The far right racist douchebag-o-sphere has been warning us for some time that Cultural Marxism works insidiously to destroy Western Culture and make women all frumpy and shit. Well, you’ll never guess just how sneaky these Cultural Marxist plotters really are: apparently they have the power to cause women to repeatedly drop their iPhones.
In a new post on Roosh V’s Return of Kings site, some dude called Theodore Gumbril dissects what he sees as the increasing “Degeneracy Of London’s Women.” The four signs of this ongoing Lady-pocalypse?
1) Cracked iPhone screens
Gumbril reports with horror that “London is full of iPhones with broken screens, the majority of them owned by women.” Why? Brace yourself: it’s because these women use their iPhones a lot, and therefore also drop them a lot. No, really — one of them actually ran into Gumbril on the sidewalk, quite literally, as he was walking along minding his own business and pondering just how degenerate London women are becoming.
Even in busy areas of London, British women are walking around intently staring into their iPhones, earphones in, oblivious to all around them as they bathe in Facebook likes and Tinder swipes from thirsty male supplicants online. A girl doing this walked into me on Tottenham Court Road a few weeks ago. I was chastised with an indignant yelp of protestation. It is, of course, men’s duty to move out of the way promptly when this happens.
Yeah, it’s not as if dudes ever march down the sidewalk oblivious to the world around them. Never ever seen that happen. Nope.
Oh, but it gets worse:
2) Women wearing sneakers with business suits on the way home from work
Nothing betrays a Sheryl Sandberg-clone femcunt like sports shoes with business attire. In London, this is the exclusive preserve of Anglo women who have brought into the myth of office-cubicle empowerment. I have yet to see this ghastly mismatch of styles in women from Eastern Europe or Russia.
Huh. I’m pretty sure women in the US started wearing sneakers — known in the UK as “lorries” — on their way home from work way back in the 1980s. You might think they did this because their feet hurt after wearing uncomfortable heels all day, and because they didn’t feel obligated to dress up for random schlubs on the subway. You would be wrong. It was Cultural Marxism all along!
3) Women wearing leggings as pants
“This fashion trend,” Gumbril declares, “is a Chernobyl-level disaster in the field of female attire, and an egregious affront to all decency.” Why? Because this shameless immodesty is a disgrace, an assault on all decent men, at least when the women’s butts are, you know, fat.
4) Increasingly androgynous women (who won’t give Gumbril their phone numbers)
After lamenting “the distinct and often brash lack of femininity” of today’s London women, Gumbril tells this horrifying story of what happened when he tried to pick up one of these women, for some reason:
Over the weekend, I had an unpleasant experience opening an Audrey Hepburn lookalike.
I’m just hoping he means he “opened” her in the pickup artist sense and not in the serial killer sense.
What struck me about this distasteful set, aside from the the snarky disdain and aggressive, relentless shit testing, was the fashion—high cut bangs, a formless cream coat, boy trousers, and boy shoes.
The style is an instant erection killer, and (unfortunately) increasingly common.
Er, quick question: if you think the existence of women like these are a sign of the Cultural Marxist apocalypse, and if the sight of them causes your permaboner to shrink, WHY DID YOU TRY TO PICK HER UP? You’re not actually obligated to start a conversation with anyone or anything you can, at least in theory, put your penis into.
Anyhoo, this dire state of affairs, Gumbril tells us, is all the fault of Cultural Marxism and the evil elites promulgating it, who for some reason benefit when women wear sneakers with business suits.
Similar to the Soviets’ New Socialist Man, the New Feminist Woman is a grotesque pastiche of anti-femininity, Kurzweilian automation, and repugnant narcissism taken to depraved extremes. The men who have to come to terms with these women must deal with androgynous, unfeminine women who are addicted to their iPhones and who live at the centre [of] a CERN-like attention vortex driven by real life and social media validation.
So I guess the only solution is for Gumbril and other dudes who think like him to stop giving these women their attention.
Somehow I suspect this proposal will be acceptable to the women of the world as well.
NOTE: Sneakers are not actually referred to as “lorries” in the U.K. I was just making a joke. They are actually known as “spotted dicks.”
Kootiepatra-“On a related note, I very foolishly left a comment elsewhere on the interwebs, pointing out that, “You look so much prettier without your glasses” is a really crappy compliment for a woman who routinely (or always) wears glasses. Apparently this was grievously offensive to the dudebros who are now dogpiling on my comment.”
Not to mention the fact that people wear glasses for a reason, like I dunno…maybe not being able to see without them? I honestly think that the people who say such things expect these women to stumble around without glasses being as blind as a bat just to please them with this ‘prettiness’.
skiriki – that tweet is brilliant.
I’ve always felt a bit off about those kinds of art subjects and never been able to put my finger on why, but that sums it up.
