Categories
advocacy of violence all about the menz antifeminism antifeminist women crackpottery creepy empathy deficit entitled babies grandiosity gross incompetence manginas men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA no girls allowed not-quite-explicit threats Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) post contains sarcasm

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) warns women who comment on his Facebook ripoff site that he just might kill them for it

ManBook founder: No girls allowed!
ManBook founder: No girls allowed!

The last we heard from Men’s-Rights-adjacent eccentric Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), he was falsely accusing an Ohio University student of being a false rape accuser and posting her personal information on the internet.

Now he’s back in the news again with an exciting new social media venture. While Paul Elam takes on the world of publishing with his Possibly Still Unnamed Publishing House for Men Who Don’t Write Good (not its real name), Nolan(c) is taking on an even bigger target: Facebook.

Nolan(c), who for complicated crackpot reasons now goes by the name Joschua-Brandon: Boehm(c), has just launched ManBook, his version of Facebook, but for men only. While ManBook might look to the world like a glorified blog, Nolan(c) Boehm sees it as a viable alternative to the alleged misandrist tyranny and “censorship” of “fascist book.”

Well, unless you’re a woman. If you’re a woman and try to post on ManBook, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains, he has the right to kill you.

Nolan(c) Boehm(c) explains this rather strict comment policy as follows:

We have asked politely for women to not register but you are registering anyway. This shows total lack of respect for our right to freedom of association. We do not wish to associate with women in this place. Period. …

We would ask you women to respect our rights as you wish your rights to be respected. If you are unwilling to respect our right to freedom of association do not expect men to respect your right to life. Ok?

So far ManBook is little more than a collection of blog posts by Nolan(c) Boehm(c) with a smattering of comments, but the site has gotten a bit of media attention, inspiring posts on Raw Story and Jezebel, mostly because of that whole “killing women” thing.

While Nolan(c) Boehm(c) is clearly delighted with all the traffic that his new notoriety has brought him, he doesn’t feel he’s getting a fair shake on the whole “right to kill women who post comments” deal. In a post today, he responded to one critic with this, er, clarification of his philosophy:

[Y]ou have to love the fact that he actually encourages women to go and join the site thereby encouraging women to violate the right of freedom of association. This is why men are now starting to kill women more often in divorce. Because men openly encourage women to violate the rights of other men and then pretend to be “horrified” when the men defend their rights with force, up to and including deadly force.

But, you know, if you’re a dude, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) would love you to sign up for his wannabe Facebook-killer site. You can even log into his site … using Facebook.

ManBook is not Nolan(c) Boehm(c)’s first attempt to take on an internet giant. He is also the man behind a little site called A-MAN-ZON. THE politically incorrect store for MEN.

… which also looks suspiciously like a blog. I’m not even sure that there’s a way to buy anything on the site. There are no links to actual products or categories of products on the site’s main page, and a search for books turns up one online “book” that you can “buy” for free.

In a welcome note on A-Man-Zon, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) can’t help but come back to the whole evil-women issue:

Stop spending your money with men who will sell products and services to men and then take that money and give it to women to spend on lawyers in  the divorce courts until the man is so harassed and so broke that he decides to kill himself like Robin Williams did this week.

And the FIRST such man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigot that I recommend men stop spending money with is Jeff Bezos.

Jeff Bezos is one of the worlds biggest man-hating, mangina, white-knight, sexist, discriminatory, bigots.

Jeff Bezos openly employs tens of thousands of women who have committed crimes against fathers in divorce courts. He is completely un-apologetic about that.

Despite the name, Nolan(c) Boehm(c) makes it clear that women are allowed to buy from A-Man-Zon — at least if they are

“good women” who are “man enough” not to be “offended” by other peoples opinions … #WomenAgainstFeminism are welcome to be buyers of products and services here.

So he apparently has no problem accepting women’s money — just their opinions.

EDIT: Added links, fixed a few proofreading things.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

227 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Miss Andry
6 years ago

@Puddleglum

That guy’s a total creeper. He was so desperate for sex that he once propositioned his own mother, and allegedly tried to blackmail several different women for sex. The guy runs some blog about being “incel” now and ditched the “governments get girlfriends” thing. It’s really unsettling.

kittehserf - MOD
6 years ago

Puddleglum, what Miss Andry said. GGG’s every bit as scary as Nolan when you’ve read a bit more of his stuff. He turned up here, iirc, when David first posted about him, and it didn’t take long before he got himself banned. He essentially wants women forced into prostitution (aka “dating”) and still calls himself incel even though he’s had relationships. He calls his parents murderers because they haven’t provided him with sex one way or another, whether by forcing (which is what it would amount to) some young woman to take him, or by his mother fucking him herself. He also obsessively googles himself, which is why he’s seldom mentioned here except by his initials. He’s Elliot Roger material.

