The last we heard from Men’s-Rights-adjacent eccentric Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), he was falsely accusing an Ohio University student of being a false rape accuser and posting her personal information on the internet.
Now he’s back in the news again with an exciting new social media venture. While Paul Elam takes on the world of publishing with his Possibly Still Unnamed Publishing House for Men Who Don’t Write Good (not its real name), Nolan(c) is taking on an even bigger target: Facebook.
Nolan(c), who for complicated crackpot reasons now goes by the name Joschua-Brandon: Boehm(c), has just launched ManBook, his version of Facebook, but for men only. While ManBook might look to the world like a glorified blog, Nolan(c) Boehm sees it as a viable alternative to the alleged misandrist tyranny and “censorship” of “fascist book.”
Well, unless you’re a woman. If you’re a woman and try to post on ManBook, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains, he has the right to kill you.
Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains this rather strict comment policy as follows:
We have asked politely for women to not register but you are registering anyway. This shows total lack of respect for our right to freedom of association. We do not wish to associate with women in this place. Period. …
We would ask you women to respect our rights as you wish your rights to be respected. If you are unwilling to respect our right to freedom of association do not expect men to respect your right to life. Ok?
So far ManBook is little more than a collection of blog posts by Nolan(c) Boehm(c) with a smattering of comments, but the site has gotten a bit of media attention, inspiring posts on Raw Story and Jezebel, mostly because of that whole “killing women” thing.
While Nolan(c) Boehm(c) is clearly delighted with all the traffic that his new notoriety has brought him, he doesn’t feel he’s getting a fair shake on the whole “right to kill women who post comments” deal. In a post today, he responded to one critic with this, er, clarification of his philosophy:
[Y]ou have to love the fact that he actually encourages women to go and join the site thereby encouraging women to violate the right of freedom of association. This is why men are now starting to kill women more often in divorce. Because men openly encourage women to violate the rights of other men and then pretend to be “horrified” when the men defend their rights with force, up to and including deadly force.
But, you know, if you’re a dude, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) would love you to sign up for his wannabe Facebook-killer site. You can even log into his site … using Facebook.
ManBook is not Nolan(c) Boehm(c)’s first attempt to take on an internet giant. He is also the man behind a little site called A-MAN-ZON. THE politically incorrect store for MEN.
… which also looks suspiciously like a blog. I’m not even sure that there’s a way to buy anything on the site. There are no links to actual products or categories of products on the site’s main page, and a search for books turns up one online “book” that you can “buy” for free.
In a welcome note on A-Man-Zon, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) can’t help but come back to the whole evil-women issue:
Stop spending your money with men who will sell products and services to men and then take that money and give it to women to spend on lawyers in the divorce courts until the man is so harassed and so broke that he decides to kill himself like Robin Williams did this week.
And the FIRST such man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigot that I recommend men stop spending money with is Jeff Bezos.
Jeff Bezos is one of the worlds biggest man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigots.
Jeff Bezos openly employs tens of thousands of women who have committed crimes against fathers in divorce courts. He is completely un-apologetic about that.
Despite the name, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) makes it clear that women are allowed to buy from A-Man-Zon — at least if they are
“good women” who are “man enough” not to be “offended” by other peoples opinions … #WomenAgainstFeminism are welcome to be buyers of products and services here.
So he apparently has no problem accepting women’s money — just their opinions.
EDIT: Added links, fixed a few proofreading things.
guest – I gather that he doesn’t think that national governments are valid.
But copyrights are.
-_-
Who does he think enforces copyrights?
The captain of the ship that you’re currently on.
(Which might also be a courtroom. I will never let him live that down – everyone should watch the video.)
Copyright that’s only enforced within a single ship seems vulnerable to piratism.
Are you kidding me? He gets a couple of days of bad publicity for saying that he’s going to kill people (and then doubling down on his insistence that he was right to do so and everyone should see that), and he just gives up? Did he expect everyone was going to rally to his banner and no one was ever going to say anything bad about him ever? What did he think activism involved?
Seriously, what dream world is this man living in?
A world where death threats are NBD as long as they are leveled against women.
@laughnwitch
Hey thanks for the follow! The more people who
pledge their allegiance to the gynocracyvisit and follow, the better. It’s the only way I can get my blog out there.Besides, it’s full of misandry goodness.
@Miss Andry I am reading it right now. I also put it up on my googe+ account I have a lot of feminists I follow and who follow me.
Oh sweet lord baby Jesus in heaven, I had never heard of GGG. I looked it up. At one point he was in court on criminal charges and ASKED THE JUDGE TO FUCK HIM. The judge was like “dude you have problems, we are going to set you up with a therapist and a social worker, okay? They are going to help you, it is going to be okay”…and then he came back all “THEY WOULDN’T FUCK ME EITHER, I AM PRESSING CHARGES BECAUSE YOU BROKE YOUR PROMISE!”
