Pickup artist and rape legalization proponent Roosh Valizadeh continues his long march to literal Nazidom. Roosh’s far-right leanings have been obvious for some time, and he’s not exactly shy about his racism. But so far he’s managed to avoid one topic of great interest amongst those who think Hitler had some good ideas, if you think about it.
SPOILER ALERT: It starts with a “J.”
Well, Roosh has now rectified that failing with a post today titled “The Damaging Effects Of Jewish Intellectualism And Activism On Western Culture.” No, really.
It seems Roosh has been reading a book, and would like to share its, er, insights with the rest of us. The book, titled The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, is the third in a trio of books on the wily Jew by Kevin MacDonald, a retired Evo Psych professor at California State University, Long Beach who’s been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “the neo-Nazi movement’s favorite academic.”
That’s a pretty fair assessment of the guy, a white supremacist with intellectual pretensions whose fans include Holocaust denier David Irving and former KKK Grand Wizard/Neo-Nazi pinup David Duke. His writings appear on assorted “race realist” web sites and on his own Occidental Observer, a site devoted to “white identity and white interests.” They love him on Stormfront, the popular Neo-Nazi discussion forum.
And if you look on Amazon, you’ll see that people who bought MacDonald’s book also bought such lovely contributions to the historical literature as “The Track of the Jew Through the Ages,” by a prominent Nazi party “thinker,” and the anti-Semitic nonsense classic “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.”
Roosh’s post is made up largely of quotations from MacDonald’s book. Lots and lots of quotations. MacDonald’s argument, in essence, is that Jews have been pursuing a sneaky “group evolutionary strategy,” maintaining a tight-knit group identity while trying to undermine the group identities of white Europeans through the promotion of multiculturalism and other “cultural marxist” evils.
McDonald sees anti-Semitism as an understandable reaction to outsized Jewish influence on culture and politics, and has gone so far as to describe Nazism as a “group evolutionary strategy” that “mirrored Judaism” in many key ways.
In his post, Roosh reiterates McDonald’s main arguments about what both see as the baleful cultural influences of Jews on their “host cultures,” decrying their alleged “promotion of cosmopolitanism, individualism, and decadent lifestyles.”
A few of the “lessons” that Roosh draws from the book:
- “Sigmund Freud, a Jew, pushed psychoanalysis to break down traditional pair bonding in gentiles.”
- “A race to degeneracy hurts Jews less than gentiles because they still retain guiding ingroup values. Gentiles are left in the cultural winds that Jews help create.”
- “Jews were originators of the “social justice” movement that we now have to deal with, but they lost control of it after Jews were no longer seen as minorities in need of social justice but as privileged whites who are part of the power structure.”
Roosh, more circumspect in his language than your typical Stormfronter, professes to admire the tenacity of the Jews even while decrying the “degeneracy” they have allegedly promoted.
What amazes me is how methodical, patient, and determined Jews are in promoting their group interests. Such efforts should be commended and modeled. Why isn’t there such a group of Americans that do the same for Christian interests?
As Roosh sees it, the so-called “Red Pill” movement has already started fighting evil Jewish influences.
A lot of red pill truth is concerned with dismantling myths that have been institutionalized by intellectual Jews over the past century. … The bulk of what I criticize about Western culture was in fact ushered in by intellectual Jewish movements.
Even after making what is in essence a neo-Nazi argument — and echoing old school Nazi rhetoric identifying Jews with “cosmopolitanism” and “degeneracy” — Roosh doesn’t see himself as a Nazi but rather as some sort of “truth bomber.”
Before opening this book, I wondered if it would turn me into a neo-Nazi, but instead it served as a historical truth bomb that has made me skeptical of the ideas, behavioral actions, and teachings of prominent Jews and where their true intentions and loyalties lie … I feel both outrage and admiration at the same time.
Roosh’s readers, for the most part, seem overjoyed that he is finally coming out as an opponent of the wily Jew. They’re a bit more blunt about their anti-Semitism than Roosh himself is. Here’s one, er, instructive exchange from the comments to Roosh’s post.
Notice the upvotes.
One commenter was moved to contribute this not-so-little rant:
But Roosh may find it a bit more difficult to win over white supremacists who aren’t already fans of his site. Why?
Well, here’s the irony: because many of them don’t see Roosh, of Armenian and Iranian descent, as white.
