Well, you have to admire their ingenuity, I guess: The terrible people at the lady-hating megasite Return of Kings have figured out a way to blame feminism for … revenge porn.
No, really. Here’s the argument, such as it is, from regular RoK contributor Mark Webster:
What we are seeing with so called ”revenge porn” is an example of the disturbing but inevitable consequences of the first generation of women who, brainwashed by feminist propaganda, truly believe they can do no wrong, and that there are no consequences for their actions. …
Like so many other modern social problems, feminism is definitely to blame for “revenge porn.” This warped ideology has always irresponsibly promoted the delusional idea that women have all the same rights as men, but without responsibilities or consequences for their actions.
They were the ones who encouraged a life of reckless hedonism and narcissism for young women, with no thought for their futures. They were the ones who spun the gross lie that being pumped and dumped by men who couldn’t care less about them is “empowering.”
Webster pauses for a moment to reflect on the possible culpability of the ex-boyfriends who, you know, actually posted these pictures online as a form of petty revenge, but figures that, since the women chose to go out with these guys, it’s really still the women’s fault anyway.
Now admittedly putting them on the web for the whole world to see is a pretty low act, but they don’t call them bad boys for nothing. You can bet your bottom dollar these are the guys who are far more likely to receive and distribute “sexts” than the nice guys forever languishing in the friend zone.
Lovely.
Webster is right about one thing, though: the proliferation of revenge porn is very definitely related to the issue of consequences. That is, the almost complete lack of consequences faced by the dirtball guys who post these sometimes stolen, sometimes gifted pics online without permission.
But that has started to change. Let’s hope the 18-year-sentence meted out to revenge porn kingpin Kevin Bollaert — who combined internet-age skeeviness with some old-fashioned extortion — is a sign of things to come.
The readers of RoK have some rather different ideas about possible “solutions” to revenge porn.
(If you’re having a decent day, or would simply rather not read puerile fantasies about domestic violence and suicide, you may just want to stop reading here.)
As Black Poison Soul sees it, any woman who takes nude pics of herself should face these “consequences.”
1/ tattoo the word “slut” on her face
2/ put her into the local sluttery (aka free whorehouse)
3/ problem solvedPlus it semi-forces the red pill down men’s throats. I would think it’s hard to validate some whore when you constantly see “slut” every time you look at her face. Even if you’re a blue-pill white-knighting mangina enabler.
Remember. There is always a loser in the game of musical cocks.
Idonggor thinks the problem would be solved if American men were more willing to, well, punch “their” women.
As much as I dislike feminist bull dykes and other self entitled cunts, I also equally blame American men for acting like faggots. I hear many times even from so called “red pill” men that hitting women is wrong.
With that kind of mentality, you are bound to get a chick who will act out of her line.
In the Middle East and certain parts of Russia (where it is ruled by ALPHA MEN), girls would not dare to act like spoiled Americunts. Why?
Because they are scared of their men.
You need to get your women to be scared of you guys…. Have her fear you.
I used to feel sorry for American men for getting all the shit but you guys pretty much deserve it.
If you act like coward faggots, you are doomed to get your women acting like cunts.
BlueSkyGreyWolf, meanwhile, suggests that women who have their pics posted on the internet without their permission just kill themselves.
If the stupid cunts are so guilt ridden ain’t nothing stopping them from killing themselves. In fact, the more worthless female parasites who off themselves, the better off the woorld will be.
Something must be terribly wrong with the “red pills” these guys are taking; they seem to be turning everyone who pops one into literally the worst human beings on planet Earth.
And 100% of fetuses aren’t people, as far as I’m concerned. Also, you’re not going to win feminist sympathy points by appealing to the idea that feminists value female human life over male human life. That’s a straw feminist idea.
I mean, seriously, I do think you are just about scraping the bottom of the barrel, but William Blake? A man who constantly criticised the cruelties of the Christian Church as an avid believer? Someone who specifically referred to it as a cause of child neglect in The Little Vagabond, with the comment about bandy children?
Many of Blake’s poems are specifically critical of the Church as a tool of repression and destruction. He saw institutionalised churches as destructive tyranny especially as regards sexual expression and love:
Is Stranded the Time Cube guy?
No, I am not your uncle Rick, Treehugger. I imagine I would like to meet him?
The drums in the Dies Irie section of Mozart’s Requiem interact with the choir and orchestra in special Pythagorean scale which is currently being uncovered. I do not entirely understand it myself, but textual evidence from Dies Irie complements this.
Henry VIII of England started the downward spiral by taking England away from the Catholic Church. The Pope defended Queen Katherine, refusing to prevent schism for feminist principles.
George Washington fought the American Revolution because Catholic agents were planning a revival of Catholicism. Alexander Hamilton tried to spy for the British but was unsuccessful so he tried to prevent what would later become cultural Marxism a different way; however, he was thwarted by Aaron Burr. I should probably go read some Augustine and Aquinas now.
However, I will add that Mozart also tried to prevent the American Revolution. It all starts to make some sense now, right?
Either way, it is very interesting to generate ideas and content here.
I can only assume you’ll find an encoded message there about how the drumbeats in Beatles songs come from African pagan rituals.
