Today, another little treasure from the trash pile — that is, a comment someone left here but that I decided not to let through but which I have since decided might be worth sharing with the world.
This particular commenter — an excitable Man Going His Own Way reacting to my post Women are overpriced vagina buses that won’t let you ride them — has a bit of a fixation on a certain word that starts with “C,” which he managed to use 14 times in his tl;dr rant.
I’ve taken the liberty of cutting out boring stuff, breaking up his wall of text into paragraphs, and highlighting some of my favorite bits. And, in the interest of making the world a slightly nicer place, I’ve replaced each instance of the word “cunt” with “bundt cake.” Who doesn’t like cake?
Let’s see what Poltergeist1981 has to say, shall we?
Wow – look at all the bundt cake-hurt on this comment section! Nothing but baseless statements, Strawmen, and a myriad of other logical fallacies combined with emotional trauma. Not amazed or surprised through, bundt cakes hate it when you call them out on their bundt cake bullshit, especially if they are biased feminazi bundt cakes. …
Damn. I’m hungry already.
What are the feminists doing now? Complaining about how men sit? Man Spreading they call it? Give me a fucking break you bundt cakes – we have something in between our legs that makes it uncomfortable to sit like you do! It’s too bad you can’t grow a cock and pair of balls to understand that, but none the less what a pathetic fucking group it has become.
Ah, manspreading. If what I’ve seen is any indication, the overwhelming majority of the talk about “manspreading” has come from men who are absolutely furious that anyone could possibly suggest that maybe they shouldn’t take up more than one seat on a crowded subway. With all the talk about the possible harm to their allegedly HUGE BALLS, it’s almost as though they’re afraid of some sort of symbolic castration.
Angry dudes: some people with cocks and balls as big as yours manage do this on a regular basis — in part to avoid getting harassed or worse by transphobes — so quit your bellyaching about having to keep your legs together for a few minutes on the subway.
Feminists need to fuck off about the first world – you have more than your fair share of human rights (way more than men now) – and need to start focusing on the middle east where they still force bundt cakes to wear burkas or however / whatever you call them.
Spoken like a real expert on gender in the Middle East. Are you by chance Richard Dawkins?
Do they really focus on that though? No – they focus on bullshit like man-spreading. You want to know why? Because first world bundt cakes are superficial – idiotic – and are only good for what is between their legs, and half of you aren’t even good for that now – fucking STD infected land whales.
Uh, if these “land whales” aren’t even “good for” sex now, how is it that so many of them (at least in your imagination) have managed to get Sexually Transmitted Diseases?
Put the fork fucking down and close your fucking legs.
I would say “or” rather than “and” here. Nothing wrong with forks, or with sex, but combining the two may not be the best idea. You could put an eye out.
[A]ll you bundt cake are so extremely superficial, fucked up, nasty, no morals, can’t fucking cook, can’t fucking clean, just overall good for nothing, and you’re only good for sex assuming your bundt cake is clean and you’re not a fucking whale.
True, a clean bundt cake is preferable to a dirty one.
[I]t’s not that we can’t get laid – it’s because we just don’t want it from you anymore – it’s not worth our trouble.
I get more enjoyment from fucking a fleshlight to my favorite porn now than going through the trouble of being with some boring good for nothing / nasty / etc bundt cake to then eventually bust a nut with.
That poor, poor Fleshlight.
Also why would I or any of us want to have a “deep / intimate / close” relationship with you? You are not interesting, fun, uplifting, or anything what women USED to be back during the days where traditional conservative women were the norm.
I’m sure women who were systematically denied education were much more interesting conversationalists.
You say that “patriarchy” forced them to be that way when really, they simply just had more class than you.
Uh, that’s not how things work.
Myself? 32 yrs old, Never married – 0 kids – make over 100k / year doing java programming, 0 STDs, Great body work out every day, Near perfect credit, awesome house, Ferrari (not an expensive one a modest one I got for a great price :D), and a PC master race gaming habit i’ll never leave.
Gosh, an angry MGTOW who’s a computer programmer and gaming enthusiast who thinks it’s hilarious to refer to himself as part of the “master race.” Way to dismantle the stereotypes, dude!
I love my life. Why should I fuck it up with marriage.
I’ll agree with you on this one. Do not fuck up your life — or, more to the point, anyone else’s — by getting married
I look at things like an economic transaction when it comes to women.
Boy, there’s a shock.
When you consider myself – the value I have will continue to grow as I get older – i’ll continue you make more and more money, and increase my market value.
