Very cool: We humans have landed a space probe on a goddamned comet!
Not cool: when one European Space Agency dude gave an interview about the landing, he was wearing a shirt festooned with cheesecake images of scantily clad women.
Even less cool: when Atlantic magazine science writer Rose Eveleth pointed out that this choice of attire doesn’t exactly broadcast the message that women (other than scantily clad ones) are welcome in STEM, she received a torrent of abuse from angry Twitter dudes, including requests for her to kill herself.
The cherry atop this crap sundae? The nastiest Twitterer of the bunch, who not only went after Eveleth but her defenders as well, is a regular contributor to A Voice for Men.
The whole thing started off with a couple of tweets from Eveleth about the shirt. Here’s one of them:
https://twitter.com/roseveleth/status/532538957490561024
After this, the deluge: And those are just some of the harassing tweets Eveleth retweeted. (I’ve highlighted the explicit death wishes for your convenience.)
You’ll notice that one of the death wishes (“Please kill yourself”) comes from a fellow named Christopher Cantwell.
If you take a look at his Twitter profile, you’ll see that this self-described “Anarchist, Atheist, Asshole” and Bitcoin fan had similar advice for a number of others who found the shirt troubling.
To wit:
Cantwell has also been sharing some of his charming thoughts about women in STEM.
So how does A Voice for Men respond to this sort of behavior by one of their regular contributors? They repost his blog entry on the, er, controversy, deriding concerns about the shirt as “feminist hysteria” and arguing that the real reason more women aren’t in STEM fields is that, well, they’re just not as smart as he is.
No, really:
The reason you don’t see women in highly technical fields nearly as often as you see men is not because of sexism. It certainly isn’t because of Matt Taylor’s shirt. You can’t even blame this on education anymore, since more women attend college than men. The issue at hand is one of simple aptitude and the choices people make as a result of that aptitude.
You gals remember choices, right? I seem to recall you caring about those things once upon a time.
If you think about it, this makes a lot of sense. A society needs leaders and followers. In men, we see very high IQs figuring things out and working out these complex ideas. They document them in easy-to-understand ways for those of lesser intelligence in society and make technology available to all of us. We also see these low IQs, which are more suited to, say, mining the resources that this technology requires and operating the machines the geniuses designed. Women, traditionally carrying the role of raising children and supporting the men who designed and operated the machinery, needed to be somewhere in the middle. They couldn’t well manage the many complex tasks their role in society required of them without being smarter than the worker drones, but there wasn’t any need for them to be super geniuses who could land spacecraft on comets hundreds of millions of miles away either. …
For those of us at the upper end of the IQ spectrum, we are sentenced to a lifetime of watching stupidity like this run rampant. We will watch in horror for all of eternity as idiots dominate the headlines with their hysteria, responsibility avoidance, and demands for state privilege disguised as “equality.” We’ll see brilliant men like Matt Taylor smeared as being the worst type of bigot, simply because he’s smarter than the people who accuse him.
Yeah, it’s hard to imagine why anyone would complain about sexism in STEM.
The first time I walked into a physics class, I realized I was one of two women, and most of the men were a year younger than me (I was a biology student taking physics for a well-rounded science background–most of the guys were potential physics majors). My first thought was, “Oh, God. I can’t let these guys do better than me.” Because I felt like it was up to me and the other women alone to hold up the honor of women in physics.
It was stressful, and even though I kicked ass in that class, I still am glad I didn’t have to fight that my whole way through. I don’t blame any women who decide that much as they might like the field, they don’t always want to be The Only One.
And you know? I didn’t experience anything I’d call misogyny in that class–all the guys were nice, and the teacher called Emmy Noether his favorite physicist on the first day. Imagine what it would be like with a different mix of people. Or worse–when my dad was in college, the physics building didn’t even have women’s restrooms.
Ticks “No,no, you, the regular, are actually the troll” box on troll bingo card. Wonders if it’s worth scrolling up to look at all of troll’s comments in attempt to get full house.
i would actually be really interested in an ethnographic study of women in all walks of life to find out if they ever wanted to be a scientist, and if so what happened to that, if not why not. i don’t think one has been done, and i’m not in a position to do that atm but really want to see what results would come up. the closest i’ve seen is one where women who stared out in stem programs and quit were asked why they quit (spoiler alert: it was the misogyny).
