Categories
#gamergate 4chan a woman is always to blame anti-Semitism antifeminism conspiracy theory creepy doubling down emotional abuse empathy deficit entitled babies evil sexy ladies gamebros irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny playing the victim post contains sarcasm zoe quinn

Actually, it's about Zoe Quinn. The midwife of #GamerGate has no regrets.

ZoeQuinnPS

Do you remember when #GamerGate was young? You know, back before #NotYourShield and Vivian James and bizarrely complicated conspiracy theories involving Gawker, Weird Twitter and some sort of international Jewish conspiracy?

Remember when #GamerGate was still called #BurgersAndFries, and the angry gamebro army was focused on the real enemy of all that is good and true – a young game designer by the name of Zoe Quinn?

If you’ve been feeling nostalgic for those good old days, you’re in luck. A sprawling blog post by a female friend of Quinn’s obsessive, accusatory ex-boyfriend Eron Gjoni takes us back to the dog days of August when his even more sprawling thezoepost was unleashed upon the world.

Rachel M, who describes herself as an “engineer, designer, accidental writer,” recalls the months she spent with Gjoni as he began to process his breakup with Quinn and marshal his arguments against her. She was there when he posted thezoepost, making her a sort of midwife of what became #GamerGate.

It’s no secret whose side of this controversy she’s on. Her depictions of Gjoni are written with affection and indulgence; her portrayal of Quinn is brutal and a step or two beyond unfair. When Rachel M pretends for a moment that she’s not “someone with an ax to grind against Zoe,” that’s because her little hatchet is already buried in Quinn’s back.

If there is a point to GamerGate Launched in My Apartment, and, Internet, I’m Sorry (Not that sorry) beyond making Gjoni look angelic and Quinn look like a demon, I’m not sure what it is.

After presenting us with a series of uninteresting and unnecessary details of her own life, Rachel M repeats a number of largely discredited myths about Quinn and even seems to have made up a new myth of her own, accusing Quinn of “telling Eron she believed I was lying about my PTSD” in an online chat.

Never mind that the chat log itself, which Gjoni pasted into his zoepost, and which Rachel M also pasted into an earlier post of her own, suggests that Quinn was dubious not about Rachel M’s medical diagnoses but about Rachel’s intentions towards her then-boyfriend.

As I searched through the screenshots on Eron’s site to see if Rachel M’s recollections of this exchange matched the evidence, I was struck again by the utter surreality of #BurgersAndFries and its successor #GamerGate.

Because, the thing is, I don’t want to be reading these chat logs. I shouldn’t be reading these chat logs. These are private moments between two people at a vulnerable moment in both of their lives. They shouldn’t have been posted on the internet in an act of petty revenge against an ex-girlfriend. They shouldnt’ be on the internet at all.

The fact that the details of Zoe Quinn and Eron Gjoni’s sex lives and their messy breakup are so central to the conflicts now roiling the video game world that I have to turn to these screenshots to fact check this post is weird and wrong and rather depressing. Zoe Quinn isn’t the president, caught pantsless in flagrante delicto with a Haliburton lobbyist. She’s a video game developer, and the details of her sexual history are none of our fucking  business.

None of this matters much to Rachel M, who seems to have become trapped in Gjoni’s reality distortion field, borrowing some of his narcissism for herself. She describes Gjoni’s decision to “go public” with the ugly details of his breakup with Quinn and her various alleged infidelities and lies:

Eron talked about going public. He talked about panic, about awareness, about making sure that people knew what they were getting into, about taking a hit – there’d be a hit, for speaking publicly against a woman in any field, but especially against a woman with Zoe’s position and friends in progressive indie gaming – for the good of all, eventually.

This is so perverse and backwards and wrong it’s hard not to wonder if Gj himself wrote it.

He talked about evaluating the risk to his current job, his future jobs, his family, himself. You know, whether he’d get stalked or murdered for this. He talked about the danger to Zoe, about how he could minimize personal harm toward her, whether he could effectively defray harassment towards her.

Well, he did a bangup job of that, huh?

He settled on a few plans toward that end, and decided the risk to himself was worth it. Even the total loss cases for him still meant greater than zero public knowledge about Zoe’s manipulative behavior, her role as an abuser, and the number of lies she’d told. Anything was better than the way it was now.

Really? Because for a lot of people, not just Quinn, things have gotten a lot worse since Gjoni launched his attack against his ex.

Rachel M is actually quite aware of this; indeed, she notes explicitly that the movement that was born out of Gjoni’s long post has directed much of its fury towards women.

