Less than 24 hours after an apparent white supremacist murdered nine black churchgoers in cold blood during a prayer meeting in a historic black church in Charleston, South Carolina, one prominent MRA is trying to put the blame on feminism, because of a remark the killer reportedly made about rape.
One of the survivors of the church killings reported that, before he began shooting, the killer told those in the prayer group that “you rape our women and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go.”
Dylann Storm Roof, the accused killer, wore his racism on his sleeve, almost literally: a former classmate tells the press that Roof “made a lot of racist jokes”; his license plate featured the Confederate flag; his Facebook profile picture shows him in a jacket with patches representing the flags of Rhodesia and apartheid-era South Africa.
But Dean Esmay, the second-in-command at A Voice for Men, probably the most influential Men’s Rights site, thinks that Roof’s killing spree may be the result of too much feminism. Earlier today, he posted a link to an article on the shooting to the Men’s Rights subreddit with this headline:
To their credit, the Men’s Rights subreddit regulars voted his comment down; one told him “[n]ot everything is about us, man. This is distasteful.”
Two hours later, apparently undaunted by the criticism and oblivious to irony, Esmay returned to the Men’s Rights subreddit to make another accusation:
No one has declared the shooter to be an MRA. The little we know about Roof right now suggests that he was a garden-variety old-school racist. The paranoid notion of black men raping “our” white women is one of the oldest racist tropes out there; as Jessica Valenti noted on Twitter, Roof’s language is “the language of white supremacist patriarchy.”
The alleged threat to “our women” was used for generations as an excuse to lynch black men and terrorize the black community as a whole. In the case of Roof’s shootings, it’s an even more transparent ruse. As Rebecca Carroll notes in The Guardian, it’s hard to argue that these killings had anything to do with real fears or even paranoid fantasies about the rape of white women when most of the victims were not black men — the symbolic “rapists” in the equation — but black women:
There is something inconsistent with the Charleston shooter’s alleged evocation of the historical myth of black man as beast and rapist of white women, and the fact that he killed mostly black women. Did he only shoot black women because there were no more black men to kill? Because black women birth, care for and love black men? Or because he didn’t see black women as women at all …
The idea that white women’s bodies represent that which is inviolable while black women’s are disposable hasn’t changed enough since it was first articulated by white men; but again, aimed at black men on Wednesday night, it was predominately black women who suffered by their invocation.
We will find out more about Root’s twisted beliefs in days to come. But it is clear already that they had nothing whatsoever to do with feminism.
H/T — r/againstmensrights
EDIT: I’m making this a NO TROLL, no-derailing-with-idiotic-MRA-or-incel-talking-points thread.
“the male suicide rate is 3 times that of women ”
BUT WOMEN ATTEMPT SUICIDE MORE OFTEN.
And women also want love and sex. But only WOMEN have literally been treated as property because of their gender. and prevented from voting. and so on. So fuck off.
….seriously, why does it never occur to MRAs that women and gay people also struggle in the dating world, and that having trouble dating at 21 isnt oppression? like uh Maybe being murdered for being black is actual oppression?! & this murder isnt about how oppressed men are?!
@WWTH, you’re right about it being “undeservedly generous” 😉
He’s now derailed in 2 threads about tragic killings, what an asswipe.
@KL
“….seriously, why does it never occur to MRAs that women and gay people also struggle in the dating world, and that having trouble dating at 21 isn’t oppression? like uh Maybe being murdered for being black is actual oppression?! & this murder isnt about how oppressed men are?!”
It does occur to them. Everybody struggles. But aren’t you being obtuse here? Obviously, countless men will tell you that if they don’t risk socially, read women’s minds, and do the miserable song and dance that seems to be required of them, they won’t date at all. And when they attempt to do that dance or figure out how to do it, all they get are contradictory messages as to what women are expecting them. If they just listen to what women say they want, they find themselves ignored, resented, used, and so on. That is the exact scenario that countless men experience independently of one another.
Everybody struggles, but our roles obviously aren’t equivalent. No guy can make some online dating profile and screen applicants like an employer at the height of the great depression, now can he? So what you’re saying here is “well employers struggle to find good help that is affordable!” I’m sorry, but I don’t really feel that bad for employers. I feel bad for the people interviewing for the job, since the power dynamic clearly is not in their favor.