As an inferior woman with an inferior psychology degree, I concur. Anecdotes do not equal data is one of the first things students in the social sciences learn.
Even if you wanted to go by anecdotal data, who are you going to listen to? The woman who says “I feel unwelcome in this field,” or the dude that says “nah, nah, women are so welcome in this field!”
Ghostiger’s little “everyone wanted to be friends with the few women in the field” tickles me. I’m guessing the women didn’t see the constant attention as “wanting to be friends.”
Policy of Madness:
Blockquote mammoth… o/
weirwoodtreehugger – Well thanks for pointing out the flaws in my comment here (not sarcasm). I was lazy.
First of all, my example of the shirt does apply because past history and probability of that shirt being worn by women doesn’t change the fact that it is an equivalent scenario: the environment and context of an event are not part of that event’s properties (good or bad is an intensive property, as it does not depend on the size of the system: how many women wear a shirt depicting scantly clad men). Example: A white man attacking a black man is as wrong as a black man attacking a white man, regardless of the years black people spent oppressed or how likely both are. Pure analytic reasoning.
My point is not the shirt, and I think that those threats made towards those that criticized it are very wrong. My point is that people can’t blame their life choices on anyone else. You studied a STEM because you wanted to, despite how “inviting” the people or the field was, right? Your case is the perfect example. And you should know that it is in everybody’s best interest to have more women in STEM fields. In fact I bet you met very nice people there.
I do not act as if I have the intellectual superiority here, I thought I was the only one in STEM simply because everyone here speaks based on stereotypes about STEM and men in general, actually perpetuating the myth STEM seem being uninviting by how they speak about it (girls will hear that and avoid the field without ever hearing insider’s opinions), you are the first one to actually mention that you also have experience in the field.
You are well aware of the different currents in feminism, I assume. Again, my gender does not affect the quality of my reasoning behind it (that’s sexist!) and the people that have a different opinion than the one in this comments section.
Also I am here the only one that does not have an aggressive tone. It is a simple question of maturity and being able to discuss sensitive subjects without hating (at least you seemed to try to contain yours and actually talk).
In Delusions of Gender, Cordelia Fine writes about a study conducted on college math students. Female students performed less well on a math test when they were asked to write down their name and gender on the test paper than females students who were just asked to write down their names. Even if a woman doesn’t think “girls can’t do math” on a conscious level, the stereotype seeps in.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be an astronaut. Or at least an astronomer. But I grew up thinking I was better at English than math and science. It wasn’t until I was about 20 years old that I looked back at my academic performance over the years and realized the opposite is true. I’m actually far better at science than I am at English. I didn’t realize I was good at science until I took a biology class with my friend who was majoring in the subject and I outperformed her without even studying very hard. When I was 22, my parents divorced and sold the house. While I was cleaning out my bedroom I found a certificate that said I had come in second in a math competition in 7th grade. I don’t even remember this happening. I’ve searched my brain and still can’t remember. I often regret not majoring in physics or biology. By the time I had my epiphany I was a junior and had completed too much of my psych major to turn back. Changing majors would have required an extra year of school that I couldn’t afford.
I grew up in a progressive city with progressive parents who encouraged both my scientific and artistic interests. Nobody ever told me that girls can’t grow up to be scientists. Still, the attitude seeped in.
This comment section seems very uninviting, I hope you’ll see the irony in that.
