Categories
#gamergate advocacy of violence antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? boner rage bullying creepy empathy deficit entitled babies evil SJWs evil women harassment hate speech homophobia hundreds of upvotes internet tough guy men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA rape culture rape jokes reddit sarkeesian! threats trigger warning zoe quinn

The five worst comments about outspoken women posted on Reddit's PunchchableFaces subreddit … today

original

Reddit, what the hell is your problem?

So last night I discovered the PunchableFaces subreddit. That’s right, an entire subreddit devoted to posting pictures of people so that Redditors can fantasize about doing them bodily harm.

While most of the pictures in the subreddit are of boys and men – some targeted for being “faggots” – the recent posts (as of this writing) with the greatest number of upvotes and comments were, naturally, aimed at women. Specifically, at two outspoken feminists who’ve been singled out by Men’s Rights Activists and #GamerGaters for endless harassment: video game critic Anita Sarkeesian and Canadian feminist activist Chanty Binx, perhaps better known amongst her enemies as “Big Red.”

toppunchablefaces

Here are five of the worst comments I’ve run across in the, er, discussions about these women.

Needless to say, TRIGGER WARNING for explicit threats of violence and rape.

.

.

.

1) This rapey comment about Anita Sarkeesian:

AkatsukiXeno 1 point 3 hours ago   I'd punch her face with my dick. Shit, for a colossal cunt she sure does have a fuckable mouth.2) This comment about Sarkeesian with more than two dozen upvotes:

hollander93 31 points 12 hours ago   Disregarding her shit and talks and whatever, she does have a punch able face. Expression doesn't help though.3) This comment about Chanty Binx:

iambecomedeath7 2 points 3 hours ago   I would probably be willing to go through the legal system if it meant punching this insufferable twat in a public setting.4) This other comment about Chanty Binx:

RogueHelios 2 points 2 hours ago   I predict her dying very young if she is still being the angry bitch s high she was in that video.5) And this other other comment about her:

I-NEED-YOUR-SKULLS 1 point 7 hours ago   I'd gladly punch this face into non-existence.

BONUS: Three comments about much-maligned game designer Zoe Quinn, the subject of another post on the PunchableFaces subreddit:

fuckyourteam 2 points 2 hours ago   Wtf is this cunt looking at?      permalink     save     report     give gold     reply  [–]edu_gon95 [S] 5 points 2 hours ago   Hopefully an incoming fist      permalink     save     parent     report     give gold     reply  [–]ovenbutt 2 points 2 hours ago   I want to pretend it's a fist coming straight for her face.

One more BONUS Zoe Quinn comment:

NO3SCAPE 2 points 3 hours ago   Shes a fucking gronk. She isn't a feminist shes a psycho. I want to punch her so badly. Ill elbow the slut too. She will pay for what she is trying to do to le chan.

Oh, and as an ADDED BONUS, here’s another terrible comment, this one directed at a gay teen boy whose picture is the third-most upvoted one on the subreddit as of this writing.

FAP-FOR-BRAINS -1 points an hour ago   I would pretend to be gay so I could get him alone...tie him down, and punch the gay right off of his gay-ass face. Then, I would prepare his quivering anus for

Why exactly is Reddit providing a forum for hate speech and explicit violent threats directed at, among others, gay teenagers and women who are already the regular targets of widespread harassment and threats?

H/T: r/againstmensrights

207 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

Emma Watson seems like a good egg. Hopefully the dudebros are just trying to intimidate her and they’re not actually gearing up for yet another massive invasion of privacy.

I’m not convinced it’s fake. There is no threat there, no “you do this/stop doing this or else nudes will be released,” it’s a countdown. I don’t believe they would have put it up if they couldn’t follow through, otherwise what would be the point?

I hope I’m wrong.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

@ kirby

Oh, it gets better than that. After introducing the word “adversarial” to describe his own behavior himself he then demands that hellkell prove that he’s being adversarial. Um, what?

Michael McG
Michael McG
10 years ago

The whole issue of the “derail” is kind of irrelevant. It wasn’t any more what had already been said about Reddit’s free speech policy, yet there was a difference in the way that my comments were being treated addressed when compared to the way the initial comments about address free speech policies were being addressed.

emilygoddess - MOD
emilygoddess - MOD
10 years ago

They will literally never stop crying into their sippy-cups

OMG perfect.

I don’t have any brain bleach, but in a completely O/T way this popped up and made things a little better.

Yeah, I’m looking forward to the tinhat wing of the manosphere freaking out over that. OMG Emma Watson must be one of the reptilian Illuminati feminazi agents! Harry Potter is feminist propaganda! Someone save us from the NWO (New Women’s Order)!

*reads the next few comments*

Or we could just do regular, non-funny misogyny. Fucking 4chan.

@Leela, I know how you feel. I work in emergency/critical care at an animal hospital, which is stressful enough on its own (I can only imagine what working with sick humans is like!), and then I have to deal with gossip, backbiting, tattling and just plain rude coworkers and just, ugh. I’ve been crying a lot lately, too.

However, appearing to assert that morally reprehensible speech–after all, that is what kind of speech is being promoted on PunchableFaces–is prima facie illegal seems to skirt the very issues that the First Amendment was written to address.

Please keep in mind that not everyone on Reddit, or here, is in the US.

The fact that you don’t find some of my other opinions relevant our that you may not agree with doesn’t make them–or the way that they are communicated–annoying.

Um, annoyance is pretty subjective, and you telling someone else that they can’t possibly be annoyed by what you said is kinda gaslighty.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

@ kirby

I hope so too. Given her age I’m worried that it’s not and they do have something on her, since most people in that age range seem to have done some sort of sexting and hacking into celebrity phones seems to be commonplace.

