UPDATE 2: See here for my updated take on the hoax.
UPDATE: It appears the Emma You Are Next site is indeed a hoax, put online not by a 4chan hacker but by a sleazy internet “marketing” company known for similar hoaxes in the past. That said, it was a hoax designed to take advantage of two disturbing trends — not only the widespread public demand for leaked celebrity nudes but also the antifeminist backlash culture of the internet. Emma Watson was already being denounced and derided by internet misogynists even before the Emma You Are Next Site went online. I have made some changes in my original post below; strikeouts indicate the original text. I have also rewritten the conclusion, and taken down the video version of this post.
You already know the basic facts, I imagine: This past weekend, actress Emma Watson gave an eloquent speech at the United Nations about the necessity of feminism, and how the fight for gender equality can benefit both women and men.
Then some asshole or assholes apparently associated with 4chan a sleazy internet “marketing” firm decided to punish her for her opinions exploit the widespread desire for stolen nudes of female celebrities and the antifeminist backlash that was already developing in the wake of Watson’s speech by threatening to release stolen nude pictures of her, setting up a page entitled Emma You Are Next featuring a photo of Watson alongside an ominous countdown clock, presumably highlighting just when she can look forward to her privacy being egregiously violated.
There’s been a lot of debate over whether or not this threat is a real one or a “hoax.” [It appears that it is a hoax.] Business Insider declares that
it’s likely that the countdown site is nothing more than a prank designed to increase the notoriety of anonymous message board 4chan. … The site’s anonymous users often launch pranks and hoaxes to laugh at other internet users and also to further worsen the site’s reputation.
Well, no, that’s not it at all.
First off, it doesn’t really matter if that the site is appears to be a hoax or not. The threat is was a credible one: as we’ve seen recently with the leak of nudes pics of Jennifer Lawrence and others, hackers are indeed capable of stealing the private pictures that celebrities thought were under electronic lock and key – and sites like Reddit have made themselves conduits for the dissemination of the illegally obtained pics, which have included child pornography.
Even if Watson has no nude pictures to steal, some 4channers have insinuated that there are surreptitiously photographed “upskirt” pictures of her that could be equally embarrassing to her.
More to the point, though, the Emma You Are Next site can’t be so easily dismissed only as a “lulzy” prank or publicity stunt. it’s a clear attempt to punish a woman for practicing feminism in public to exploit the reflexive antifeminism of a large misogynistic subculture on the internet– and a warning reminder to other women that if their opinions offend the creepy assholes of the world they could find their most private pictures plastered all over the internet. In other words, it’s blackmail – aimed at all women with opinions.
Some 4channers have been utterly transparent in their aims sympathies, writing comments such as these, collected from a now-deleted thread by Robyn Pennacchia at DeathAndTaxes:
“she makes stupid feminist speeches at UN, and now her nudes will be online, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH”
“It is real and going to happen this weekend. That feminist bitch Emma is going to show the world she is as much of a whore as any woman.”
Actresses and other women in the public eye are already acutely aware that there are little armies of creeps out there with a vested interest in violating their privacy. As Jessica Goldstein notes on ThinkProgress, singer Taylor Swift recently told Rolling Stone that she lives in constant fear of prying eyes:
“There’s someone whose entire job it is to figure out things that I don’t want the world to see,” she says. “They look at your career, they look at what you prioritize, and they try to figure out what would be the most revealing or hurtful. Like, I don’t take my clothes off in pictures or anything – I’m very private about that. So it scares me how valuable it would be to get a video of me changing. It’s sad to have to look for cameras in dressing rooms and bathrooms. I don’t walk around naked with my windows open, because there’s a value on that.”
The Emma You Are Next page reveals that privacy-invaders (and would-be privacy invaders) aren’t just motivated by money; some are motivated by a hatred of feminism and outspoken women in general, by the desire to take these women down a peg or two. The obsessive interest in stolen celebrity nude pictures reflects not only or even primarily prurient interest, but also and perhaps more importantly a clear desire to punish and humiliate the women in question. For men who hate women, as I put it in a post on the leaked Jennifer Lawrence nudes, the violation of privacy is part of the thrill
And, as #GamerGate and numerous other cases of online harassment of women have made abundantly clear, it’s not just famous women who have to worry about the people who’ve made it their “entire job … to figure out things that I don’t want the world to see.”
Before #GamerGate, Zoe Quinn was an indie game developer little known outside the game world; now her name, the private details of her life, and assorted nude pictures of her, are all over the internet.
Men’s Rights activists and other harassers of women online have been happy to release — or at least threaten to release — the private information of women they’ve declared their enemies; there’s no doubt that if they were able to get hold of nudes someone would post those online as well.
The Emma You Are Next site isn’t just a prank. It’s a symptom of a civil rights issue faced by all women who risk becoming the target of angry misogynistss each and every time they speak up about feminism online or in any other public forum. You can’t have a true free market of ideas if those of one gender can’t speak freely without worrying about their private lives — up to and including nude pictures — being exposed online.