Now take a woman – when it comes to most of you the only thing you’re really only good for is what is between your legs and your looks. That is what I consider a depreciating asset since eventually your looks will fade. Why should I have to MARRY you? No what I will do though – I will lease you. When our contract is up – I’ll replace you with a newer model.
Wait, weren’t you just declaring that women are worthless, and singing the praises of your Fleshlight? And now you’re bragging about “leasing” young hotties with your Java money? Money that could be spent on Steam, or on a replacement Fleshlight? You’re going your own way SO HARD that you brag about bribing women into having sex with you?
You ask who will take care of me when I get sick? My new model or you if you have not depreciated enough to be replaced at such a time. I will ALWAYS have a replacement..
Yes, keep telling yourself that.
Now if I found a woman that actually has many values / morals / etc that is worth keeping around – EVEN THEN – I would still not marry her. Why? Because a woman like that probably ALREADY has a job that pays really well, she can take care of herself, she does not need my money – she would be seeing me because we have mutual interests and SHE IS INTERESTING and not superficial –
I shudder at the thought of a women who has “mutual interests” with you, given that your main interest seems to be calling women “cunts” on the internet.
BUT SHE HAS ALL THIS MONEY??!?! So why should I risk losing HALF OF MY SHIT to a woman who is making as much IF NOT MORE money as myself? Where is the logic in that shit?
We don’t care if you don’t marry. I’d much prefer you didn’t.
Honestly until the laws that fuck guys financially GO AWAY from drivoces go the way of the dinosaur – MGTOW 4 fucking life. Fuck that shit.
And now we’ve reached the part of the rant in which the ranter descends into gibbering incoherence.
I would like to ask some of you bundt cakes. Is your pussy worth my life? Is it? I seriously fucking doubt it – and to the those who say Yes – it is – fuck off and die – you are what is wrong with the world and women today mmmkaY? kkthxbai
MGTOW 4 life, bundt cakes.
Bundt cake for life, MGTOWs!
And if he isn’t a candidate they’re taking seriously, why are all the Republicans smoothing over Trump’s speech about Mexicans raping and drug dealing and stuff? It seems that if he wasn’t being taken seriously, they would tear the fuck into him.
Don’t all republicans say these things?
@Danny Chameleon
They’re more subtle than what Trump said.
It’s going to be like last time, the candidate du jour, because none of them can bring the Tea Party wing and the business wing together. Trump is well-known but makes an ass of himself every time he opens his mouth. (What you really need to look for in the polls at this point is a candidate’s unfavorable rating. Trump has high name recognition, but I’ll bet his negatives are very high too.) I would sort of like to see him win the Republican’t nomination, because I would love to see Hillary hand him his ass in the Presidential debates. He’s a male Sarah Palin — a diva who won’t put the time into learning the issues that a serious candidate must.
The thing about this election: If a Democrat wins, she won’t be able to do much in domestic affairs anyway because the R’s will have the House and will obstruct everything as they have done for the last 6 years, so it doesn’t matter much who the D candidate’s program is — it won’t be done. Disaster for the D’s (and the country) is an R President, because that would also mean that they keep the Senate and the House and can do all sorts of bad things. Disaster for the R’s is nominating someone like Trump or Cruz and having a “wave” election (like Johnson/Goldwater in ’64 or Nixon/McGovern in ’72) where they would lose in a landslide that might be enough to throw the House back to the D’s. I’ve always liked Bernie BUT there’s more chance a Bush or Walker might beat him, and that would be a catastrophe.
Chris Ladd, the last sane Republican, wrote a piece on this. Spoiler: he’s very, very pissed off about Trump entering the primaries, not just because Trump is an asshole but because of what it indicates is happening with the party.
http://goplifer.com/2015/07/01/how-trump-might-change-the-gop-race/
Let’s not go implying that republicans are insane, please.
Pandapool, if you want to worry I can’t stop you, but Trump has a 25/57 favorable/unfavorable rating among Republicans. He won’t win the nomination, and if he does, it’s likely to mean a landslide for Hillary, whose favorability is 80% among Democrats and about even overall.
it’s early in the campaign with a very crowded Republican primary field that’s bound to be a circus. The more attention they give fringe candidates like Trump, the less time they’ll have to build a real campaign behind a credible candidate. So yes, Trump is absolutely a good thing for Democrats.
