Would you like to hear the good news about Jesus Christ?
I suppose I should preface this by saying it’s only good news for evil misandrist women who want to make life as hard as possible for men, and (of course) f0r self-hating manginas. But here it is, straight from the Black Pill blog (formerly Omega Virgin Revolt).
No real-life dude can possibly live up to Jesus as a boyfriend.
In Christian churches, many women treat Jesus not as their savior as such, but as they’re boyfriend. It “works” for them since they’re dealing with someone they are only imagining in their heads. However, it creates a huge problem for Christian men since no man can compete with the Jesus boyfriend women have inside their heads.
So God’s Match for You is … His son, the carpenter?
To Christians, Jesus is God, and no man can compete with God, much less what women have in their own heads with treating Jesus as their boyfriend.
Imaginary Jesus boyfriend is the ultimate Alpha and Omega Male.
The Christian dating advice industry doesn’t deal with this problem and won’t even admit it exists.
Well, the “Christian dating advice industry” may not, but Wikihow sort of does.
But men who are not Jesus can take comfort in one thing: When Jesus returns to earth, he’ll have to deal with false accusations just like mortal men.
If Jesus were to come back, millions of Christian women would have their illusion shattered that Jesus is their boyfriend. This would lead to women falsely accusing Jesus of rape to get back at him. The same false accusation bandwagon effect that happened to Bill Cosby would happen to Jesus.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!
Just remember, not even Jesus can avoid false accusations from women. If the son of God can’t, then you won’t be able to either if you spend enough time with women.
In other words, the only solution is COMGTOW — “Children of Men” Going Their Own Way.
And if she was a widow first, that meant that Jesus was having another man’s sloppy seconds! Oh noes!
This is just…what? If Jesus were to come back, i.e. actually be real, Christian women would have their illusion that he’s their boyfriend….shattered? How does that work? How does Jesus turning out to actually exist break anyone’s illusion that he…exists? At which point all these Christian women would accuse him of having raped them…when? Back when he didn’t exist? And…why? Because they think he cheated on them with all the other millions of women back when he didn’t exist? And other people would take them seriously because…why, again?
This is seriously the most bizarre….I’ll call it a train of thought because it certainly isn’t reasoning…I’ve ever seen.
@Karalora (somewhere up the thread)
“He makes up this completely imaginary scenario…and then uses the completely imaginary scenario he made up as a basis for cautionary advice he gives to real men in the real world.”
So, par for the course, then?
To be fair, there was a recent reality show about women who wanted to be nuns; I watched an episode or two. One of the women seemed to really think that hunky Jesus was her boyfriend.
That’s an interesting reason to become a nun. I hope she’s willing to share her beau with other people (not just women).
And is there anything left that is not a topic of a reality show? Is there one about proofreaders? We live exciting, drama filled lives of staring at other people’s writings.
(In case of many many mistakes in my English: This is not the language I proofread in. :))
I just… I’m still confused. Are the folks on BP trying to date/hook up with Christian women? If the BP readers aren’t Christians, then a good number of Christian women are probably not going to see them as a prospective soulmate in the first place. If they are Christian… from where did they get this behavior/attitude?
I mean, Christian women (and men) understand that their significant others and spouses aren’t perfect; it’s what it is to be human, after all. That being said, if you’re gonna try to exploit a woman’s religious beliefs to get in her pants, then perhaps “you’re not [deity or human incarnation of deity]” isn’t the big reason why she showed you the door (or, at least, not the biggest specific reason).
I’m just still trying to wrap my head around the whole comparing Jesus to Bill Cosby thing. I mean, you can read the New Testament gospels, and you won’t find any women accusing Jesus of any wrongdoing. Ironically enough for the BP lads, it seems to always be MEN who accuse and question Jesus’s words and actions.
Is this the highest number of false assumptions in any post??
1. All Christian women see Jesus as a perfect substitute boyfriend.
2. He will definitely appear on Earth to these women.
3. They will forget all their theological devotion and react purely to the realisation that He isn’t really their boyfriend.
4. They will react by falsely accusing him of rape, because that is a rational means to the end of “getting back at Him”.
5. They will have no qualms about accusing the literal Son of God incarnate of rape, en masse.
6. This hypothetical Second-Coming fiasco is in any way analogous to the Bill Cosby allegations (a guy who actually had means, motive and contact with his victims).
7. All the Bill Cosby allegations are false, because women want Bill Cosby to be their super-boyfriend???
8. Actual attainable men are at risk of false allegation, because Imaginary Jesus Boyfriend is the tidemark by which we measure this phenomenon.
