"Cultural Marxism" explained in helpful infographic (that somehow manages to avoid using "Le Happy Merchant") With BONUS CRAP PICS

Speaking of racism, there’s this site called vdare. It’s basically a white nationalist site, but unlike sites like amren of stormfront it denies it and calls itself ‘anti immigrant. But The thing about anti-immigrant places like vdare, is that they’re not as much anti immigrant, as just plain white nationalist, albeit, a a ‘suit and tie’ type rather than frothing bonehead type. They piss me off because they go beyond ‘dog whistles.’ Most ‘dog whistles’ try to obscure their true intent to some extent. Vdare is essentially screaming quacking ducks who deny they are ducks or quacking.

In fact, vdare especially annoys me just because they’re do dishonest about it. He, they, walk and quack like a duck, but just won’t say “yeah, I’m a duck.”

Basically, it’s not immigrants they’re against. It’s non white immigrants, and black Americans, and basically, yeah. Vdare denies being white nationalist and says they’re anti immigrant, but their founder is an immigrant, many writers are immigrants, and most of the content that includes immigrants is only used to Bash non white pEople. They even bash non-white AMERICANS on behalf of… white IMMIGRANTS. Of course, the site also frequently bashes non white non immigrants who’ve likely been in america longer than many of their writers as well, if not more. Sure , they might accept people from these non-white groups on an individual, everyday level, but you get what I mean. If they just came out and said ‘we’re white nationalist and are against non-white immigrants’ it’d be way more honest.

So yeah. Vdare annoys the shit out of me because they aren’t dog-whistle racists, but plain as day white nationalists who deny it while having it written on their forehead and oozing from their pores. What’s it called when it’s a ‘dog whistle’ without the effort to obscure anything?

^ I wuv her. She writes like she masterbates with a thesaurus

Wait … hold up … *squeegees eyes* Is that Simpsons one actually saying something positive about the UN !?

Yep. Because the UN resolution mentioned bans “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” How that’s being done to white people, though, I’m not entirely sure.

Re:Ilana Mercer

I see she’s one of those Democracy vs. Republic libertarians …so uninformed about political systems she’s not aware that a Republic can also be described as a type of representative democracy. 🙄

“Lolbertarian” is perfect. Wish I thought of it.

Australia
Here our nut jobs are just much more straightforward racists or they are business leaders who confuse their class interests with the national interest.

Okay, first, when did genocide become a verb?

Second, is it really genocide when you are talking about people who don’t exist except in your imagination? I always thought genocide was killing of actual living, breathing people, not the potential people that white women are not having. I know these people are all in a panic because overall white people are having fewer babies, and countries like Italy have a birthrate that is lower than replacement rates. In fact, Italy’s population relies on immigration right now – genocide! (I don’t think low birthrates are a true outcome of ‘cultural marxism’ or hatred of one’s own race or what have you, but a result of higher living standards, costs associated with having children, and many more causes. IOW, I don’t think women want fewer babies because they feel guilty being white).

Basically, my translation of all this is: “The world doesn’t work the way I think it should and people like me are not on the receiving end of groveling, accolades and blow jobs for just showing their face in public! waaaaahhhhh!”

I’ve never understood libertarians who are anti-union. I mean, they are Private Associations of Individuals using their Skills and going together for leverage of their OWN Interests, you know something like what JG did with Galt’s Gulch, and if I remember correctly, the preliminary name for “Atlas Shrugged” was “The Strike”

Mud is one hell of a building material – as in, using it properly is hell.

Oh, sure. You built a castle out of rock. Big deal, hotshot. You had access to a material that retains its shape, doesn’t deal with water erosion, can be chipped into figures, has high shear and tensile strenght, is shock resistant and easily polished into a fine sheen. How nice for you.

Person over there? They built a functional home out of a material that can’t even retain a shape without proper heat baking procedure.

It’s so hypocritical for libertarians to be anti union. They claim they’re for free association when they’re arguing against the outlawing of discrimination in employment or housing but when free association benefits workers rather than business owners,suddenly they’re opposed.

For people who claim corporations are state fictions, they sure seem to fetishize them.

I know it doesn’t, but “genophilia” just looks like it should mean “I love genitals”

More like “I love studying genealogy”

If you know anything at all about archaeology, you know that cultures all around the world constructed huge palaces and cities and public works of art and massive feats of engineering.

First, this. Second, there were genuine differences in the development of technology and the accumulation of individual and public wealth – but those can be better explained by environmental factors than by human biology or super hard-ingrained cultural factors.

I don’t see how side-by-side photos of two men who are both pale-skinned but have few other facial features in common are supposed to prove that race is not a social construct. If anything, it serves as a very good demonstration of how arbitrary the boundaries of “race” really are.

I can only guess that the poster author took “race is a social construct” to mean “color is only skin deep” ie. that racial differences are very superficial and meaningless. Then they went on to prove that…black and white people look different aside from color.

Re: unions: What John Galt told me was he was opposed to people being forced to join the union and pay dues. I don’t know how universally true this is; my union does have an opt-out for conscientious objection, but objectors are asked to give money for some student fund.

The thing is, there are lots of people who dislike aspects of the union, but they are the first to call up the union rep when they feel they’ve been treated unjustly. Some people don’t want to pay the dues but want all the benefits. Human nature!

John Galt also didn’t like that national unions donated to campaigns or advocated for legislation. Relying on bosses to know what’s best and always act in the best interests of the company and the employee – and never mistreat anyone or make mistakes.

Some people don’t understand why they are paying dues. There are costs associated with being in a union. We pay lawyers at times to read or draft legal documents; sometimes someone with special expertise is needed to come in and negotiate an area. We have a secretary who gets paid. In our case, we have a great faculty member who can do the collective bargaining – he’s someone good with labor law, statistics and health care policy. He is a rare find. Some unions have to hire a negotiator. There may also be arbitration costs.

It may seem like negotiating should be a slam dunk. You come in with no-duh statements about the circumstances of your job; you present statistics or data or whatever; everyone shakes hands. But it is a power struggle, and it doesn’t matter what is rational if it will put another penny in the administration/management pocket.

People like John Galt are also surprised at some of the aspects of work that must be negotiated: like having your own office, having your own computer or phone, having access (keys) to the spaces you need access to, providing people with the means to do their job and safe environments to do it in. Negotiation isn’t just about money

If you know anything at all about archaeology, you know that cultures all around the world constructed huge palaces and cities and public works of art and massive feats of engineering.

Yup. Timbuktu alone is proof that those who think Africa is one big primitive grass hut…are full of shit. Which, by the way, is a lousy building material, but if dried properly, makes fairly decent firewood.