@Pandapool – as a former Republican living among and related to a whole bunch of Republicans, I can (anecdotally) confirm katz’s note above: everybody I know thinks Trump is a grade-A slimeball.
Thank you for catching me on that, spindrift. Please read that as if it’s written:
“…Chris Ladd, the last Republican to prefer a harsh reality to a comforting illusion….”
Bundt cakes may sometimes be a bit dry … but.
Anyone not experienced in cooking cakes would do well to get themselves a plain ring tin. There’s a good reason why ring cakes are not permitted in cake competitions. They’re almost guaranteed to cook evenly. (They do sometimes allow them in kids’ sections.)
They’re especially good for fruit cakes or those upside down thingies where the pineapple rings or apricots or citrus slices or whatever finish up on the top of the cake with some syrupy stuff when it’s turned out. Because they _will_ cook evenly and they _won’t_ sink.
(Though lining them with baking paper can be a bit fiddly.)
W.
Twice.
Never forget it. American voters are capable of eminence stupidity.
Well that was a funny spellcheck mistake.
Let’s all stand back and admire it’s majesty.
*hands on hips*
Yessir, that is spectacular.
Agree with everything Katz said. I also want to point out that it’s six months until the first primaries/caucuses and six months is an eternity in electoral politics. IIRC, there was a point in which Herman Cain was polling really well.
I think I already said this last time we had this conversation, but as stupid as George W Bush is, he’s not a fair comparison to Trump. Bush is a political legacy with a Washington insider father. As much as his views were compatible with the far right fringe, he was still an acceptable establishment candidate. Donald Trump is not. He can’t be relied on to toe the line or keep his mouth shut ever. Reagan didn’t have establishment backing either, but he was much more charismatic and likable than Trump, he already had previously held elected office, and the political climate/demographics are different today than they were in 1980.
I’m pretty confident that the establishment will come out for Jeb Bush and the angry white guy vote will split between Santorum/Paul/Trump/Huckabee. Honestly though, I’d prefer one of those fringe candidates win because it would be better for the Democratic nom (let’s hope it’s not Jim Webb).
Come on, we’re talking about a
toupeeman whose presidential announcement was so odious he got dropped by his TV network the moment it was over. A trump for Trump is not happening any time this millennium.Unless Hillary makes a whopper of a mistake (which I think she’s much too smart to do) or the Greek situation really blows up and causes a recession in Europe that spreads to the US, she is the next President. (Except for her vote to give W authority to invade Iraq, she would be President now.) She has been the target of one of the most severe and longest-running slime campaigns in recent history — it hasn’t worked yet, and I don’t think it will. And I expect there will be enough sexist and ageist shit said about her to turn out the women’s vote. (One guy on a NY Mag blog called her “Ol’ Thunder Thighs” and “Grandma Pantsuit”, and tried to deny that that was sexist and ageist.)
As I said before, I really like Bernie, but his having been mayor of Burlington as a socialist makes it impossible for him to be elected President.
The best Republican’t candidate would be John Kasich (governor of Ohio), particularly if he was smart enough to choose Susanna Martinez (governor of New Mexico) as his running mate. But he’s radioactive to most right-wingers because he accepted the Obamacare Medicaid expansion for Ohio and then said it would have been “heartless” not to do so, thus insulting most of the Republican’t base. Jeb!!!! will probably get the nomination — but only after Trump tears him a new one in the debates — but his terrible stumble when asked whether he’d have gone into Iraq knowing what we know now, tells me his head isn’t into the campaign.
Quick query – why do people always write Bush’s first name with an exclamation mark?
@EJ
Taking the piss out of his stupid-ass campaign logo:
http://eyeondesign.aiga.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/aiga-design-diary-jeb-bush-logo.jpg
Oh, I seeeeeeeeeeeee…
And I add a few extra !’s because it’ll take a lot more than one to make him an exciting candidate.
And just for the record, for non_USAians, Jeb is not his first name — it’s his initials (John Ellis Bush).
Wait, Trump and Bush are currently the top GOP contenders? What was the point of all the primaries a couple years ago then? What happened to those candidates?
I’ve never quite understood all this ‘primaries’ business. I like our way of choosing a Head of State.
“Are you The Queen?”
“Yes”
“Excellent Ma’am; you’ve got the job”
@Alan
But that means you only change Head of State once in a lifetime, and I hear they get pretty stale after a while.
Hey! We have a Tower here for thoughts like that. 😉
@Alan: But you have to hope that your queen lives forever, or you get King Charles the Doofus.