9. Because of hypothetical bullshit some guy just pulled out of his butt, this means all men are at 100% risk of false allegation if they don’t stay away from all women forever.
10. Christian women with Jesus-Boyfriend-Complex => All women.
11. Christian dating sites don’t cater to men who want to ignore all the huge pool of Christian women who aren’t hardcore, celibate Brides-of-Christ, and that is a problem.
And that doesn’t even cover nearly enough of the WTFery in this guy’s train-wreck of an argument.
One can only assume the guy who wrote this isn’t a Christian himself, or if he is, he hasn’t even the faintest grasp on the core tenets of his faith.
They’re complaining about not being able to bone *the most* unattainable women (Nuns?!), whilst being “incel”? I hope they never touch a real human woman.
@moomoocow
While I agree with you, that might just be because at that time, even moreso than today, all the important people were men.
But yeah. The image of Jesus coming back to earth only to be devoured by a horde of angry females is… strange, to say the least.
Jesus: “Behold, I have returned. A new era of peace and brotherhood has begun. This is the second coming. Rejoice!”
Horde of Angry Women: “There he is, get him, get him!”
Judge: “Well, we have 4 Billion claims of rape, you’re sentenced to a life in prison!”
Jesus: “But I bring life eternal!”
Judge: “Should have thought that through before returning, sucks to be you.”
And thus, the Apocalypse was delayed indefinitely.
Um, Catholics call women like this “nuns”. And as far as I know they don’t have a problem sharing Jesus…
“Delusional”‘s not ableist, right?
Because that describes the content of this post.
“Delusional”‘s not ableist, right?
Because that describes the content of this post.
From, like, every possible angle.
The only way they could up their game is if they followed up with “because women are lizard people controlled by the Illuminati”.
Proxieme – I don’t know if we decided that “self-deluded” works better, but it at least implies that they’re spouting this stuff out of foolishness more than something that’s used as a medical term.
Jesus: Lol, wut.
I have heard the “Jesus as boyfriend” language before—from stodgy evangelical preachers who have a problem with sentimental and/or poetic worship songs. This usually goes hand-in-hand with complaints about the feminization of the church and/or society, which is of course why more men don’t go to church. Nevermind that the majority of religious songwriters are men; they’re clearly catering all to women, since women are the largest audience at church. Also nevermind the fact that a lot of the Psalms in the Bible itself use emotional, lovey language. And nevermind that the overwhelming majority of churches still have all-male leadership; those women are still being all womanly all over the church! And apparently that’s a really bad thing!
I’ve had more than one—uh, “energetic conversation” about this. It’s really demeaning to women and it usually is just as unbiblical as the fluff it seeks to oppose.
So yeah, associations with Jesus and boyfriends are basically only ever made in a derogatory and pretty misogynist way. It’s what happens when older men take potshots at women (and sentimental men). At least, that’s my experience, living pretty squarely in the Bible Belt, and being a Christian myself. It’s true that Biblical doctrine of the “Bride of Christ” uses marriage language, but it never uses boyfriend/courtship language, and the vast majority of Christians understand it as a spiritual concept that is a not even close to the same thing as settling down with a spouse.
Now, I have no doubts that women exist who have more of a genuine infatuation with Jesus (as David mentioned above), because when you have a couple billion people following a single religious figure, some of them are bound to be odd ducks. But I can practically guarantee that the number of them who would be devastated that He’s not going to be their personal perfect boyfriend is very, very tiny in comparison to the population of Christian women as a whole.
And of course, among many conservative branches of Christianity, women are raised being taught that they should marry a man who is Christ-like. But that’s not an expectation of perfection—in fact, it’s pretty foundational, credal stuff to know that no human (besides Jesus) has been perfect. It does, however, expect that a good husband will and do his best to practice kindness, compassion, justice, etc., to try and live according to the same values that Jesus modeled for us.
So I imagine this is the particular issue that’s sticking in the craw of BP’ers—all these Christian women having the temerity to hold out for a guy who cares about living like a genuine follower of Christ.
And the idea that they would turn around and falsely accuse Him of rape—yeah, no. Besides the fact that not many women do that to anyone, let alone Jesus, there’s the minor detail that He’s God. I’m pretty sure most people consider it a bad idea to directly insult and slander an all-powerful Being…
Alto-Fronto – Thanks for the heads up.
Then the content of this post is so full of self delusion (and its close compadre, mutually-reinforced delusion) that it should be put forward as a case study of some sort.