One of the best ways to fight against this attack on free speech is to ensure that Watson’s message reaches as many people as possible. Below, a video of her speech; you can find the transcript here.
Am I misremembering or did 4chan exercise better judgment when targeting women in the past. Given the tendency of people to conflate the character with the actress it seems to me that the mods at 4chan have reason to worry. It is possible that they are going to find out what happens when you go after someone with deep pockets and deeper sentiment.
Time for a dance interlude. Here is a male belly dancer.
Apparently the worst 4chan types have moved to 8chan. They are pissed off that Moot is shutting down some of the worst crap over there.
Tiyn, feminists do not try to frame their opponents. Those are troll tactics. Feminists argue and teach, but they do not resort to dirty tricks.
@ralmcg Thanks for the dance interlude. I’ve never seen anything quite like that!
Ralmcg: Wow. He has to be one of the best belly dancers I have seen.
http://funnyshit.com.au/img/pancake_bunny.jpg
Unless you’re talking about the 101st Flying Monkey Keyboardists of 4chan, what you’re saying makes about that much sense.
Hey, maybe if things keep going this way I might actually start visiting 4chan again!
Well. Now I’m really cross, so I guess I’ll duck out of this thread.
@ralmcg
I love when people dance like that – making their bodies move in ways that don’t look quite real. Reminds me of Les Twins.
So I got into an argument with a friend of a friend last night, who said “Well she should just say fuck ’em and let the photos come out if they exist, because she’s a woman who has a body and that’s nothing to be ashamed of! And that will take away their power!”
When I and several other people correctly pointed out that 1) his advice is meaningless because he doesn’t actually know Ms. Watson, b) he’s advocating that she be put through miserable shit which has no chance of ever impacting him personally and iii) we don’t actually live in a world where women are not shamed for having a body, the jackass starting whinging that since he’s gay, he’s been oppressed so! much! and it wasn’t fair for me to judge him when I don’t know him! and I was being a big meaniepants! for interpreting what he said as what he actually meant! Because he DIDN’T MEAN anything negative! And intent is magic and he wins the Oppression Olympics and Words Only Mean Things I Like and GOOD FUCKING GOD SHUT UP YOU ASSHOLE.
Sorry, I’ve been fuming about this all day and since my actual friend is someone I like, I couldn’t vent about it anywhere else.
Feminists don’t need to resort to underhanded tactics to make our point. We know for an absolute certainty that we are the equal of men and should be treated like human beings. There’s nothing to be underhanded about. There’s no reason to try to trick people into thinking we’re equal ( which naturally implies that we know we’re not but seek to trick others into believing we are anyway – if that makes even an ounce of sense.)
It’s fascinating to me how convoluted yet shallow their thinking is. They can see a problem, but lacking the ability to see beneath the surface of the problem,( and in an effort to seem as if they’re really smart,) they come up with deeply complicated and circuitous arguments for why something is a problem.
It’s inconceivable to them that others think in a different manner. In their minds, of course feminists do such things, bc it’s the kind of thing THEY would do.
Kim: Oh, I loved that video. Loved it!
Although that music is quite possibly the most annoying sound I’ve ever heard in my life.
To those who liked the male belly dancer, thanks. And Kim, I think Les Twins do have some amazing moves.
Roguepixie, that is base disinformation. Mt. Shasta is where the Lemurians live; the reptilians operate out of Denver International Airport.
Of course, the Milk Marketing Board is the REAL enemy. . .
And of course, if these privacy-invaders are exposed, they will throw a tantrum about *their* lives not being respected. If that does happen, I hope someone is around to play a guitar solo to it. Like this:
+1 for awesome dance interludes in this thread.
@drst wow – that must have been infuriating. I’m almost surprised he didn’t suggest she leak the photos herself, just to take the wind out of their sails (if said photos even exist). Way to miss the point.
I thought the Reptilians lived under Mt. St. Helens, and that’s why it erupted? I KNOW NOTHING NOW!!!!!
I loved Emma Watson’s speech. Funny how they miss the points she made about how breaking down gender roles is better for all.
I have a musical interlude. Jurassic Park Theme Song (Melodica Cover): http://youtu.be/-w-58hQ9dLk
They’re just a front.
http://youtu.be/h6CcxJQq1x8
@blahlystic – I never claimed women were bullying men all over the web.
BIG NEWS: It looks like the Emma You Are Next page was a twisted “viral marketing” hoax; I’ve updated the post to reflect this.
A marketing hoax? That’s even worse, in a way. As Bill Hicks once said, marketing people really are sucking Satan’s cock. Desperately sleazy.
RE: David
Well. That’s disturbing. What the hell were they supposed to be marketing FOR?
@ tigerbos, I went back and looked. My brain edited out a very important ” of ”
I beg your pardon * blushes *.
Wait wait wait. We officially live in a world where threatening/blackmailing a woman with release of nude photographs is so likely that we’re now using it so sell things and people think someone is doing it for real. I think that’s worse! What the hell are they selling?