The last we heard from Men’s-Rights-adjacent eccentric Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), he was falsely accusing an Ohio University student of being a false rape accuser and posting her personal information on the internet.
Now he’s back in the news again with an exciting new social media venture. While Paul Elam takes on the world of publishing with his Possibly Still Unnamed Publishing House for Men Who Don’t Write Good (not its real name), Nolan(c) is taking on an even bigger target: Facebook.
Nolan(c), who for complicated crackpot reasons now goes by the name Joschua-Brandon: Boehm(c), has just launched ManBook, his version of Facebook, but for men only. While ManBook might look to the world like a glorified blog, Nolan(c) Boehm sees it as a viable alternative to the alleged misandrist tyranny and “censorship” of “fascist book.”
Well, unless you’re a woman. If you’re a woman and try to post on ManBook, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains, he has the right to kill you.
Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains this rather strict comment policy as follows:
We have asked politely for women to not register but you are registering anyway. This shows total lack of respect for our right to freedom of association. We do not wish to associate with women in this place. Period. …
We would ask you women to respect our rights as you wish your rights to be respected. If you are unwilling to respect our right to freedom of association do not expect men to respect your right to life. Ok?
So far ManBook is little more than a collection of blog posts by Nolan(c) Boehm(c) with a smattering of comments, but the site has gotten a bit of media attention, inspiring posts on Raw Story and Jezebel, mostly because of that whole “killing women” thing.
While Nolan(c) Boehm(c) is clearly delighted with all the traffic that his new notoriety has brought him, he doesn’t feel he’s getting a fair shake on the whole “right to kill women who post comments” deal. In a post today, he responded to one critic with this, er, clarification of his philosophy:
[Y]ou have to love the fact that he actually encourages women to go and join the site thereby encouraging women to violate the right of freedom of association. This is why men are now starting to kill women more often in divorce. Because men openly encourage women to violate the rights of other men and then pretend to be “horrified” when the men defend their rights with force, up to and including deadly force.
But, you know, if you’re a dude, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) would love you to sign up for his wannabe Facebook-killer site. You can even log into his site … using Facebook.
ManBook is not Nolan(c) Boehm(c)’s first attempt to take on an internet giant. He is also the man behind a little site called A-MAN-ZON. THE politically incorrect store for MEN.
… which also looks suspiciously like a blog. I’m not even sure that there’s a way to buy anything on the site. There are no links to actual products or categories of products on the site’s main page, and a search for books turns up one online “book” that you can “buy” for free.
In a welcome note on A-Man-Zon, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) can’t help but come back to the whole evil-women issue:
Stop spending your money with men who will sell products and services to men and then take that money and give it to women to spend on lawyers in the divorce courts until the man is so harassed and so broke that he decides to kill himself like Robin Williams did this week.
And the FIRST such man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigot that I recommend men stop spending money with is Jeff Bezos.
Jeff Bezos is one of the worlds biggest man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigots.
Jeff Bezos openly employs tens of thousands of women who have committed crimes against fathers in divorce courts. He is completely un-apologetic about that.
Despite the name, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) makes it clear that women are allowed to buy from A-Man-Zon — at least if they are
“good women” who are “man enough” not to be “offended” by other peoples opinions … #WomenAgainstFeminism are welcome to be buyers of products and services here.
So he apparently has no problem accepting women’s money — just their opinions.
EDIT: Added links, fixed a few proofreading things.
I read that donotlink link.
Ugh. Just…ugh.
I agree with the first commenter. This guy took a tragedy and made it all about himself and the “torment” he suffers. What an utter bonking narcissist. And not the good, healthy kind either.
The idea that men will lash out and kill someone if they’re not given everything they want is something feminists want to stop, right? To help get rid of toxic masculinity and teach men that there’s better ways to handle their emotions other than “MAN SMASH!”.
The address for the Web site appears to be a PO box in Fiji….
Reality, noticing that Wonder Woman’s enemies mostly sucked, decided to provide her some.
Right. And these guys, conversely, are out to cultivate that very “MAN SMASH” thing, and make it the whole of the law, and the ONLY law.
They must be stopped. Preferably before another shooting rampage occurs.
I remember back in university, as a callow young man, opining to a fellow student, “There are several things I would live for, and a few I would die for – but none I would kill for.” He looked at me pityingly and replied, “Have you thought about what the world would be like if _everyone_ felt like that?”
Yeah, many fewer people getting killed by other people. Show me the downside.
Worst application of that logic ever.
Robert, what a first-class prat that fellow was.
That prat’s “logic” reminds me of every dumb warmonger in the history of Ever.
You know that scene from The Simpsons where Lionel Hutz imagines a world without lawyers…
… And shudders in fear? The prat reminds me more than a little of that.
Quoting Robert,
Oh dear. That was way too easy to find.
http://youtu.be/RfVbiefMdNU
Okay, I am an evil person. I laughed at that creepy chucklefuck getting tasered.
I loved the barely-contained eyerolling from the first guy who had to deal with this pillock.
Schadnefreude brandy, indeed.
Did that dude seriously say “I was born in several states”? Behold, a post-Christmas miracle.
I LMAO. Best part was “leave the camera with your mother outside the courtroom.” Tells you everything you need to know.
He’s a citizen of several states! But not of America. Or his body is but he isn’t, or something something.
I wonder if they bought the dude that tasered him a round of drinks?
I would hope he at least got a raise.
I doubt he’s paid enough for that kind of bullshit.
Clearly a “man of many parts”, like Igor.
Just in case you think that statement is entirely meaningless, it does have “meanings” to these chumps. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/fall/sovereign-idioticon-a-dictionary-of-the
Look at the “Birth certificate” entry, read it again. Then read it again.
Have a look at the ALL CAPS and other punctuation entries. You might need to read it aloud to check that what you read the first time was what was really written.
That “trick” is sadly popular with enormous number of asshats on the internet, I’m surprised SPLC think that sovereigns tendency to JAQ off is special.
That’s definitely unique to Sovereigns and an impressive feat of magical thinking.
Corporate shell name?
I’m seeing retirement funds for buying shell suits. Now that’s scary.
Someone popped in there to point and laugh and made a reference to the Life of Brian and the stoning scene.
Was called a “man hater” and instantly doxxed.
Lovely people.
Oh jeez, that’s terrible.
Curse you, blockquote mammoth!
cassandrakitty asked:
Haha, no, he just said “one of the several states” as a followup to a reply he’d given shortly beforehand about not having been born in D.C. and thus not being a U.S. citizen. As you may know, hardcore “constitutionalists” — many of whom don’t actually understand the Constitution — use the term “the several states” to refer to all 50 states because, back in 1776 and shortly afterward, the 13 original states were known as “the several states.”
Guys like this, though, go out of their way to make trouble with bureaucratic types who have no real authority to change anything anyway, people who are just doing their job (and, no, before any troll brings up Nuremburg here, not allowing a camera into a courtroom is not analogous to killing 6 million Jews). There are truly serious concerns in this country regarding the abuse of authority, and to that extent I can sympathize with them, but then they go off and make mountains out of molehills (“I don’t have a license — my person does, but I don’t…” Ugh). That said, TASERing him was unnecessary, as it probably wouldn’t have been difficult to take the camera away. He hadn’t become violent (yet) and I think too many officers are too cavalier with TASERs, especially given that they can cause permanent damage or even death. You don’t know if someone has a heart condition until you’d stopped their heart with a TASER….
Still, I have little pity for that guy.
And exactly where does this money come from? In troy ounces of motherfucking gold, no less?