Today, another little treasure from the trash pile — that is, a comment someone left here but that I decided not to let through but which I have since decided might be worth sharing with the world.
This particular commenter — an excitable Man Going His Own Way reacting to my post Women are overpriced vagina buses that won’t let you ride them — has a bit of a fixation on a certain word that starts with “C,” which he managed to use 14 times in his tl;dr rant.
I’ve taken the liberty of cutting out boring stuff, breaking up his wall of text into paragraphs, and highlighting some of my favorite bits. And, in the interest of making the world a slightly nicer place, I’ve replaced each instance of the word “cunt” with “bundt cake.” Who doesn’t like cake?
Let’s see what Poltergeist1981 has to say, shall we?
Wow – look at all the bundt cake-hurt on this comment section! Nothing but baseless statements, Strawmen, and a myriad of other logical fallacies combined with emotional trauma. Not amazed or surprised through, bundt cakes hate it when you call them out on their bundt cake bullshit, especially if they are biased feminazi bundt cakes. …
Damn. I’m hungry already.
What are the feminists doing now? Complaining about how men sit? Man Spreading they call it? Give me a fucking break you bundt cakes – we have something in between our legs that makes it uncomfortable to sit like you do! It’s too bad you can’t grow a cock and pair of balls to understand that, but none the less what a pathetic fucking group it has become.
Ah, manspreading. If what I’ve seen is any indication, the overwhelming majority of the talk about “manspreading” has come from men who are absolutely furious that anyone could possibly suggest that maybe they shouldn’t take up more than one seat on a crowded subway. With all the talk about the possible harm to their allegedly HUGE BALLS, it’s almost as though they’re afraid of some sort of symbolic castration.
Angry dudes: some people with cocks and balls as big as yours manage do this on a regular basis — in part to avoid getting harassed or worse by transphobes — so quit your bellyaching about having to keep your legs together for a few minutes on the subway.
Feminists need to fuck off about the first world – you have more than your fair share of human rights (way more than men now) – and need to start focusing on the middle east where they still force bundt cakes to wear burkas or however / whatever you call them.
Spoken like a real expert on gender in the Middle East. Are you by chance Richard Dawkins?
Do they really focus on that though? No – they focus on bullshit like man-spreading. You want to know why? Because first world bundt cakes are superficial – idiotic – and are only good for what is between their legs, and half of you aren’t even good for that now – fucking STD infected land whales.
Uh, if these “land whales” aren’t even “good for” sex now, how is it that so many of them (at least in your imagination) have managed to get Sexually Transmitted Diseases?
Put the fork fucking down and close your fucking legs.
I would say “or” rather than “and” here. Nothing wrong with forks, or with sex, but combining the two may not be the best idea. You could put an eye out.
[A]ll you bundt cake are so extremely superficial, fucked up, nasty, no morals, can’t fucking cook, can’t fucking clean, just overall good for nothing, and you’re only good for sex assuming your bundt cake is clean and you’re not a fucking whale.
True, a clean bundt cake is preferable to a dirty one.
[I]t’s not that we can’t get laid – it’s because we just don’t want it from you anymore – it’s not worth our trouble.
I get more enjoyment from fucking a fleshlight to my favorite porn now than going through the trouble of being with some boring good for nothing / nasty / etc bundt cake to then eventually bust a nut with.
That poor, poor Fleshlight.
Also why would I or any of us want to have a “deep / intimate / close” relationship with you? You are not interesting, fun, uplifting, or anything what women USED to be back during the days where traditional conservative women were the norm.
I’m sure women who were systematically denied education were much more interesting conversationalists.
You say that “patriarchy” forced them to be that way when really, they simply just had more class than you.
Uh, that’s not how things work.
Myself? 32 yrs old, Never married – 0 kids – make over 100k / year doing java programming, 0 STDs, Great body work out every day, Near perfect credit, awesome house, Ferrari (not an expensive one a modest one I got for a great price :D), and a PC master race gaming habit i’ll never leave.
Gosh, an angry MGTOW who’s a computer programmer and gaming enthusiast who thinks it’s hilarious to refer to himself as part of the “master race.” Way to dismantle the stereotypes, dude!
I love my life. Why should I fuck it up with marriage.
I’ll agree with you on this one. Do not fuck up your life — or, more to the point, anyone else’s — by getting married
I look at things like an economic transaction when it comes to women.
Boy, there’s a shock.
When you consider myself – the value I have will continue to grow as I get older – i’ll continue you make more and more money, and increase my market value.
Now take a woman – when it comes to most of you the only thing you’re really only good for is what is between your legs and your looks. That is what I consider a depreciating asset since eventually your looks will fade. Why should I have to MARRY you? No what I will do though – I will lease you. When our contract is up – I’ll replace you with a newer model.
Wait, weren’t you just declaring that women are worthless, and singing the praises of your Fleshlight? And now you’re bragging about “leasing” young hotties with your Java money? Money that could be spent on Steam, or on a replacement Fleshlight? You’re going your own way SO HARD that you brag about bribing women into having sex with you?
You ask who will take care of me when I get sick? My new model or you if you have not depreciated enough to be replaced at such a time. I will ALWAYS have a replacement..
Yes, keep telling yourself that.
Now if I found a woman that actually has many values / morals / etc that is worth keeping around – EVEN THEN – I would still not marry her. Why? Because a woman like that probably ALREADY has a job that pays really well, she can take care of herself, she does not need my money – she would be seeing me because we have mutual interests and SHE IS INTERESTING and not superficial –
I shudder at the thought of a women who has “mutual interests” with you, given that your main interest seems to be calling women “cunts” on the internet.