Ugh, this reminds me of the creepy countdown they did when the Olsen twins were getting close to 18. Leave the former child stars alone, creepers.

emilygoddess - MOD
emilygoddess - MOD
10 years ago

Michael, you just went from “I might have been adversarial” to “how dare you call me adversarial” in like 20 minutes. What are you even doing, and can you please stop?

Michael McG
Michael McG
10 years ago

Oh, it gets better than that. After introducing the word “adversarial” to describe his own behavior himself he then demands that hellkell prove that he’s being adversarial. Um, what?

There’s a difference between acknowledging that one’s behavior could be adversarial and saying that another’s behavior is adversarial.

LBT
LBT
10 years ago

RE: cassandrakitty

Emma Watson seems like a good egg.

I’ve heard that about most the Harry Potter actor kids. Even though I don’t know them personally, I kinda hope they have happy rewarding lives, just because… well, child actors always seem to get so screwed over, you know? I don’t want that to happen to them.

RE: Michael McG

I’m sorry I don’t see where I have been adversarial

We’re sorry too. But please, keep arguing your case, we’ll succumb and decide you’re not being annoying or adversarial any minute now.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

There’s a difference between acknowledging that one’s behavior could be adversarial and saying that another’s behavior is adversarial.

Do you even hear yourself right now? “Gaslighty” is definitely the word for you.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@cassandrakitty:

All I know is that I remember random talk on random sites about Emma Watson nudes, so the threat seems entirely credible to me. If they do follow through, I just hope the police find them quickly.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

@ LBT

Considering how poorly most child actors fare the Harry Potter kids seem to have all turned out pretty well. It’s a relief, honestly, cause I was really hoping history wouldn’t repeat itself with them. Keeping them well away from Hollywood for most of their youth probably helped.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

We’re sorry too. But please, keep arguing your case, we’ll succumb and decide you’re not being annoying or adversarial any minute now.

This is why we love you lots and missed you while you were gone. Don’t ever leave us again!

emilygoddess - MOD
emilygoddess - MOD
10 years ago

Ah, so when you acknowledged that it could be considered adversarial, you didn’t intend for us to confirm that it was indeed adversarial – you didn’t want to actually admit any fault, you just wanted to pretend to so we’d stop bugging you.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Michael McG:

Stop digging. That being said:

There’s a difference between acknowledging that one’s behavior could be adversarial and saying that another’s behavior is adversarial.

Why yes, yes there is! You win the Language award, for being able to speak a language and realize that using a different word changes the meaning! *golf clap*

One would hope, however, that if you acknowledge that your behavior could be considered adversarial, you would not immediately dig a trench and get super defensive when someone else tells you “why yes, it was adversarial.” To do so would cause one to wonder if your original admission was truthful.

Michael McG
Michael McG
10 years ago

Do you even hear yourself right now? “Gaslighty” is definitely the word for you.

Again there is a difference between acknowledging a general possibility and enumerating a specific instance. I’d also like to note that you just accused me of quasi-abusive behavior which is pretty adversarial in itself.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

Fucking A right I’m adversarial towards you.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

And there’s nothing “quasi” abusive about gaslighting.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

Well this argument became even more tedious than it was before. That’s actually a pretty amazing feat.

LBT
LBT
10 years ago

RE: cassandrakitty

Considering how poorly most child actors fare the Harry Potter kids seem to have all turned out pretty well. It’s a relief, honestly, cause I was really hoping history wouldn’t repeat itself with them.

No kidding. Child actors seem to have it really rough; I always feel really bad for them.

This is why we love you lots and missed you while you were gone. Don’t ever leave us again!

Aw, shucks. *scuffs shoe in dust*

RE: Michael McG

Again there is a difference between acknowledging a general possibility and enumerating a specific instance.

Yay! You did it! You totally convinced me you aren’t being adversarial or annoying anymore! Let me give you a hand! Have a trophy, son!

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

Some people have flying or rapid healing as their superpowers, this dude has “make every conversation 75% more tedious”.

Michael McG
Michael McG
10 years ago

OK, I’m sorry that I have been more than more than demonstratively adversarial

I will simply stop trying to justify my adversariality. I have clearly dug quite a furrow with my heels and I apologize for whipping up a few more with my continued justifications for my poor behavior. I guess it didn’t just feels different when someone says something about you then when you said about yourself.

I think I’m going to take a break for a couple hours. I hope I’m still welcome, but I will never show up again if I’m not.

I am truly sorry.

Talk to you later?

Policy of Madness
Policy of Madness
10 years ago

There’s a difference between acknowledging that one’s behavior could be adversarial and saying that another’s behavior is adversarial.

Dude, did you even read my comment about how being a pedantic nitpicker is generally agreed by most people to be annoying?

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

Michael: You really need to stop showing your ass and then apologizing for it.

Shade of Mr. Al.

contrapangloss
contrapangloss
10 years ago

Michael, Policy of madness had some fine advice for you back one page, at the bottom. Please do read it.

You have been adversarial and a bit ‘splainy, in my opinion. I think you can recover from it, but no more digging. Please and thank you?

LBT
LBT
10 years ago

RE: Michael McG

I guess it didn’t just feels different when someone says something about you then when you said about yourself.

Well, yes, welcome to being a human. Sometimes people will agree with you when you say your behavior is substandard.

Seriously, go cool off and maybe rethink how you interact here. This is not the first time you’ve pulled this shit, and it is tedious as fuck.