Well, that certainly is some flawless, unassailable logic right there.
http://i.imgur.com/Cc8G6Wk.gif
To be fair, taking Jesus as a boyfriend/husband is not a new concept in the Church; in fact the Church is referred to as the “bride of Christ” and many medieval nuns practiced a form of affective piety which framed their celibacy as choosing to marry Christ instead of marrying a mortal man (because, you know, have to marry /somebody/; monks didn’t have this problem for some reason, everyone just accepted that they were abstaining from fleshly desires and didn’t have to marry anyone =P). In the Book of Margery Kempe, Margery actually pretty much does marry Christ. What this guy has just done is update that idea and then add some weird misogynist commentary that women will accuse Jesus of rape when he comes back because they’re so jealous of him (. . .huh?). I think this man has lost track of the basic premise of the Second Coming i.e. the world will end, so maybe people won’t be looking for significant others anyway lol . . .
Since The Black Pill pulled this out of his ass, does he worship his ass as God?
“Behold His mighty wisdom!” {*fart*}
A blessing.
XD
This video accurately represents my response to this:
I have no idea how much attention that PUA’s and MGTOW pay to each other. But I can imagine that the mental gymnastics that would happen in the brains of some of the weirdly religious pick-up artists if they came across TBP’s line of thought.
“Jesus, the victim of vengeful harpies after the second coming? He’s the Christ, the Son of God! He’d never drop a plate. He’d have five thousand of them spinning all at once, like one of those dudes from olde-tyme TV, and then He’d fill them with a nutritious dinner of loaves and fishes. Jesus is divine, He would leave every wench on this globe sanctified, with beatitudes on her lips and a Psalm in her heart. I mean, Mary of Bethany washed His feet with her hair! Jesus, brought down by mere women? Bullshit.
“…on the other hand, women are awful. I bet a bunch of them were in the crowd before Pontius Pilate, screaming for Christ’s death. The crowd was probably all women! Maybe it is possible for females to bring down the Lord. No, can’t be. But it might be a good idea to let this “Jesus jailed for false accusations” thing stand so that women can see exactly how irrational and unaccountable they are. That would be a pretty solid neg.
“Damn, my head hurts. Think I’ll got to Starbucks and get some coffee. Maybe I’ll try out this whole “you’re going to condemn Christ twice” opener on those Bible-study cuties that are always there on Wednesday.”
As to the “Jesus is my boyfriend” thing… I’ve heard that before. It was a staple of youth group culture back in my day (90’s and early 2000’s). It was usually what pastors and youth group leaders recommended to young women as a way to fill their hearts while they were waiting for a faithful earthly husband (wasn’t my cup of tea, but vastly preferable the more recent “give your girlish heart to daddy until he gives it to your husband” trend. That makes my skin crawl). “Dating” Jesus was way to stay pure. Which you’d think would be a plus to the denizens of the manosphere, what with their rage about slutty-sluts and Chads and the cock carousel. But since wimmenz are doing it, it’s wrong and harmful to men.
I’ve never thought about this until now, but I’ve never heard what the young men were supposed to do while they waited for their bride. Well, beyond the whole “don’t have sex” mandate. The whole narrative around guarding your heart usually plays into the “men=physical, women=emotional” so I don’t know if the boys even got any guidance about what to do with their emotional needs. I’m hoping that maybe they had a built-in support in the youth groups, but I really don’t know. :/
“… these guys feel threatened by god. That is to say, they cannot bear the thought of another man holding a higher place than themselves in the minds of women…”
Zing! Nailed it.
This brings into fruition a thought that’s been mulling around my head for the past few weeks (and this is coming from a Christian, so I know my frame of reference is very different from many of yours…); the “nice guys” complain about finishing last, but “nice” isn’t as solid or as valuable as they think it is.
You might be “nice,” but are you patient? “Nice” doesn’t mean compassionate. “Nice” doesn’t mean forgiving. “Nice” doesn’t mean trustworthy and honest. “Nice” doesn’t mean humble.
Jesus was compassionate, forgiving, honest (often brutally so–“brood of vipers” isn’t exactly mincing words) and humble. He might not have been considered “nice.”
In the long-term, “nice” is a pretty flimsy currency.
MRAs would have a real problem with Jesus, considering that, for his time, he was THE Social Justice Warrior, with stuff like treating people fairly, not judging them on blind prejudice, taking care of the weak, forgiving instead of hating.
Look, if having a Magdalene Complex is wrong, I never wanna be right. And if Jesus came back, down from heaven, assault accusations are the last thing I’d be thinking of. I’d be in line to wash his feet with my hair. That is some kinky fun right there.