Today I’d like to share with you two quotations. One is from Martin Luther King Jr., the civil rights leader whose legacy we honor today. The other is from someone who considers himself the leader of a human rights movement that follows in the footsteps of King.
The first quote:
Sooner or later all the people of the world will have to discover a way to live together in peace, and thereby transform this pending cosmic elegy into a creative psalm of brotherhood. If this is to be achieved, man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.
The second:
[Name redacted], I hope you are looking forward to our date. I certainly am. … [I]t is clear that you have gone to great lengths to keep your image off the internet.
Nice try.
Is that a threat? No, it is a promise. Big difference.
As we have been saying here for years, the time for collegial, polite discussion and negotiation with these piles of refuse is over. …
We have people working on securing her image. Meantime, $100.00 to the first person who gets us a clear image of her which we can verify. Something large and clear enough to be used as a feature image is preferred.
As you have probably gathered, the first quote comes from Dr. King. It’s from his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, in which he sets forth a powerful argument for the transformative power of nonviolence, which, as he notes, โnonviolence is not sterile passivity, but a powerful moral force which makes for social transformation.โ
The second quote comes from Paul Elam of A Voice for Men. I’ve taken the liberty of redacting the name of his target.
Yes, this self-described โhumanitarianโ is launching yet another campaign of doxxing and intimidation aimed at an ideological enemy who just happens to be female. And once again, as he so notoriously did several years ago, Elam is offering a bounty for the personal information of one of his targets โ in this case a clear photograph of her face.
It’s a strategy that draws not on the tactics of Martin Luther King but on those of his enemies โ in particular the Ku Klux Klan, which in the 1960s posted โwanted postersโ featuring the faces of civil rights activists, including King himself. Some of those whose faces appeared on these โwanted posters,โ most famously King himself, were later murdered.
In more recent years, anti-abortion activists have posted similar โwanted postersโ featuring the pictures and addresses of doctors who perform abortions โ some of whom were themselves later murdered.
Now AVFM has taken up this classic technique of intimidation.
Last year, AVFM activists โ including the site’s โactivism directorโ Attila Vinczer — posted hundreds of wanted-style posters of feminist philosophy professor Adele Mercier on and around the campus of Queen’s University in Kingston Ontario. The year before, a Men’s Rights group in Edmonton closely associated with A Voice for Men put up similar posters targeting Lise Gotell, the chair of womenโs and gender studies at the University of Alberta.
We can only assume that Elam has a similar campaign in mind for his latest target.
So what are Elam’s charges against this new woman to hate?
According to him, the woman, a professor at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, accused AVFM activist Sage Gerard (aka Victor Zen) of โdemonstrat[ing] a desireย toย kill womenโ in a complaint she filed with the KSU administration.
Elam has posted the complaint on his website. Her name appears nowhere in the complaint, nor does anything about Gerard wanting to kill women.
[ Clarification: Elam has now posted a separate campus police report about an incident in which Gerard came to the office of the Interdisciplinary Studies department requesting to see the professor; the police report contains her name as well as notes from the officer saying that “she has seen the cartoons, videos and blogs online and believes Gerard demonstrates having violent fantasies about hurting and murdering women.” ]
This anonymous complaint, along with another complaint about Gerard, were evidently triggered by a video Gerard posted last year of a late-night โsticker runโ he made on the KSU campus.
The video, which Gerard filmed and narrated on the fly, is more than a little creepy. In it, Gerard describes his preparations for his โactivismโ as if he were launching some sort of covert operation; at one point he talks about hiding his stickers in the sleeves of his jacket. As he heads out the door to start his stickering, he announces โlet’s go fuck with people.โ
Gerard clearly sees what he’s doing as a deliberately provocative act. He talks about putting AVFM stickers in places โwhere they cannot be ignoredโ and about his desires to โpush the boundariesโ by plastering them in places they’re really not supposed to be put โ most notably in a women’s bathroom where, thankfully, no women were present.
Weirdly, given that he later posted the video on his YouTube channel, Gerard also took steps in the video to conceal his identity and cover his tracks, wiping his fingerprints off of some of the stickers after pasting them in a bathroom. Later, apparently wanting to look as much like a serial killer as possible, he dons latex gloves.
At one point, Gerard jokes about how he’d like to paste one of the stickers over the mouth of a feminist to shut her up.
His behavior in the video and in his interactions with others on campus, as well as his affiliation with AVFM, clearly rattled some on the KSU campus. The anonymous complainant to the KSU administration suggested that Gerard’s actions were creating a โhostile work environmentโ for some faculty and staff and making students fear for their safety.