Have to disagree with you, right there, ghostiger. If I jump on you, and start pushing on your chest hard enough to move your sternum (and possibly break ribs) it’s a very bad thing. Unless, of course, your heart has stopped beating and I’m doing CPR. See how context works, there? In the first scenario, I’d rightfully be charged with assault. In the second, I’m trying to save your life.
and yet your position is that the shirt is actually fine. if x is exactly as wrong as y (which i am not agreeing with, but for the sake of argument let’s go with this) it does not then follow that y is actually a-ok.
your logic is terrifically bad here. do you even see how bad it is?
so, when stem people say that stem is misogynist, and you believe that it isn’t, your response is not to say, wow, I maybe need to think this over a bit more. instead you assume that they are not actually stem people.
when evidence doesn’t match your presumption, you question the evidence not your presumption. that’s not very stem.
true. the quality of your reasoning is shit regardless of your gender.
http://i.imgur.com/wUwIteR.gif
Shut up, Ghostiger.
The refusal* to understand the concept of “context” really comes out when they start complaining about how feminist women wearing scanty clothes to protest against slut-shaming, rape culture, and purity myths means that sexualized fictional characters are a-okay all the time every time.
*Because I don’t believe they are actually that dense about social norms.
Troll is shocked (shocked I tell you!) to find that people (women, even) disagree with him. Gee, I wonder how often he’s dictated reality to women in real life; here’s a hint buddy, they gave up listening and were just nodding politely so you’d finish blathering and go away.
Do any of these look familiar:
http://the-toast.net/2014/06/23/women-listening-men-art-history/
Thanks for your story, but it doesn’t have any mention of anyone being rude or uninviting to you, it is a matter of self-discovery (I’ve also had self-discovery issues). Also, I don’t know how long ago was your story, but in my case, when I entered college 5 years ago, we were 50 men in the classroom and not a single woman, bigoted students used to verbally harass pretty girls (most of us hated them and blame them for the lack of women scientists). But now, after 5 years that has changed, one third of students are women and assholes keep their mouths shut. Progress has been made and those girls that decided to enter a STEM are what helped to fight the sexism of a few: sheer numbers. The rest of us have been nice to girls all our lives and don’t like to be judged by the crimes of others.
I was actually encouraging women to get in STEM, they seem to be better students. But what do I know? I am just a terrible person for being a man and having a different opinion.
you know who refers to “maturity” all the time?
people who are not mature, but think they are.
yep
The environment and the context are important. When discussing a social phenomenon (women and our allies being offended by a shirt depicting women in a sexualized way) the culture that phenomenon takes place in is important. We are not discussing a physics problem. We are discussing sexism. You clearly do not know the first thing about sociology, psychology or history. Being good at the “hard” sciences does not confer expertise in unrelated fields on you. When you analyze whether or not a shirt is sexist or contributes to the culture of sexism, you must analyze the context the shirt is worn in. You’re a bit out of your depth here and you don’t even seem to realize it because you have a massive ego.
It appears that you haven’t read the whole thread. Lots of women commenting here have spoken of their experiences in STEM already. But you couldn’t resist marching in here and pretending you know better than everyone else could you?
By the way, you claiming that sexism in STEM is a myth. Do you have any actual evidence of this? Anything other than your own personal observations? You see, men often don’t notice misogyny because you don’t experience it. If your mighty STEM brain knew the first thing about how the human brain works, you’d realize that our perceptions are not unbiased and they don’t always reflect objective reality. This is why a single anecdote is not data. Your claim that because you don’t see sexism at your university that means it doesn’t exist doesn’t hold up to any scrutiny at all.
Strange. I experienced quite the opposite, but then again I wasn’t mansplaining to the regulars. I actually even lurked to not make false assumptions about them or the topic in the first place.
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
wordsp1nner – I would love to reverse the roles in those paintings and see how the world reacts.
And you are also claiming that other people have no influence on thise choices, that witnessing the sexism meted out on other women would not discourage a woman from subjecting herself to that sexism. Damn, you’re such a fool, it’s embarrassing.
Presumably, you think that death and rape threats, doxxing and harrassment, aren’t currently discouraging women from going into Games Design, right? I mean, hey, why would that make any girl or woman decide to that her love of programming wasn’t worth the sacrifice?
Empathy? You fail at it.
News flash: humans aren’t Vulcans.
Still, thanks for the lulz. Your attempt to use concepts like “reason” and “logic” against people who are much better than you at both is pretty entertaining.
Ah, poppet, are you talking to those straw feminists in your head again?