Zoe received floods of hate and threats within hours of the post going live. Anita Sarkeesian, a feminist media critic, was forced to cancel a speech at USU after receiving death threats referencing the École Polytechnique Massacre … Brianna Wu, Liana K, and anyone who identifies as a feminist within gaming — they’ve been getting smeared.

Women in games, creators and critics alike, are working through a tide of hate that’s reached the front page of the New York Times. Each new story makes me a little sicker.

Yet somehow she’s still “not that sorry” she helped Gjoni to launch the movement that caused all this. She thinks it’s all somehow … good for women. Because people now know what she thinks is the truth about Zoe Quinn. She ends her post with these bizarre assertions:

I want more women in tech and media, at all levels—in development, in journalism, in the games and books and comics themselves.

I want those women to be as safe, respected, creative, and supported as any man, and I do not want them unprepared in an industry with Zoe Quinn.

And this, I guess, is how someone who helped Gjoni to usher in a hateful, spiteful, reactionary “movement” that has left numerous women fearing for their lives convinces herself that she’s on the side of the angels after all.

EDIT: I corrected Rachel M’s name. No idea why my brain turned her name into Sarah.

424 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sylviaplant
sylviaplant
10 years ago

@libarbarian: Zoe Quinn is not on trial. She’s not the one who mobilized an internet hate mob. The truth isn’t “somewhere in the middle,” you sophist nematode.

JQ
JQ
10 years ago

Who gives a fuck if Zoe’s action were dark gray? This shit should not happen to bad people or good people. The only allegation I’ve seen that in any way would match the scale of what happened to her (Not saying that the two wrongs would justify each other, just that it actually would make it a real case of ‘well there’s terrible behavior on both sides’) is the one that she killed a dude, but that one seems to carry literally no weight at all so fuckit.

The implication behind “I’m not saying she deserved it, but…” is usually “but I am saying she deserved it more than other, better people” and it’s one that pairs with viewing violence against women as immutable. As long it’s happening to people who you can convince yourself to see as immoral, it’s an issue that doesn’t affect “good” people and you can just shove it to the back of your mind. Put another way, so many people who are saying “She didn’t deserve it but she did do x” are trying to equate it to “well, I wish smoking didn’t cause cancer but that’s the way it is.”

But human behavior isn’t immutable, and even setting aside the fact that the behavior restrictions that women get told to use to avoid violence A) are so confining that you’d hardly be living if you followed all of them and B) don’t even work, if you’re really sincere about saying things like this shouldn’t happen to people, focus on making those things not happen at all. Talking about Zoe’s “share of the blame” is just a way to excuse not dealing with the actual problem. So that’s half of it.

The other half of why no one here cares if the allegations against her are true, frankly, is that almost no Gaters care whether they’re true. They want them to be true and so they declare that they’re true and call that proof.

ark
ark
10 years ago

> Context is a thing, people. When an abuser threatens to kill themselves if you leave or if you call the police, that is manipulation.

So ZQ is manipulative, then? Because that’s what she allegedly did, to stop Eron from leaving her?

The suicidal threats happened long before the internet found out, it was because he was trying to break up with her.

Binjabreel
Binjabreel
10 years ago

I’ve never been in an abusive relationship either, but I watched a good friend slowly become one over the course of a few years (and we are no longer friends) and I went to school for counseling so…

One refrain I hear over and over from abusers is that they’re actually the victims of abuse. And usually with so little self awareness that they will describe to you scenes wherein they are clearly the abuser and say, “see how bad that was for me?” Actual thing I’ve heard “she’s an abuser because this one time I backed her into a corner yelling at her during a fight she tried to push me away!”

So, keeping in mind that she could very well be emotionally abusive, pardon me if I give ol’ Gjoni some serious fucking side eye anyway.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
10 years ago

I don’t believe that EG is a reliable narrator, not even slightly. But that’s actually irrelevant, because his version of events could be 100% accurate, and his interpretation thereof could be 100% accurate, and that wouldn’t make his own actions remotely defensible. His actions are not defensible under any color of what he claims she did.

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
10 years ago

I need some brain bleach.

tinyorc
10 years ago

WWTH:
At the start of this whole thing I was willing to concede that he may in fact have been abused while still believing his behavior was dead wrong. However, the more I read about him, the less seriously I take any of his claims.

Yup. And this article is just another way of inserting himself back into Quinn’s life. Since he and Rachel are apparently super close, I assume she ran this by him before publishing it, and he’s also tweeted about it, saying it’s an article about “how #GamerGate started” (which, again, is incredibly disingenuous). He technically is not violating the restraining order against him, but it’s clear that he endorses this latest attack on Zoe’s character.

