By all rights, the furor over rocket scientist Matt Taylor’s cheesecake shirt should have died down by now. After being chided earlier this week for marring the celebration over the landing of a space probe ON A GODDAMNED COMET by doing interviews in a tacky shirt covered with half-naked ladies, Taylor offered a brief but heartfelt apology. You would have thought we’d all be able to move on.
Not so fast. Because these days apparently no controversy can ever be over as long as it serves someone’s interest to keep it going. And so a loose but very familiar coalition of reactionaries and antifeminists and angry techies have started flogging an amorphous cause they call #Shirtgate or, more popularly, #Shirtstorm, purporting to be outraged that Taylor was “humiliated” into apologizing.
So many of the angriest voices in this, er, conversation are #GamerGaters it looks a lot like a sequel. Call it GamerGate Part Two: The Straw Graspening. And it’s not just me making the connection: #GamerGaters and #Shirtstormers, often one and the same, are making the connection:
So radical #shirtstorm SJW have attacked my games my #gamergate revolt and now they are attacking #science. Am i allowed to be mad ?
— Anti-ProcrusteanBed ☀️🏴 (@antiprocrustes) November 16, 2014
I am a man. I'm sick of hearing that because of my gender, my opinions don't count and sexism towards me isn't real. #GamerGate #shirtstorm
— Lord Inquisitor Ineptus Astartes (@AstartesIneptus) November 16, 2014
https://twitter.com/Scrumpmonkey/status/533409838207078400
Heck, our old friend Milo is making the connection:
Note to those infuriated by poor Dr Matt Taylor and #shirtstorm: this is what #GamerGate has been fighting against. Are you getting it yet?
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) November 15, 2014
Oh, it’s a veritable #GamerGate Old Home Week! GG mainstays Thunderf00t and Mundane Matt have rushed out videos about The Shirt.
People are making graphics covered with hard-to-read text:
There are giant complicated conspiracy theory graphics covered with red lines and angry red text. This one notes that Chris Plante, who wrote an article criticizing Taylor’s shirt, also wrote one of the now-notorious “Gamers are Dead” pieces.
https://twitter.com/Reyeko_/status/533482641774100480
Apparently there were a few dudes who were none too pleased with Plante’s story on The Shirt:
https://twitter.com/plante/status/533244307105648640
#Shirtstormers wrote angry “letters” in too-small-type. (Click here for larger, more readable version and here for one with angry graphics, too.)
https://twitter.com/Alpha_duck1/status/533698520100777984
While others tried to draw a parallel between Taylor’s alleged “humiliation” and … rape.
#shirtgate #SupportMattTaylor #GamerGate pic.twitter.com/L8s1GrOow7
— Mark 🐸 🗑 Samenfink (@MSamenfink) November 16, 2014
#ShirtStorm #shirtgate Matthew 7:1 pic.twitter.com/bRXr7bA1Si
— Be Just & Fear Not | Let None Survive (@SuperNerdMike) November 16, 2014
Neo-reactionaries and “Dark Enlightenment” types see opportunity in the #Shirtstorm hashtag.
https://twitter.com/voxday/status/533336186535030784
Don't judge me because of what I'm wearing – unless I'm a guy. Then you can define my personality and try to ruin my life. #shirtgate #NRx
— VDARE (@vdare) November 15, 2014
https://twitter.com/antidemblog/status/533341319184531456
https://twitter.com/BernardChapin/status/533628518077186049
As do MRAs:
https://twitter.com/deanesmay/status/533758421158227969
As does this familiar name:
Women do not face a hostile climate in science. And they can handle seeing a guy in an edgy shirt. #GamerGate https://t.co/8gvTyo0bg6
— Christina Hoff Sommers (@CHSommers) November 16, 2014
They’re all there, all hoping to turn a debate over a shirt into another endless internet Benghazi.
wwth:
Yes, this.
And I don’t think having a bare minimum of “doesn’t actively try to harm women and rollback every hard-fought feminist gain” in order to be called a feminist is unreasonable.
My oath, I’m glad I slept late and missed this clusterfuck of pretending rabid anti-feminist (which is, bluntly, anti-women ) people are really feminists deep down inside. Fuck that shit.
I blame part of that on the ‘Do you believe in equality for men and women? Great, you’re a feminist!’ crap that is still being used as a talking point. No one ever seems to get around to defining exactly what ‘equality’ means. I’ve met plenty of people whose idea of ‘equality’ is really crappy.
And don’t get me started on what people have done with postmodernism. I studied postmodernism. What people do with it these days… ugh.