There are not enough emoticons in the world for all my D:
Important facts:
-He is wanted in several countries and by Interpol, because it turns out that punctuating your name differently doesn’t actually mean you don’t have to obey laws.
-He thinks that if a courtroom has a fringed American flag in it, then it is legally a ship and admiralty law applies. Also if you sign your name in blue ink. You’re supposed to sign things in red ink.
-He claims he was once attacked by a pack of Romanian wild dogs, but he scared them off just by staring at them because he was so Alpha that they knew he could kill them barehanded if he wanted to.
This person needs to be in jail.
@laughnwitch
Thanks for getting the word out about Hail to the Gynocracy! ^_^
@Policy of Madness
He did spend time in a Croatian prison. Though I forget exactly why. It was either stalking or death threats, and since he’s done both of those things and more I don’t remember what it was.
Now he’s complaining about having his life ruined by some “Atheist Cult” and promoting rape/violence against women on his own blog and another one called CoAlpha something-or-other.
He needs to be in jail again. And stay there. He needs to be classified as the local equivalent of a dangerous offender and kept in custody.
I read the AVfM article about him, and them going “Feminists always try to weasel out of accepting that TERFs and SERFs are part of their movement!” and then turning around and going “Yeah, this guy’s not with us.” is really ironic, in a very funny kind of way for me.
Can we stop with the “It’s okay if we do it” rhetoric, please MRAs and anti-SJWs? If it’s bad for the goose, it’s bad for the gander. If you do it, it’s still bad, by your own admission.
Also, side note: I really need to stop reading YouTube comments. ‘Tis a very toxic place.
Frankly I’m surprised GGG hasn’t gone on a Marc Lepine rampage yet. Maybe we’ll get lucky and he’ll turn out to be just another MRA “activist” who never leaves the keyboard.
As for Nolan or whatever his name is, of course he was surprised when people disagreed with him. In his mind he is the reasonable one and reasonable people must agree with him. That kind of crank is never really aware of how fringe their ideas are.
PoM:
This. We don’t do that sort of thing.
Arctic Ape:
First pirate joke of the day! Huzzah! 🙂
emilygoddess:
Gold fringe, at that.
I’m confused, I always thought the “gold fringe on the flag = Admiralty (or US Navy?)” and courtrooms was one of Owly’s specialties.
I assume there’s a whole community of weirdos who all believe the same thing.
Yeah, that was what I got out of it too. There are wiki articles on it, but I couldn’t finish them because the whole concept was stupid.
Seems to be closely connected both to the idea that odd punctuation in your name means the government can’t send you to jail and to the whole bitcoin thing. Crank magnetism, it’s real.
I’m now wishing characters like Punctuation Fail Nolan could end up in front of a pirate court. I doubt any of the dudes from the Golden Age of Piracy, or the famous fictional pirates for that matter, would have any time for him. They’d maroon him somewhere inhospitiable, quicksmart.
@kittehserf
How about Rumrunner’s Isle a la Pirates of the Caribbean?
Oops, you are probably right.
Miss Andry – yes, minus the rum! 😀
katz, I really don’t know: I always thought it was one of his, but it’s the sort of thing Bozo Nolan could easily go with.
Didn’t David used to have a fringed flag on the sidebar? That was before my time.
So SSM closed down her old blog after being doxxed by a manospherean she had a falling out with. She now has a new blog using her real name, and this blog seems to be toned down a bit on that a good deal of the kooky, kinky, manosphere-unicorn-girl persona is gone. Though she’s still very reactionary, and thinks ladies shouldn’t vote. And dosent seem to understand the point of the tweeter who mentioned voting:
I didn’t break the link cause it’s a screenshot
https://archive.today/vJssr
Nothing really seems to have changed much other than her losing her manosphere-groupie-dream girl status and persona
@Ellie
That blog made me so sad. I was raised by a mother who supposedly held the same kind of values SST advocates, and it was (shocker!) not actually a happy household. My mother was/is full of so much rage, all the time, and so much shame and hate that she projected onto other women. I don’t understand why you would choose a beliefset that says you are inherently inferior (or at least should be subservient to) your partner, but if that’s what floats your goat, I think you should go for it. But it’s pretty messed up to look at people who don’t want that for themselves and tell them they’re somehow immoral and in any case are DOIN IT RONG.
Also as a sidenote: according to my mother, the laydeez should not be in positions of leadership okay and a woman should NEVEREVAR be President because omfg HORMONES PMS WILL CAUSE WW3, and a woman’s proper place is under the leadership of her husband!!!1…but if my dad ever disagreed with her, it wasn’t him who got physically abusive, and he most assuredly did not make leadership decisions for the household. In fact, he used to cash his paycheck every week and guiltily squirrel a few twenties away without telling her, so that sometimes he could buy himself a video game. It was really sad. And kind of surreal, now that I am an adult.