Roosh Valizadeh has long fantasized about ruining the professional lives of alleged “social justice warrior” journalists who criticize racist and misogynistic assholes like himself.
Now he’s fantasizing about murdering them.
Yesterday, the pickup guru and “Return of Kings” founder posted a short story on his personal blog about a twentysomething mailroom worker who loses his job after a feckless SJW reporter working for a Gawker-like blog called “The Denouncer” discovers an offensive Facebook post of his and writes a hit piece on him.
Unable to get a decent-paying job, the young man travels to New York and guns down the reporter who, in his mind, ruined his life.
If you have to guess which of the two characters Roosh sympathizes with, you clearly haven’t encountered him before.
Roosh has had a hate-on for “SJW” journalists – and Gawker media in particular – for some time. In 2012, he included Gawker, alongside such other obvious-to-him evils as Kim Kardashian, Apple Computer and “most media companies,” in a list of “culture parasites” that in his mind are “contributing to the decline of American women, and therefore [male] happiness.”
In 2013, Roosh led a Manosphere crusade against Vallywag writer Nitasha Tiku and blogger/entrepreneur Anil Dash after Tiku wrote a post highlighting a series of offensive Tweets from Business Insider’s then-Chief Technology Officer Pax Dickinson, whom she described tartly (and accurately) as a “tech bro nightmare.”
Dickinson lost his job and Roosh tried his best to ruin the lives and livelihoods of the “two Indian immigrants [who] coordinated to destroy the livelihood of a white American-borne professional,” declaring Tiku to be “a suspected Marxist [with] a pattern of disliking white men.” (For what it’s worth, Tiku and Dash have both lived their entire lives in the US. Neither, and I’m taking a wild guess here, are Marxists.)
Roosh has used his blogs Return of Kings and Reaxxion to launch similar if less extensive smear campaigns against several other “SJW” journalists, including several others who were at the time writing for Gawker media. (See here, here, here, and here.)
And he has enthusiastically supported #GamerGate’s anti-Gawker media crusade.
His short story, titled “The Denouncer,” takes his “critique” of Gawker one step further, setting an everyman hero whose “only fault in life was that he was an average man” against the “star blogger” for a Gawker-like “social justice” blog whose speciality is ruining the lives of “heterosexual white men.”
Roosh, struggling against his inadequacies as a writer, resorts to crude stereotypes in his attempts to convey to his readers the true evil of The Denouncer’s staff. His vision of New York new media is cartoonish and conspiratorial.
In her job interview with The Denouncer’s founder, a gay man named Ted who was from South Africa and had a fiery Filipino ladyboy lover, Katie asked what was the overall mission of the new venture.
“To make society better,” Ted replied. “We want to shame, humiliate, and embarrass all the racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, fatphobic, and cisgender jerks to forever stop all that is offensive. America has no place for such backwards beliefs and thinking.” …
“This sounds like a social justice blog.”
“This is social justice on steroids.” Ted spoke with a lisp so the phrase ‘social justice’ was a tongue twister for him. “We won’t be afraid to dox people and go after their bread. My dream is that in a year or two, people will be so scared of us that it will change not only what they say publicly, but also how they think.”
Katie signs on enthusiastically, quickly becoming known for her takedowns of racists; she receives bonuses of $500 each time one of her posts gets a man fired.
Brad, the hero of the story, comes to her attention after posting a picture of himself brandishing a newly bought Glock pistol to Facebook with the caption “I’d like to see some dirty Mexicans try and take my country.”
After being sent his Facebook photo from an anonymous reader, she darkened it a bit in photoshop to make him appear more sinister. She called him a “racist asshat” and then showed photos of sad Mexican children with dirt on their faces attempting to cross into America for a better life. She also added that Brad is “not what America stands for” and “will probably commit murder if he’s not stopped.” To end her article, she pleaded with her readers to put a stop to men like Brad by contacting his employer and letting them know what they think of his racism and pre-violence.
To celebrate his firing, Katie upgrades her iPhone.
Brad, meanwhile, is left reeling. He’s unable to get another job that pays enough to pay the bills, because a “dozen other blogs picked up Katie’s story and now the first page of Google was bombed with accusations that he was a racist and a future murderer.”
Ironically, Roosh is an enthusiastic advocate of “Google bombing” when the target is an alleged “SJW” journalist he doesn’t like. In a 2013 post, Roosh gleefully outlined what he saw as a foolproof plan to torpedo the careers of “New York city media liberals.”