Right now postmodernism seems to be mostly “Do you want to assert a belief that makes no damn sense at all? Just throw a vague reference to Foucault in there and yay, postmodernism!”
Minds made of swiss cheese, I swear.
@cassandrakitty, this is why I now won’t even touch it with a thirty-foot pole.
I, also, would not touch swiss cheese with a ten foot pole. Team cheddar!
I love how the conviction in that @Alpha_duck1 letter is so strong that he signs with no name but as being angry and concerned. Wiping away these douche bags’ tears must be making facial tissue companies a lot of money.
@kirbywarp
Oh oh oh oh oh oh!
“Pacific Rim”
This. From a dude who believes himself an ally. What. The. Fuck.
Thanks for ‘splainin yet again, GOM.
This looks suspiciously like the guy getting the girl to me.
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140405165007/pacificrim/images/e/ea/Mako_and_Raleigh_rescued.jpg
I like Stephanie Zvan’s response to all the “it’s just a shirt” bullshit.
~*~*~*~*~*~
LordCrowstaff sez:
First, the presumption of innocence doesn’t apply outside of criminal prosecutions. Second, this is just how contracts work: you agree to behave a certain way (or provide something) in return for some kind of access/compensation. Violate the contract and compensation can be revoked. Or do you think software companies are violating due process when they require you to click “yes” to their EULA before you can use their product?
Puddlegum:
Yes, one can have beliefs that are feminist without being a feminist. That was the point. As I said, I don’t consider Sommers a feminist, a statement that CassandraKitty ignored. And neither did Grumpy Old Man, which was also ignored. CassandraKitty said prove she has any basic feminist beliefs — not actions. The belief that women should have equality to work and be professors is a basic feminist belief and a relatively new one in our lifetimes. (And it’s a belief that is still often challenged, including by legislators — it’s interesting how quickly we’ve taken it for granted and believe that it’s safe when it is constantly being threatened. Women professors are still less likely to be hired, promoted, granted tenure and make it into administration than male professors, for example.) That Sommers has stated that she believes that women should be equal under the law is also a feminist belief. Sommers can in fact have feminist beliefs while not being a feminist and in her particular case, working against feminist efforts.
Feminism is an idea that has lead to several movements at different times. It is not limited to one movement. A person can be a feminist and believe in the idea without also being an activist. A person can be a feminist and not want to call herself a feminist. Women of color often do not like to be called feminists or identify with the feminist movement because of the racism they experienced from white feminists in the past and because they feel feminist activism is still dominated by those white women. Young women believe in the equality of women, but are reluctant to call themselves feminists because they believe feminists are only a particular group that hates men and promote division in their actions. Conservative women may believe in the equality of women but disagree that certain problems of discrimination exist or require legal action.
Words are actions, and while actions are certainly an indicator of things, there is the issue of how and who judges the actions. When Emma Watson spoke for the HeForShe program, many felt she was a feminist helping the call to action. Others think the HeForShe program and Watson’s speech were damaging to feminism, reinforcing that men should decide what constitutes sexism for other men, etc. There are some black people, conservatives and liberals among them, who believe in respectability politics as a strategy for activism — that black people should not use violence, be model citizens, invest in education, etc., and use some strategies that worked for them somewhat in the 1960’s. There are other black people who believe that’s just a form of racism and victim blaming, and other strategies are needed that are angrier, more aggressive or confronting, etc. The Catholic Church says Catholics should not use birth control to be Catholics. Ninety-eight percent of them take the action of using birth control and still consider themselves to be Catholics.
Black conservatives don’t have to join the KKK. They can just join the Republican party (which has some members and politicians who were in the KKK or have had white nationalists on their staff, as we read in the news.) Those black conservatives may be firmly against racism and believe in equality but also work in and support a political party aggressively working against racial equality — actions which the black conservative may not see as doing that. If a white liberal tells the black conservative that he’s a self-hating racist, which is the bigoted action — the black conservative working against legal equality protections or the white man saying he’ll define racism for the black man? Both are, basically, at least perhaps in our judgments.
So, while I agree that I don’t find Sommers to be a feminist, in my opinion, and to be, in fact, a damaging activist against feminism, that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have feminist beliefs at all. Nor does it mean that people who are actively feminist don’t have some beliefs that are anti-feminist, consciously or unconsciously. It does not mean that these situations are always cut and dried and simplified, which is what Grumpy was wondering about.
Take Taylor and his shirt. I would assume, if you asked everyone in that agency if they are feminists, that most of them would say yes, they were, including Taylor. And yet, Taylor committed a sexist action. Others committed a sexist action not making him change the shirt. Women were discriminated against into keeping quiet about the shirt by sexism — they couldn’t be activists. The female reporter who interviewed Taylor didn’t start screaming into her microphone about his sexist shirt.
