“Is it just me? Or are women biologically inferior to men?” Red Piller asks

Wetherby:

My wife is one of the funniest people I know, but I somehow doubt that she shares this with her clients, what with her job being to diagnose potentially life-changing medical problems.

http://therefinedinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/larson-testing-whether-laughter-is-the-best-medicine.png

@ binjabreel

Very Emu-sing!

[I’ll get my coat]

I assume these guys think that interesting women are those who have some knowledge in the areas terpers deign relevant, but who won’t correct them if they ever make a mistake – or have more knowledge than them, for that matter, because then they would just feel unmanly. Oh, and they also have to be conventionally attractive, because yes.

Also, if we can’t think and plan in advance, how do we manipulate betas (And the whole society!) into providing for us despite us being such horrible, horrible creatures none should like?

@sn0rkmaiden (or anyone, really)
I’m new to this whole manosphere thing, but I’ve seen this thing about bon bons a couple of time. What’s that supposed to represent?

Also, I broke the bird-pun chain of comments and I feel really bad. This is hard to swallow.

@RosaDeLava re ‘bonbons’–it’s a 1950s stereotype of a ‘housewife’–the husband slaves away at his grueling job all day to make money to support his wife, who sits home on the couch in her lingerie and eats bonbons and reads trashy magazines while waiting for him to come home.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_liq7hoeKoF1qa70eyo1_500.jpg

(Or goes out all day shopping for clothes and getting her nails done and doing lunch with her girlfriends, I don’t know which stereotype is which now.)

Regrettably for the whole feminist tern theory, birds do the whole sex thing so differently from humans that no analogy is really possible (or, if we really stretch it, the egg-laying birds more closely resemble mammalian males).

http://io9.com/why-do-birds-have-zw-sex-chromosomes-instead-of-xy-1682328912

@ Buttercup

Yes, that must be why insurance companies give 18 – 25yo males such favorable rates.

In the EU, insurance companies are now prohibited by law from discriminating against blokes just cause we cause more damage in accidents.

That’s one bit of equality law you don’t see men complaining about.

@Alan
Aye, but these guys rarely focus on anything outside the USA, unless it furthers their agenda. See: the Justice for Men and Boys Party.

Is it just me…..

Or is anyone else trawling through this site trying to figure out puns:

http://www.rspb.org.uk/discoverandenjoynature/discoverandlearn/birdguide/name/a/

Speaking of inferior creatures, this is what redpillianism looks like in action (standard warnings apply): http://therationalmale.com/2015/08/03/the-quick-fix/#comment-113013

And this is the FBI tip line, should you feel inclined to use it after reading the above:
https://tips.fbi.gov/

The redpillian asshole prefaces his screed with “none of the following is true,” but that’s to pre-emptively cover his ass, IMO. I, for one, don’t take his disclaimer seriously; but his violent braggadocio, even if exaggerated to impress his fellow redpillian assholes, does ring true.

Technically, the reason that men between 18-25 or even up to the age of 35 if they are unmarried tend to pay the highest insurance premiums is because someone in charge of analyzing data to determine the price structure strategy that comes with group-funded pooling on loss-risk coverage (e.g. insurance) found that this particular demographic had a greater propensity for more significantly expensive vehicle crashes attributed to high rates of speed, etc and these collisions were total loss on at least one vehicle and also required payment for injuries to other parties not exclusive to the driver themselves. Therefore, because they are more likely to cost a shit-ton of money in the event of an accident with property/vehicle damage and loss plus injuries to themselves and others, they get to pay more for their insurance premiums.

Women tend to back into things, or tap the bumper of the car in front of them, not a whole lot of injuries and depending on the road conditions, rate of speed, and whether the idiot behind them is a tailgating jerk who can’t slow his roll or see that there are a bunch of screaming toddlers in the backseat and mom is about to pull over and leave those kids on the side of the road if they don’t quit – the costs associated with accidents involving female drivers are comparatively lower so they pay lower premiums. To match the lower pay they get for doing the same job with the same skills, qualifications, experience and education. Thanks for playing!

Translation:
“I’ve only met one girl who likes the same shitty Adam Sandler movies I do and laughs at my cringe-worthy juvenile jokes and agrees with me on everything, so she must be super funny and smart. Other women just don’t get me, so they’re dumb. Also men are physically better in every way, with their rippling muscles and burly chest hair and rugged masculine physique, MMM! Who needs women, am I right guys? Let’s all go camping together!”

Seriously though, I’ve met several women who are funny, interesting, smart, and fun to hang out with, and although I’ve also known men who are funny or fun to hang out with (although never particularly interesting or smart), I’ve never met one who is all 4 at once. But because I’m not a complete jackass, I’m not going to use that as definitive proof that men are “biologically” inferior. There are billions of them out there, and I’ve met less than 0.00000002% in my life. That’s not much to go on, and if men are so great at math, shouldn’t he know that?