Little Susie is writing for Jezebel today, but she will have to change jobs at some point, meaning a Human Resources airhead will search for her name to make sure she is a proper fit for the company. …
Unless she’s applying for a position at Jezebel, no respectable company will touch a toxic individual who has been linked to racism. … If you dig into these writers work and background, you can easily find cases where they spew anti-white or misandrist views. All that’s left is getting that on the first page of Google.
As proof, Roosh posted a screenshot of a Google search for Tiku’s name, showing his attack on her among the top results. (In fact, though he didn’t know it at the time, his accusation of anti-white racism would cause Tiku no career troubles; she was promoted at Vallywag, then hired away by The Verge.)
But in his story, Brad’s plan for revenge is far more direct than fucking with Katie’s Google results: he borrows money from his father to travel to New York and kill her.
Heading to SoHo, where the fictional Denouncer’s offices are located (and where the real Gawker media offices were until recently), Brad spots Katie leaving work, and Roosh lets us know that she is not only a life-ruining narcissist but a man-jawed fattie, the ultimate PUA nightmare:
The first thought that struck Brad’s mind was how much fatter she was in person than in her carefully managed online photos, but it was definitely her—he recognized the same strong jaw and broad nose.
He follows her to her Brooklyn apartment, stalks her as she walks her “little dog” to a nearby park, and confronts her, demanding to know “Why did you ruin my life?”
Then he pulls out his gun and shoots her dead. Moments later he turns the gun on himself. [See CORRECTION note at end of post.]
Roosh sees the killing as a sort of rough justice for her “crimes” against a decent man:
Brad’s only fault in life was that he was an average man. He was destined not to greatness, but to having a mediocre job in a mediocre town with mediocre entertainments to fill his time. Getting out of the hole that Katie put him in was too great a task. Someone more capable would have thought of other options … but Brad believe [sic] this was the only way to end his pain.
Katie’s murder generates a good deal of media coverage, leading one policeman to Tweet “If you ruin a man’s life, don’t be shocked when he tries to ruin yours.”
An “an up-and-coming intern” at The Denouncer spots this Tweet, and quickly writes a post labeling him an apologist for murder.
She got him fired within 81 minutes, a new record. The next day she arrived at work to applause from her co-workers—it was her very first firing bonus.
In the comments to his post, Roosh himself gets mostly applause for his chilling revenge fantasy, including this exchange, referencing a film about a 12-hour purge in which all crimes are legal.
I can only hope that Roosh and his followers limit their enthusiasm to fictional violence.
CORRECTION: In my original post, I wrote that Brad killed Katie and her dog. He kills Katie and then kills himself. But Roosh is such a terrible writer I misread the passage and concluded Brad had shot the dog.
Roosh tried to tie PZ Meyers to the murders in Chapel Hill? But, he’s not the promoting Islamophobia. That would be Dawkins and Harris. Besides, a significant portion of the manosphere are Dawkins style atheists. Is Roosh sure that those are the people he wants to go after?
Yeah, I guess Roosh saw an opportunity to try and smear someone who’s not His Kind of Atheist.
Also I don’t recall much that would lead me to believe that Roosh would honestly cry over dead Muslims.
I’m going to guess there’s no point in the story where the guy makes a public apology in the hopes of cleaning up his image? It’s just fired-no job opportunities-murder?
It’s a Turner Diaries type of story because the point is that it allows Roosh to express specific violent desires without getting in trouble for threats or intimidation. It’s fiction, so he can continue to plausibly deny that he supports violence.
The Turner Diaries itself was modeled after Jack London’s book The Iron Heel, which is the standard totalitarian-oligarchy-vs-resistance book. Except The Turner Diaries doesn’t try to develop an interesting world, plot, or characters and it’s basically a shell for some boring exposition of Neo-Nazi ideology that needs some plausible deniability.
Yep. Here’s PZ’s story on it: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/02/11/beliefs-have-consequences/
And here’s the actual tweet in question:
https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/565496230323957761
Followed by responses from Mike Cernovich and Milo Yiannopoulos, just so you know the quality of reasoning we’re talking about here.
Of course. They’re people he hates. Whether or not they could actually logically have anything to do with it is irrelevant.
My favorite part is where they just assume the answer to Roosh’s question is “Yes.”
