Is your love life lacking acronyms and made-up words?
In love, as in every other aspect of life (except perhaps talking to cats), it pays to increase your word power. Happily for all of us I have discovered a wondrous Red Pill Glossary on Black Dragon Blog (tagline: “Love Women While Staying Free”), which includes a wide assortment of terms that will be new even to the most advanced Alpha.
Most would-be PUAs (Pickup Artists) can tell an AFC (Average Frustrated Chump) from a DHV (Demonstration of Higher Value). But here are few other acronyms you may not have encountered:
CTF – Cheating Time Frame. The amount of time you have installed in your brain before you will cheat on a monogamous partner. …
EFA – Early Frame Announcement. The strongly conveyed but unspoken overall message to a woman non-verbally conveying who you are and why you’re there. …LSNFTE – Long Soft Next For Temporary Exclusivity.
I didn’t make this one up, seriously. What all that apprently means:
A common occurrence with Alphas in nonmonogamous relationships where a woman leaves the Alpha, who will not give her monogamy, so she can get a traditional boyfriend or husband who will.
Huh. Maybe she’s leaving you because you’re the sort of person who goes around talking about CTF and LSNFTE, OK?
TEP – Three Exchange Process. Pitching a first date to a woman on the third or fourth email exchange with her on a dating site.
WHY DO YOU NEED AN ACRONYM FOR THIS? How many spammy messages are you sending out on OK Cupid anyway?
VYW – Very Young Woman, a woman between the age of consent (usually 18) and 23. VYW have the lowest ASD of any age group, by far.
Oh, whoops, I forgot: ASD is “Anti Slut Defense,” which Mr. Black Dragon defines as:
A condition created by societal programming experienced by women wherein they attempt to avoid sex, even if they want it, so as to not look or feel like a “slut” or “inappropriate” or not like “a lady”.
I think this is his complicated way of saying that no means yes.
There are three different types of VYW’s by the way. You can look them up yourself.
Now that you’ve mastered some of the most useful acronyms, let’s give acronyms a Hard Next and move onto actual words. And made-up words.
I might as well start with Hard Next, huh?
Hard Next – A permanent breakup. Where a man leaves a woman, never contacts her again, and literally never sees her again (or at least never again in a sexual context). …
This is not to be confused with a Soft Next, which is apparently a synonym for “acting like a douchebag.”
Soft Next – When a man removes a woman from his life for a short period of time, usually three to seven days, during which he completely ignores all communication from her, because of drama she gave him. At the end of the soft next, the relationship resumes as normal.
Or she tells him to go fuck himself because he’s being an immature asshole.
The Soft Next is not to be confused with the Stinky Next, which is when a man leaves a woman after letting out a fart so noxious that he’s too embarrassed to ever speak to her again.
Ok, I made that one up. But these are all real:
Betaization – The slow process by which a woman transforms a man she’s in a relationship with from an Alpha to a beta, usually by means of drama, demands, rules, sex (giving or withholding), or threats. Betaization is a completely natural part of a woman’s biological makeup … .
Comfort Bombardment – A process by which you get a woman comfortable about you after the first date is scheduled via online dating but prior to actually meeting her in real life. Comfort Bombardment raises the odds of sex considerably and reduces the odds of flaking. …
This is also useful if you’re planning to start a cult; you can use it alongside “love bombing.”
Disney – Any thought derived from societal programming that monogamy, child rearing, or traditional marriage is pleasant and/or permanent in the modern era. …
And for the fellas:
Guy-Disney – The incorrect thought men have that somewhere out there is a girl who will love you forever, never cheat on you, never get bored with you, and never break up with you.
This is not to be confused with:
Hanna-Barbera — In which someone plays a bongo drum very quickly every time you run.
Ok, I made that one up too.
There are more, but I think we’d probably do better just to make up some of our own.
Well, if he did, he wouldn’t be the first fuckwit to think that. My sister used to have an incredibly dense (but domineering) boyfriend who seriously believed that lesbians were lesbians because they were “hardcore”, i.e. sexually unsatisfiable by men. Well, yes, they are…but that’s not due to unusually high sexual demandingness, it’s due to sexual orientation. Which, to the fuckwit, was not a thing. He actually believed that lesbians were gay because no man had fucked them right!
That gender myopia thing is so incredibly stupid, not least because it assumes everyone of the same gender is attracted to the same thing!
I’m not even scared of heights, just looking at the overall state of that cliff and going “hmm, that doesn’t look particularly stable”.
Also, I’m sure that house is stunning (and the views couldn’t be beat!), but I’d have constant vertigo in it. Not for me, in other words…
You guys have got to stop making me make this confused frowny face, my mom told me it would stay that way.
I would have said that pretty much all women are unlikely to be satisfied by a man whose understanding of female sexuality is that poor.
I’m flaming petrified of heights. I couldn’t stay more than a few seconds at the wall – high and solid though it is – at whichever Yosemite lookout point it was.