Would we say that beauty standards aren’t oppression? I’m pretty sure I can find no shortage of feminists who would disagree.
Since we can see obviously that women factor in men’s financial, professional, and social success on top of expecting them to initiate relationships the majority of the time, this suggests that there is a political and economic consequence to women’s expectations which isn’t true for men’s expectations. Men aren’t throwing women away and rendering them invisible because they don’t make enough money or have sufficient education. If you’re having trouble as a woman, watch what you eat, be more receptive, try to hide the fact that you’re crazy, etc. – all of those things are within your control. But what does the guy do in a failing economy? Overthrow the government?
And none of this is even related to the topic of the blog post. Somebody else brought up something unrelated which was posted elsewhere.
@policy of madness
“Divided Line: WHAT ABOUT THE (white) MENZ!?!?!?”
Gender is a two way dynamic, there are no men’s issues that aren’t women’s issues and vice versa. And this is true for non binary people as well since they are stuck with a culture that is shaped by heteronormativity, so…
@policy of madness
And you have no idea what my race is.
Wow, such insight into women and you’re *still* having trouble making friends with them?
Who’d of thunk it?
aw its cute when trolls think Im gonna have a conversation with them. Nah dude just pointing out your ridiculousness. If you wanna keep begging for an intellectual beatdown I guess youll have to harass someone else.
If you’re having trouble as a man, watch what you eat, be more receptive, try to hide the fact that you’re crazy, etc
because a man not getting laid is women’s fault, but women not getting laid is also women’s fault, and gay people dont exist.
More Divided Line: THE MENZ!!! THE MENZ!!! Yeah, women also sometimes have problems dating BUT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE MENZ ALWAYS THE MENZ!
You’re right. I don’t. Your race has nothing to do with the fact that you’re hijacking a thread to discuss problems that predominantly affect straight, white, middle-class men.
“But hey, know what this racist hate crime wherein elder black women and men were murdered at churcj really makes me think about? My white dick.”
@KL
““the male suicide rate is 3 times that of women ”
BUT WOMEN ATTEMPT SUICIDE MORE OFTEN.
And women also want love and sex. But only WOMEN have literally been treated as property because of their gender. and prevented from voting. and so on. So fuck off.”
The overwhelming majority of people had no right to vote for centuries, regardless of their gender. The original franchise was only enjoyed by propertied white men, not all men, and the extension of it to women occurred only a century later, and this in spite of women agitating against it. So, I don’t know, I don’t think men and women are opposing teams. There is no team men with an in group preference for other men. If anything, there is a team women and a bunch of guys tearing each other down and segregating into racial, national, tribal, in groups and out groups in order to make team women happy.
Again, I’m having a hard time understanding how it is that it’s the privileged gender which is 4 times as likely to die by violence, 3 times as likely to commit suicide, 3 times as likely to be homeless. How is it that it’s the privileged gender which experiences 90% of workplace injuries and deaths. It’s the privileged gender which experiences a gendered sentencing disparity that is six times the one that exists between the races. I’m sorry, but this isn’t adding up. Could it be that men and women aren’t opposing teams?
And if women want love and sex, given the statistical picture, and since we can say for sure that, for most women, the things required of them by the opposite sex are generally within their control, I guess women can expect an easier time of achieving both, yeah?
Or he’s just lamenting he hasn’t had sex in a while. You don’t speak for every man out there, fer fuck’s sake.
And I fail to see how saying that “average males” are only talking about sex is “dehumanizing” them.
You know what’s “dehumanizing”? Being considered as nothing more than a pretty little sex toy for these men to fuck.
Oh fuck you.
Feminism is all about trying to give men better access to mental health and getting them to talk about their emotions, something that MRAs don’t seem to give two shits about.
You want someone to blame for men not having the “language” to talk about sex? Blame other men. Y’all are so concerned about looking “feminine” and being “macho” that you refuse to find other language. Stop blaming feminism for other men’s bullshit.
Secondly, sexual or romantic relationships are not “basic to emotional and psychological well being of bother [sic] genders”. There are aromantic and asexual people of all genders (because there’s more than two, dipstick).
I don’t know how we went from “men need to get their boners wet because biology!” to “men commit suicide more often!”, but alright then.