They give away so much when they try to write fiction, don’t they? Every insecurity gets highlighted. Every stupid bigoted misconception shines for the world to see.
That story was horrible and not remotely like reality, other than a man killing a woman because he blames her for all of his failures. Keep in mind that the only part of this story that Doosh thinks is pure fiction IS the murder of and that’s the part he wants to see come true.
That’s how his mind and the mind of every one of his fans works.
http://reactiongifs.me/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/the-avengers-angry-hulk-smash-loki.gif
The tragedy of the story is that, as written, it doesn’t actually matter how the protagonist lost his job.
If the jobs were outsourced, then the protagonist would be hunting his state senator with a deer rifle. If the plant were closed due to asbestos contamination, he’d be chasing after an EPA inspector with a meat cleaver. If the building burned down because of faulty wiring, he’d be hiding in the back of an electrician’s van with a survival knife.
The protagonist isn’t tragic because he lost his job, but because he identified the entirety of his life as belonging to this one, unskilled job. The protagonist has no hobbies and no interests. They have no friends (close or otherwise), no social activities, no connections to the community at all beyond family. They have no specialized skills or training, no additional education, and no ambition to pursue them. There’s no ethics about making an effort for a better job, or making efforts for more social connections, just listless apathy and entitlement.
Guys like Roosh probably do root for Travis Bickle and Seymour Parish and Humbert Humbert, and manage to miss the point entirely.
Well, yeah. They all are. Elam wants b*tches bashed. Doosh advocates rape because he wants men to rape women. GG supporters were loving the harassment free for all and whipping eachother up until finally a guy decided to go to Brianna Wu’s house with a gun. That is STILL not over. They’ve all got the bullshit cranked to 11 and the knob torn off. They openly obsess over men’s hatred of women escalating to violence.
These are terrorists. They want us to be afraid and ya know what is really scary? More Marc Lapines and Elliot Rogers. Moore Steubenvilles.
It’s supposed to be a sympathetic character and he shoots the dog, too?
I don’t even know, man. I don’t even know.
Sounds like this came right from Roosh’s soul. He’s terrified of mediocrity, of being average.
What’s the term? stochastic terrorism?
I think we found a chapter of Ayn Rand’s magnum opus on gender relations. I’m okay with the other 700 pages staying lost.
Keep in mind all of the things Doosh claims that women do to “ruin” men’s lives (and all that is good in the world) and that “ruining” women’s lives is a reference to murdering the woman in his fantasy.
Women should expect men to murder them for what now?
Being feminist?
Being educated?
Screwing the wrong dudes?
Not screwing who the man with a gun told her to?
This guy is a piece of work.
Tracy,
You can almost hear the plaintive cry, “But he deserved so much more.”
The thing is, Doosh is not average. He’s well below. He does not deserve better than his lot. He deserves to be in prison for rape.
Didn’t a guy recently threaten to kill women for signing up for his social media that was really just a WordPress blog?
I guess we should add that to the list.
Damn first blockquote attempt.
Well, it IS a LITTLE dog. You know, the kind that only women and gay guys (and, presumably, gay guys who date “fiery” trans women for some reason) like.
The dog could have been female, so I guess killing it fits into the general theme then…
I think Roosh specifies that the boss is gay and South African to make sure we know that The Denouncer is his version of Gawker, which is run by a gay British guy. Not sure why he threw in the “fiery Filipino ladyboy lover” except to make the boss seem extra eeeeeevil, at least to the sort of people who read his terrible blog.
I’m surprised they didn’t make it a cat. A small percentage of cats will go out on leashes. Including my Darrow.
Darrow has lots of hairballs. I wish I could teleport some of his vomit into Roosh’s shoes.
Agreed – that’s generally frowned upon here, I think we all just missed that comment (I know I did until you pointed it out, whoops).
That’s the most telling thing of all in my reading. I can’t imagine any person involved in what Roosh and his ilk regard as SJW activism or employment thinking that paying people to get other people sacked or otherwise ruined would be a good thing at all, let alone their single major objective.
Projection. I think that’s what it’s called. And it’s the major block for these guys. They literally have no idea about what other people do and think. Even when they try to “opposite” their own approach, they get it completely wrong. We don’t do the same activities as them with different “targets”. We look at the world differently and we do different things and we do them for different reasons. And it is _not_ the same coin just flipped to the other side. It’s completely different.
Roosh’ll get you, *and* your little dog, too!