And why? What possible motivation could he have for putting their relationship up for dissection again? He’s already told his (extremely long) side of the story. thezoepost is out there in the world forever, the entire internet has been well and truly “warned” about Quinn, she has been thrown to the wolves and thoroughly and repeatedly punished for any abuse she did commit. Why would , nearly three months later, would he want a close friend to publicly revisit his abuse once again?

tinyorc
10 years ago

Forgot my blockquote, first paragraph is weirwoodtreehugger!

Pocket Nerd
10 years ago
Reply to  tinyorc

Thus Spake Zaratinyorc:

And this article is just another way of inserting himself back into Quinn’s life. Since he and Rachel are apparently super close, I assume she ran this by him before publishing it

I’ll go one step further: The article reads like Gjoni ghostwrote half of it.

libarbarian
libarbarian
10 years ago

@weirwood,

No. I take the When I interact with GameGaters I mostly just mock them for … well pretty much everything.

1. For thinking that “has a feminist perspective” = “corruption”.
2. For thinking that a hashtag = a community and a movement.
2. For thinking that they can “know” that none “of us” could possibly be sending threats or doxing … in an amorphous group of thousands united only by use of a hashtag. Because it’s not like it’s statistically certain that EVERY group of thousands has mentally unbalanced people as well as just assholes.
3. For the ridiculous idea that they are “winning” the greater PR struggle insociety and citing tweet #s as evidence.
4. For stupid label-based thinking
5. For being obviously about harassing feminists.
And pretty much everything else

ark
ark
10 years ago

> the entire internet has been well and truly “warned” about Quinn,

I don’t think innumerable articles about this shitstorm that all repeatedly fail to pick up on said ‘warning’ angle support that claim. No one with a metaphorical megaphone seems to take seriously the claim that ZQ admitted to being a “compulsive liar”, or seriously accept Eron’s argument that it’s dangerous for such a person to be held up as a paragon of high ideals that she apparently does not actually believe in.

Presumably Rachel would rather that change, going by her last line.

libarbarian
libarbarian
10 years ago

I was thinking the same thing. I’m not an abuse survivor, so I really can’t claim to speak for those who are. But everyone I’ve spoken to who left an abusive relationship wasn’t plotting revenge or trying to fight restraining orders. They were trying to stay strong and not go back. They were rebuilding their lives and self esteem. After getting some distance they tend not to want anything to do with their abusers.

Actually … thats a good point.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

I think ark needs his firmware updated, since apparently that hasn’t been done since Noah first loaded him up.

tinyorc
10 years ago

ark:

No one with a metaphorical megaphone seems to take seriously the claim that ZQ admitted to being a “compulsive liar”, or seriously accept Eron’s argument that it’s dangerous for such a person to be held up as a paragon of high ideals that she apparently does not actually believe in.

HUH GEE WHIZ I WONDER WHY.

tinyorc
10 years ago

On a lighter note, has anyone been on #ReaderGate yet? It’s pretty much a perfect parody and an excellent antidote to #GamerGate fuckery.

Shalimar
Shalimar
10 years ago

libarbarian, so you troll everyone, because no one else sees the true complexity of situations like you do? This sign of narcissism doesn’t enhance your credibility as much as I suspect you think it does.

M. the Social Justice Ranger
M. the Social Justice Ranger
10 years ago

The second skidmark is trying to greentext? Why not just name yourself “I AM FROM 4CHAN”?

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@M.:

To be fair, that’s also how you quote on reddit, so they could be a Redditor!

… Considering that Reddit is generally more lenient towards some awful things than even 4chan is, I’m not sure whether this would be an improvement.

libarbarian
libarbarian
10 years ago

@Shalimar

It doesn’t surprise me that you don’t get it. Only brilliant misunderstood people like myself get it.

http://www.clickhole.com/article/7-nihilistic-quotes-only-brilliant-misunderstood-y-1324

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@libarbarian:

You… do realize that article was sarcasm, right? Just checking.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

Oh FFS can we ban the troll, surely no-one is stupid enough to believe a clickhole article.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@libarbarian:

I mean, just so you’re aware, but ClickHole is a site set up by The Onion to parody other sites like Buzzfeed.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Is Librarian going to start trolling in the same style as that dumbfuck Beam on the other thread? Yawn.

M. the Social Justice Ranger
M. the Social Justice Ranger
10 years ago

I think they’re trying the “LOL I TROLL U” approach. The last gasp of desperate failed trolls and embarrassed genuine idiots everywhere.

grumpyoldnurse
grumpyoldnurse
10 years ago

@ libarbarian – Between the size of your ego and those massive chips on your shoulders, it must be really hard to fit through doors, or find seating on public transit. However do you manage?

1 10 11 12 13 14 17