Noted pussyconomist Roosh Valizadeh offers these sobering thoughts on the rising costs — and decreasing quality — of vagina:
The quality of women—both their appearance and their attitude—is sliding to the bottom while the work we have to expend to meet these more inferior females is increasing. This phenomenon of pussy inflation is starting to force men out of the market, for what “average” man can find the time, ability, and motivation to seduce a merely cute woman who may only want to fuck him a couple times before becoming distracted by the next shiny object that gets placed in her path? If this inflations proceeds, the only men who will get laid consistently are ones who approach it like a job, blocking out a minimum of two hours a day to the task.
If anything Roosh is underestimating the dangers here. During Germany’s hyperpussyflation in the early 1920s, men had to devote as many as 3700 hours a day in order to score with merely cute women. Indeed, it is rumored that some of these men were forced to wipe their own asses in order to make themselves more appealing to women.
The reality we face right now is this: the quality of men around the world is increasing to compete with a decreasing quality of women. This is great if you’re a woman, because without lifting a finger you can get better than a couple years before. If you’re a man and didn’t step up your game recently, however, you will get lower results. If you don’t stay on top of the latest game scientific data or dating app, you will be out-competed. Or you’ll just get nothing. Inflation often helps those who have debt, but if you have no debt, if you lived life prudently and with virtue, inflation destroys your purchasing power. As much as men improve themselves, women are appreciating in relative value as they make all the wrong decisions with their lives. This is the world we live in.
To be honest, Roosh, I don’t think you and I live in the same world.
D00D! Read the name and description of this blog. You came to us for mocking and mocking is what you will get. That is what we do here.
Hey, reading comprehension is going up! A bit, not much.
You blundered in here without the slightest understanding of the community. You look like a complete ignorant fool. We’ve seen plenty of you type before (you even started as a necro troll) and we have little tolerance for stupidity. You don’t look at what you post or even consider it. I mean, look at the idiocy beyond belief of the first thing you ever posted. You’re a joke, and we smack you around until you burst and run away.
I am considering changing my nym to Cassandry, so this conversation wasn’t entirely pointless.
Yes, Cassandry is awesome. So thanks for that, at least.
3 men, 1 man, 200+ men. Fucking numbers, how do they work?
@
“(Lack of mockery request denied, though.)”
So you pretty much admitted that is the point of your posts then? Well, I have to thank you for your honesty at least. Like 90% of trolls I have seen even in irrelevant forums at least don’t get to admit they are trying to mock.
Well, having said that I leave. I thank you guys for those that did it for providing me with responses.
As I have said in the beginning, I came here to offer and also gain perspective. I have never entered a feminism enviroment (not because I avoided it) and I expected to gain some perspective here or at least learn a thing or 2. There is no interest in debate here, neither in even explaining stuff, discussion or presenting arguments.
The very fact of disagreeing with peple here (not all of course ) is enough to offer nothing but pure mockery, and in this case, where can value be found?
I just want to close saying it was not my intention to troll anyone and that I really wanted to see the points of view here and hopefully have a good discussion.
You had to bring up Insane Clown Posse, didn’t you? 🙂
Wow, this troll cruised the staged pretty quick. How long until flounce?
tracks and mocks the New Misogyny online
*stages
I missed this. Try to understand the nuances of human relationships more and make baseless proclamations less. Or don’t, I don’t care and I’m off to bed.
@ Cassie
“Hey, reading comprehension is going up! A bit, not much.
You blundered in here without the slightest understanding of the community. You look like a complete ignorant fool. We’ve seen plenty of you type before (you even started as a necro troll) and we have little tolerance for stupidity. You don’t look at what you post or even consider it. I mean, look at the idiocy beyond belief of the first thing you ever posted. You’re a joke, and we smack you around until you burst and run away.”
How can I gain understanding of the community where you flat out REFUSE to explain? I ask for explanation and understanding, and you only give insults.
Yes I know what you think of me, I want to know WHY, exactly. And no saying “You barely think” is not telling me why.
I look like a complete ignorant fool, okay. But why? Exactly by what point? On what grounds?
It seems that the entirely of it, is simply refusal to believe what I am saying (like the contest stuff and 200 comments) are not true, and it is indeed true.
If your grounds for saying I am a joke, is simply because you believe what I said is not true, I can say with total conviction to my knowledgement that I have been truthful. Now if there are other reasons I don’t know them, care to explain?
THEY NEVER STICK THE FLOUNCE!
I am genuinely confused as to why so many dudes think that feminist communities exist for the purpose of helping them figure out how to find a girlfriend. It’s like walking into a donut shop and being confused when they don’t have any pizza to sell you.
He wanted to debate why he doesn’t have a girlfriend?
@ Brook
“I missed this. Try to understand the nuances of human relationships more and make baseless proclamations less. Or don’t, I don’t care and I’m off to bed.”
I said this applied specifically to my experience and where I lived, this is not false. Now you can claim is baseless as I cant say “Here there is all the evidence” yes, but it is certaintly not false.
Indeed I find your advice all in all valid, next time I state something I will try to have evidence ready to produce.
Albeit some of the thing I said (for example about the Facebook group) I have available in evidence and can produce it if you want.
ninja’d by Cassandry.
It’s the same old same old, fellow Cassie. Refusal to do due diligence. They can’t even read the comment policy, then get huffy about their ignorance.
Also: necro. And failure to understand Latin.
We have no pizza here, only donuts. You can have maple, frosted, chocolate, whatever you like! But no pizza, because we don’t have any tomatoes.
If you’re looking for advice then you’re not looking for a debate. FYI
All those
pulled out of his assnumbers he keep posting (in some strange attempt to prove a point) are terribly amusing.Granted that just may be because I can’t stop thinking about that sounding like Dragon Ball Z scene. The “It’s Over 9000!” one.
You know like “Over 200 replies!” or “Over 15 guys!” or AT THE VERY LEAST 50 oh, wait no. He actually did write that last one.
Do you think that guys like this one have some super secret “scouter / numbers of people interested in her reader” thingies?
That they use to read the women’s “power level”?
Or do you think they are just talking nonsense?
(I know what my bet would be)
@ He wanted to debate why he doesn’t have a girlfriend?
Are you a psychic? Because this is not the first proclaimation about my personal life I have seen.
How do you know I don’t have a girlfriend, I don’t remember having said that in my post, did I?
@
I am genuinely confused as to why so many dudes think that feminist communities exist for the purpose of helping them figure out how to find a girlfriend. It’s like walking into a donut shop and being confused when they don’t have any pizza to sell you.
I didn’t, when did I claimed such a thing?
All I said is that saying some guys retreat from dating and from romantic interest in women in general because they find it too difficult. That is ALL I said in the beginning. And that the guy in the article could had said that without having to add women hate.
Now I sincerely ask, what is wrong with stating that?
“Some guys retreat from approaching women romantically becuase they find it too difficult, either their standards or because of repeated rejection. You can say this without having to add women hate”
Do you find something offenssive or woman hating in that statement? I am sincerely curious. Because this is all I said in the begining that is the core of my argument, that you can make a valid point and pollute it with myso rethoric.
@ Catherine
You seem to be on the conviction that I am lying and somehow it seems to be the pure basis of refusing anything I say.
So I ask, if I post the screenshots of the group with all 200 comments would it be valid proof for you? Or a link to the group? What would be valid proof for you?
Or you are going to say “I will not believe you and claim you are making up numbers, no matter what”?
In which case well……. if you are going to flat out keep saying I am lying even if I show you evidence the problem is not me.