Puddleglum
6 years ago

Sorry, I was thinking more of the Pierre comic, which is why I laughed.

katz
6 years ago

I think the most disturbing thing about GGG was his whole “pretend to be out of control” act. He’d mash the keyboard and type in all caps with a lot of fucks, apparently trying to convince people that he was JUST TOO UPSET to type properly. Sometimes he’d say it was a joke afterwards.

kittehserf - MOD
6 years ago

The Pierre comic was hilarious – that was before any of us knew how bad GGG was, I think.

mildlymagnificent
6 years ago

FMOTLers think that because corporations are legally people, people can legally be corporations. And then it goes downhill from there.

Downhill? I think we’re in AliceLookingglass territory here.

Zolnier
6 years ago

So what’s incel meant to mean?

Jarnsaxa
Jarnsaxa
6 years ago

He really doesn’t seem stable. Has he considered getting some psychiatric help? He just seems … unstable.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
6 years ago

Involuntarily celibate. Yes, “can’t get laid” is now supposedly a demographic group in the same way that sex or race is.

katz
6 years ago

He really doesn’t seem stable. Has he considered getting some psychiatric help? He just seems … unstable.

He was seeing a therapist for a while, but it happened to be a female therapist, so he inevitably tried to get her to bang him. I’m assuming that was the end of their professional relationship.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
6 years ago

Remember when we tried to explain why a therapist wouldn’t be able to say yes even if she wanted to because professional ethics and potential loss of licensing and all that stuff? And he was all (sticks fingers in ears and sings a song about government sponsored rape).

Shaenon
6 years ago

So what’s incel meant to mean?

Ugh… “Involuntarily celibate.” It’s a term MRA types came up with to label their failure to get laid as some kind of medical condition. People who identify as incel are pretty much always awful, but GGG was particularly weird about it because he did have sex. He just kept redefining celibacy so he could still call himself “incel.” At one point he insisted that celibacy meant not having sex within three months. At another point he had a FWB, so he decided celibacy meant not having a committed partner.

As funny as his bizarre ideas can be, he’s one of the dangerous ones. He’s been arrested for assault, and when he posted here he was blase about stalking an underage girl and physically attacking people, including his parents, during his irrational rages.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
6 years ago

Yeah, GGG is another Eliot Roger waiting to happen.

BritterSweet
6 years ago

I first heard of GGG on WGW.

(Trigger warning for violence toward children)

It included him saying he would shoot up a kindergarten, and the other posters would be responsible for those kids’ deaths because they didn’t “show him empathy” (they were rightly calling him out on his immense selfishness and assholery in the thread).

And the turdbag in this article (I don’t care what his name is) sounds kind of like he simply wants to kill someone, and the idea of killing people makes him happy. No matter how much he wants it, murdering is not a right.

Blughh, enough disgust for today. Time for some cute lolz.

contrapangloss
6 years ago

The comments are kind of ridiculous on puddleglums link. There’s a couple nice folks being patient with a rather ooky and disturbing sealion.

I half wonder if the ooky and disturbing sealion is a sock of the blog talked about in the article…

… especially when one of his comments boiled down to “prostate cancer and suicide are caused by women making men incel”

Kyla Ball
6 years ago

Can these people get any worse? 🙁

M. the Social Justice Ranger
M. the Social Justice Ranger
6 years ago

I know nothing about the law in Fiji; can his local police use his posts as a reason for a warrant to check his backyard? Almost every MRA posted here gives off serial rapist vibes, but this one gives off serial killer vibes.

Cyberwulf
Cyberwulf
6 years ago

oh man GGG! I jousted with him on WGW too. He’s all into forming a “co alpha” society or something now and refuses to work because all his tax money will go to sponsor feminists and the “omegas” who love to r*pe them.

sunnysombrera
6 years ago

What’s WGW?

shad0cat
shad0cat
6 years ago

I followed the manbook link and there’s a dropdown menu at the top of the page in the red bar labled “comments” it had buttons for flagging the page as “offensive” or “dangerous”. I can’t see the actual content of the page because it’s down for maintainance but if he puts something on it that can be flagged either or we could go mass spam those buttons.

Miss Andry
6 years ago

@sunnysombrera

The forum “Why God, Why?”