Indeed, several years ago, one regular on Stormfront site warned unwary Estonians that “a really nasty sex tourist from America … name[d] … Daryush Valizedeh, nickname – Roosh” was entering their country in hopes of seducing “beautiful, young white women of Baltic and Nordic descent … this person is not white which makes it even more problematic.”
Over on The Daily Stormer, another white supremacist site, one commenter snorted that Roosh “looks like a typical sand n*gger Iranian … who obsessed with with white women.” Another suggested that Roosh wasn’t even a “Real” Persian:
This butt ugly so-called Persian Roosh is pure khazar. Just look at his morphology; Receding forehead & chin, humongous ears, drooping face, heavy lidded eyes, prognathous median section of face, and let’s not forget the mentality. I’ve met many Real Persians, and he ain’t one of them.
Still another suggested that Roosh might even be a … you know.
Roosh might be styling himself as ‘Persian’ and maybe his parents were born in Iran. Jews are also born in Persia.
He looks, sounds and acts like a secular Jew.
Tough crowd, huh?
Does any of this matter? Men’s Rights activists often dismiss Roosh as a “marginal” character in the Manosphere, but nothing could be further from the truth. According to Alexa, his Return of Kings site gets a good deal more traffic than A Voice for Men, the most influential site in the Men’s Rights movement. Indeed, perhaps hoping to divert a little bit of that traffic to itself, AVFM recently ran a puffball interview with Roosh, whom the interviewer described as “a deep thinker, a powerful communicator … I got nothing but respect for the guy.”
Huh. If AVFMers want to convince the world that their site isn’t a hate site, they should probably apologize for running that interview.
It will be interesting — by which I mean both horrifying and cringeworthy — to see how Roosh’s budding anti-Semitism develops over the months and years to come.
Theboost, maybe it’s related to Sovereign Citizen ritual magic*, in which using the correct words in the proper order act as a cheat code for reality. It works as well for them.
*For a cargo cult value of magic.
“I like to pretend that anti-Semites are all complaining about The International Jew, a single man with supervillain-like powers, who enacts byzantine plots and just happens to be Jewish.”
You mean Magneto?
I just found out something very funny, and I seriously hope that there are red pillers here to read this.
The Wachowskis, the brothers who created “The Matrix,” from where the red pill dudes got their “philosophy,” are half Jewish. Yeppers, you anti-Semitic fellows, your cherished ideas were created by Jews! And, on top of that, the brothers Wachowski are now the brother and sister Wachowski. Yes, you read that correctly. So, for all the red pill bigots, anti-Semites and homo/trans-phobic douchebags, put THOSE in your “reality” pills and swallow them.
Perhaps the thing that amazes me most about this knuckle-dragging inhuman sack of excrement is that he’s actually ABLE to pick up women. I can’t imagine any woman would want him; certainly no one I know would.
You have to remember no woman would actually want this uses an incredible amount of deception lies and from what I understand hopefully there are some apps and Congress that are going to stop this sex and rape by deception . All people should be supporting this for humanity for there have been many misrepresentations of men tricking women getting into their body with false,devious evil motivation.
@KingofKings, huh?
Sorry about the grammatical errors- I was using voice to text with Siri and I didn’t check . What I wanted to say was: this man uses deception so that any woman that does want him, is being tricked into liking a fake- he’s a fake and a phony for sex. He’s a soulless creature who looks at a female as a hole, as opposed to a person. There are laws in Congress and throughout the world right now that’s going to make this against the law .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11261464/Lied-your-way-into-sex-You-could-be-a-rapist.html
It’s called rape by fraud. And I hope this man is the first one convicted.
@KingofKings, so are you a fan of that Ozymandias poem?
The notion of ‘rape by fraud’ has been a discussion point for a long time, I’m not sure how it would work in practical terms, can we ever legislate people into not being assholes? But Roosh goes one stage further in that he won’t just lie to women, he’ll also use a lot of physical coercion, if what I’ve read of his writings is anything to go by.
I know nothing of poems or the fact that this has been discussed in the past, but I feel the male “right” to rape, stalk and kill females should be challenged and stopped.
‘females’? Interesting choice of words for a feminist/ally.
But yes you’re right, rape culture needs to constantly be challenged. Rape by fraud is tricky because it operates on a more sophisticated concept of consent, where do you draw the line between the unethical and the illegal? We’re only just getting society at large to acknowledge that being incapacitated by drugs or alcohol means being unable to give consent, one of the reasons Bill Cosby was able to act with impunity for so long.