A painting or sculpture is just a snapshot of a moment – the viewer doesn’t know how long she’s been looking in the mirror, whether she likes to practice self-affirmation, or she’s just trying to examine a mole on her face. “Vanity” has always seemed like just another way to police women’s self-esteem.
I’ve heard it said that if you look into a mirror for long enough, the devil will look over your shoulder, and I’ll bet that’s a bit of witchcraft-related folklore that’s been adapted to instil fear of vanity, too.
“Sometimes i wonder what these whiny men look like, cuz i want to pick their appearance apart.” Me too! XD
@misseb47: I think the dudebro expectation is not that women should walk around without seeing, but that we should “just” wear contacts instead. Because obviously things like expense, eye irritation, and time spent on maintenance are not really worth considering when there are boners to please. Of course, folks who do wear contacts are welcome to them—wear what you like for whatever reason you like—but it seems pretty safe to say that someone who chooses not to wear contacts has a reason or two that they can’t or don’t want to mess with it.
I think there’s also the perception from every makeover show and/or movie ever, that women wear glasses instead of contacts specifically to make themselves wallflowers. We are afraid to let our true selves shine. We’re just shy.
I actually had a guy tell me once—and I could tell that he meant it with the most sincere of flattery: “You’re so beautiful when you’re not hiding behind your glasses.” …Um.
Bonus points: We were on a date.
Extra bonus points: I wear thin wire frames.
Super extra bonus points: He wore the thickest black plastic frames I’ve ever seen a person wear.
@wordsp1nner:
If you have an Easy Spirit store nearby, those are super comfortable shoes. They definitely have some styles that, er, “look comfortable”, but they also have a pretty decent selection of cute flats and heels. I’ve got a pair of red pumps from there that are pretty darn cute, and I can wear them all day without much problem.
And best of luck for your interview!
These sorts of people seem to frequently mistake their fantasies for reality. Supplicants? Does he think unsolicited peen pics are men worshiping women like gods? You know, when men used to only be able to do that by flashing their cocks at passing women on the street that shit was illegal. (Somehow the internet magically makes harassing and assaulting women consequence free.) Of course, this is the kind of man who would call that a compliment. So, I can see where he’d get confused.
Maybe she yelped because she was startled when she accidentally ran into a stranger? In what way is a yelp indignant? Is that even possible?
I’m seriously crosseyed without my glasses. I’d wonder what the “Women can’t be pretty with glasses!” types would say to that, but I don’t give a single rat’s haemorrhoidal asshole what men think of my appearance. Sorry (by which I mean not sorry at all), boners.
Quick google search proves many men don’t seem to mind leggings at all. At all!
Okay, mate, speaking as a Londoner: you don’t call women ‘femcunts’.
Because you don’t call women ‘cunts’.
As long as you’re in our country, you do things our way. ‘Cunt’ is a male-only insult. It refers to a man who’s mean, obnoxious and stupid.
You know. Assuming you can find anyone like that. Have a look round, maybe you’ll turn a couple up.
OMG women are walking around dressed in whatever they like, without a single thought for what gives this guy a boner!!!
What is this world coming to?
@ Ice and Indigo
Nah, a Londoner, or indeed anyone from Hampshire, Dorset, Surrey or Kent can get away with calling anyone a cunt as long as it’s said in a friendly jocular fashion; Somebody throws you a surprise birthday party? “Ho, Ho, Ho, you bunch of cunts, you shouldn’t have”. Best friend having a rough day? “Come ‘ere you silly cunt, gimme a hug”. Make a mistake on a report for work “Er.. you might wanna take a look at this, I think i’ve been a bit of a cunt”. And if done in this way, almost nobody under the age of 35 will be offended regardless of gender.
Never call someone a cunt in anger, that’s the rule.
Women’s feet and knees not being in pain is misandry!
If they were teetering around on tall stilettos he’d use it as an excuse to call women impractical, vain and slutty.
Did he use Audrey Hepburn as an insult? She was lovely. such sour grapes. These guys are always complaining that woman are too ugly and that we won’t give them the time of day. What really pees in this dude’s Cheerios is that women don’t notice him. We don’t care about his boner. It doesn’t factor into our choices and that gives him a sad. Lindy West is so right to call misogynists babymen. “WAH WAH WAH” is all they ever really have to say.
re: cunt: It’s a much nastier invective in the US, one of the few that most find really, truly offensive (and is generally reserved for women, perhaps because it’s also coarse slang for vagina).
“You stupid bitch!”
Well, aren’t you a peach.
“You stupid cunt!”
The fuck you say?
By slinging it around, US MRAs are trying to show that they’re supah edgy and DGAF about approval from larger (to them, corrupted) society.
It’s part and parcel to creative skull arrangement and bloody logos.
On the flipside of the glasses argument, there’s also the men that fetishize the fuck out of glasses. Because somehow, the idea of not being able to see without them gives these men a boner?
I don’t see the “boner appeal”.