Elam has posted the actual complaints, which, in what seems to be a pretty clear violation of privacy, were sent to Gerard with the identity of one of the accusers laid bare. Here’s the anonymous complaint that Elam has attributed to his current target:
Among other similar offenses by the same individual, a KSU student (Sage Gerard) posed as a custodian and entered the womenโs bathrooms on campus, placing stickers intended to intimidate women. โฆ Gerardโs behavior indicates contemplation of violence against women (he posts art depicting guns pointed at womenโs symbols, as well as other violently anti-feminist themes). His behavior has created a hostile work environment for multiple KSU employees who do not only fear intimidation and harassment, but actual physical violence against themselves and their families. KSU students have also expressed real fears for their own physical safety on campus . . . I do not feel safe on this campus. As an advocate of women, I feel strongly that I am at real risk of becoming the target of violent retaliatory actions perpetrated by Sage Gerard and the organization sponsoring him, A Voice For Men.
Emphasis mine.
The KSU administration investigated these complaints, and concluded that Gerard was not responsible for creating a hostile work environment, and that his speech was protected under the first amendment. The complaints were dismissed; no charges against Gerard were even filed.
He was asked to stay out of women’s bathrooms in the future. And the KSU counsel who prepared the report also had this suggestion:
We do recommend that Mr. Gerard continue to refrain from further contact with the persons who made the hotline reports (or those who Mr. Gerard believes may have made them), to avoid any real or perceived retaliation. In addition, we recommend that Mr. Gerard refrain from further contact with the members of the Interdisciplinary Studies Department to avoid escalating the situation to the point that it becomes a hostile environment in the legal sense.
That’s right. Gerard wasn’t charged with anything. He faced no sanctions. He was simply asked not to contact those on campus he was making uncomfortable.
But apparently this โno contactโ request is so offensive to Gerard and his AVFM comrades that they have decided to launch the very retaliation campaign that the KSU complainants were afraid of. Thus, once again, proving their critics have been right to label them a hate group in the first place.
AVFM’s new target joins a long list of women (and a few men) who have been doxxed and/or harassed in retaliation for their โcrimesโ against Paul Elam’s delicate sensibilities.
Elam started off this parade of harassment shortly after this site started by attempting to get a woman fired from her job at a women’s shelter for a comment she made here in which she wondered aloud if Elam had a criminal record.
Since then, Elam and his AVFM cronies have:
Started Register-Her, a fake โOffenders Registryโ designed to vilify and intimidate women. (The site is now in the hands of AVFM defector John Hembling.)
Gleefully participated in the unending harassment of a Canadian feminist that one AVFM author dubbed โlittle red frothing fornication mouth,โ for her crime of โฆ arguing with some AVFM activists at a demonstration once. Unflattering images of โBig Redโ at that demonstration have since been plastered all over the internet; she even has a page devoted to her on KnowYourMeme.
Launched a years-long harassment campaign against feminist writer Jessica Valenti. Starting with a 2011 post in which Elam himself attacked her as a “stupid, hateful bitch,” the hate campaign has moved on toย labeling her a โchild abuser,โ posting her personal photos on AVFM without permission, putting her on Register-Her.com, and libeling her by making up inflammatory quotations and attributing them to her. (AVFM’s โsocial media directorโ and serial quote-fabricator Janet Bloomfield was evidently permabanned from Twitter for her persistent harassment of Valenti.)
Supported GamerGate’s harassment of cultural critic Anita Sarkeesian, with AVFM’s PR whiz Bloomfield doing her part by blatantly libeling her on Twitter.
Launched a campaign of vilification against a Chicago-area โmommy bloggerโ for writing that she felt uncomfortable with the idea of a male day care staffer taking young girls to the bathroom.
Along with an assortment of white supremacists and online assholes, joined in a hate campaign against a young woman wrongly accused of trashing applications from white guys as a staffer at a college admissions office. Elam declared the woman, by name, to be a โwarped by ideologyโ with โdeep seated prejudices that guided her unscrupulous actions.โ The blog was a hoax, and the woman Elam so eagerly vilified had nothing to do with it.
Published an article falsely accusing a male feminist blogger of being a โconfessed rapist,โ because, as Elam puts it, โkarma is a BITCH.โ (AVFM’s defense? It was being โsatirical.โ)
Accused a former AVFM staffer, with no evidence, of absconding with money donated for a men’s shelter.
Attacked feminist and skeptic Rebecca Watson on numerous occasions, including a post from Elam in which he used the term โwhoreโ several dozen times.