Ozymandias is a famous poem by Shelley where these lines appear:
‘My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!’
Thank you for your reply. It’s interesting that you’re the second person to ask me why use the term “females?” Well, it’s difficult to say girl or woman because then you start to denote age, and when I want to talk about gender or half the population I use the word female which I don’t find very offensive as a feminist or an ally – would you explain to me why you do? .
That’s funny, I didn’t know about the poem, no, I actually got king of kings from the Bible.
I think the key word in your statement is, “consent” and I agree with you about the Bill Cosby debacle… I think giving females more rights to defend themselves from non-consent is what the rape by Fraud may attempt to pursue. So far saying no is it doing it. There has to be some sort of deterrence in place for men to stop.
How vicious this man? he’s almost is as the KKK is to blacks or Jews. I’m all for freedom of speech but when it becomes violent and it hurts others like making rape legal, it all makes me insane.
I rethought Islam’s laws why women become liable when they’re raped and killed by five men- the only way that can happen, is rape is legal !!! It never made sense from the western consent female right point of view. This man is from the Middle East and Clearly wants to subject us to that barbaric law structure.
“Female” can refer to animals and many people who use the term “female” when talking about women do that to distance or have distance women from man as humans. This is known throughout many feminist spaces. Just use “women and girls” if you’re so concerned about including age.The convenience doesn’t override women’s rights to be called women and not reduced to a multiple-species catch-all term like “female”.
Also, this KingofKings guy was on here before, and was quite negative. They were a more Islamophobic troll–which seems still to be true since I finished reading their comment.
Can you stop with the racism? Roosh is American. Do you say African-Americans are from Africa even though they were born American citizens? Lots of Americans have fucked up ideas of consent/rape, this isn’t just a “Middle Eastern” thing.
KinIMO. WomengofKings – females sounds dehumanising – women works, as does ‘women and girls’ if you need to include girls. Even if ‘females’ didn’t sound dehumanising the manosphere LOVE using the word (and I think that that might be because it sounds dehumanising!).
That got garbled, but the gist is there.
I saw middle eastern thing because only Islam
Makes raping women legal. Any questions ?
“Thank you for answering. Are you the only person offended by this? Because I see a very distinct difference between males and females, as a species, and I feel people are animals in that we are flesh and blood and have certain physical characteristics. I’m also a scientist so I am very comfortable using the sexual difference term without taking away from women’s humani
i’m more offended by being called islamophobic while I’m stating the obvious -people you’re getting off the topic, which is a guy who’s anti-Semitic and anti-female and wants to make rape legal. Give me a break people! Focus, instead of calling names.
If you really don’t want to use the term “women”, might I suggest “female people”?
Female is primarily an adjective and using it as a noun is seen as dehumanizing by a fair number of folks, in the same way that using adjectives like “black” or “gay” as nouns is dehumanizing as well. Generally people who talk about “the blacks” “the gays” or “the females” do not have good, unbigoted things to say about those demographics.
One of the old common law definitions of rape includes where the act is procured through “fear, force or fraud”, that’s still the case here in England even though rape is now a statutory offence.
The fraud though has to (with one exception covered in a mo) about the “nature” not the circumstances of the act. So, to use an old but real case, if you tell someone that a sexual act is actually a technique to improve someone’s singing voice or a breathing exercise, then that’s rape.
It’s also rape to pretend to someone known to the victim. That used to be just in relation to pretending to be someone’s husband (a throwback to the marital rape exception) but now it’s anyone. That seems to be designed to cover a situation where say, someone snuck into someone’s room at night and pretended to be someone else who the victim had consented to have sex with.
The courts have also stated that fraud as to a person’s original gender would also count. So a trans man would have to make his status clear otherwise consent would be negated.
Fraud as to the circumstances though doesn’t fall foul of the law. So pretending to be a Navy SEAL or something wouldn’t amount to an offence.
My state is one of the eight that still has exceptions to marital rape being illegal and my state is predominantly white and Christian. There are a fair amount of Somali Muslims here, but they sure didn’t craft those laws.
I’m not sure where the notion that rape apologia is a Muslim thing or a Middle Eastern thing comes from. This is something that happens across cultures. The only differences are in rhetoric really.
@Catalpa
I don’t really think there’s a compromise on the phrase, especially when “female” is often used in reference to women with vaginas and such.