“Misogyny is secondary misandry” and other perplexing insights from non-feminism’s philosopher king

…This is Poe’s Law in action, right?

Yeah, except I understand Timecube.

I’d make a marijuana joke, but I’m pretty sure I could smoke all the pot in the world and still not come up with something as bizarre as that “Spherical reasoning” one.

I’ll be in my gynobot if anyone needs me.

Is that a mech or a gundam?

M.,
I volunteer as a test subject! Let’s do some science!

Well, reasonable chap that I am, I’m happy to concede when even someone I disagree with has a valid point. So I’ll defend this one:

“Anti-antifeminism serves feminism, and feminism encourages it.”

The first part just seems to be a manifestation of Lewis’s Law.

This very site demonstrates the efficacy of the second part.

I am a bit of a free speech advocate for may reasons; including allowing that to hate groups (subject to “time, manner and place” considerations). One reason for that is that such groups condemn themselves from their own mouths. Whenever MRA’s and related groups claim that they are “misunderstood” one only has to direct people to their own writings.

Oh, I’ve just spotted that additional “anti” in there. Take back what I just said. That tweet is equally as incomprehensible as the rest of them.

Although, applying logic, the two “anti”s cancel each other out leaving in effect “feminism serves feminism and feminism encourages it”.

Er, well quite.

What in the hell does mildew have to do with any of this?

What in the hell does mildew have to do with any of this?

Cause, like, the dew goes through the mill of feminist thought and becomes corrupted (mildew).

Also: Dude, when I clap my hands touch themselves.
And fingers, man. FINGERS!
They’re like wiggly and, like, at the end of stumps and…*looks*holds up hand* 5…5…is that too many?
Five.
FIII-VE.
That doesn’t seem like a real word
Ffffive.
fife.

Fyyve.

https://youtu.be/Ki7VqBmkf7M

These… don’t make a lick of sense. Sorry, David, I don’t think I can help you here. Let’s see if I can manage to laugh at some of them, at least.

Feminist hostility to everything that is not feminist, must be provoked into showing itself.

So… he admits that trolling feminist blogs and sites in the hopes of getting a rise out of feminism is the height of his activism? Thank God feminists don’t have to resort to such tactics. Not only because trolling is an utter waste of time and proof that one has nothing better to do, but also because antifeminists don’t need to be provoked into saying terrible shit. They do that on their own.

How is misogyny “secondary misandry?” Did the patriarchal social system begin by men hating themselves so much that they started taking it out on women? That doesn’t really make sense.

Has there ever been another word as arrogant and self-absorbed as “anti-antifeminism”? Like, people who criticize antifeminism do it because they have a chip on their shoulder, not because antifeminists are a bunch of misogynists and/or dumbasses who say and do awful things? So, amid all the misogyny, bigotry and all the death and rape threats sent to feminists, they once again actually think this is all about them and people being mean to them for no reason whatsoever?

Although the term “gynocentric” is as dumb and pointless as a bucket with a hole, he’s right about misogynists often being pretty obsessed with women. MGTOW are a good example of this.

These tweets once again prove that when reactionaries try to sound professional and scientific, they just start producing a lot of gibberish that has no rhyme or reason behind it. They really think communication is primarily about bluffing, not about giving information about what’s actually happening in the world.

Right, I think I’ve worked it out!

“anti-feminism” would be things like MRA’s etc.

Now an argument can be made that being against them does benefit feminism (although I subscribe to he view that it may be better to give them enough rope to hang themselves).

So on that basis, being “anti” the “anti feminists” would benefit feminism.

Therefore feminism would encourage something that is to its own benefit.

Simples (as those ratty things say)

I see he takes his name from the German word, Fidelbogen (n): A stupid person’s idea of what a smart person sounds like.

This describes a depressingly large portion of Manosphere-generated content. Also, that name raises the possibility that the account is a clever parody after all, kind of like @birdsrightsactivist?