So by their actions, ye shall know them, doesn’t work very practically in many circumstances, or at least not in a simplified manner. And people’s awareness of the racism, sexism, etc. we’re all steeped in can change, as I’m sure that it’s done for Taylor. Sommers has obviously chosen a different path — but even she has feminist beliefs, and is marked by the advancement of the idea of feminism from the past. And that’s a good thing for feminist efforts, even if Sommers is not. There’s nothing wrong with looking at that contradiction — that she holds feminist beliefs and yet works against feminism as her career. We’re not going to be able to do much about what she’s trying to sell if we don’t look at it and consider where it comes from.
For the love of little apples, learn to edit.
Splaining–not just for dudes!
I know less in general about Sommers than, say, Anne Coulter, who has definitely been a terrible, terrible person since she outed gay schoolmates at Dartmouth in her conservative school paper. That said, why would I care about Sommer’s supposed unvoiced inner thoughts? An unfortunate side effect of this blog is I’ve seen way too much of Sommer’s dreary infuriating conservative shilling. That’s all she is, a simple standard issue pseudo-academic think tank conservative shill. Everything she vomits out is about playing to a single audience that eats up her every effort to vilify and straw-man progressives, who she paints as misguided, if not dangerous, revolutionaries who are ruining all of Western society. Unfortunately for the many passionate male anti-feminists of the manosphere, only women get this sort of paid gig. Sorry mangry fellas.
Of course it’s unlikely that a propagandist believes all the bullshit they say, but they sure as hell love the effects their bullshit has on people. She’s an anti-feminist who who only pretends that her anti-feminism is “true feminism” in order to torpedo all sorts of actual feminist thought. AKA not a feminist. Believing women can go to universities and be academics doesn’t make you a feminist, it just means you aren’t a comically out of touch with reality reactionary. Sommers is a very much in touch with reality reactionary, but, again, she’s not a feminist.
If someone decides to wax pedantic about how Coulter is also expressing feminist ideas on a deep spiritual level or whatever I may end up turning to drink.
Yeah, but see, with Sommers we have a pattern of actions. I think that once someone has made a career out of tearing down feminism and feminist gains, then we can pretty safely say that person is not a feminist.
I mean, really, is it Opposite Day and nobody told me?
We don’t know if Sommers has feminist beliefs or not because what she believa really doesn’t matter, it’s her actions -plural- that really define her. And, no, having somebody actively trying to destroy feminism and feminist gains is not a good thing for feminist efforts. Particularly if, like Sommers, they are positioning themselves as the “real feminists” and feminists as “fake feminists” who hate men. And what do you mean “where it comes from?” Are you saying Sommers is a creation of feminism?
I mean, really, is it Opposite Day?
Fuck it, I’m going out for a drink anyway. Or I’m going to try, depends if I can find a place with people I know. If I’m successful, I’m getting a cider, hopefully Sommersby or Magner. What’s your poison?
@ sparky
My theory is still that, for some unknown reason, someone slipped acid into my morning beverage. Perhaps this happened to you too? It appears to have happened to many of us, actually.
I have a nice bottle of sake in the fridge but honestly, if this keeps up I think I’m going to need something stronger.
Well, in my time lurking here I’ve seen a lot of splain-y teal deers.
But I think this should count as a splain-y teal dicraeosaurus.
Seriously, I know that NaNoWriMo is going on, but that doesn’t mean you should try for novella length posts.
Vodka for me. Straight.
Bloody hell, this might be the most fucked-up thread I’ve ever been in here.
This may indeed be the first time we’ve reached our weekly quotas for both splaining and pedantry on Monday.
Exactly. And that, I suspect, is where our trolly interlocutor falls on his ass. Assuming that this even happened (and for the record, I deeply doubt it), why be offended by being told not to do something you have no intention of doing anyway? Did he get this touchy when the Driver’s Ed instructor told him to stay between the lines, keep to his lane, and obey the road signs? Do “Don’t Drink and Drive” PSAs offend him this much, too? If he owns a gun, did he bellyache about having to get a hunting licence and firearms registration? And so on.
There’s a great meme making the rounds of Facebook lately: If you’re sitting in a deck chair beside a pool, and the lifeguard orders some rowdy kids nearby not to horse around, do you take offence? Because this is what that amounts to. The huffy-defensive “Not All Men/Help, Help, I’m Being Repressed” reaction is pointless and melodramatic.
cassandrakitty: That’s a bummer. I thought an acid trip would be a little more interesting, y’know?
I’m having a whiskey and coke.