrain from violating their personal space. No one was keeping secrets from Roosh- his message is so repugnant and hateful it is barely fit to be publicly spoken in Canada. And he acted on that message.

Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
Pandapool -- The Species that Endangers YOU (aka Banana Jackie Cake, for those who still want to call me "Banana", "Jackie" or whatever)
6 years ago

“Anarcha-feminists” is a key word here. Anarcha = Anarchy. Anarcha-feminism isn’t liberal feminism, which is the majority of feminist in North America.

I know you don’t understand this because MRAs don’t understand social movements at all, but I just want to clarify that.

http://38.media.tumblr.com/8346134e5360c2b564a7e4995a17aa85/tumblr_n3zouiMQlb1tpsowyo1_400.gif

RosaDeLava
RosaDeLava
6 years ago

@HTBS
Well, I guess we really should believe in a single comment in a forum rather than one the people involved in the incident.

And do we really have to tell people not to go about trying to guide people they just met by the waist? Really?

loquora
6 years ago

@HTBS

If Roosh’s “kino” was unwanted, Roosh had no way to know that — because she “let him hit on her” to stall for time as she waited for accomplices. How can it be Roosh’s fault that she actively deceived him while waiting for her backup to arrive for the planned confrontation?

There’s a difference between letting something happen and actively encouraging it. She didn’t deceive him, she just didn’t get him an immediate and firm ‘no’. Or, knowing Roosh and what he’s all about, she might have given him a ‘no’ that he ignored. But all of that is conjecture. Just like saying that she actively deceived him. By her own words she did nothing of the sort. I can let my cat sit on my arm even if it’s an annoyance to me but that is in no way means I called the cat over and pressed on his butt until he sat there. One of those is “letting” one of them is “actively deceiving”.

katz
katz
6 years ago

Well, I guess we really should believe in a single comment in a forum rather than one the people involved in the incident.

Specifically, a single comment from the guys who proudly announced that they were deliberately spreading misinformation.

Zeb Berryman
Zeb Berryman
6 years ago

Had To Be Said: Interesting how its victim blaming to defend a woman who did not tell the self admitted rapist off for grabbing her without her consent immediately, but NOT victim blaming to blame said woman for not telling the self admitted rapist to keep his hands to himself.

In short you are a sleazy asshole who came here to mansplain in defense of a rapist. FUCK OFF.

weirwoodtreehugger
6 years ago

Had to be said,
Why are you ignoring that Rhoosh wore a disguise in order to go to bars he had been banned from? Otherwise known as trespassing. Funny how you’re exaggerated the crime that was committed against Rhoosh (which at the very worst would be the Canadian equivalent of misdemeanor assault). Which may not have even been a crime and could be construed as self defense. Do you think Rhoosh should be charged for trespassing? Are you on record on his blog telling his supporters that he was in the wrong for trespassing? Have you scolded them about the fact that he’s threatening to file false charges with child protection against one of the protesters? Funny how you’re only focusing on the feminist “mob.” And since when was a few people shouting a mob? Nobody was hurt, there was no property damage, police weren’t called to the scene, there were no weapons present. This was milder than most of the bar/party fights I’ve witnessed men having with each other.

Catalpa
Catalpa
6 years ago

She took one for the team and let him hit on her while putting the word out on her phone as to his location.

Wait you mean a woman who was faced with an admitted rapist waited for backup to arrive before entering into a confrontation? Holy shit, how terrible! She clearly should have dumped her drink on him right away, while she was alone, because we definitely haven’t heard ANYTHING from Roosh’s ilk that would imply that these shitbuckets would react with violence to that, surely not!

Also, I know it’s difficult from MRAs to grasp this, but a lack of a “No” doesn’t mean “Yes”.

Can we ban the rape apologist troll yet?