LOL, I wasn’t thinking of “repellent personality traits that would put everyone off” so much as the idea that all women are attracted to Brad Pitt, or whoever the dude du jour is.
Probably they also believe in vaginal orgasms. Betcha…
I’m totally fine with glass elevators, glass bottomed rooms, and so on, so it’s not vertigo, I’m just remembering look out the window at some coastal castles and actually being able to see it eroding away under the building, and having custodians point out that, yep, if they don’t do extensive maintenance work it will eventually fall into the sea.
Living DIRECTLY ON THE BEACH is for betas.
That’s like pics of Dunwich, and how what little was left of the medieval port washed away over a few years at the turn of last century.
Does the design for that house even include curtains? Because hello, cliff or no cliff, I want privacy, thank you.
::dies::
pallygirl wins the thread. And the internets.
Thank you for my award. I assume it is a scented fucking candle.
But of course!
You’ll all be glad to know frothyragetroll has been put on moderation. All hail the Dark Lord!
1. Attention from women.
2. Bragging rights as they run back to their buddies and lie about “riling up the henhouse of feminists”, even though they got their asses and their faulty logic handed back to them on a platter. We’re just another field report that never happened.
3. They get to enact revenge fantasies against feminists in a totally safe way, by ringing the doorbell and running.
Wait, I thought he didn’t advocate cheating, being a morally upstanding right-winger and all.
I wouldn’t want to live in that glass house either. Not only would it be hell to heat, it would put a serious crimp in my stone-throwing lifestyle.
Oh, and this was a particularly choice bit of sophistry:
Translation: “I’ve heard your arguments somewhere before, but I have no idea how to refute them. So instead, I’ll call you a liberal again. Also, I have no idea what “cliche” means. It means unique, lived experience, right?”
Apparently, when debating trolls, you must only have brand new arguments that have never, ever been made before. If someone, somewhere, already said it, they cancel each other out and it doesn’t count.
I wonder if he singled out Lea because she mentioned she’s happily partnered?
I gave the pathetic PUA’s shit spittle as much thought as it deserves and constructed this response accordingly:
BWWWwwwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa!
*inhales*
-hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!
Kittenserf,
I know why they come here. Because we won’t go there. At least, not to beg them to be our lovers the way they claim we should. (I’m sure they get some drive-by ear beatings.) This is the most female attention they get. If they were so “alpha”, sexy and superior they would have women flocking to their websites. Women would seek them out and they wouldn’t be online trying to figure out some way to get sex from people who do not desire sex with them. They’d be too busy going out every night with a gaggle of adoring ladies to stay in and whine about how hard it is to get laid. Women aren’t chasing them down for their liquid fucking gold like they’re Lucky the Leprechaun. They are not magically delicious and they know it. Otherwise, why turn to these transparent grifters for “romantic” advice?
I know I’m late but trolly reminded me of this pic for some odd reason O.o :
http://i.imgur.com/tfcpDM2.jpg
From what I can gather, he doesn’t actually think cheating is morally wrong. He seems to think it’s a real alpha male will always inevitably cheat. He declares that PUAs should not enter into monogamous relationships in the first place but should instead only be in poly or open relationships. I mean, there’s nothing wrong with preferring a non-monogamous relationship. But I fail to see how PUA tactics will get you there. Open or poly relationships are only going to be successful if everyone is on board. Tricking or pressuring someone prefers monogamy into one does not work. I’m also not sure how Black Dragon and his disciples think they’re going find women who are politically conservative and into poly or open relationships. That’s got to be quite a unicorn. All the women I’ve known who are down with open relationships are progressives who wouldn’t touch a right wing PUA with a ten foot pole.
I think I might have something stuck in moderation.
So, that’s the real name of The Game, then? It’s Nicky-Nicky-Nine-Doors?
Suddenly, it all makes sense… >light dawns<
Um
Nice to see you’re above ad hom/personal attacks.
Also, are you getting paid every time you say “cliché”? Because shit, dude, I will buy you a thesaurus if you need one that badly.
Drat, I’m missing so many of the fun trolls these days. Too bad PUA’s gone, I would have loved to hear him explain how feminists, the proponents of birth control and female sexuality/empowerment, are to blame for telling women they are awful for having sex. Or how one can differentiate a real “no” from a “no” caused by cultural pressure. Do PUAs get special glasses that let them see “the slut inside?”
Actually, probably… and it’s probably a cheap pair of goggles with a cartoon naked woman taped to the lenses. That’d explain quite a lot.
You know what – I don’t give a shit why a woman is saying “No”. I don’t care whether it’s because she feels pressured by society not to have sex before the nth date. Feeling pressured by society not to have sex before the nth date and therefore feeling uncomfortable with having sex on the current (<nth) date is a perfectly good reason not to have sex. She doesn't need to be "liberated" from how she feels about societal pressures or to have her "inner slut" revealed. She needs you to respect her "no", you fucking creep!