That’s because men tend to go for big, flashy suicides that are more effective (i.e. shooting themselves in the head), whereas women tend to go for quieter suicides that don’t always work (i.e. pill overdose).
However, women are more likely to attempt suicide, but men are more likely to succeed at it.
So, when women fail to die from their attempt, it goes from “committed suicide” to “attempted suicide”.
Yet more Divided Line: MENZ MENZ WHY THE FUCK AREN’T YOU TALKING ABOUT THE MENZ 24/7 WHY THE HELL DO YOU HATE MENZ SO MUCH THAT YOU SOMETIMES DISCUSS SOMETHING ELSE?????
– Person tells Troll they do not wish to converse with them
– Troll continues to address Person directly.
– White man kills mostly black women
– Troll wants to talk about his white penis.
cute.
HEY YOU KNOW, IMMA GONNA STEP IN HERE AND SAY:
I know the matter has been dropped, but I just want to say, I happen to agree with EJ and WWTH on the issue on atheism and teaching children religion for a multitude of reasons.
Also, berdache from a previous life, if you’re truly sorry, don’t bring it up anymore and adjust your writing accordingly.
And shut up, Divided Line.
With that, I shall leave with a dramatic flourish.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/best-gif-ever1.gif
Fuck you blockquote mammoth. I can’t concentrate on your damn tags when I’m responding to a novella-length teal deer about male tears and penises.
@KL
““But hey, know what this racist hate crime wherein elder black women and men were murdered at churcj really makes me think about? My white dick.””
Actually what it makes me think about is Emmett Till. You know, the young man who was famously lynched by the Klan for whistling at a white woman. His mother allowed the picture of his battered 14 year old corpse to be publicized and it was a major catalyst for civil rights movement. I believe a modern feminist would call somebody like the 14 year old Till a “street harasser,” yeah?
What’s interesting about it is that I’m willing to bet that the white men who lynched Till believed they were saving the damsels from the out group men who supposedly menaced “their” women.
See, masculinity apparently is all about being the tough guy and saving women from the bad guys. That is, after all, why you will call people like myself misogynists, losers, rape apologists, neckbeards, and so on. Because we’re the bad guys. The “nice guy” Elliot Rodgers who menace women. I guess if a guy wanted to avoid being seen as a social failure and potential monster, he would do best to stamp his feet as loudly at the patriarchy and rally around the trembling women folk in order to save them from the villains yeah?
Why do you think this dynamic was any different in the south when Till was lynched? All you have to do is swap out the criteria for who belongs in the out group of bad guy men, and the dynamic is identical to the tripe you see on the SJW left.
It’s embarrassing. Not only is it antithetical to any notion of actual gender equality, it’s psychologically identical to the same dynamic at work in racism historically.
Look at the guy who shot up that church. “Our women.” He’s saving “his” women. Why couldn’t I just put racist saviors of damsels and SJW saviors of damsels on the same side of a debate and myself on the other?
Also, Divided Brain didn’t stick their flounce.
-3/10.
No, we’d ask him to do that because wanting equal rights and treatment for your fellow human beings is a requirement for being a decent human being.
If a Male Feminist/Feminist Ally came in here and attempted to save us “damsels” from something, chances are we’d tear into him much like we’re tearing into you.
The “save the damsel” trope is sexist as fuck, and we’d prefer to have allies who are willing to boost feminist voices in spaces that won’t listen to them coming out of the mouth of a woman due to their own sexism.
Because “SJW saviors of damsels” aren’t shooting people because of their race? Or killing anyone at all?
How daft are you?
-4/10
Do you think the Klan would have lynched a white boy who whistled at a woman?
That might give some insight as to their motives.
Obviously I’m debating with you, not trolling. Is it possible you use accusations of trolling to avoid having to consider points of view you don’t like? Or is that you don’t understand what trolling is?
At any rate, I’m bored with this. Enjoy your hugbox.
They never do. I’m starting to believe that Divided Line is like that guy who kept moaning about what unregulated drugs had done to his cock every couple of days, namely that making people online read about his sad boner actually makes his boner happy.
@Divided Line
We only don’t like the point of views that derail threads from the topic at hand, which currently has nothing to do with guys not being able to get laid.