BUT SHE HAS ALL THIS MONEY??!?! So why should I risk losing HALF OF MY SHIT to a woman who is making as much IF NOT MORE money as myself? Where is the logic in that shit?
We don’t care if you don’t marry. I’d much prefer you didn’t.
Honestly until the laws that fuck guys financially GO AWAY from drivoces go the way of the dinosaur – MGTOW 4 fucking life. Fuck that shit.
And now we’ve reached the part of the rant in which the ranter descends into gibbering incoherence.
I would like to ask some of you bundt cakes. Is your pussy worth my life? Is it? I seriously fucking doubt it – and to the those who say Yes – it is – fuck off and die – you are what is wrong with the world and women today mmmkaY? kkthxbai
MGTOW 4 life, bundt cakes.
Bundt cake for life, MGTOWs!
Gah! Dude, punctuation is more than just a capital letter at the start and a period at the end.
Edginess does not obviate the need to communicate well.
I love how women think we work out to tease you, the truth is we work out to stay healthy. If women actually did it we wouldn’t have an obesity epidemic lol.
@Falconer
Obvious troll is obvious, not to mention obviously bad at it.
As ever, M is right; and autosoma makes a solid point.
Thinking about autosoma’s point a little more, it occurs to me that a lot of redpill people define themselves simply by a list of status-relevant things that they are or have, either positive or negative. For example, “I have positive status because I own a Ferrari” or “I have negative status because I am ugly.” It’s not only an unnecessarily competitive way of seeing the world, but it’s very essentialist. You say you’re ugly, but plenty of people who think of themselves as ugly are married (and therefore presumably have lots of sex), while lots of people who think of themselves as ugly find themselves disagreed with fairly earnestly. Equally, you say that you have a high salary but as has been pointed out, this a) is a relative rather than absolute thing, and b) doesn’t matter to most people.
Wanting to be judged by a list of positive and negative status-effects in this manner strikes me as a good way to make yourself unhappy. More importantly though, it’s inherently objectifying. If you want people to react to you according to your list of status-effects, then you’re asking them not to react to you according to truly humanising things like how you act or how you treat others. You’re creating a mask and hoping that people don’t notice the human being behind it.
That seems terribly lonely. John, if you feel that way, I’m sorry to hear it.
You realize that this makes any insult we lob at you completely justified? You’ve managed to once again prove how toxic the MGTOW movement is, display why we need feminism and more specifically this blog. Thanks!
Better contribution to this conversation than anything you’ve got.
No, you do it to compete with each other. Being healthy is different from having big muscles.
Let’s face it, what you really want to compare is penes, but you’re deathly afraid that looking at another man’s penis will give you The Gay, so you found a surrogate.
If a woman insisted on reducing the entire male population to their penises and complained about how men are all horrible because they won’t let her have sex at them at her command because they’re all good for nothing but their penises and why won’t they let her jump them, then yes. Telling her to stick to her dildos and leave men alone would be an appropriate response.
john,
You do know that, on average, there are more obese men then women?
Uh, John, maybe it’s just my feeemale brain but, if you are Going Your Own Way, why are you posting on a site that is a feminist site? I thought the point of going your own way was to not had to deal with us, so why voluntarily do it?
Yes because women don’t have exclusive gyms where the workout, let alone workout at all, and are the only fat people on planet earth. Also that apparently men are never fat. You know in fantasy land where people think they come from hell.
BRAH, you need to pump some metal RIGHT NOW or else you’ll totes will ruins your body, brah!
Here’s some tracks for your workout:
BRAH PUMP BRAH PUMP BRAH PUMP BRAH PUMP!
Because obviously only women are the problem!
From the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/06/22/americas-getting-even-fatter-startling-growth-in-obesity-over-past-20-years/
I see you don’t let silly things like facts stop you.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LR_VBEG_yqM/S_3PxATgF-I/AAAAAAAABuc/hiNnhs4x3UA/s1600/funny-pictures-your-cat-has-been-working-out.jpg
Thank you Pandapool. My strange brain processed that as some sort of inflatable bra being pumped up. I’m not not sure weather I should be disturbed by it, or laughing because of it, or both.
Insult me all you want I eat them for breakfast and mgtow isn’t going anywhere. Im not competing with anyone I don’t have any friends and I usually go to the gym when no one is there.
First off, drop the “we.” You don’t own “men” as a category. Sorry about that.
Second off, oh yes… you most definitely do work out to “tease women,” or at least try to attract them. The “red pill” philosophy, apart from being hopelessly misogynistic, is a worldview entirely centered on what women think of you, and how to make them do things you want them to do.
Face it; if you somehow thought that women were in to heavier guys, you’d be swapping high-calorie cooking tips and bragging about how big a plate you could force down.
Other men? Sure, other men work out for a wide variety of reasons, either as competition, health upkeep, body image, preparation for strenuous activities, or just because they like it.
But you red pill men do it completely for the ladies, somehow not realizing that your philosophy is going to far outweigh any other superficial body changes you make.
Mate, that’s the saddest thing I’ve seen all day.
You eat who for breakfast?
Me too! 24 hour gyms are the best. I bet we go when no one is there for very different reasons though :/
Man, john, that’s real sad. But I think we know the reason why you have no friends.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/small-violin.gif
You really should consider something more substantial…
Oh John. We know.
Er, isn’t that rather self defeating?
Damn, where’d I put that prize for stating the flipping obvious?
You’re right it’s a dead end, a path to nowhere but misery. Certainly you aren’t living up to the “G” in the acronym because you won’t actually leave.
@Alan:
Well, yes, but at least someone finally admits it!