Categories
antifeminism empathy deficit entitled babies evil human females men who should not ever be with imaginary women ever men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny red pill sexy robot ladies straw feminists

Do Misogynists Dream of Electric Sex Ladies?

Truly offal.
Truly offal.

Do Misogynists Dream of Electric Sex Ladies? Well, yes. Yes, they do. This terrible, terrible comic provides yet more evidence of this, as if we needed any. Click on it for a larger version.

I’ve lightly censored the comic, but yes, the covered-up letters in “bioc**t” are indeed the letters you think they are.

H/T — r/thebluepill. I’m not sure where the original cartoon is from.

262 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spindrift
Spindrift
9 years ago

The idea of male sexbots somehow always reminds me of this weird 80s music video.

I think MRAs will start complaining about men being “cuckolded” by women who prefer robot lovers the moment they become a reality. It’s gonna be all “robot fux, beta bux” whining.

Zolnier
Zolnier
9 years ago

Isn’t too much fiction about male robot lovers now that I think about it. I think Asimov did it a couple of times. That is robots whose primary function is sex or romance, not just androids and humans dating or marrying.

mildlymagnificent
9 years ago

ambrosejackass

Welcome! Your welcome package awaits you thataway —>

Just click on the Scented Fucking Candle.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
9 years ago

@ Zolnier

” I think Asimov did it a couple of times.”

In “Robots of Dawn” the difference between ‘marrying’ a robot as opposed to using one as a hi-tech dildo is an important plot point.

Ghost Robot
Ghost Robot
9 years ago

My god, why do so many of these misogynist shitstains talk in appropriated Japanese geek-speak? They’d be chewed up and spat out by the kinds of pressures Japan’s patriarchal culture places on men. I sure can’t picture any MRAs or MGTOW as Japanese salarymen, that’s for sure.

BritterSweet
9 years ago

@ theboost

You hit the nail on the head. The robot is not even being a sexbot in the comic. It’s being more of a validation-bot.

I remember being on a forum on dating advice. One misogynistic poster wrote about how he was gleefully anticipating the future where sexbots are perfected and he sees the look on the real women’s faces. It’s clear that this is not about fulfilling sexual desires but about “punishing” women for not doing/being/giving him what he wants. And he somehow didn’t understand why the other posters concluded from it that he hated women.

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

@fromafar2013, thank you 🙂 I’m still learning the ropes of such things, I only just figured out how to make screen shots.

Okay, this is how I would picture the OP really going down (assuming I’ve done it right):

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

It ate my link. I will try again.

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

Ok, I give up.

Zolnier
Zolnier
9 years ago

Twist is the “feminist” is also a robot the MRA built to be a strawman for him to burn.

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
9 years ago

As a gold-digger, I am eagerly awaiting the first shipment of FatWallet 1.0 bots.

Dvärghundspossen
9 years ago

I also note that they have zero clues about what “cis” means. Seems like they believe it’s just a word that feminists can randomly throw in when they dislike someone.

Dvärghundspossen
9 years ago

Isn’t too much fiction about male robot lovers now that I think about it. I think Asimov did it a couple of times. That is robots whose primary function is sex or romance, not just androids and humans dating or marrying.

In Swedish sci-fi drama Äkta Människor/Real Humans (and it’s great! You should totally check it out if you have a chance!) there are a number of plot points about men as well as women using androids as sex toys or romantic partners… there’s this disturbing plot point with two women who originally seems to be honestly in love with their androids, but as the plot advances, it turns out that they do regard them more as objects than as persons after all. Won’t say any more about it, but… it’s a great show.

sunnysombrera
sunnysombrera
9 years ago

Bet you dollars to doughnuts that whoever made this would argue with anyone that called him a misogynist.

Zolnier
Zolnier
9 years ago

Double twist, the sexbot originally built the misogynist, because when you’re a genitaless ball jointed Swedish stress toy lookalike what else are you going to do for a laugh.

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

Btw I agree with those who are pointing out that the cartoonist’s real fantasy is upsetting straw feminists with his waifu. And why on earth didn’t he make his robot a little more conventionally attractive? She should at least have a blonde wig on.

Zolnier
Zolnier
9 years ago

I hate to kink shame but maybe this guy was just into some very… unconventional things.

Zolnier
Zolnier
9 years ago

Also what is up with that thing’s feet?

Aunt Edna
Aunt Edna
9 years ago

Men pairing up with sex dolls:

It is creepy and fascinating.

sn0rkmaiden
9 years ago

@Aunt Edna, I saw that documentary when it aired. My conclusion was these guys are better off with the dolls, and so are the rest of us.

Anonymous
Anonymous
9 years ago
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
9 years ago

Women are also capable of going their own way, like the woman who married the Eiffel Tower:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2074301/Woman-with-objects-fetish-marries-Eiffel-Tower.html

Notice how she isn’t hanging around incel forums, taunting the men and asking them if her thrusting, 300-meter husbuilding makes them feel inadequate.

sunnysombrera
sunnysombrera
9 years ago

Um, hasn’t feminism been saying that patriarchy makes women the permanent sex underclass— that female oppression is based on our *sex* and utility as sexbots/breeders—for a very long time now?

They really don’t get it, do they? Oh, they’ve got a good handle on the woman = sex part, to be sure, but that’s what patriarchy f*ing *is*! Yet they say there’s no such thing and we live in a gynocracy?

List of terms and words that the MRAs don’t actually understand:

-Feminism
-Patriarchy
-Misogyny
-Misandry
-Satire
-Irony
-Context
-Reliable sources (because AVFM and YouTube videos don’t count)
-Rape
-Consent
-Oppression

Anything else?

1 3 4 5 6 7 11