And of course AVFM has accused me of everything from starting Reddit’s terrible BeatingWomen subreddit to somehow faking my site’s traffic stats on Alexa. (AVFM has never even bothered to provide “evidence” for any of their various accusations against me, perhaps because none of them are even remotely true.) Elam has posted bizarre sexual fantasies involving me, called me a pervert, and publicly suggested that I kill myself. One of AVFMs most, er, enthusiastic activists once left me a creepy, threatening voicemail at 1:38 AM. And AVFM โactivism directorโ Attila L. Vinczer has tried to dox me, with somewhat comic results.
This isn’t even close to an exhaustive list of AVFM’s assorted retaliatory campaigns against feminists and other critics.
AVFM has made it very clear to the world โ through its actions and its rhetoric โ that if someone starts putting up AVFM posters or stickers on your campus or in your neighborhood, you have every reason to worry.
AVFM is not a civil or human rights group by any stretch of the imagination. It is a hate group, plain and simple, less akin to Martin Luther King Jr. than it is to those who so stubbornly fought against him.
NOTE: Here is Sage Gerard’s (aka Victor Zen’s) video of his sticker “activism.” You can probably see why people found it a little unsettling.
Well, this is just frightening.
Creeping into women’s washrooms, wiping off finger prints, posing as a custodian (Can we say TED BUNDYISH)?! SICK. These people are sick, truly ill. So true kirbywarp, what am imbecile, posting himself doing it and then wiping off prints and THEN wears gloves. And he needs to have an attorney on hand to advise him on where to not place the stickers. All I can say is GET A LIFE. Zen (he bastardizes that word which has a wonderful meaning) is one sick dude.
And thanks for David for posting this to remind us just how crazy and dangerous they can be.
Sorry if I ranted but this kind of thing just triggers me.
@cassandrakitty:
It’s really unfortunate sometimes that a lot of terrifying behavior can be strictly legal, or at least not illegal enough to warrant action… It sucks to see this guy getting away with shit that obviously isn’t good, but we don’t have ways of getting him to stop.
I really have to laugh at the claim that AVFM isn’t associated with Gerard in any way. What else do you call publicly posting a defense of him, twisting the situation to “prove” he did nothing wrong, and explicitly targeting the people who complained about him? It’s practically Mob territory, with a “powerful” organization throwing its weight behind a local supporter.
Another great piece David, scary as hell too!
@kylagb:
Don’t use “crazy,” but otherwise ranting is fine. I’m sure yours won’t be the last. ๐
It’s not becoming one, it is one. The MRAs became a terrorist movement the moment some #Gater threatened to shoot up Utah State University.
He isn’t trying to actually conceal his identity. Since when were there consequences for publicly displaying misogynistic attitudes? What he’s doing is living out some James Bond fantasy. It would be funny if it weren’t so creepy.
Cheryl Kerkin
“I wonder if I, or anyone, will be terrorised for suggesting that itโs becoming more than a โhate movementโ, itโs becoming a terrorist one? And where is law enforcement with these thugs? They are out of control, over-entitled screeching, women-obsessed babies who must now be stopped.”
No, these are babies
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-74KRGEtP-Rw/UKlL2dCQ6fI/AAAAAAAADZc/LY3DrDlN6LQ/s1600/babies-cuties-friends.jpg
These are mras.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1939502/thumbs/o-WOMAN-MAN-YELLING-facebook.jpg
http://cdn1.bloguin.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2012/03/man-yelling-at-computer.jpg
Sorry, I don’t mean crazy as in mentally ill ( I have a diagnosis myself). I mean normal-person crazy if you get what I mean and work with other consumer survivors. We often talk about how “crazy” supposed normal people are. ๐ meanwhile we get the bad rap. It’s kind of like turning the word on those who have used it against us.
@kylagb:
This community has decided not to use the term, or similar terms, here because of the negative ways in which it’s used. Just thought I’d let you know.
Ok thanks. Trust me, I know the negative ways it can be used. I won’t use it again. If feels odd though, being muzzled as a consumer/survivor but that is not news.
AVFM is to Men’s Rights what PETA is to protecting animals.
Seems like MRAs have been verging on being a terrorist group long before #gamergate. They’ve just never had a very straightforward connection to violence. Mainly because they reflect the status quo of misogyny, so the people who do commit real violence in the name of misogyny get treated as run-of-the-mill violent offenders rather than members of an ideology…
I guess my question is, at what point are online threats legally actionable? I honestly don’t know. What’s the line between behavior intended to intimidate that’s technically legal and behavior that law enforcement can act on?
Elam reminds me of bullies in school. Everything he does is about making himself feel better by dominating and pushing other people around. None of this helps men in any way, it’s just YOU THINK YOU’RE IN CHARGE BUT FUCK YOU I’M IN CHARGE I’M THE BIG MAN.