Kootiepatra
“I think the dudebro expectation is not that women should walk around without seeing, but that we should “just” wear contacts instead. Because obviously things like expense, eye irritation, and time spent on maintenance are not really worth considering when there are boners to please.”
Contact lenses must be awful! I can’t imagine how uncomfortable they must be to wear and deal with. Ugh! The end result is still the same, though-the woman is expected please these men at her expense. It is still extremely selfish of these men to expect women to go without their glasses just to please them. But they don’t get that, because pleasing their boners is infinitely more important. Sigh…
“I think there’s also the perception from every makeover show and/or movie ever, that women wear glasses instead of contacts specifically to make themselves wallflowers. We are afraid to let our true selves shine. We’re just shy.”
I think that glasses (for some reason) have been associated with ‘nerdness’ (for both men and women) and in turn, shyness. Even though having to wear glasses doesn’t have anything to do with shyness or nerdness at all.
“I actually had a guy tell me once—and I could tell that he meant it with the most sincere of flattery: “You’re so beautiful when you’re not hiding behind your glasses.” …Um.
Bonus points: We were on a date.
Extra bonus points: I wear thin wire frames.
Super extra bonus points: He wore the thickest black plastic frames I’ve ever seen a person wear.”
Oh my gosh! That must have been awkward! ^^; I bet you didn’t date him for very long. 😉
PS
Wire frames are awesome!
Check this out. It’s great.
@Lea:
It seems like these sorts of dudes have a tendency to read a whole lot of intent into other people pretty much minding their own business. “I could tell by the way she looked at me that she thought I was a creep.” Or, “This chick got on the train, and though she didn’t say anything, I could clearly see that she was mad that nobody offered her a seat.”
I mean, wow, I did not know that the red pill granted mind-reading abilities!
re: glasses
I haven’t worn glasses in about a year, and wear contacts instead. Religiously. I really don’t like specs and I have contacts that you can wear for a month solid, including overnight, and then you take them out for one night and put new ones in in the morning. For £15 a month it’s a good deal for almost 24/7 vision. That’s me though. I couldn’t care less how others want to deal with eyesight correction.
On the main topic, when you combine this guy with the one who hates hair buns and all sorts of other stupid pedantry from their type, these dudes are the living embodiment of the 2/10 Would Not Bang meme.
I wish there were a phrase to describe that, Kootiepatra, because I see it a lot as well. They’re so wrapped up in their own narrative about how women behave that it practically makes them hallucinate about what a woman is doing. You can see it in full force on Reddit with the one kiss-cam gif where redditors will gather en-masse for their two minutes of hate and speculation on how horrible the woman is when all she’s done is make a face at a guy kissing his beer.
Oh gosh, kirbywarp, I know exactly the gif you mean. The first time I saw it I thought it was amazing, because props to that guy for taking an awkward situation and being hilarious about it. But then the comments… sweet mercy, the comments.
Oh gods, this dude should visit us in Saskatchewan Canada. The land of 6 months of wearing the biggest puffiest clothes you can find. Ultimate misandry! (phone autocrrected misandry to misadventure and I am highly amused…) Then spring is 2 months of us rural people wearing rubber boots around because our roads are mud puddles.
These guys would lose their minds here. Seriously no one gives any shits about fashion in winter here. It is all about keeping warm in -20’s to -40’s C. Also I work with geologist you should see us in our grease, dirt and diesel covered Canada goose coats, steel toes boots, fur hats and ripped up cargo pants. Sorry I just find this outrage so hilarious! Like get lives boys. Our lives do not center around your boners so get over it!
Re: the use of cunt
I have used it myself to refer to someone particularly vile and understand it isn’t always meant as a slur for women. But now that I’m more aware of how I use language that may be offensive (ableist, sexist, or otherwise) I think it wise for people to not use it as an insult, whether directed at a man, woman, or yourself. What bothers me even more than a man calling a woman a bitch, is a man calling another man a bitch (or cunt or whatever). It’s like calling a man some homophobic slur… they do it because the worst thing a manly man can be compared to is a feeeemale or gay man (in their eyes). Just speaks volumes for our society.
Re: glasses
I have reading glasses which I rarely use because the Rx is so light and I don’t like having anything on my face. I have an ex who was basically only attracted to women who wore glasses, and would request that I wear them to please his boner. I admit, I did a few times before feeling so icky about the fact that I was trying to change myself to please his fucking erection. There were other examples of this too, of course. Overall, a real asshat. My point being that there ARE guys who like glasses…but an asshat is an asshat, whatever their preference. And I never understood why someone who was obviously attracted to me when we first met (or we wouldn’t have started dating) would later say I was only attractive if I looked some other way. Pfft.
Hope all this made sense, as I still have morning brain.
Skiriki: that tweet was very well put!
Oh no. 🙁 Terry Pratchett has died. Another pro-feminism great. http://www.pjsmprints.com/