Once again, a look at some of the comments that people try to leave here, but which for assorted reasons don’t get past the rigorous We Hunted the Mammoth screening process.
I kid; the process is not rigorous at all. You just need to pass a minimal standard of basic human decency. Here’s an assortment of comments from people who, well, fell short. In each instance, I’m pretty sure you’ll be able to guess why.
I’ll take “Protocols of the Elders of [BLANK]” for $400, Alex!
This fellow, like a lot of manospherians, seems really, really obsessed with cuckolding.
This fellow tried to post a number of comments on the same theme. This is is most succinct:
I’ll take “I don’t condone violence but you feminists totally deserve it for making jokes” for $200, Alex.
tl;dr: This guy, not really a big fan of women. (Spot the “we hunted the mammoth” for bonus points.)
You thought that last one was the worst it gets? Unfortunately not. Whoever sent this one — from a dubious IP address — is either a giant douchebag of a troll, or the next Elliot Rodger. (Please be the former.)
I’m going to just stop now. This post turned out a bit darker than I expected.
Still waiting, incidentally, for some kind of denial that trollboy is perfectly okay with violence against women and the promotion thereof, so long as it is perpetrated by no true MGTOW.
@PoM
I know who’s he’s talking about. It was this woman a while back who made a blog post in anger maybe 2-4 years ago and happens to stick by what she says. She was in a few articles 2 or so years ago and then dropped off the map.
What leadership she has.
The Femitheist is our new leader? I specifically voted against her at the last nefarious feminst conclave. Katie is our only rightful head of state. I demand a recount!
@PoM
Oh, best part, she was 22 when she made that blog post. Yep. 22 year old leader. Very influential, such knowledge, such wisdom.
epitome of incomprehensibility-I think it by Saintluger we wrote that ‘men built, own and run this world’ and that women are ‘parasitic whores’.
So we’ve established femitheist isn’t in the media and isn’t a leader in any sense. Who else is calling for the death of most men, big boy?
Not going to deny that, but he’s 1000x more of a leader of MGTOW than some lady who, again, I literally never heard of before about 10 minutes ago. He’s well known, his website gets tens of thousands of hits a month, and he was on national TV only a month ago. He would meet your criteria of “leader” if he were a feminist.
I think it’s something that one lady said one time on a website that I’ve never heard of before.
Your assertion was that feminism’s “leaders” (whatever that might mean) promote this culling idea. You’ve produced literally one lady, a complete unknown to me, who has a single website on some corner of the internet. I want to see leaders, nationally recognized ones talked about on the media. That’s what you promised me.
If you’re going to dismiss Roosh as a nobody, you’re going to have to produce a feminist with a higher profile than Roosh if you want to claim she’s a leader of feminism.
Roosh is one
So you agree on the final solution? Yes or no
Policy you make the rules, huh.
NO DEAL
You first, troll. Are you or are you not willing to confront men who commit or promote violence against women and tell them it’s not okay? You know, something beyond coming onto a third-party website and going “that’s not one of us.”
Horrible comments, David, but it’s sadly nothing new.
I have been a follower of your blog for months and months now and I like it a lot. Keep up the awesome work. Don’t know how you do it, though.
big boy, YOU made the rules. you promised feminist leaders, plural, calling for the culling of 90% of men. you haven’t produced even one. TROLL FAIL.
@bigboy
Are you trying to get us to say that it’s a good thing to kill 90% of men? Because, uh, it isn’t. We’re decent people. We don’t want that sort of thing.
So no. Everyone here would vote no; some of us are just way too fed up with you to let you go off on whatever tangent a no would cause.
So, uh, go off on that tangent at me if you like. *shrug*
See, now this is just funny.
The male supremacists are all flying the banner under various head honchos, so they presume feminists must be just like them and have leaders that they unflinchingly fight for.
They have yet to realize that feminists *gasp* read whoever they want, and think about who they are listening to and form their own opinions. My god! Who’da ever thunk it?
It kind of goes back to what I said about Anita Sarkeesian. Defending her human rights doesn’t make that an automatic agreement on my part to blindly follow everything she says. I would expect nothing less from any reasonably smart person.
This calls into question the level of intelligence the average MRA has, and what level of cognitive ability they have that they continue to hold this warped worldview despite all evidence. I’d say we’d be delusional to hope for much on both counts.
POM
“So that makes Roosh, who thinks rape should be legal, your leader. How about you boot out Roosh and then I’ll get to work on booting some lady I’ve literally never heard of before in my life out of feminism.”
And Paul Elam he is the leader of the a voice for men.
Troll boy
“No policy, Roosh is a laughing stock. He’s a moron. Well policy, what do you say about this Final Solution for men?”
It’s ok for men to promote violence against women if they’re not calling themselves mgtow but one woman promoting violence against men deserves to be booted. That’s exactly what you just said.
Where are all these leaders you are talking about? Feminthiest is not our leader, katie is!
And no, nobody should be killing anyone
If you can find one article on this website that has a plan to kill 90% of men, and it isn’t just David quoting something an MRA said or him being sarcastic, you’ll, I dunno, win a cookie.
Policy: answering a question with a question!
Andrea Dorkin
Sharon Stone
Sally Miller Gearhart
Marilyn French
Let me guess you haven’t heard of them?
We are already booted, Roosh out.
Jackie,
Yeah, I was more wondering if Roxanne was a big boy sock. Same incoherent style, same fixation with femtheist. Of course, it’s also entirely possible that we’ve gotten similar idiot trolls.
One that you continually and mysteriously refuse to answer. My first conclusion, that you are actually perfectly fine with men advocating the murder of women so long as you can deny they are one of yours, remains intact and continues to await a denial from you.
Where did they advocate the killing of 90% of all men?
I certainly have never heard any of them. Of course, I don’t really follow any feminist, I’m just a feminist. I think Anita Sarkeesian is the only prominent feminist that orbits around feminism that I know, and I certainly don’t follow or agree blindly to everything she says.
Oh, wait, is Andrea Dorkin one of those radfem types? I think we’ve discuss her here before. Yeah, I don’t take radfems seriously. Waaay too, well, radical a lot of their ideas are really cartoonish or don’t make much sense.
@WWTH
I wouldn’t take the option off the table. If they share the same IP address or live in a similar area, yeah, they’re probably the same person. David would probably know.
Treehugger can’t get over the insults, huh
I’ll give you some advice
Insults = weakness and in-security, which concludes a weak argument.
Strong and Independent, you claim?
@bigboy
I’d say insulting people are also a sign of immaturity and being a large gaping asshole.
And, yes, I am both these things and still have proper grammar unlike the gaping asshole I am addressing right now.
Policy, read what they say about men, I can’t do all the work.
No man supports, rape, murder, violence unless their a psychopath.
Policy: answering a question with a question, yeah it’s annoying isn’t it ?