I wanted to add that a part of this and it’s timing HAS to be about how gamergate has #1 been pretty unimpressed with Paul Elam, #2 MGTOW’s are now breaking up with Paul Elam and #3 His fundraising is down by a bunch (if David’s last posting on it held steady as to his numbers). He wants a big story so he can drive traffic and the MANOSPHERE may buy into that or not we will have to wait and see. I understood gamergate to be in it’s death throws and I am not sure what affect the ABC news report had on it. I do know at one point a week ago someone paid the lizard squad to crash 8chan probably to lash out at gamergate. I hope this is just another one of his plans that fizzle out like hijacking the White Ribbon name.
NAL in the slightest, but I believe the theoretical idea behind a crime is that there was intent, motive, and means. If the law reflected this, you’d just have to show the online threateners really did want to do it and has a reason to do it, and they had the means to do it.
Problem is that with just words, you can’t really prove that those words are true intent. People say they want to do all sorts of things that they never would actually do, so it’s really easy to deny.
Plus, the actual threatening act Elam is using is “obtaining a picture of a person” to write about them and reveal their identity. It’s super-weaselly because that by itself isn’t harmful; it’s what others might do with that info that is harmful. Of course, you’ll never catch Elam dead actually saying he wants those bad things to happen…
I dunno. It feels like something should be possible to do; it’s clear that Elam wishes harm through obtaining the picture, but I have no idea what that something should be. Unless doxxing itself were recognized as a harmful act…
At the very least, this behavior can be added to the long list of horrid actions Elam has taken that David seems to be compiling. Nobody who looks at that list could possibly think Elam is a valid and moral activist for human rights.
@kylagb:
I am also a mental health consumer (survivor is yet to be determined :P) and I don’t view it as being “muzzled”. I make mental health jokes sometimes with my boyfriend and friends who also have various diagnoses, but I have made the effort to cut the ableist terms from my everyday/online conversations. Why? Because some people find it upsetting and triggering. Because they are often used as lazy othering slurs in order to create distance from disturbing behaviour. And because most people with a mental health diagnosis still find a way to be decent human beings who don’t demean or threaten or hurt other people.
My $0.02 (CAD). Thanks for listening.
Ok Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. ๐ Don’t worry I won’t be back here. I know exactly what you are saying and did mean to hurt anyone. Now I am the one who feels they can’t be here, that I am not a “decent human being” due to being upset about something.
… huh.
@ Kirby
So, basically, figure out exactly where the line is in terms of what’s legally actionable, and as long as you don’t cross it you can do what you want.
Is it just me or is this like the 100th time this week that someone has been asked in the kindest and most neutral way possible that we don’t use the word “crazy” as a slur here to describe assholish behavior only to have them freak out about being “muzzled” or driven away?
Because it seems to be my thing today let me point out, kylagb, that no one is asking you to go away and never come back. You’ve made good and interesting comments in the past and I can’t see any reason people wouldn’t welcome more of them in the future.
When folk push back against the use of the word ‘crazy’ we do so because we’ve come to a community consensus that we don’t want to use it because it causes people pain. To anyone who faces this pushback:
1. no one thinks you are a bad person for inadvertently using the word (it’s pretty embedded in our culture, anyway and most people haven’t needed to think about it much)
2. pretty much everyone here has used that word (or any one of a number of others) in the past without realizing that it causes some people pain and had to deal with that realization
3. we get how easy it is to forget because we are all part of a set of societies that freely sling the word “crazy” around as an insult and are pretty willing to forgive
4. the easiest thing to do is just apologize, learn from it, and move on
5. no one is even suggesting you can’t use the word to describe yourself or others, just that we don’t do it here.
You might even use it again accidentally, which will be okay. I’ve done that. I apologized and tried again. No one here hates me (or maybe I’m wrong, pile on if you feel like it, folks!) for being a flawed human in a flawed world. What we object to is people feeling like being “right” is more important than being respectful of other people and the norms of a community.
Unreasonable? Reality-challenged? I’m trying to think of alternatives here.
@cassandrakitty:
Isn’t that always the way of things? ๐ Bullies are particularly adept at scoping out that line.
Elam’s probably never gonna get a job anywhere useful, and he’s probably not gonna have any sort of career in politics. He’s certainly not gonna be able to start any sort of influential organization save for AVFM, and AVFM basically runs on the fumes of his fervent followers.
Beyond that, there isn’t much we can do until he crosses the line hard enough for police to take notice… It sucks, especially since register-her should have been that line long ago.