Miss Andry
6 years ago

But as for the actual topic, this is the first time I’ve ever heard of Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) — whose name I shall pronounce as Peter Andrew Colon Nolan Copyright. Even A Voice for Men thinks he’s nuts.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
6 years ago

@BritterSweet

That kitty! OMG so cute! “STFU and let me sleep!” 😀

gilshalos
6 years ago

OK, the #internal screaming gif is sending me to Netflix and Dr Who. I may be some time.

Wetherby
6 years ago

But as for the actual topic, this is the first time I’ve ever heard of Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) — whose name I shall pronounce as Peter Andrew Colon Nolan Copyright.

I don’t see how you can avoid it. But you left out the hyphen, and there’s also some debate above about whether (c) actually means © or something else. In which case you should probably pronounce his name Peter Hyphen Andrew Colon Nolan Open Bracket Sea Close Bracket.

(I rather like the “colon nolan” rhyme in the middle. It’s certainly the only pleasurable sensation I’ve ever had in connection with this person.)

As for GGG, the last time I heard about him he was trying to impregnate a schizophrenic fuckbuddy (his term, of course), to “prove his manhood” or some such drivel. I devoutly hope that this was mere bragging, because the thought of him procreating makes me break out in hives, especially given that he’s already notorious for his views on what parent-offspring relationships should involve.

proxieme
proxieme
6 years ago

*reads article*

http://m.imgur.com/YcAQlkx

*walks away from article, subject matter keeps itching the back of my mind*

http://m.imgur.com/7XAMl00

Jay Elmore
6 years ago

Miss Andry:
“Even A Voice for Men thinks he’s nuts.”

But do they REALLY think he’s nuts, or is it a “I can’t believe he’s willing to say out loud what many of us think privately”?

Miss Andry
6 years ago

@Jay Elmore

I’ll leave the sanitized AVfM link here.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
6 years ago

I followed the manbook link and there’s a dropdown menu at the top of the page in the red bar labled “comments” it had buttons for flagging the page as “offensive” or “dangerous”. I can’t see the actual content of the page because it’s down for maintainance but if he puts something on it that can be flagged either or we could go mass spam those buttons.

First, I suggest you investigate donotlink.com and figure out what it’s about and what it does.

Second, “mass spamming” is something channers do, not real people, and it’s weird and suspicious that you would even suggest it.

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

When I went to the site it said it was down for maintenance

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
6 years ago

He’s all into forming a “co alpha” society or something now and refuses to work

Observe my complete lack of surprise. Dude with a massive entitlement complex who doesn’t think he should have to get a job? I just want to hear how the scheme by which the government subsidizes incels is supposed to work.

I’d forgotten that some current regulars weren’t around for GGGs visits here. What’s amazing is that propositioning his own mother wasn’t even the most horrifying thing that he said (nor does he feel embarrassed about it, in fact he’ll be more than happy to tell you why he did it and why it was a perfectly reasonable thing to do in great detail).

The contest for creepiest person on the internet is a tough one, but this guy must at least be in the top 3.

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

He has a manifesto up now and it is freakish You have got to read this ladies and gents. http://www.manbook.biz/ it is RICH

fotocopiadora
6 years ago

[Y]ou have to love the fact that he actually encourages women to go and join the site thereby encouraging women to violate the right of freedom of association. This is why men are now starting to kill women more often in divorce. Because men openly encourage women to violate the rights of other men and then pretend to be “horrified” when the men defend their rights with force, up to and including deadly force.

so… his defense consists on arguing that his website is actually *the cause of women being murdered*? wow.

i’m already used to the “we don’t hate women BUT…” thinly-veiled misogyny in much of this kind of discourse, but this guy is really straight to the point. as in “don’t even enter my website woman or i’ll fucking murder you” straight to the point. says a lot about him/his intended audience i guess.

also lol at the pseudo-corporate bullshit and stock photos mixed with men’s rights rhetoric and stuff in A-MAN-ZON.

AltoFronto
AltoFronto
6 years ago

@ Miss Andry – I can’t believe someone at AVFM actually wrote this paragraph:

[blockquote] As stated previously, anger is not necessarily wrong. Humans being humans and all, they will have human reactions. But actions caused by anger can be wrong. Especially when they cross over into hatred, statements of violence, advocating dangerous and illegal activity, slander and libel, or desires of death upon other persons. Nolan, I am afraid, is guilty of all of these things. [/blockquote]

It’s probably just as well they seem oblivious to AVFM’s various crimes, as I suspect even the tiniest amount of self-awareness would blow their minds so hard they’d go into a coma for 3 years.

But the rest of the page makes me think I might have fallen into Bizarro World in which AVFM agrees with David about someone being a dangerous misogynist. Aside from the able-ism at AVFM, even the commentariat seems to be of one accord with the Mammotheers about this Nolan guy. Is he the one to have finally reached the bottom of the barrel the manospherians have been scraping for so long??

