Bill Frezza, the overgrown, overtan frat man who warned the frat boys of America about the gravest threat to their very existence — drunk chicks — may have lost his gig at Forbes, but he’s found a new fanbase amongst the MRAs of Reddit, who’ve hoisted him aloft as the latest martyr to femifascism. In a couple of highly upvoted threads in the Men’s Rights subreddit, the regulars celebrated his heroism and good sense.
Let’s just take a look at some of the wisdom they deposited in the threads.
We might as well start with the most-upvoted comment of all, from the legendary JohnTheOther himself, who is evidently well aware of the threat that drunk chicks pose to his very life:
![johntheother 197 points 1 day ago It's not just that women are being infantalized, and exempted from personal responsibility. If men recognize the threat to their job, their fraternity, or life that this culturally-supported female irresponsibility creates - they are not allowed to speak about it or act in self preservation. Men are supposed to carry on as if there is no danger. A woman might feel slightly uncomfortable if she's treated as a threat, so men should just shut the hell up, and weather the hazard in compliant silence. Thus, the Forbes article had to go offline. permalink save report give gold reply [–]trudatness 70 points 1 day ago This is really fucked up censorship. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]johntheother 34 points 1 day ago At the risk of being piled-on with thought-stopping godwin's law accusations - it's fascism. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]JayBopara 24 points 20 hours ago Godwin be damned. They are called the feminazi for a reason.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/jto.png?resize=495%2C545&ssl=1)
Camdaniel encouraged his brothers to stick together to defend themselves against this insidious threat:
Stay strong, brothers!
Chrispy3690, meanwhile, warned against the greatest unrecognized danger from drunk chicks: their big mouths.
![Chrispy3690 43 points 23 hours ago I think this is my main take-away. Why aren't drunk obnoxious women seen as destructive as men? Is it because they cause less harm? I doubt it. Do they break everything in your living room? Maybe not. Do they make other people miserable? Absolutely. This is something I've been trying to pin down for a while: Why is the destruction that women cause; emotional, mental, psychic trauma, any less significant? I'd take a beating from any guy over the worst slanderizing and humiliation most women can dish out any day. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]downztiger 34 points 22 hours ago Get your ass beat by a drunk dude, that will ruin your night. Get accused of rape by a female and that shit will ruin the rest of your life. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]Chrispy3690 12 points 21 hours ago I'm not even just talking about something like a false allegation. You ever had a woman come after your character? It's partly because she's a woman that it's so destructive (this is something I can concede might be helped by changing our views of women) but, regardless, they can be utterly brutal. Women don't fight or argue to wound. They do it to humiliate. You argue with a woman in a public/social setting... sheesh... I'd rather let her hit me.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/chrisp.png?resize=500%2C573&ssl=1)
In the world of MRAs, evidently, it’s no big deal when men call women “cunts” and threaten them — hey, they’re just words! But when it’s women doing the talking, suddenly words are worse than fists.
Anonlymouse, meanwhile, threw up his hands in despair, because clearly there is no way that frats can possibly protect themselves from the insidious danger of drunk chicks. Because they are so terribly, tyranically sexy.
![anonlymouse 23 points 1 day ago The logical solution is for a frat to kick out every girl who gets drunk... which of course will never happen. It's identifying a problem with no viable solution in the short term. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]FasKap 13 points 1 day ago Why not? They can go where someone else is responsible if they want to get over served and be around other people who are as well. Frats should reclaim the Gentlemen club label from strip joints if every sloshed slut continues to be a threat to their members. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]ihavecandygetinmyvan 22 points 1 day ago Yeah like that's ever gonna happen. These are thirsty 18-22 year olds you're talking about. They will literally do and say anything to get laid at any cost and girls eat that shit up. I've literally seen girls act like royalty, with a swarm of dudes around them at their beck and call, all acting suuuper interested in what she has to say, hoping they'll be the one to get with her that night. The desperation is very real, especially in the younger frat and general party scene.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/anonly.png?resize=491%2C538&ssl=1)
Men literally forced to act as though they are interested in what a woman has to say. Is there any clearer evidence of the tyranny of drunk chick sexiness?
Profhelios, meanwhile, highlighted one hidden danger that no one has the courage to address: drunken giantesses.
I guess Bill Frezza really is the hero that MRAs deserve.
Erm, that first sentence is also a question.
The UK doesn’t have them either. From what I’ve seen of them so far I’m rather glad about that.
I seem to remember recently reading that they spread to the UK.
Ew, why? British universities already have binge drinking and drunken hookups, so why do they need to add an extra layer of stupid?
Geez guys and girls. Why do you have to reply EVERYTHING with hostility? I made an honest question, no one is attacking you. Can’t anyone think different from you?
The guys were douches? YES they were.
Doesn’t that mean that if a group wants to not have women or men, they can’t do it? I don’t think so, as long as you are polite about that what is wrong? There may be valid reason for why a group of women may not want men in a group or viceversa. That is all I am saying.
Maybe you should go find someone who disagrees to argue with, then? Off you pop, petal.
I wasn’t replied to with hostility. Venn diagrams, you fail at them.
And yes, I am now going to talk like my gran for a while, as a tribute to the old timey feMRA quoted in the other thread.
(My gran is more Nanny Ogg than feMRA, but eh, I feel like being super cheerful and positive will drive this guy up the wall.)
Because we’re not arguing that single gender groups can’t get together? It makes your question pointless.
Also, I’m not a girl. I’ve been an adult for some years now.