A dramatic reading of that terrible, terrible 4chan/#GamerGate crowdsourced book

Tion, child, GG was only and ever about misogyny and one man stalking and terrorising his ex, with the help of other misogynists. There was never anything about ethics in it. Only liars or the terminally deluded would claim otherwise.

That’s the other thing, isn’t it – Tion here pretending that the US = the world with its mass shootings. Nope.

As for someone taking one for the team, I can’t think of any incentive that would work for anyone. About the only thing that can be said for Tion is that he isn’t Owly or Meller.

Until the next massacre by a disgruntled male, when it’s as usual predictably too late already. Well, people like me do our best to try and make others see reason, but there’s only so much one can do, after all…

How come there were less mass murderes before the existence of porn, if porn somehow makes some men less inclined to violence? The realist position is that frustrated men will always react with tremendous rage and kill non-response femmes they can’t have, and that the only way to soothe this is to subsume their rage-wrath with sexually available decoys. The patenly unrealistic feminazi position is clearly that the issue isn’t porn or sex, but seriously stunted people doing bad things.

Which is really more politically unrealistic?

“Oops, there goes Tion’s entire loopy antifeminist argument.”

No, it supports it by confirming that heterosexual male sexual frustration is one of the root cause, if not root cause, of the anti-social heterosexual male violence, which manifests itself today, among other things, in Islamic terrorism. And by continuing to provoke such straight male sexual anger-rage by among other things, criticizing straight male sexual panaceas/placebos, feminazis risk becoming the collective Girl Who Played with Fire and/or Girl Who Kicked The Hornets Nest, i.e. She got burned, she got stung, but this time, she’s likely going to take the rest of Western civilization down with her.

To put it simply, just as the Western Establishment learned that criticizing Islam, rightly or wrongly, triggers Muslims into raging maniacs, and thus now largely refrains from criticizing Islam for better or worse, so too will the Western Establishment learn that the same thing will happen and is in fact already happening with what will be and is being perceived as the feminazi assault on straight male porn and it’s derivatives by the ever-growing number of straight male incels and PUA-haters.

Dear Tinfoil Tion,

I’m still waiting on my stats. If you would please post some numbers for me to crunch on your ‘statistically significant’ bit a few posts ago, it would be much appreciated.

Otherwise, I’ll be sadly inclined to believe that you don’t understand that words mean things.

Furthermore, would you care to elaborate on how the US is all of the world some more?

Sincerely,

A Stats Loving Contrapangloss

So you’re still saying men should be able to rape women without hindrance, aren’t you?

Why do you hate men so much, or think they’re all as obsessed with PENISSSSS as you are? What’s so precious about shoving your dick into someone else that it overrides any idea of that person having the right to make her own choice about who she wants to have sex with?

it’s a wonder you can find your ass with a flashlight in order to wipe it.

Of course, if he signs up to the Roosh school of PUA, he won’t need to.

@Tion:

No, it supports it by confirming that heterosexual male sexual frustration is one of the root cause, if not root cause, of the anti-social heterosexual male violence, which manifests itself today, among other things, in Islamic terrorism.

Except that Islamic countries top lists of country residents searching out pornographic material.

And Elliot Roger, the guy you want to pretend represents all mass shooters, had plenty of access to porn.

And even if Islamic terrorism, particularly represented by ISIS, was soley motivated by lack of sex, it is only an extremely small part of world-wide male violence.

Just give up, dude. Your pet theory is not supported in the slightest. Lowering the amount of fan service in your anime isn’t going to lead to global destruction.

Tion’s latest anti-muslim rant leads me to believe his “politics of realism” goes hand in hand with “race realism.”

Of course, if he signs up to the Roosh school of PUA, he won’t need to.

Or wash his hair, wipe his boogers, use deodorant, and get rid of smegma and/or toe jam, either.

You’d certainly be safer around the tiger than around our rapey little buddy here.

This is true. I would gladly scritch the tiger’s ears. Tion? Not with a 39 1/2 foot pole.

WEIRD.

Tion, those ISIS (Islamic) terrorists you keep invoking — they’re not frustrated because they have no women to sex with. They’ve reduced women to second-class citizens who don’t have a say in their own society. Maybe that kind of toxic masculinity is what drives some to violence — not lack of sex. Um, you don’t understand the culture enough to keep referencing it. Sorry.
(TRIGGER WARNING)
Errr, and invoking the fictitious character Lisbeth Salander? She scares you? She’s a rape victim who takes revenge on the man who victimizes her. In the context of the novels, why would you have a problem with that? He brutalizes her so badly that she has to take a shower to wash the blood off. Do you admire the man who raped her?
What kind of asshole uses that kind of character (Lisbeth) as a warning to women on what not to become? Ewwwwww, good god, man, your priorities are fucked. Your boner doesn’t dictate reality for the rest of us — thank fucking god.

Is a civilization that relies on the unquestioning of hardcore pornography, sexual violence and constant sublimation of all sorts of sexuality really worth it? Is it a civilization at all?

In my books, not at all. And if that motherfucker collapses tomorrow, well…bring it ON. I’m working on the replacement already.

Finally, why does everyone assume that I personally share the same views as the people I’m taking about? What is this, the tv series Hannibal?