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

Yeah he is rage quitting the site, that is what his latest manifesto post says.:

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5qHIbohZa8&w=420&h=315%5D

seraph4377
6 years ago

@ Miss Andry – I spent most of that article gobsmacked that AVFM was showing something approximating good sense…then I got to the end, and saw where he said he was saving this for the next time someone held up Petey Trademark as an example of an MRA.

Covering his ass, in other words.

I guess Petey is to the MRA’s what Fred Phelps was to the anti-gay movement: someone who takes their beliefs to their logical conclusion, and embarrasses them with how uncivilized they are.

Except for the legal chicanery. That’s a delusion all his own.

estraven
estraven
6 years ago

Wow, laughn, that is a piece of work. For one thing, I thought Germany was part of the west . . . when did that cease to be the case? And you gotta love the repeated “99.9% of women, as in ” who condone perjury, kidnapping, extortion, theft and child abuse.” Also, “criminal victimisation of tens of millions of men”? By whom? (Not that we don’t know the answer.)

How did anyone slander him? since when is using a person’s own words “slander”?

And on and on. There’s so much distortion, lying, made-up statistics, and heaven knows what all in there it’s impossible to fisk it.

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

Openly mocking men whose rights you have seen violated is a very dangerous game to play. One that I have recommended women and men cease and desist many times over.

THOSE are the people who are inciting violence. The ones mocking and laughing at and attacking men who have clearly been criminally victimised.

No woman or man would tolerate mocking and laughing at a woman who has been bashed and raped.

But 99.9%+ of western women and 99%+ of western men openly mock and laugh at men who have been horribly and disgracefully criminally victimised.

You can not do this for 30 years, as has been the case, and expect no adverse reaction from the young men.

Women, and men, have played with fire for a long time. I can assure you, that fire is about to burn far hotter than these fools imagined it might. The backlash that has been created these last 30 years or so is only about 5% underway at the moment.

This is how he ends it. DON’T YOU DARE LAUGH AT ME WAWA.

Perhaps it is this very article on WHTM that drove the poor lad to GO HIS OWN WAY
and if we are lucky that way will be off a cliff

sunnysombrera
6 years ago

I don’t know if this has already been posted but:

http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/9011/index.php&start=0#first_unread

In which he writes an open letter to men saying that because they didn’t support him in his Divorce Legal Services venture they are responsible for the suicide of Robin Williams, and the murder of women and children by angry ex husbands.

He also makes it crystal clear that he thinks the murder of women during divorce proceedings is justified.

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

@sunnysombrera He took that down too it seems. I think he is actually rage quitting the interwebs

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

I might be a little concerned if I was David Futrelle because he is really upset about being mocked and aside from the RationalWiki facebook people I don’t know of another site dedicated just to mocking these certifiable asshats

weirwoodtreehugger
6 years ago

Seraph,
Agreed. AVFM wasn’t disagreeing with any of the misogyny. They are just spooked that he’s being honest about how much he wants to commit violence.
I hope Nolan’s rage quitting of the internet isn’t an indication that he’s planning a mass murder.

sunnysombrera
6 years ago

laughnwitch : does that mean you can’t see his open letter? Because I can, and I can copypaste it here if you’re having trouble.

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

sunnysombrera please do thanks

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

Sunnysombrera I have it now thanks I was looking at the bottom post of his which was removed, I scrolled up and saw the rant

Miss Andry
6 years ago

@laughnwitch

I might be a little concerned if I was David Futrelle because he is really upset about being mocked and aside from the RationalWiki facebook people I don’t know of another site dedicated just to mocking these certifiable asshats

Not to blow my own trumpet or anything, but my relatively new blog (you can get there by clicking my user name I believe) works to do that for misogynists and homophobes. It’s not quite as satisfying as this blog but I’m calling it a close second 😀

Hey, I’ve already been threatened with death and legal action (neither of which have obviously happened). That counts for something, right? Right?

guest
guest
6 years ago

‘I shall exercise my right to refuse to participate in any public discussion as to the processes and activities being undertaken to secure the rights of men and boys and to re-introduce the rule of law to the lands known as Ireland and Australia.’

OMG no, don’t do that!

guest
guest
6 years ago

OK, and what is this ‘the lands known as’ thing?

laughnwitch (@laughnwitch)

Miss Andry I love it and I am sure you also helped awe this is so great. I am now following your blog. I feel something really good happened today, and someone who deserved a spanking got one hahaha