Also, holy shit, Mozart, PLEASE tell me you aren’t regurgitating Alexander Pushkin here, right? PLEASE TELL ME THIS. Anyway, Constanze had a big problem with it, primarily the fact that she was SOL unless folks believed it was completed. So you’re talking about an altered piece from the word go.
So if the Requiem has secret prophesy silliness in it, can you explain which bits Franz Xaver Süssmayr made up and which bits Mozart made up?
Anyway, I can absolutely GUARANTEE you that Mozart wrote more about farts than abortion.
Is that you admitting that you made all this up on the spot, or…?
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/chkle.gif
Were any of these folks lizard people?
Okay, not going to get annoyed at him dragging William Fucking Blake into his crackpot who-knows-whattery, because that would be hypocritical of me. Not going to get annoyed. Argh… *twitch*
Stranded sounds like me before I turned eight and grew out of my “namedropping theologians to sound pious and impress my teachers” phase.
I love how stranded talks about morality and preaching the good word because of the overcoming of the Holy Spirit when he blamed sex before marriage for revenge porn.
The pattern of farts is currently being decoded.
You were the one going on about “natural law”, so people told you that gay is natural. Boom. It was relevant to the conversation.
According to Christianity, yes.
I, and a few other peeps here, are not Christian (I’m one of those heathen, witchcraft-practicing pagans your pastor most likely warned you about. 😉 ), so forgive us if we all don’t take your interpretation of creation as fact.
(Apologies if this rubbed any of our Christan regs the wrong way. I’m not trying to be snide, just prove a point about not everyone being Christian.)
Acutally, if we truly want to get down to the science-y bits of this: All fetuses start off as female. (This is why men have nipples, despite not having the need for them to feed babies!)
However, they do start to develop genitalia around six weeks in, so it’s possible that there are a far greater number of “female” fetuses “murdered” than male. So, it’s actually more likely more than half, considering that most abortions take place before the thirteenth week (first trimester).
However, I still fail to see why this is important, and why this was necessary to say. What, are we supposed to jump and become pro-life because you pointed this out? Are we all supposed to rush to the defense of those poor widdle clumps of cells and immediately stop giving two fucks about the already born person carrying them, or the already born people that person might have to care for?
Again, I care more for the already born people than a clump of cells that is taking nutrients from its mother. In my experience, “pro-life” people do not. Once the baby’s born, they immediately stop caring about its well-being.
[[Citation Needed]]
Ah, the old “[Insert “third world” country here] is so much worse than your silly little first-world problem!” argument.
One, Africa isn’t a homogeneous country. It’s a continent. If you’re going to call out “the worst anti-gay laws”, perhaps it would be best to cite particular countries instead of vague places.
Won’t someone please think of the unsophisticated conservatives! [/clutching pearls with sarcasm]
Dude, if the “unsophisticated conservatives” are being “driven to the arms of the racist” simply by people asking that they respect their basic human rights, chances are they were already pretty fucking racist.
I fail to see how us going “Hey, perhaps we should have rights equal to yours, and maybe you should stop treating us like shit” is a “social irresponsibility”. Unless, of course, you’re a fucking bigot yourself.
Us wanting to be equal isn’t a “social irresponsibility”. Us already not being equal is a social irresponsibility.
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150617205835/plantsvszombies/images/4/43/I_SAY_OLD_BEAN.gif
Yup, because I’m going to totes take the word of a guy who has been dead for centuries that access to abortion and same sex marriage is bad.
Yup. Totes. [/sarcasm]
Ah ha ha ha ha! Oh, Stranded, you had me going for a little while. I’ll give you points for that.
I’ll let you keep posting until someone is able to correctly identify which returning troll you are.
Boy, I love mad libs
Did you know that Benjamin Franklin was the one who invented the light bulb? What about Rosa Parks being our 30th president? And did you know It was actually Nicholas Cage who predicted 9/11?
Not at all. We all believe different things. (And his gloss on the creation story is pretty weird anyway.)
Mozart completed the vocals and figured bass for Dies Irie. At least four other composers worked on Mozart’s Requiem. Sussmayer claims he completed Dies Irie from qua resurget ex favilla onwards. So which one was encoding The Secret?
I’m going to guess Pell. Just because he’s so darn persistent and always comes back.
Is this a recent (as in the last few months) troll, or someone older? Because either my memory’s failing me, or I have no clue due to being semi-new.
I know, Scented Fucking Hard Chairs, I know. I’ma like: You besmirch William Blake?! IMA GONNA FITE YOU NOW!
DON’T TEST ME, BRO.
Paradoxical Intention
“(I’m one of those heathen, witchcraft-practicing pagans your pastor most likely warned you about. 😉 ), so forgive us if we all don’t take your interpretation of creation as fact.
(Apologies if this rubbed any of our Christan regs the wrong way. I’m not trying to be snide, just prove a point about not everyone being Christian.)”
No offense taken and you’re not a heathen or whatever 🙂
David Futrelle
Oh! I think I know who he is but I can’t remember his name, bummer! Is he that guy who came in to argue about abortions? Oh well I’m sure someone will get it.
Benjamin Franklin in the Temple Chruch with the African Ritual Drums. It’s Conspiracy-Clue. Clonspiracy? CLONE-Spiracy. Illuminati confirmed.
Umm…Meller? Someone religious, obviously.